2026年6月16日 美国东部夏令时下午1:34 / 福克斯新闻
州长贾里德·波利斯签署一项例外条款法案，此前有律师称该州强迫他们配合庇护政策
作者：查尔斯·克莱茨，福克斯新闻
前移民与海关执法局官员称特朗普在科罗拉多州及丹佛市庇护诉讼案中拥有“有力论据”
退休移民与海关执法局外勤总监约翰·法布里卡托加入《福克斯周末老友记》节目，就司法部起诉科罗拉多州和丹佛市的庇护城市政策一事发表看法。
新功能：您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章！
科罗拉多州废除了一项颇具争议的要求：使用该州法院电子 filing 系统的律师必须证明他们不会利用法院信息协助联邦移民执法行动。
上周，科罗拉多州民主党州长贾里德·波利斯签署第26-1276号众议院法案，为使用该 filing 系统的律师创设例外条款，这项核查要求随即从州法律中移除。
今年4月，该州电子 filing 系统要求律师签署证明，承诺不会向联邦政府分享此类个人信息后，多名律师公开表示反对。科罗拉多州官员称，这项要求源自2025年《保护公民身份民权法案》。
科罗拉多斯普林斯律师伊恩·斯皮尔告诉福克斯新闻数字频道，科罗拉多州似乎在“非法强迫全州私人律师配合其反联邦庇护政策”，他补充道，自己虽不从事刑事或移民法律业务，但不签署“致敬反抗”的声明就无法使用州法院系统。
科罗拉多州律师称法院电子 filing 系统现在要求他们证明不会协助移民与海关执法局
视频
众议院司法委员会注意到福克斯新闻数字频道对此事的报道，并于4月通知科罗拉多州官员，他们与移民相关的认证要求错误地“征用私人律师参与科罗拉多州激进的庇护政策，束缚联邦官员在科罗拉多州执行移民法的手脚，且违反了基本的言论自由原则”。
众议院司法委员会移民诚信、安全与执法小组委员会主席、共和党议员汤姆·麦克林托克在周一接受福克斯新闻数字频道采访时表示，他很高兴看到科罗拉多州反悔，但警告这一事件只是庇护州对抗联邦至上原则的最新交锋。
他称这是“任何州都可以阻挠自己不喜欢的联邦法律”这一观念的最新例证。
众议员吉姆·乔丹、众议员汤姆·麦克林托克：民主党人以为他们可以推翻法律
“我认为他们已经越界，构成阻挠：如果没有这项离谱的宣誓要求，就不让律师进入法院系统，违者将以伪证罪论处，要求他们承诺不会为联邦移民执法目的提供任何信息，”麦克林托克说道。
“显然，该州意识到自己站不住脚，于是反悔了。但我仍然担心，这个新‘邦联’中的其他庇护司法管辖区未来可能会采取其他行动。”
2020年6月17日，加利福尼亚州共和党众议员汤姆·麦克林托克在国会游客中心出席众议院司法委员会关于《警务正义法案》的 markup 会议。（汤姆·威廉姆斯/CQ罗尔呼叫/西帕美国）
个人权利与表达基金会（FIRE）对这一消息表示欢迎，并指出，如果州政府不废除该条款，他们已准备好在丹佛以第一修正案为由起诉州政府。
“科罗拉多州取消认证要求的做法是正确的，这显然是基于观点的监管，违反了第一修正案，”总部位于华盛顿的该组织在一份声明中说道。
斯皮尔补充道，尽管州政府或许可以要求其公职律师如何与移民与海关执法局打交道，但作为私人律师，他“为我的客户服务，而非为政府服务”。
个人权利与表达基金会高级律师格雷格·格罗伊贝尔在一份声明中表示，政府依法不能将“承诺不将信息用于国家不认可的合法用途”作为律师获得法院准入的条件。
血腥委内瑞拉帮派被警告，新法案收紧蓝州庇护政策
2026年5月28日，移民与海关执法局（ICE）特工站在新泽西州纽瓦克的德莱尼厅拘留中心外。（拉希德·乌马尔·阿巴西 为福克斯新闻数字频道拍摄）
“赞扬科罗拉多州议员和州长迅速采取行动解决这一问题，但该州最初竟试图这么做，这令人不安。”
根据第一修正案，限制言论的法律必须保持观点中立，但批评者认为，强迫律师不与移民与海关执法局沟通，实际上是在偏袒某一党派立场。
麦克林托克表示，他所在的小组委员会持续关注各州和城市的各种庇护政策，这些政策“在抵制并在许多情况下阻挠联邦执法”，他援引至上条款称移民事务属于联邦政府权限范围。
“这在我所在的地区尤为重要，当地警长非常希望与移民与海关执法局合作，”麦克林托克说道，他曾主持过一场喧闹的听证会，会上弗吉尼亚州费尔法克斯县检察官斯蒂芬·德斯坎诺和警长斯泰西·辛凯雷德因处理非法移民相关案件而受到严厉批评。
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序
他所在的小组委员会正在制定一项法案，允许庇护政策受害者就释放非法移民罪犯等行为造成的损害起诉相关司法管辖区。
福克斯新闻数字频道已联系波利斯州长和移民与海关执法局征求评论。
查尔斯·克莱茨是福克斯新闻数字频道记者。
他于2013年加入福克斯新闻，担任撰稿人和制作助理。
查尔斯负责报道福克斯新闻数字频道的媒体、政治和文化领域。
查尔斯是宾夕法尼亚州本地人，毕业于天普大学，获广播新闻学学士学位。新闻线索可发送至charles.creitz@fox.com。
Blue state’s anti-ICE pledge collapses as GOP warns of new sanctuary ‘confederacy’
June 16, 2026 1:34pm EDT / Fox News
Gov Jared Polis signed a bill creating a carveout after attorneys said the state was coopting them into sanctuary policies
By Charles Creitz, Fox News
Former ICE official says Trump has ‘strong argument’ in sanctuary lawsuit of Colorado, city of Denver
Retired ICE field director John Fabbricatore joins ‘Fox & Friends Weekend’ to discuss the Department of Justice suing Colorado and the city of Denver for their sanctuary city policies.
