新分析显示:2025年特朗普关税中近90%由消费者和企业承担


2026年2月12日 / 美国东部时间下午5:10 / CBS新闻

根据纽约联邦储备银行的一项新分析,去年特朗普总统实施的几乎所有关税都以成本上升的形式转嫁给了美国消费者和企业。

随着美国平均进口关税从不到3%跃升至2025年的13%,“近90%的关税经济负担落在了美国企业和消费者身上”,研究人员写道。

谁来承担关税负担?


特朗普政府坚持认为,外国公司和其他出口商承担了大部分关税。

例如,在1月30日《华尔街日报》的一篇捍卫其关税政策的专栏文章中,特朗普表示,“数据显示,关税的负担或‘转嫁’ overwhelmingly落在了外国生产商和中间商身上,包括非美国的大公司。”

“在很多情况下,严重依赖出口的国家别无选择,只能‘承担’关税,以避免因产能过剩而遭受更严重的损失,”他补充道。

纽约联邦储备银行的研究结果与大多数主流经济学家的观点一致,对这一说法提出了挑战。分析显示,从1月到8月的八个月里,美国进口商承担了94%的关税成本。到11月,出口商承担的负担略有增加,但美国进口商仍需承担86%的关税。

“总之,美国企业和消费者继续承担2025年实施的高关税的大部分经济负担,”报告总结道。

为关税政策辩护


白宫周四为特朗普的关税政策辩护,吹嘘其经济收益。

“在过去一年中,美国平均关税税率提高了近七倍,然而通货膨胀率却有所降温,企业利润却有所增加,”白宫发言人库什·德赛在给CBS新闻的声明中表示。“事实是,特朗普总统减税、放松管制、关税和能源充足的经济议程正在降低成本并加速经济增长。”

最新数据显示经济增长强劲。第三季度该国国内生产总值(GDP)按年率强劲增长4.3%,是两年来最强劲的增长。

本周早些时候公布的就业数据显示,就业市场也保持健康,雇主在1月份新增了超出预期的13万个工作岗位。

关税可能被裁定违宪


经济学家去年曾预测,进口关税的提高可能会推高通货膨胀。但在很大程度上,这些价格上涨未能实现。

12月,消费者价格指数(CPI)同比上涨2.7%,与11月持平。美国劳工部定于周五发布1月份的CPI数据。

根据里士满联邦储备银行的数据,美国财政部在2025年征收了2870亿美元的关税,较上一年增长192%。

然而,特朗普未来实施关税的权力范围尚不确定,最高法院预计很快会就其根据联邦紧急状态法征收关税的权力作出裁决。

根据宾夕法尼亚大学沃顿商学院的研究,如果这些关税被裁定违宪,美国政府可能需要向企业退还高达1680亿美元的税款。

https://www.cbsnews.com/video/how-trumps-foreign-policy-has-evolved/

Consumers and businesses paid nearly 90% of Trump tariffs in 2025, new analysis found

February 12, 2026 / 5:10 PM EST / CBS News

Almost all of President Trump’s tariffs last year were passed on to U.S. consumers and businesses in the form of higher costs, according to a new analysis from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

As the average U.S. tariff on imports jumped to 13% in 2025, up from less than 3%, “nearly 90% of the tariffs’ economic burden fell on U.S. firms and consumers,” the researchers wrote.

Who bears the burden of tariffs?


The Trump administration maintains that foreign companies and other exporters pay the lion’s share of tariffs.

In a Jan. 30 Wall Street Journal op-ed defending his tariff agenda, for example, Mr. Trump said that “data shows that the burden, or ‘incidence,’ of the tariffs has fallen overwhelmingly on foreign producers and middlemen, including large corporations that are not from the U.S.”

“In many cases, nations that are heavily dependent on exports have had no choice but to ‘eat’ the tariffs to avoid even worse losses from their excess capacity,” he added.

The New York Fed’s findings, which align with those of most mainstream economists, challenge that view. For the eight-month period from January through August, U.S. importers bore 94% of tariff costs. By November, exporters were shouldering slightly more of the burden, but U.S. importers remained on the hook for 86% of tariffs, according to the analysis.

“In sum, U.S. firms and consumers continue to bear the bulk of the economic burden of the high tariffs imposed in 2025,” the report concluded.

Defending tariffs


The White House on Thursday defended Mr. Trump’s tariffs, touting the economic gains.

“America’s average tariff rate has increased nearly sevenfold in the past year, yet inflation has cooled and corporate profits have increased,” White House spokesperson Kush Desai said in a statement to CBS News. “The reality is that President Trump’s economic agenda of tax cuts, deregulation, tariffs, and energy abundance [is] reducing costs and accelerating economic growth.”

Recent data point to solid economic growth. The nation’s gross domestic product expanded at a robust 4.3% annual pace in the third quarter, the strongest growth in two years.

The job market also remains healthy, with employers adding a stronger-than-expected 130,000 jobs in January, according to employment figures released earlier this week.

Tariffs could be struck down


Economists predicted last year that elevated tariffs on imports were likely to drive up inflation. For the most part, those price hikes have failed to materialize.

In December, the Consumer Price Index rose at an annual rate of 2.7%, unchanged from November. The Department of Labor is scheduled to release the January CPI data on Friday.

The Treasury Department collected $287 billion in tariffs in 2025, up 192% from the previous year, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.

Yet President Trump’s scope to wield tariffs in future is uncertain, with the Supreme Court expected to rule soon on his authority to impose levies under a federal emergency powers law.

If those tariffs are struck down, the U.S. government could owe businesses as much as $168 billion in refunds, according to the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School.

https://www.cbsnews.com/video/how-trumps-foreign-policy-has-evolved/

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注