2026年5月7日 06:00:31 美国东部夏令时 / 福克斯新闻网
此举正值得克萨斯州SB 4法案面临新的法律挑战之际，该法案允许警方逮捕涉嫌非法进入美国的移民。
作者：兰登·米恩 福克斯新闻网
发布于2026年5月7日 美国东部夏令时早上6:00
参议院通过移民与海关执法局及边境巡逻局拨款框架
福克斯新闻首席国会记者查德·珀格拉姆在《特别报道》节目中报道了参议院在隔夜投票中通过一项为移民与海关执法局和边境巡逻局提供资金的预算框架。
独家报道： 美国众议院得克萨斯州共和党核心小组周四宣布，全体一致支持来自得克萨斯州联邦众议员乔迪·阿林顿（共和党）提出的一项决议，该决议辩称各州拥有宪法赋予的权力，可抵御“入侵”或“迫在眉睫的危险”以保卫边境。
该核心小组敦促国会批准这项法案，共和党人将其归咎于前总统乔·拜登政府的“失败的开放边境政策”，并指出在拜登执政期间有数百万非法移民越境进入美国。
“保护选举我们的美国民众是当选官员的职责，”得克萨斯州联邦众议员布兰登·吉尔（共和党）在给福克斯新闻数字频道的一份声明中说道。
“不幸的是，我们看到民主党领导人一次又一次蓄意推动边境入侵。当联邦政府无法或不愿履行边境安保职责时，各州理应介入并守护边境。我很自豪能加入得克萨斯州共和党核心小组，为美国民众挺身而出。”
这项众议院决议最初于2021年提出，旨在应对拜登政府时期的边境危机，其中明确规定，若联邦政府未能采取行动，各州拥有宪法赋予的权利保卫边境。包括美国最高法院在内的法院长期以来一直将移民执法视为主要的联邦职责。
民权团体提起诉讼，试图阻止允许警察逮捕非法移民的得州法案
美国众议院得克萨斯州共和党核心小组宣布全体一致支持一项决议，确认各州拥有宪法赋予的权力，可抵御“入侵”以保卫边境。（戴维·佩纳多/阿纳多卢通讯社 盖蒂图片社）
H.Res.50号决议称，根据宪法第一条第十款，当联邦政府未能履行共和党所称的宪法第四条第四款规定的保护各州免受入侵的义务时，各州保留为保卫其领土和公民抵御“入侵”或“迫在眉睫的危险”的主权权力。
在接受福克斯新闻数字频道的独家专访时，阿林顿表示，美墨边境在特朗普政府时期基本得到了巩固，但他认为，为确保民主党人再次入主白宫时各州仍能采取行动，这项决议十分必要。
“我们想要避免的是拜登政府四年间发生的情况：大量州被非法移民及其引发的各类问题淹没、压垮。当时联邦政府没有履行职责，事实上，联邦政府还阻挠得克萨斯等州填补他们留下的安保空白，因为他们放弃了自己的责任，”这位众议员说道。
阿林顿指出，在拜登执政期间，经边境流入的芬太尼和其他毒品在一年内导致超过10万美国人因过量服用死亡，而非法越境、卡特尔团伙活动以及毒品和人口贩运给边境各州带来了沉重负担。
“这些毒品每年夺去数十万人的生命，相当于每周坠毁一架满载美国公民的客机，”阿林顿说。“单一年份就有超过10万美国人丧生，这比我们在越南战争中损失的人数还要多。当我们有更多美国公民死于墨西哥恐怖主义贩毒团伙与提供合成芬太尼前体的中国团伙勾结实施的所谓化学战时，这在那四年间就是对我们国家最重大、最迫在眉睫的威胁。”
这位众议员强调，他的决议得到了得克萨斯州共和党核心小组、保守派组织、执法官员和法律专家的支持。
司法部指控法院在最高法院高风险边境案件中削弱行政权力
乔迪·阿林顿众议员表示，当民主党人再次入主白宫时，各州仍需能够采取行动，因此他的决议十分必要。（汤姆·威廉姆斯/CQ-罗尔公司 盖蒂图片社）
“正如最高法院所解释的宪法，禁止各州干预联邦政府对我国领土主权的垄断，”前司法部法律顾问办公室副助理部长约翰·柳在给福克斯新闻数字频道的一份声明中说道。“但众议院可以自行认定边境的失职已达到‘迫在眉睫的危险’程度，足以证明各州行使自卫权是合理的。这类认定可能会增强得克萨斯州在法庭上的胜算，以及向公众展示的政治立场。没有国会的此类支持，得克萨斯州很可能会败诉。”
在福克斯新闻数字频道获得的一份新闻稿中，得克萨斯州共和党核心小组主席、得克萨斯州联邦众议员纳撒尼尔·莫兰表示：“建国先贤们明白，当边境遭遇入侵、联邦政府拒绝履行职责时，各州不能任由其摆布。”
“这正是第一条第十款存在的意义——这也是得克萨斯州和我们的边境各州在拜登政府执政四年间面临的处境。H.Res.50号决议确认了宪法早已保障的内容：各州拥有保护本国公民的一切权利。得克萨斯州共和党核心小组将团结一致，确保这项权利得到承认和维护。”
该决议出台之际，正值围绕得克萨斯州参议院第4号法案的法律争议升级。这项州级法案允许警方逮捕涉嫌非法越境进入美国的移民，并授权州法官下令某些移民离开美国。
此前一名联邦下级法院裁定暂停该法案执行，但上个月联邦上诉法院撤销了这一裁决，该法案将于下周生效。上诉法院认为，该案原告没有起诉资格，但并未解决围绕该法案的 broader 宪法争议。
SB 4法案将非法入境定为州级犯罪，并授权州治安法官在定罪后下令某些个人离开美国。
阿林顿告诉福克斯新闻数字频道，随着法律挑战持续，得克萨斯州的SB 4法案可能很快会被提交至美国最高法院。
纳撒尼尔·莫兰众议员表示，各州“拥有保护本国公民的一切权利”。（比尔·克拉克/CQ-罗尔公司 盖蒂图片社）