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
Colorado has reversed a controversial requirement that attorneys using the state’s court e-filing system certify they would not use court information to assist federal immigration enforcement efforts.
The verification requirement was removed from state law last week after Colorado Democratic Gov. Jared Polis signed House Bill 26-1276, creating a carveout for attorneys seeking to use the filing system.
Multiple attorneys spoke out in April after the state’s e-file system required them to certify they would not share such personal information with the federal government — a requirement Colorado officials said stemmed from the Protect Civil Rights Immigration Status Act of 2025.
Colorado Springs attorney Ian Speir told Fox News Digital that Colorado appeared to be “unlawfully coopting private attorneys across the state to further its anti-federal sanctuary policies,” while noting that he doesn’t practice criminal nor immigration law but couldn’t sign into the state court system without “saluting the resistance.”
COLORADO LAWYERS SAY COURT E-FILE SYSTEM NOW MAKES THEM CERTIFY THEY WON’T ASSIST ICE
Video
The House Judiciary Committee took note of Fox News Digital’s reporting on the matter and notified Colorado officials in April that their immigration-related certification wrongly “commandeers private attorneys into Colorado’s radical sanctuary policies, handcuffs federal officials from enforcing immigration law in Colorado, and violates fundamental free speech principles.”
Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Calif., the chairman of the Judiciary Committee’s immigration integrity, security and enforcement subcommittee, told Fox News Digital in a Monday interview that he was pleased to see Colorado reverse itself but warned that the incident is just the latest volley in sanctuary states’ battle against federal supremacy.
He called it the latest example of the notion that any state “can obstruct federal laws they don’t like.”
REP JIM JORDAN, REP TOM MCCLINTOCK: DEMOCRATS THINK THEY CAN OVERRULE LAWS
“I think they’ve crossed the line into obstruction by forbidding attorneys access to the court system without this outrageous pledge under penalty and perjury that they wouldn’t report any information for federal immigration enforcement purposes,” McClintock said.
“Obviously, the state recognized what tenuous ground they had staked out, and it reversed themselves. But I remain concerned over what other sanctuary jurisdictions that comprise this new ‘Confederacy’ may take in the future.”
Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Calif., arrives for the House Judiciary Committee markup on the Justice in Policing Act in the Capitol Visitor Center on June 17, 2020.(Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Sipa USA)
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), celebrated the news and noted it was prepared to file a lawsuit against the state government in Denver on First Amendment grounds if it did not repeal the provision.
“Colorado made the right move removing the certification requirement, which was a clear viewpoint-based regulation that violated the First Amendment,” the Washington-based group said in a statement.
Speir added that while the state may be able to tell its own public lawyers what to say to ICE, he, as a private attorney, “work for my clients, not the government.”
Greg Greubel, FIRE’s senior attorney, said in a statement that the government by law cannot condition an attorney’s access to courts “on a promise not to use information for a lawful purpose the state disfavors.”
BLOODTHIRSTY VENEZUELAN GANG PUT ON NOTICE AS NEW BILL CURBS BLUE STATE SANCTUARY POLICIES
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents stand outside Delaney Hall detention center in Newark, New Jersey, May 28, 2026.(Rashid Umar Abbasi for Fox News Digital.)
“Kudos to Colorado legislators and the governor for acting quickly to resolve this issue, but it’s troubling that the state attempted this in the first place.”
Laws restricting speech must be viewpoint-neutral under the First Amendment, but critics argued that by forcing attorneys not to speak with ICE, they were putting their thumb on the partisan scale.
McClintock said his panel’s focus continues to be on the variety of sanctuary policies in states and cities that are “resisting and in many cases obstructing federal law enforcement,” citing the Supremacy Clause’s assertion that immigration falls under the federal government’s authority.
“That’s particularly important in regions such as mine where the local sheriffs very much want to cooperate with ICE,” said McClintock, who notably chaired the raucous hearing that featured Fairfax County, Virginia, prosecutor Stephen Descano and Sheriff Stacey Kincaid who have been lambasted for their handling of illegal immigrant-related cases.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
A measure his panel is working on would allow victims of sanctuary policies to sue those jurisdictions for damages created by the release of illegal immigrant criminals and the like.
Fox News Digital reached out to Polis and ICE for comment.
Charles Creitz is a reporter for Fox News Digital.
He joined Fox News in 2013 as a writer and production assistant.
Charles covers media, politics and culture for Fox News Digital.
Charles is a Pennsylvania native and graduated from Temple University with a B.A. in Broadcast Journalism. Story tips can be sent to charles.creitz@fox.com.
发表回复