美国关税诉讼案被发回贸易法院以确定下一步行动


2026年3月2日 美国东部时间下午6:17 / 路透社

威尔明顿,特拉华州,3月2日(路透社)- 美国联邦巡回上诉法院周一将导致唐纳德·特朗普总统大部分关税被裁定无效的诉讼案发回美国国际贸易法院,这可能决定向进口商退还超过1300亿美元的流程。

美国联邦巡回上诉法院发布了一份一页纸的命令,批准了进口商将案件发回最初于2025年初受理此案的贸易法院的动议。特朗普政府反对这一动议,称希望将案件推迟最多四个月,以便其有时间考虑应对方案。

路透社《内部跟踪》通讯是您了解全球体育界重大事件的必备指南。请在此注册。

广告 · 滚动继续阅读

最高法院于2月20日推翻了特朗普根据紧急经济法征收的关税。超过30万名进口商缴纳了这些关税,但最高法院未就政府如何退还这笔款项提供任何指导,特朗普表示这一流程可能导致长达五年的诉讼。

约2000家进口商已提起退款诉讼,其中许多是像联邦快递(FDX.N)这样的大型跨国公司。小型进口商则希望海关官员能采用简单且低成本的流程来办理退款。

进口商已要求贸易法院一旦案件重回其管辖范围,就下令政府开始着手制定退款流程。

汤姆·哈尔在特拉华州威尔明顿报道;比尔·伯克罗特编辑

我们的标准:路透社信托原则。

US tariff lawsuits returned to trade court to determine next steps

March 2, 2026 6:17 PM UTC / Reuters

WILMINGTON, Delaware, March 2 (Reuters) – A U.S. appeals court on Monday returned the lawsuits that led ​to most of President Donald Trump’s tariffs being struck ‌down to the U.S. Court of International Trade, which could determine the process for refunding more than $130 billion to importers.

The ​U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ​issued a one-page order granting the motion by ⁠importers to send the case back to the trade ​court, where it originated in early 2025. The motion was ​opposed by the Trump administration, which said it wanted the case delayed for up to four months to give it time ​to consider its options.

The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide to the biggest events in global sport. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

The Supreme Court struck down tariffs on ​February 20 that Trump imposed under an economic emergency law. More ‌than ⁠300,000 importers paid those tariffs, but the Supreme Court did not provide any guidance on how the government should refund that money, and Trump said the process ​could lead to ​five years ⁠of litigation.

Around 2,000 importers have sued for refunds, many of them large multinational companies ​like FedEx (FDX.N). Smaller importers are hoping customs ​officials will ⁠adopt a simple and low-cost process for obtaining refunds.

The importers have already asked the trade court, once the case ⁠is ​back in its jurisdiction, to ​order the government to begin taking steps to create a refund process.

Reporting ​by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; Editing by Bill Berkrot

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

节点运行失败

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注