得克萨斯州民权项目、美国公民自由联盟（ACLU）以及得克萨斯州美国公民自由联盟本周提起了一项新诉讼，寻求紧急救济，以在该法案于5月15日生效前阻止其多项条款的实施。
这些团体辩称该法案违宪，称移民执法是联邦政府的专属职责，联邦法律应优先于该州法案。
美国公民自由联盟移民权利项目副主任科迪·沃夫西辩称，SB 4法案“残忍且非法”，并补充道，该团体“将持续抗争，直至该法案被永久推翻”。
点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP
“所有审理过类似SB 4法案实质问题的法院都认定其违宪，”他在一份声明中说道。
在截稿前，这三个团体未回应福克斯新闻数字频道就阿林顿的决议置评的请求。
Texas GOP backs resolution saying states have right to repel border ‘invasion’
2026-05-07 06:00:31 EDT / Fox News
The push comes as Texas’ SB 4, allowing police to arrest migrants suspected of entering the US illegally, faces new legal challenges
By Landon Mion Fox News
Published May 7, 2026 6:00am EDT
Senate passes ICE and Border Patrol funding framework
Fox News chief congressional correspondent Chad Pergram reports on the Senate passing a budget framework to fund I.C.E. and Border Patrol in an overnight vote on ‘Special Report.’
EXCLUSIVE:The U.S. House’s Texas GOP Caucus announced Thursday that it is united behind a resolution from Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, arguing that states have constitutional authority to secure their borders against an “invasion” or “imminent danger.”
The caucus is urging Congress to approve the measure, citing what Republicans called the “failed open-border policies” under former President Joe Biden and the millions of illegal immigrants who crossed into the country during his administration.
“It is the job of elected officials to protect the Americans that sent them to office,” Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, said in a statement to Fox News Digital.
“Unfortunately, we’ve seen Democrat leaders willfully facilitate a border invasion time and time again. States ought to be able to step in and secure the border when federal government cannot or will not do so. I am proud to join the Texas GOP Caucus in standing up for the American people.”
The House resolution, first introduced in 2021 in response to the border crisis under the Biden administration, affirms that states have a right under the Constitution to secure their borders if the federal government fails to act. Courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, have long treated immigration enforcement as primarily a federal responsibility.
