2026-04-30T09:00:50.791Z / 美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）
作者：埃里克·布拉德纳
3小时前发布
发布于2026年4月30日，美国东部时间上午5:00
枪支暴力 枪支管控 唐纳德·特朗普 媒体
查看所有话题
Facebook 推特 电子邮件 链接 Threads
链接已复制！
唐纳德·特朗普总统于4月25日在白宫记者协会晚宴枪击事件后举行的新闻发布会上发表讲话。内森·霍华德/盖蒂图片社
在一名枪手试图在唐纳德·特朗普总统出席白宫记者协会晚宴期间闯入华盛顿希尔顿酒店宴会厅的45年前，另一名未遂刺客曾站在人行道上，在罗纳德·里根总统走出同一家酒店时向其胸部开枪。
地点和共和党总统在场的情况，可能是两者仅有的相似之处。
1981年，枪手约翰·欣克利 Jr. 还枪击了白宫新闻秘书詹姆斯·布雷迪，导致其半身瘫痪。布雷迪后来成为顶尖枪支管控倡导者——1993年《布雷迪手枪暴力预防法案》即以他的名字命名，该法案引入了手枪购买的强制背景调查和等待期。该法案得到了里根的支持，尽管里根终身都是全国步枪协会成员，但他在1991年的演讲中公开支持该法案。
如今，即使在特朗普、副总统JD·万斯以及众多美国高层领导人与华盛顿媒体团共进晚宴的宴会厅附近发生枪击事件，枪支管控辩论很可能仍将停滞不前。共和党人立场坚定，多年来为推动新限制措施而努力的年轻一代感到沮丧，而引发最多讨论的解决方案是为美国精英阶层打造更安全的宴会厅。
周六晚间的枪击事件发生在截然不同的政治环境中——此前数十年，在大规模枪击事件后，人们多次尝试禁止突击步枪和高容量弹匣、扩大枪支购买背景调查范围等，但均以失败告终。这些努力主要由民主党人倡导，大多遭到共和党人反对。
“在我看来，这不是修改法律或加强枪支拥有限制的问题，”代理司法部长托德·布兰奇本周早些时候在接受哥伦比亚广播公司采访时表示，“这是执法人员履职、嫌疑人试图实施袭击但彻底失败的问题。”
布兰奇周三与枪支行业领导人一同宣布，司法部将进一步放宽枪支管控措施，提出一系列新规则，旨在帮助枪支销售商更轻松地遵守法律。布兰奇表示，本届政府正在“削减不必要的繁文缛节，用清晰直白的语言取代混乱，这样普通美国人就不必拥有法律学位就能理解自己的权利”。
枪支辩论中的固化立场
前罗纳德·里根政府白宫新闻秘书詹姆斯·布雷迪于2011年3月30日在一场敦促国会议员在枪支管控立法上取得进展的新闻发布会后离场。乔纳森·恩斯特/路透社/档案照片
布雷迪枪支暴力预防组织（由这位前新闻秘书协助创立）主席克里斯·布朗在采访中表示，全美各地的父母都担心，由于这些立法失败，他们的孩子“每天上学就像参加白宫记者协会晚宴一样危险”。
布朗认为，“即使在充满挑战的环境中，也总能有所作为”。
“看看美国通过的每一项重要联邦枪支法案，都是在骇人听闻的暴力事件之后通过的——在某些情况下，暴力事件还针对的是民选官员，”她说。
2022年，国会批准了近30年来首个重大枪支安全法案《两党更安全社区法案》，该法案是在得克萨斯州乌瓦尔德和纽约州布法罗发生大规模枪击事件后通过的。法案扩大了对21岁以下枪支购买者的背景调查范围，并填补了所谓的“男友漏洞”，即禁止犯有家庭暴力罪的人购买枪支。
但布朗也表示，她“不会对当前的政治环境抱有天真幻想”，并将里根对布雷迪枪支管控倡议的支持与特朗普提议建造白宫宴会厅的做法进行了对比。
“这也需要领导力，”她说。
全国步枪协会立法行动研究所执行主任约翰·科默福德在采访中坚持认为，枪支限制并非解决之道。
当局告诉CNN，涉案枪手携带了一把.38口径半自动手枪和一把12号霰弹枪——这些枪支并未成为近期针对大容量弹匣半自动步枪销售限制立法的目标。
科默福德指出，据官员透露，涉案枪手从加利福尼亚州乘火车前往华盛顿——这两个都是深蓝州。
“这个人住在加利福尼亚州，在该州极其严格的标准下获得了枪支，前往枪支管控同样极其严格的华盛顿特区，然后被我称之为足够的安保措施拦下了，”他说，并赞扬了特勤局的行动。
“他们的安保层级发挥了作用。看监控视频，场面好看吗？不好看。但真实的情况并不好看，”科默福德补充道，“所有人都平安回家，或是能够康复。”
