2026年5月11日 美国东部时间晚上9:36 / 福克斯新闻频道
“美国不会为那些纵容大规模移民涌入美国或西方国家的全球协议正名，”美国国务院称
撰稿：兰登·米恩 福克斯新闻
美国国务院周一宣布，拒绝支持国际移民审查论坛的“进展”宣言，指责联合国试图“鼓吹并推动美国及整个西广大地区的替换式移民”。
国务院在周一发表的一份声明中表示，美国没有参加5月5日至8日在纽约联合国总部举行的第二届国际移民审查论坛，也不会支持该宣言。
据联合国移民网络介绍，该论坛是联合国各成员国审议《安全、有序和正常移民全球契约》执行情况的主要全球平台。2026年的论坛原本旨在达成一项各国政府间一致同意的“进展宣言”。
唐纳德·特朗普总统在2017年第一任期内就终止了美国参与制定《全球移民契约》的联合国进程，如今国务院表示联邦政府将再次明确反对该契约。
特朗普在大胆移民政策举措中退出联合国相关移民论坛
唐纳德·特朗普总统在2017年第一任期内就终止了美国参与制定《全球移民契约》的联合国进程。（美联社照片/埃文·武奇）
《全球移民契约》于2018年通过，此前美国已退出相关谈判。联合国和国际移民组织将该契约描述为旨在改善各国移民治理的合作框架。
“正如鲁比奥国务卿所言，对大规模移民敞开大门是一个严重错误，它威胁到我们社会的凝聚力和我们人民的未来，”声明中写道。“近年来，美国民众亲眼目睹了大规模移民如何摧毁我们的社区：边境地区的犯罪与混乱、主要城市进入紧急状态，以及数十亿美元纳税人资金被用于支付移民的酒店、机票、手机和现金卡费用。”
“这其中很大一部分是由联合国机构及其合作伙伴推动的，他们不仅助长了对我国的入侵，还着手将我们本国人民的财富和资源重新分配给来自世界最贫困地区的数百万外国人，”声明继续说道。
国务院辩称，这类移民没有任何安全、有序或正常可言，并补充称相关成本“主要由被迫争夺稀缺工作、住房和社会服务的美国工薪阶层承担”。
“联合国对此几乎只字不提，”国务院写道。
特朗普公布“反向移民”计划，以阻止“第三世界”移民、撤销拜登时代的入境政策
美国拒绝参加国际移民审查论坛。（亚历克斯·布兰登 / 法新社盖蒂图片社泳池照片）
“特朗普总统关注的是美国民众的利益，而非外国人或全球主义官僚的利益，”声明中写道。“美国不会支持任何以显性或隐蔽方式施加约束美国人民以本国最佳利益做出决策的主权、民主权利的指导方针、标准或承诺的进程。”
国务院在声明结尾表示，其目标并非“管理”移民，而是“推动移民回流”。
国务院在X平台的一条帖子中也宣布了反对该宣言的举措，称联合国机构“系统性地推动大规模移民涌入美国和欧洲，尽管这些国家的民众呼吁限制移民”。该帖子补充称，联合国与《全球移民契约》相关的材料呼吁扩大正常移民渠道，并提及对移民的“合法化”。
国际移民组织表示，该论坛每四年举办一次，供各国审查移民政策进展并制定后续步骤。作为联合国移民网络的协调方，国际移民组织表示该网络包含39个联合国机构，致力于在移民问题上支持各国。
该帖子声称，“联合国机构与其资助的非政府组织合作，在中美洲和美国边境之间建立了一条移民走廊”。“在美国民众遭受前所未有的大规模移民浪潮冲击之际，联合国一直在现场将移民输送到我们的南部边境。”
美国国务院的目标并非“管理”移民，而是“推动移民回流”。（丹尼斯·巴利布斯/档案照片/路透社）
“在推动大规模移民进入美国后，联合国机构谴责驱逐非法移民的行为，”帖子继续说道。“当英国面临前所未有的非法乘船越境问题时，联合国机构谴责驱逐计划。联合国官员游说航空监管机构阻止驱逐移民——这严重侵犯了英国的国家主权。”
联合国移民网络将该契约描述为“无法律约束力”。联合国托管的契约文本也提到，它尊重各国自主决定本国移民政策的主权权利，并区分正常和非正常移民身份。
宣言本身称《全球移民契约》是一个合作框架，承认没有任何国家能够独自应对移民问题，同时也维护各国的主权。
国务院驳斥了契约将移民描述为“安全、有序和正常”的提法。
“对于西方国家的民众而言，大规模移民从未带来过安全。它带来了新的安全威胁，造成了财政压力，并破坏了我们社会的凝聚力，”声明写道。
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序
“美国不会为那些纵容大规模移民涌入美国或西方国家的全球协议正名，”帖子补充道。
联合国材料将该契约描述为一个适用于跨境问题的合作框架，包括劳工移民、边境管理、移民保护和发展问题。包括联合国人权事务高级专员办事处在内的联合国机构将国际移民审查论坛描述为一个由国家主导的审议进程，相关利益攸关方均可参与。
福克斯新闻数字频道已联系联合国征求评论。
Trump administration rejects UN migration declaration, says ‘mass migration was never safe’
May 11, 2026 9:36pm EDT / Fox News
‘The United States will not legitimize global compacts that enable mass migration into America or Western nations,’ the State Department said
By Landon Mion Fox News
The U.S. State Department announced on Monday that it refused to back an International Migration Review Forum “progress” declaration, accusing the U.N. of efforts to “advocate and facilitate replacement immigration in the United States and across the broader West.”
