沃什首次美联储新闻发布会或披露其通胀与利率策略


2026-06-15T10:03:17.68Z / 路透社

华盛顿6月15日电(路透社)——新任美联储主席凯文·沃什近年来曾多次就美国央行的资产负债表、减少对利率议题表态的必要性,以及美联储不应涉足气候变化等议题发表过长篇论述。

不过,周三举行的美联储新闻发布会将是他首次以主席身份,就通胀、失业率和经济前景发表实质性评论,完成从政策分析师的抽象表述到这位全球最重要央行行长可能引发市场波动的具体表态的转变。

当前通胀率较美联储2%的目标高出逾1个百分点,且似乎陷入停滞,沃什关于通胀是否会回落、何时回落的定性,将是其领导下货币政策演进的关键第一步。

投资者将把这一表态视为今年不少人预期的加息可能性的信号。

原本可能只是暂时性的价格冲击,由特朗普政府上调进口关税以及美伊冲突推高油价引发,如今正威胁演变为更持久的通胀问题。与此同时,美国劳动力市场已接近充分就业,就业复苏势头强劲,美联储各地区分行在近期报告中也暗示薪资压力正在上升。

美联储6月16日至17日的政策会议结束后随即举行的新闻发布会,将为沃什提供一个阐述当前经济多面性的契机,他将借此说明自己眼中美联储面临的风险,以及计划如何制定应对措施。

沃什于约一个前接替前美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔。哥伦比亚线程固定收益与宏观投资组合经理埃德·阿尔-侯赛尼上周对记者表示:“沃什在资产负债表和沟通策略方面的表态要坦率得多,但当涉及你对通胀的变化逻辑是什么、你对当前货币政策态势有何看法时,这些问题此前都像一个巨大的黑箱,我们即将揭开它的面纱。”

有诸多细节有待拆解:沃什将如何评估关税对商品价格的影响;近期的油价冲击是否会持续并蔓延;正如近期数据显示的那样,此前由租房价格放缓带动的通胀改善是否已告一段落。

这些都是仍担任美联储理事会成员的鲍威尔在新闻发布会上会直接回应的议题。沃什曾表示,他不愿过多透露美联储下一次加息举措的相关信息。但他在“前瞻性指引”和阐述经济或通胀展望之间划定的界限,将是其首场新闻发布会的重要看点。

“我认为沃什会回避通胀走向以及美联储可能采取何种应对措施的问题,”法国外贸银行美洲区首席美国经济学家克里斯托弗·霍奇说道。霍奇仍预计美联储将降息而非加息,尽管降息时间仍不确定。尽管霍奇指出沃什的论调“偏向中性甚至鹰派”,但他补充道:“我认为他不会排除降息的可能,但举证责任将落在数据身上,需要数据证明能源冲击已经过去。”

通胀政策规则折线图。

避免“负面观感”

市场普遍预计美联储周三将把基准利率维持在3.50%-3.75%的区间,该区间自去年12月以来一直未变。除政策声明外,美联储还将发布政策制定者更新后的季度经济预测。沃什的新闻发布会将紧随其后。

这位新任美联储主席对央行当前的部分沟通工具持反对态度,包括经济预测和附带的利率预期“点阵图”,但他需要获得18位同僚的广泛共识才能取消或修改这些工具。

沃什没有义务提交自己的预测,若提交的话,可能会暴露他与美联储主流货币政策思路的契合度,比前美联储理事斯蒂芬·米兰更高。米兰在美联储理事会任职时间较短,曾支持唐纳德·特朗普总统提出的大幅降息要求。米兰的“低点位”点阵将从此消失。

更值得关注的是,美联储是否会删除政策声明中有关下次加息可能为降息的表述,转而采用更中性的措辞,为可能的加息敞开大门。在4月28日至29日的会议上,有三位政策制定者投下反对票,支持这一转变。包括颇具影响力的美联储理事克里斯托弗·沃勒在内的其他官员随后表示,在近期就业增长跃升缓解了他们对劳动力市场健康状况的担忧后,他们现在支持这一举措。这一调整也符合沃什减少前瞻性指引的偏好。

如果美联储的政策声明采用更中性的基调,而点阵图却显示许多政策制定者预计今年年底将加息,沃什将可能面临沟通难题。

市场普遍预计,政策制定者的中值预测将显示美联储将维持利率不变至2026年,不再像此前两次展望中那样预期降息25个基点——此前的降息预期是2024年开启的宽松周期的延续,当时通胀似乎有望回落至2%的目标。

然而,如果正如预期的那样,中值通胀预测也有所上调,且未出现预期中的加息,这将引发质疑:沃什领导的美联储是否重蹈鲍威尔时期的覆辙,将推高物价的因素视为暂时性因素,认为无需提高借贷成本即可消退。事实上,沃什在斯坦福大学胡佛研究所任职时曾称之为“理想型”工具的政策规则,如今几乎都一致表明应该加息。

在特朗普提名沃什担任美联储最高职位之前,沃什就曾阐述过通胀及利率可能回落的理由,包括他计划缩减美联储6.71万亿美元资产负债表的影响,以及人工智能热潮带来的生产率提升。他还曾暗示通胀的统计方式可能存在偏差,实际通胀率可能低于公布数据。

他在多大程度上依赖这些观点来警示加息风险,将首次展现他作为美联储领导人的施政思路,以及尽管他曾尖锐批评美联储近期的决策流程,但其政策是否会有显著不同。

“美联储如果说通胀过高,但却置之不理,称排除这五项因素后通胀就会回落,这会造成非常负面的观感,”前美联储货币事务部门主管、现为耶鲁管理学院教授的威廉·英格利希说道,“他不想过早采取行动。”

霍华德·施奈德报道;丹·伯恩斯与保罗·西马奥编辑

Warsh’s debut Fed press conference may reveal his strategy for inflation, rates

2026-06-15T10:03:17.68Z / Reuters

WASHINGTON, June 15 (Reuters) – New Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh has talked at length in recent years about the U.S. central bank’s balance sheet, the need to say less about interest rates and why it should not dip into issues like climate change.