他指出，一些大规模谋杀者在没有枪支的情况下实施了他们的计划——以2025年新年当天新奥尔良的袭击事件为例，一名男子驾驶皮卡车冲撞波旁街的人群，造成14人死亡。
“一心要造成伤害的人总会找到办法造成伤害，”他说。
关于宴会厅的争执
4月28日，白宫上方可见施工起重机。安娜·莫尼迈耶/盖蒂图片社
在周六的枪击事件发生后，几乎没有新的对话讨论预防枪支暴力的方法。
相反，本周在华盛顿，一场关于特朗普提议建造超安全白宫宴会厅的辩论爆发，该宴会厅将实现防弹玻璃窗，由特勤局负责安保。
美国国家历史保护信托基金去年12月提起诉讼，阻止该宴会厅的建造。本月，联邦上诉法院推翻了下级法院对该项目地上施工的禁令，批准特朗普政府继续建造这座总统称可容纳999人的宴会厅。（周六的晚宴约有2600人参加。）
众议院议长迈克·约翰逊周一对记者表示，“显然我们确实需要审视安保措施”。
“这就是我们需要这个宴会厅的原因。确实如此。总统在这一点上是对的。我们需要一个足够安全的场所来举办此类活动，而不必担心重大国家安全问题，”这位路易斯安那州的共和党人说。
众议院少数党领袖、纽约州的哈基姆·杰弗里斯将特朗普提议的宴会厅称为“虚荣项目”，并试图将注意力转向与伊朗的战争。
“我的意思是，显然有很多关于其成本、可容纳人数的问题，”参议院民主党二号人物、伊利诺伊州的迪克·德宾在谈到该宴会厅时说。
特朗普政府官员以及控制参众两院的共和党人表示，他们没有新的意愿通过旨在降低枪支暴力威胁的法律。
国务卿马可·鲁比奥周一在福克斯新闻上表示，有一个人破坏了“华盛顿最重要的活动之一，尤其是总统出席的活动”，这“有点像我们现在生活的世界”。
代际差异
4月25日，在唐纳德·特朗普总统和第一夫人梅拉尼娅·特朗普被紧急带离白宫记者协会晚宴后，宾客们纷纷躲避。埃文·武奇/路透社
周六晚间枪击事件发生时，一些观察人士注意到，华盛顿希尔顿酒店宴会厅里的年轻参会者——那些在学校枪击演练中长大的人——迅速躲到了桌子底下。
“为我们的生命游行”组织执行董事杰克琳·科林表示，参会年轻人的即时反应“并不令人意外”。该组织是在2018年佛罗里达州帕克兰市一所高中发生大规模枪击事件后成立的枪支管控组织，科林当时是该校的一名学生。
“很多年轻人被迫生活在这种警觉状态中，所以当真正有事情发生时，他们的本能会发挥作用，他们知道该怎么做，”她说，“我将此解读为对一种本不该存在的现实的适应。”
近年来的民调显示，约五分之三的美国人支持更严格的枪支法律——年轻美国人在很大程度上与整体民众立场一致。哈佛大学肯尼迪学院政治研究所2023年对18至29岁人群的民调发现，63%的人支持更严格的枪支法律。该民调还发现，40%的人担心自己会成为枪支暴力的受害者。
2012年桑迪胡克小学26人遇害、2018年帕克兰高中17人遇害等大规模枪击事件发生后，人们发起了联邦枪支管控运动，但尽管“为我们的生命游行”等组织进行了游说，这些努力大多以失败告终。
科林表示，1981年里根遇刺未遂事件“被所有人视为完全的震惊，需要做出回应”，而周六晚宴上发生的事情“不过是对一种模式的又一次冷酷认知，根本算不上意外”。
“如今，我们正经历着一种既更频繁、也更致命的模式，但我们的政治体系却更有能力在不付出任何代价的情况下接受这些时刻，”她说。
美国有线电视新闻网的阿里尔·爱德华兹-莱维、詹妮弗·汉斯勒、特德·巴雷特、莎拉·费里斯、马努·拉朱、劳伦·福克斯、里亚内·卢默和埃利斯·金对本文亦有贡献。
White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooting yields debates over security, new ballroom — but not guns
2026-04-30T09:00:50.791Z / CNN
By Eric Bradner
3 hr ago
PUBLISHED Apr 30, 2026, 5:00 AM ET
Gun violence Gun control Donald Trump Media
See all topics
Facebook Tweet Email Link Threads
Link Copied!
