2026年3月2日 / 美国东部时间晚上7:41 / 美联社
最高法院周一批准了一个保守派法律团体的紧急上诉，为加州学校在未经学生同意的情况下告知其父母孩子的跨性别身份扫清了道路。
该命令暂时阻止了一项州法律，该法律禁止在学生在学校改变代词或性别表达时自动要求父母通知。
此前，宗教信仰的父母和教育工作者对加州学校旨在防止学校向家庭公开学生信息的政策提出了质疑。由托马斯·莫尔协会代表的两组天主教父母表示，这导致学校误导他们，并在他们反对的情况下秘密促进孩子的社会性别转换。
加州方面认为，学生在性别表达方面有权享有隐私权，特别是如果他们担心遭到家人拒绝时，学校政策旨在平衡父母的权利。
然而，最高法院支持了父母的诉求，并恢复了下级法院的一项命令，在案件继续审理期间阻止该法律和学校政策的实施。
最高法院在其他近期案件中支持了宗教原告，包括允许父母如果反对有LGBTQ+角色的故事书，可以让孩子退出公立学校的相关课程。
在加州做出这一裁决之前几个月，最高法院维持了各州禁止未成年人接受与性别认同相关的医疗保健的禁令。大法官们似乎也倾向于允许各州禁止跨性别运动员参加女子运动队。
与此同时，涉及跨性别学生的学校政策也在法院的其他案件中受到关注。
法院在12月驳回了威斯康星州的另一起类似案件，但三名保守派大法官表示他们本会审理此案。塞缪尔·阿利托大法官称这些学校政策是“一个日益重要的全国性问题”。
与此同时，特朗普政府在1月份发现加州的政策违反了父母获取子女教育记录的权利。司法部也提起诉讼，认定各州的跨性别运动员政策违反了联邦民权法。
Supreme Court blocks California law that barred schools from notifying parents if their children are transgender
March 2, 2026 / 7:41 PM EST / AP
The Supreme Court cleared the way Monday for California schools to tell parents if their children identify as transgender without getting the student’s approval, granting an emergency appeal from a conservative legal group.
The order blocks for now a state law that bans automatic parental notification requirements if students change their pronouns or gender expression at school.
It comes after religious parents and educators challenged California school policies aimed at preventing schools from outing students to their families. Two sets of Catholic parents represented by the Thomas More Society say it caused schools to mislead them and secretly facilitate the children’s social transition despite their objections.
California argued that students have the right to privacy about their gender expression, especially if they fear rejection from their families, and school policies are aimed at striking a balance with parents’ rights.
The high court, though, sided with the parents and reinstated a lower-court order blocking the law and school policies while the case continues to play out.
The Supreme Court has ruled for religious plaintiffs in other recent cases, including allowing parents to pull their children from public-school lessons if they object to storybooks with LGBTQ+ characters.
The California order comes months after the court upheld state bans on gender identity-related health care for minors. The justices also seem to be leaning toward allowing states to ban transgender athletes from playing on girls’ sports teams.
School policies for transgender students, meanwhile, have also been on the court’s radar in other cases.
The court rebuffed another similar case out of Wisconsin in December, but three conservative justices indicated they would have heard the case. Justice Samuel Alito called the school policies “an issue of great and growing national importance.”
The Trump administration, meanwhile, found in January that California’s policies violated parents’ right to access their children’s education records. The Justice Department also sued after determining the states’ transgender athlete policies violate federal civil rights law.
发表回复