美国最高法院支持亲共和党纽约州国会选区地图


By John Kruzel
2026年3月2日 23:14 UTC (更新于1分钟前)

节点运行失败

image(图片:2026年2月25日,美国华盛顿特区,美国最高法院外飘扬着美国国旗。路透社/Kylie Cooper 版权购买许可,新标签页打开)

  • 摘要
  • 公司
  • 特朗普的共和党人寻求继续掌控国会
  • 此案是最高法院关于美国众议院选区的最新案件
  • 争议焦点为共和党掌控的史泰登岛国会选区

华盛顿3月2日电(路透社) – 美国最高法院周一支持了一名共和党议员的诉求,为共和党人在11月选举中继续掌控国会带来潜在助力。该争议涉及纽约市唯一一个由总统唐纳德·特朗普所属政党成员掌控的国会选区的划分问题。

美国众议员妮可·马利奥塔基斯(Nicole Malliotakis)正在寻求连任,此前一名法官以种族歧视为由裁定其史泰登岛选区的地理边界违宪。最高法院在一份无署名的裁定中批准了马利奥塔基斯的请求,恢复了该选区的边界划分。

路透社《内幕追踪》通讯是您了解全球体育重大赛事的必备指南。立即注册。

广告 · 滚动继续阅读

最高法院有6比3的保守派多数。保守派大法官塞缪尔·阿利托(Samuel Alito)在支持周一裁决的意见中写道。

最高法院的三名自由派大法官表示异议,指责多数派以一种…(原文此处未完整显示)

US Supreme Court backs pro-Republican NY congressional district map

By John Kruzel
March 2, 2026 11:14 PM UTC Updated 1 min ago

节点运行失败

An American flag flies outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 25, 2026. REUTERS/Kylie Cooper Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

  • Summary
  • Companies
  • Trump’s Republicans seeking to keep control of Congress
  • Case is latest at the court on US House districts
  • Republican-held Staten Island-based district at issue

WASHINGTON, March 2 (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court gave a potential boost to ​Republican hopes of retaining control of Congress in November’s elections, siding on Monday with a ‌Republican lawmaker in a dispute over the makeup of the only congressional district in New York City held by a member of President Donald Trump’s party.

The court in an unsigned order granted a request by U.S. Representative Nicole Malliotakis, who is running for reelection, ​to revive the boundaries of her Staten Island-based U.S. House of Representatives district after a judge ​blocked the district’s geographical boundaries as racially discriminatory.

The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide to the biggest events in global sport. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Report Ad[image_2]

The Supreme Court has a 6-3 conservative majority. ⁠Conservative Justice Samuel Alito wrote in support of Monday’s ruling.

The court’s three liberal justices dissented, faulting the court’s ​majority for ruling in a manner that

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注