President Donald Trump speaks during a press conference at the White House on April 25, after a shooting incident at the White House Correspondents Association Dinner.
Nathan Howard/Getty Images
Forty-five years before a gunman attempted to storm the Washington Hilton’s ballroom during President Donald Trump’s appearance at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, another would-be assassin stood on the sidewalk and shot President Ronald Reagan in the chest as he exited the same hotel.
The location, and the presence of a Republican president, is likely to be where the comparison ends.
In 1981, gunman John Hinckley Jr. also shot White House press secretary James Brady, leaving him partially paralyzed. Brady would go on to become a leading gun control advocate — and the namesake of 1993’s Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, which introduced mandatory background checks and waiting periods for handgun purchases. It was backed by Reagan, who publicly supported the measure in a 1991 speech despite being a lifelong National Rifle Association member.
Today, the gun control debate is likely to remain in neutral, even after a shooting near the ballroom where Trump, Vice President JD Vance and many of the nation’s top leaders were dining with the Washington press corps. The GOP remains entrenched, younger generations who have fought unsuccessfully for new restrictions for years are frustrated and the solution generating the most discussion is a more secure ballroom for the nation’s elite.
The gunfire Saturday night occurred in a much different political climate — after decades of failed attempts to ban assault rifles and high-capacity magazines, expand background checks on gun purchases and more following mass shootings. Those efforts have been championed largely by Democrats and mostly opposed by Republicans.
“This isn’t about, in my mind, changing the law or making the laws more restrictive around possession of firearms,” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said in an interview earlier this week with CBS. “This is about law enforcement who are doing their jobs and a suspect who tried to do something and failed miserably.”
Blanche on Wednesday stood with gun industry leaders as he announced the Justice Department would seek to further roll back gun control measures, proposing a slew of new rules aimed at helping gun sellers more easily abide by the law. Blanche said the administration is “cutting unnecessary red tape, and we are replacing confusion with clear, straightforward language so that everyday Americans don’t need a law degree just to understand their rights.”
Entrenched positions in gun debate
James Brady, former White House Press Secretary under Ronald Reagan, departs after a news conference to urge members of Congress for progress on gun control legislation, March 30, 2011.
Jonathan Ernst/Reuters/File
Kris Brown, the president of Brady, the gun violence prevention organization the former press secretary helped to found, said in an interview that parents across the United States fear that their children “are going to a White House Correspondents’ Dinner every day when they go to school” because of those legislative failures.
Brown argued that “even in challenging circumstances, something can always be done.”
“If you look at every major federal gun law that has passed in America, it’s passed on the heels of horrific violence — and in some cases, against elected officials,” she said.
In 2022, Congress approved the first major gun safety measure in nearly 30 years with the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, which passed in the wake of mass shootings in Uvalde, Texas, and Buffalo, New York. It expanded background checks for gun buyers under age 21 and closed the so-called “boyfriend loophole” that restricts firearms purchases for those convicted of domestic abuse.
But Brown also said she is not “naive about the politics in place at the moment,” and contrasted Reagan’s support for Brady’s gun control push with Trump’s calls for a White House ballroom.
“It also does take leadership,” she said,
John Commerford, the executive director of the National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action, maintained in an interview that gun restrictions are not the solution.
