2026年5月28日 美国东部时间12:15 / 福克斯新闻
该提案提出之际，加州正面临约29亿美元的预算缺口，而纽瑟姆被广泛视为2028年总统大选候选人
作者：伊莱恩·马伦
NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了！
加州民主党州长加文·纽瑟姆正提议对从唐纳德·特朗普总统新设立的“反武器化基金”中获得资金的加州人征收100%的税，此举遭到批评者指责，称纽瑟姆自己也在运作“黑金基金”。
“任何拿到这类资金的加州人，”纽瑟姆在周三的新闻发布会上表示，“我们将对这些款项全额征税，这是加州可以采取的行动，我们期待着付诸实施。”
纽瑟姆强烈反对新设立的17.8亿美元“反武器化基金”，支持者称该基金无党派属性。而此时他被广泛视为潜在的2028年总统竞选人。
批评人士称该基金是为特朗普盟友中饱私囊而设立的“面子工程”。
道歉与赔款将流向所谓“武器化”受害者，涉资数十亿的特朗普和解协议
尽管拥有精英政治人脉，纽瑟姆曾公开谈及父母离婚、自己的阅读障碍以及艰难的成长经历。（艾米·萨斯曼/盖蒂图片社）
纽瑟姆和其他民主党人士的主要不满在于，该基金可能用于赔偿与2021年1月6日国会大厦骚乱相关的定罪或被起诉人员。特朗普就职首日就赦免或减刑了超过1500名骚乱参与者。
“他赦免了所有那些殴打警察的人，为他们洗脱罪名，还发给他们17.76亿美元。你不仅能得到赦免，还能得到奖励，”纽瑟姆在X平台上写道，“这就是为什么设立这个基金是必要的。”
但纽瑟姆对特朗普基金的批评也在社交媒体上遭到共和党和保守派批评者的虚伪指控，他们长期指责这位加州州长监督了与政治关联的支出项目，以及他自己的“黑金基金”。
其中一项受到审查的项目是一项2500万美元的加州法律基金，旨在对抗纽瑟姆所称的特朗普政府发起的“法律战”。加州共和党参议院少数党领袖布莱恩·琼斯后来将该基金称为“黑金基金”。
纽瑟姆还在2021年加州罢免竞选期间因州政府使用无竞标COVID-19合同受到审查。凯撒健康新闻的一项调查发现，加州将数十亿美元的紧急合同授予了与捐赠者、政治盟友和关系过硬的内部人士有关联的公司。批评人士认为，该州的紧急采购系统允许在有限竞争和监督的情况下授予纳税人资金合同。
纽瑟姆拟对该基金的加州接收者征收100%税款之际，该州2027财年预算面临约29亿美元的缺口。
达菲嘲讽纽瑟姆的“通往虚无的桥梁”，加州野生动物通道项目超支2100万美元
图片显示司法部大楼，叠加代理司法部长托德·布兰奇的头像。（汤姆·威廉姆斯/CQ-罗尔公司通过盖蒂图片社；塞缪尔·科勒姆/盖蒂图片社）
在纽瑟姆的领导下，加州已在未完工的公共工程项目上花费了数十亿美元纳税人资金，包括该州的高铁项目，尽管尚未铺设单轨铁路，但其估计成本已达1280亿美元。纽瑟姆还在3月份因该州一座未完工的野生动物通道桥梁受到审查，该项目超支2100万美元。交通部长肖恩·达菲将该项目称为“通往虚无的桥梁”。
2026年5月21日，唐纳德·特朗普总统在华盛顿特区白宫椭圆形办公室出席活动。（杰奎琳·马丁/美联社）
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序
自司法部上周宣布设立“反武器化基金”，作为特朗普与美国国税局之间诉讼和解的一部分以来，来自纽约的民主党国会议员已提出立法阻止该基金，而一位康涅狄格州议员也推动对该款项征收100%的税。
福克斯新闻数字频道已联系白宫和纽瑟姆的办公室寻求进一步置评。
伊莱恩·马伦是福克斯新闻数字频道和福克斯商业频道的撰稿人，报道全国政治。
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6396516280112
Newsom wants to claw back Trump fund cash as California burns billions on rail and other ‘boondoggles’
May 28, 2026 12:15pm EDT / Fox News
The proposal comes as California faces a roughly $2.9B budget shortfall and Newsom is widely viewed as a 2028 contender
By Elaine Mallon
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom is pushing a 100% tax on Californians who receive money from President Donald Trump’s new Anti-Weaponization Fund, a move that comes as critics accuse Newsom of running “slush funds” of his own.