CIVIL RIGHTS GROUPS FILE LAWSUIT SEEKING TO BLOCK TEXAS LAW ALLOWING COPS TO ARREST ILLEGAL MIGRANTS
The U.S. House’s Texas GOP Caucus announced unified caucus support for a resolution affirming that states have constitutional authority to secure their borders against an “invasion.”(David Peinado/Anadolu via Getty Images)
H.Res. 50 says states retain sovereign authority under Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution to defend their territory and citizens from “invasion” or “imminent danger” when the federal government fails to meet what Republicans describe as its Article IV, Section 4 obligation to protect states from invasion.
In an exclusive interview with Fox News Digital, Arrington said the U.S.-Mexico border has largely been secured under the Trump administration but argued his resolution is needed to ensure states can act if a Democrat returns to the White House.
“What we want to avoid is what happened during the four years of the Biden administration, which is, we had a bunch of states being overrun and overwhelmed with illegal immigration and all the various problems that occurred as a result. We didn’t have a federal government that was doing its job and, in fact, we had a federal government that was obstructing states like Texas from actually filling the gap that they left because they abdicated that responsibility,” the congressman said.
Arrington argued that fentanyl and other drugs flowing across the border contributed to more than 100,000 overdose deaths in a single year during the Biden administration, while illegal border crossings, cartel activity and drug and human trafficking strained border states.
“The drugs were killing hundreds of thousands, they were killing a plane load of American citizens every week,” Arrington said. “They killed over 100,000 Americans in one year, which is more than we lost in the Vietnam War. When you’re losing more American citizens to what is tantamount to chemical warfare from the Mexican terrorist drug cartels, in close cooperation with the Chinese who were providing the precursor material for synthetic fentanyl, that was the greatest and most imminent threat to our nation during those four years.”
The congressman highlighted that his resolution has received support from the Texas GOP Caucus, conservative organizations, law enforcement officials and legal experts.
DOJ ACCUSES COURTS OF UNDERCUTTING EXECUTIVE POWER IN HIGH-STAKES SUPREME COURT BORDER CASE
Rep. Jodey Arrington said his resolution is needed to ensure states can still take action when a Democrat returns to the White House.(Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
“The Constitution, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, forbids states from interfering with the federal government’s monopoly over our territorial sovereignty,” John Yoo, former deputy assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel, said in a statement to Fox News Digital. “But the House of Representatives could make its own findings of fact that failures at the border rose to the level of an ‘imminent danger’ that would justify a state’s exercise of self-defense. Such a set of findings might bolster Texas’s case in the courts as well as its political case to the public. Without such congressional support, Texas is likely to fail.”
In a press release obtained by Fox News Digital, Texas GOP Caucus Chairman Rep. Nathaniel Moran, R-Texas, said “the Framers understood that a state cannot be left at the mercy of a federal government that refuses to do its job when there’s an invasion at its border.”
“That’s why Article I, Section 10 exists — and that’s exactly the situation Texas and our border states faced for four years under the Biden administration. H.Res. 50 affirms what the Constitution already guarantees: states have every right to defend its citizens. The Texas GOP Caucus is united in ensuring that right is recognized and preserved,” he said.
The resolution comes amid a legal battle over Texas Senate Bill 4, a state measure that would allow police officers to arrest migrants suspected of illegally crossing into the U.S. and authorize state judges to order certain migrants to leave the country.
The law is set to take effect next week after a federal appeals court vacated a lower court ruling last month that had blocked enforcement. The appeals court found the plaintiffs in that case did not have standing to sue, but it did not resolve the broader constitutional questions surrounding the law.
S.B. 4 established a state-level crime for illegal entry and authorized state magistrates to order certain individuals to leave the country if they are convicted.
Arrington told Fox News Digital that Texas’ S.B. 4 could soon reach the U.S. Supreme Court as legal challenges continue.
Rep. Nathaniel Moran said states “have every right to defend its citizens.”(Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call/Getty Images)
The Texas Civil Rights Project, the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Texas filed a new lawsuit this week seeking emergency relief to block several provisions of the Texas measure before they take effect May 15.
The groups argue the law is unconstitutional, saying immigration enforcement is exclusively the responsibility of the federal government and that federal law should preempt the state statute.
Cody Wofsy, deputy director of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, argued that S.B. 4 is “cruel and illegal,” adding that the groups “will keep fighting it until it is permanently struck down.”
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“Every court to have reached the merits of laws like S.B. 4 has found them to be unconstitutional,” he said in a statement.
The three groups did not respond to Fox News Digital’s requests for comment on Arrington’s resolution in time for publication.
发表回复