A Fed press conference on Wednesday, though, will mark his first substantive comments from the chairman’s perch about what’s happening with inflation, unemployment and the economic outlook as he makes a rhetorical turn from the abstract words of a policy analyst to the concrete, potentially market-moving words of the world’s most important central banker.

Inflation, in particular, seems stuck more than a percentage point above the Fed’s 2% target, and Warsh’s characterization about whether and when it is likely to fall will be a key first step in the evolution of monetary policy under his leadership.

It’s one that investors will take as a cue about the likelihood of higher rates that many now see coming this year.

What might have been otherwise temporary price shocks, triggered by the Trump administration’s import tariff hikes and elevated oil prices due to the U.S.-backed war with Iran, now threaten a more persistent inflation problem. Meanwhile, the U.S. labor market is close to full employment, hiring has rebounded, and Warsh’s colleagues in the Fed’s regional districts hinted in a recent report at building wage pressures.

The press conference immediately following the end of the Fed’s June 16-17 policy meeting will provide Warsh an opportunity to address those economic cross-currents as he builds a narrative about the risks he sees facing the central bank and how he plans to frame its response.

Warsh, who succeeded former Fed chief Jerome Powell about a month ago, “has been much more vocal in terms of the balance sheet, he’s been much more vocal on communication strategy. When it comes to what’s your theory of change for inflation, what’s your view in terms of the current posture of monetary policy, those things are a big black box that we’re going to start to open up,” Ed Al-Hussainy, portfolio manager for fixed income and macro at Columbia Threadneedle, told reporters last week.

There will be much to unpack: Warsh’s assessment of the impact of tariffs on goods prices; whether the recent oil price shock will persist and spread; whether, as recent data suggest, the improvement in inflation that had been coming from slowing rent prices has run its course.

Those are the sorts of issues Powell, who remains on the Fed’s Board of Governors, would address directly in his press conferences. Warsh has said he doesn’t want to provide too much information about the central bank’s likely next interest rate moves. But where he draws the line between “forward guidance” and offering his outlook for the economy or inflation will be an important aspect of his opening press conference.

“I think Warsh is going to punt on the question” of where inflation is heading and what the Fed might need to do about it, said Christopher Hodge, chief U.S. economist at Natixis CIB Americas, who still expects the central bank to cut interest rates rather than raise them, though the timing remains uncertain. Despite a “neutral-to-hawkish tone,” Hodge said, “I don’t think he will preclude cuts, but the onus will be on the data to prove that the energy shock is past us.”

Line graphs of inflation policy rules.

AVOIDING A ‘BAD LOOK’

The Fed is widely expected on Wednesday to hold its benchmark interest rate steady in the 3.50%-3.75% range, where it’s been since December. In addition to a policy statement, it will also issue updated quarterly economic projections from its policymakers. Warsh’s press conference will begin shortly after.

The new Fed chief dislikes some of the central bank’s current communications tools, including the projections and accompanying “dot-plot” chart of rate expectations, but would need broad consensus among his 18 fellow policymakers before eliminating or changing it.

Warsh is not obligated to submit projections of his own, and doing so might reveal him to be more aligned with the central bank’s mainstream monetary policy thinking than former Fed Governor Stephen Miran, who was a defender of the sharp rate cuts called for by President Donald Trump during his brief stay on the Fed’s board. Miran’s low-hanging dot will now disappear.

More significant is whether the Fed drops policy statement language indicating its next rate move is likely to be a cut in favor of more neutral wording opening the door to a possible hike. Three policymakers dissented in favor of such a shift at the April 28-29 meeting. Others, including influential Fed Governor Christopher Waller, have since said they now support the move after a recent jump in hiring eased their concerns about the labor market’s health. The change would also align with Warsh’s preference to offer less forward guidance.

Warsh faces a possible communications challenge if, for example, the Fed’s policy statement adopts a more neutral tone while the dot-plot chart shows many of its policymakers expect rate hikes by the end of the year.

The median policymaker projection is expected to show the Fed on hold through 2026, moving away from the quarter-percentage-point rate cut policymakers had anticipated in their previous two outlooks as a continuation of an easing cycle that began in 2024 when inflation seemed on track to fall to the 2% target.

Yet if, as expected, the median outlook on inflation is also marked higher without an anticipated rate hike, it will raise questions about whether the Warsh-led Fed is at risk of making the same mistake as under Powell in regarding the forces driving prices higher as temporary and likely to fade without higher borrowing costs. Indeed, the policy rules that Warsh called “aspirational” tools while at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution now almost universally suggest rates should rise.

Warsh, in the run-up to his nomination for the top Fed job by Trump, sketched out ideas about why inflation, and therefore rates, could fall, from the impact of his plans to lower the Fed’s $6.71 trillion balance sheet to productivity improvements from the artificial intelligence boom. He has also suggested inflation may be mismeasured and be running lower than reported.

How much he leans on those ideas to caution about rate hikes will offer a first glimpse of his approach as the Fed’s leader, and whether it seems to differ all that much despite his sharp criticism of its recent decisionmaking process.

“It’s a bad look for the Fed to say inflation is much too high, but we are going to ignore it because if you exclude these five things it will go away,” said William English, former head of the Fed’s monetary affairs division and now a professor at the Yale School of Management. “He does not want to get too far in front of that.”

Reporting by Howard Schneider; Editing by Dan Burns and Paul Simao

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注