The accused gunman was armed with a .38-caliber semi-automatic pistol and a 12-gauge shotgun, authorities told CNN – firearms that have not been targeted by recent legislative efforts to restrict the sale of semi-automatic rifles with high-capacity magazines.
Commerford noted that, according to officials, the alleged shooter traveled by train to Washington from California – two deep-blue jurisdictions.
“This individual lived in California, acquired firearms under their extremely restrictive standard, traveled to Washington, DC, which has very similar, extremely strict gun control, and then was stopped by what I would call adequate security measures,” he said, praising the Secret Service’s actions.
“Their layer of security worked. Watching the videos, was it pretty? No. But real time isn’t pretty,” Commerford added. “Everyone went home safe or is able to recover.”
He noted that some mass murderers have carried out their plans without firearms — pointing to the 2025 New Year’s Day attack in New Orleans in which a man drove a pickup truck through a crowd on Bourbon Street and killed 14 people.
“An individual hellbent on committing harm is going to find a way to commit harm,” he said.
A fight over ballroom
A construction crane is seen above the White House on April 28.
Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
There were few new conversations about ways to prevent gun violence following Saturday’s gunfire.
Instead, this week in Washington, a debate erupted over Trump’s proposal to build an ultra-secure White House ballroom, where bullets couldn’t pierce windows and the Secret Service would handle security.
The National Trust for Historic Preservation in December sued to block construction of the ballroom. A federal appeals court this month gave the Trump administration the green light to continue construction of what the president has said will be a ballroom that holds 999 people, overturning a lower court that had blocked the above-ground construction of the project. (Roughly 2,600 people attended Saturday’s dinner.)
House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters Monday that “obviously we do need to look at security measures.”
“This is why we need the ballroom. It really is. The president’s right about that. We need a facility that is secure enough to host events like this without having major national security concerns,” the Louisiana Republican said.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York called Trump’s proposed ballroom a “vanity project” and sought to turn attention to the war with Iran.
“I mean, there’s obviously a lot of questions about how much it costs, how many people will be accommodated,” the Senate’s No. 2 Democrat, Dick Durbin of Illinois, said of the ballroom.
Trump administration officials and Republicans who control the House and Senate indicated no new appetite for laws aimed at reducing the threat of gun violence.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Monday on Fox News that one individual disrupting “what is one of the bigger nights in Washington, especially when the president attends” is “kind of the world we live in right now.”
Generational differences
Guests take cover after President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump were rushed out of the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on April 25.
Evan Vucci/Reuters
When the shooting took place Saturday night, some observers noted that younger attendees in the Washington Hilton’s ballroom — people who had grown up with school shooting drills — quickly ducked under tables.
The response by young attendees at the dinner in the moment was “not surprising,” said Jaclyn Corin, the executive director of March For Our Lives — the pro-gun control group founded in the wake of the 2018 mass shooting at a high school in Parkland, Florida, where Corin was a student.
“A lot of young people are forced to live with this alertness, and so when something actually does happen, their instincts take over, and they know what to do,” she said. “And I interpret that as adaptation to a reality that should not exist.”
Polls in recent years have found about three-in-five Americans support stricter gun laws — and young Americans are largely in line with the overall population. A 2023 poll of 18- to 29-year-olds by the Institute of Politics at Harvard Kennedy School found that 63% support stricter gun laws. It also found that 40% said they worried about falling victim to gun violence.
Mass shootings such as the 2012 killing of 26 people at Sandy Hook Elementary School and the 2018 slaying of 17 at a Parkland high school have been followed by campaigns for federal gun control measures, but those have largely failed despite the lobbying efforts of groups like March For Our Lives.
While the 1981 Reagan assassination attempt was a “understood by everyone as a complete shock and something that demanded a response,” what unfolded at Saturday’s dinner “was just another day of grim recognition of a pattern and not surprise at all,” Corin said.
“Today, we are living through a pattern that is both more frequent and also more lethal, and yet our political system has become more capable of absorbing these moments without consequence,” she said.
CNN’s Ariel Edwards-Levy, Jennifer Hansler, Ted Barrett, Sarah Ferris, Manu Raju, Lauren Fox, Riane Lumer and Ellis Kim contributed to this report.
发表回复