The U.S. did not participate in the second International Migration Review Forum, held May 5–8 at U.N. Headquarters in New York, and will not support the declaration, the department said in a statement on Monday.
The forum is the U.N.’s main global platform for member states to review implementation of the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, according to the U.N. Network on Migration. The 2026 forum was scheduled to produce an intergovernmentally agreed “Progress Declaration.”
President Donald Trump ended U.S. participation in the U.N. process to develop the Global Compact for Migration during his first term in 2017, and now the State Department says the federal government will again affirm its opposition.
TRUMP PULLS US OUT OF UN-LINKED MIGRATION FORUM IN BOLD IMMIGRATION MOVE
President Donald Trump ended U.S. participation in the U.N. process to develop the Global Compact for Migration during his first term in 2017.(AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
The Global Compact was adopted in 2018 after the U.S. withdrew from the process. The U.N. and International Organization for Migration describe the compact as a cooperative framework intended to improve migration governance across countries.
“As Secretary Rubio said, opening our doors to mass migration was a grave mistake that threatens the cohesion of our societies and the future of our peoples,” the department’s statement reads. ” In recent years, Americans witnessed first-hand how mass immigration laid waste to our communities: crime and chaos at the border, states of emergency in major cities, and billions of taxpayer dollars funneled towards hotels, plane tickets, cell phones and cash cards for migrants.”
“Much of this was driven by UN agencies and their partners, which did not just facilitate the invasion of our country, but proceeded to redistribute our own people’s wealth and resources to millions of foreigners from the worst corners of the world,” it continued.
The department argued there was nothing safe, orderly or regular about any of this, adding that the costs “were borne primarily by working Americans forced to compete for scarce jobs, housing, and social services.”
“The UN has little to say about them,” the department wrote.
TRUMP UNVEILS ‘REVERSE MIGRATION’ PLAN TO HALT ‘THIRD WORLD’ IMMIGRATION, REVOKE BIDEN-ERA ENTRIES
The U.S. refused to participate in an International Migration Review Forum.(Alex Brandon / POOL / AFP via Getty Images)
“President Trump is focused on the interests of Americans, not foreigners or globalist bureaucrats,” the statement reads. “The United States will not support a process that imposes, overtly or by stealth, guidelines, standards, or commitments that constrain the American people’s sovereign, democratic right to make decisions in the best interests of our country.”
The department concluded its statement by saying its goal is not to “manage” migration, but to “foster remigration.”
In a thread on X also announcing the move to object to the declaration, the department said UN agencies “systematically facilitated mass migration into America and Europe, even as citizens of these nations called for restrictions on migration.” It added that U.N. materials related to the Global Compact call for expanding regular migration pathways and reference “regularization” of migrants.
The International Organization for Migration says the forum is held every four years for countries to review progress and shape next steps on migration policy. IOM, which coordinates the U.N. Network on Migration, says the network includes 39 U.N. agencies working to support countries on migration issues.
The department alleged that”UN agencies – working with the NGOs they fund – established a migration corridor through Central America and to the U.S. border,” the post reads. “As the American people suffered under an unprecedented wave of mass migration, the UN was on the ground pipelining migrants to our southern border.”
The State Department said its goal is not to “manage” migration, but to “foster remigration.”(Denis Balibouse/File Photo/Reuters)
“After facilitating mass migration to the United States, UN agencies condemned the deportation of illegal immigrants,” the post continued. “While the United Kingdom faced unprecedented illegal boat crossings, UN agencies condemned plans for deportations. UN officials lobbied aviation regulators to prevent the deportation of migrants – an appalling violation of the UK’s national sovereignty.”
The U.N. Network on Migration describes the compact as “non-legally binding.” A U.N.-hosted text of the compact also says it respects states’ sovereign right to determine their national migration policies and to distinguish between regular and irregular migration status.
The declaration itself says the Global Compact is a cooperative framework and acknowledges that no state can address migration alone, while also upholding the sovereignty of states.
The department pushed back on the compact’s framing of migration as “safe, orderly and regular.”
“For the citizens of Western nations, mass migration was never safe. It introduced new security threats, imposed financial strains, and undermined the cohesion of our societies,” it wrote.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“The United States will not legitimize global compacts that enable mass migration into America or Western nations,” the post added.
U.N. materials frame the compact as a cooperative framework for issues that often cross borders, including labor migration, border management, migrant protections and development. U.N. agencies, including the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, describe the IMRF as a state-led review process with participation from relevant stakeholders.
Fox News Digital has reached out to the U.N. for comment.
发表回复