“Anyone from California that receives any of those funds,” Newsom said at a Wednesday news conference. “We want to tax 100% of those proceeds and that’s an action the state of California can take. It’s an action we look forward to taking.”
Newsom’s staunch opposition to the newly created $1.78 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund, which supporters describe as nonpartisan, comes as he is widely viewed as a potential 2028 presidential contender.
Critics have dubbed the fund a “boondoggle” created to line the pockets of Trump’s allies.
APOLOGIES AND CASH HEADED TO ALLEGED ‘WEAPONIZATION’ VICTIMS IN BILLION-DOLLAR TRUMP SETTLEMENT
Newsom has spoken publicly about his parents’ divorce, dyslexia and difficult upbringing despite his elite political connections.(Amy Sussman/Getty Images)
The chief complaint from Newsom and other Democrats is that the fund could be used to compensate people convicted or indicted in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. On his first day back in office, Trump pardoned or commuted the sentences of more than 1,500 rioters.
“He pardoned all of those folks that were beating up cops and absolved them, providing them 1.776 billion dollars. So not only do you get a pardon, you get rewarded,” Newsom wrote on X. “That’s why this is needed.”
But Newsom’s criticism of Trump’s fund has also drawn accusations of hypocrisy from Republicans and conservative critics on social media, who have long accused the California governor of overseeing politically connected spending programs and “slush funds” of his own.
Among the programs that faced scrutiny was a $25 million California legal fund created to combat what Newsom described as “legal warfare” from the Trump administration. California Republican Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones later deemed the fund a “slush fund.”
Newsom also faced scrutiny during California’s 2021 recall campaign over the state’s use of no-bid COVID-19 contracts. A Kaiser Health News investigation found California awarded billions of dollars in emergency contracts to firms tied to donors, political allies and well-connected insiders. Critics argued the state’s emergency procurement system allowed taxpayer-funded contracts to be awarded with limited competition and oversight.
Newsom’s proposed plan to implement a 100% tax on Californian recipients of the fund comes as the state faces a roughly $2.9 billion shortfall for the 2027 fiscal budget.
DUFFY MOCKS NEWSOM’S ‘BRIDGES TO NOWHERE’ AS CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE CROSSING OVERRUNS BY $21M
An image shows the Department of Justice building with an overlay of Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche.(Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images; Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
Under Newsom’s leadership, California has spent billions of taxpayer dollars on unfinished public works projects, including the state’s high-speed rail project, which carries an estimated cost of $128 billion even though a single track has yet to be laid. Newsom also faced scrutiny in March over an unfinished wildlife crossing bridge in the Golden State that is running $21 million over budget. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy dubbed the project a “bridge to nowhere.”
President Donald Trump attends an event in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., on May 21, 2026.(Jacquelyn Martin/AP)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Since the Justice Department announced the creation of the Anti-Weaponization Fund last week as part of a lawsuit settlement between Trump and the Internal Revenue Service, Democratic members of Congress from New York have proposed legislation to block the fund, while a Connecticut state lawmaker has also pushed to implement a 100% tax on the proceeds.
Fox News Digital reached out to the White House and Newsom’s office for further comment.
Elaine Mallon is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business covering national politics.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6396516280112
发表回复