2026年4月29日 美国东部时间下午3:37 / 福克斯新闻
作者：格雷格·韦纳
前司法部办公厅主任查德·米泽尔做客《福克斯与朋友们早间版》，讨论詹姆斯·科米再次被起诉的原因，以及针对福奇博士顾问的最新指控。
NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了！
前联邦调查局特别探员、福克斯新闻撰稿人、《两个FBI》一书作者妮可·帕克表示，针对前联邦调查局局长詹姆斯·科米的案件可能很难举证，但检察官“当然有可能”获得有罪判决。
联邦当局指控科米与他们所称的一条威胁总统唐纳德·特朗普的社交媒体帖子有关。
帕克告诉福克斯新闻数字频道，涉及所谓威胁的案件通常很复杂，尤其是当案件依赖解读而非明确语言时，而且在很大程度上取决于调查人员收集的具体事实和证据。
“这类案件可能很难提起指控，”帕克说，“我过去也曾提起过此类指控，确实有可能做出有罪判决。没有人能凌驾于法律之上，有罪判决确实会出现。”
格雷格·贾雷特专栏：奥巴马及其同伙如何炮制特朗普-俄罗斯骗局，以及接下来会发生什么
詹姆斯·科米在Instagram上发布了一张他站在海滩上的照片。（福克斯新闻）
科米周二被起诉两项重罪罪名，涉及2025年5月的一条Instagram帖子，帖子中贝壳被摆成“86 47”的字样，检察官认为这可以被解读为对第47任总统特朗普的威胁。
科米已主动投案并于周三出席联邦法院听证会，他否认有不当行为，并此前将该图片描述为“很酷的贝壳造型”。
帕克表示，在威胁调查中，探员通常会先收集广泛的证据，再将案件提交给检察官，由检察官决定是否有必要提起指控。她补充说，案件并不总是取决于单一证据，检察官在试图证明犯罪意图时，可能会依赖更广泛的信息。
预计对科米的案件将在一定程度上取决于检察官能否证明该社交媒体帖子背后的犯罪意图，这一问题已经引起了法律分析师的关注。
民主党新的“头号敌人”是另一个唐纳德·特朗普
前联邦调查局局长詹姆斯·科米在议员面前发表讲话。（切里斯·梅/盖蒂图片社，资料图）
帕克还指出，案件的审理地点会对案件走向产生重大影响，尤其是在陪审团如何解读证据方面。
她补充说，在高度极化的环境中，审理地点会影响案件的审理结果，这是决定案件最终结果的一个重要因素。
“在一个完美的国家，检方应该能够向全国任何一个陪审团出示证据，并严格根据证据做出裁决，”她说，“比以往任何时候都更重要的是，审理地点确实很重要，因为在我们国家目前的极化状态下——重要的不只是出示了什么证据，而是在哪里出示证据。”
参议员林赛·格雷厄姆专栏：科米领导的FBI在反特朗普运动中调查了我和8名同事
前联邦调查局局长詹姆斯·科米在弗吉尼亚州出庭受审的法庭素描，2025年10月8日。（联邦法院，素描画家达娜·弗库特伦）
此案将在北卡罗来纳州东区审理，该审理地点可能会影响陪审团对证据的评估方式。
曾在FBI工作期间受科米领导的帕克表示，她认为科米与特朗普的过往为这起案件提供了重要背景。
“联邦调查局内部许多人认为，科米自尊心受损，从未摆脱2017年5月在洛杉矶分局出差期间被唐纳德·特朗普总统解雇的事实，”帕克说，“许多人认为科米局长傲慢自大、不可一世。”
格雷格·贾雷特专栏：检察官是否应该因针对特朗普的诉讼战而被起诉？
前联邦调查局局长詹姆斯·科米在参议院情报委员会作证。（切里斯·梅/努罗索 via 盖蒂图片社，资料图）
她补充说，在她看来，作为案件核心的这条社交媒体帖子越过了界限，尤其是考虑到科米曾担任联邦调查局局长一职。
“就在科米发布‘86 47’贝壳Instagram帖子的同一时间段，他在X平台上发布了一则关于其最新悬疑小说即将出版的公告。如果他只是想为自己的书造势，这条帖子就太荒谬了，”帕克说，“前联邦调查局局长本应更清楚这一点。”
“他在起诉书中声称自己对这些指控无罪，但科米似乎从不知道适可而止，”她补充道。
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序
帕克表示，围绕意图和解读的问题在威胁相关案件中很常见，最终将由法院根据全部证据做出裁决。
随着案件推进，科米预计将对指控提出抗辩，这场法律之战可能会考验法院如何解读社交媒体上的言论，以及如何划定受保护言论与刑事威胁之间的界限。
格雷格·韦纳是福克斯新闻数字频道突发新闻记者。
新闻线索和创意可发送至Greg.Wehner@Fox.com，或在Twitter上@GregWehner。
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6394156927112
Former FBI agent says Comey charges hinge on intent evidence and jury interpretation
April 29, 2026 3:37pm EDT / Fox News
By Greg Wehner
Chad Mizelle, former DOJ chief of staff, joined ‘Fox & Friends First’ to discuss why James Comey was indicted again and the latest on charges targeting Dr. Fauci’s advisor.
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
Nicole Parker, a former FBI special agent, Fox News contributor and author of “The Two FBIs,” said the case against former FBI Director James Comey could be difficult to prove, though “certainly possible” for prosecutors to secure a conviction.
Federal authorities have charged Comey in connection with a social media post they say threatened President Donald Trump.
Parker told Fox News Digital that cases involving alleged threats are often complex, particularly when they rely on interpretation rather than explicit language, and depend heavily on the specific facts and evidence gathered by investigators.
“These cases may be difficult to charge,” Parker said. “I have charged them before in the past, and it is certainly possible to come up with guilty verdicts. No one is above the law, and guilty verdicts do come down the pipeline.”
GREGG JARRETT:HOW OBAMA AND CRONIES CREATED TRUMP-RUSSIA HOAX, AND WHAT HAPPENS NEXT
James Comey posted a photo on Instagram showing him standing on a beach.(Fox News)
Comey was indicted Tuesday on two felony counts related to a May 2025 Instagram post showing seashells arranged to form “86 47,” which prosecutors argue could be interpreted as a threat against Trump, the 47th president.
Comey, who self-surrendered and appeared in federal court Wednesday, has denied wrongdoing and previously described the image as a “cool shell formation.”
Parker said that in threat investigations, agents typically gather a wide range of evidence before presenting a case to prosecutors, who then determine whether charges are warranted. She added that cases do not always hinge on a single piece of evidence, and that prosecutors may rely on a broader body of information when attempting to establish intent.
The case against Comey is expected to hinge in part on whether prosecutors can demonstrate intent behind the social media post, an issue that has already drawn scrutiny from legal analysts.
DEMOCRATS’ NEW BOOGEYMAN IS A DIFFERENT KIND OF DONALD TRUMP
Former FBI director James Comey speaks before lawmakers.(Cheriss May/Getty Images, File)
Parker also noted that where a case is tried can play a significant role in how it unfolds, particularly when it comes to how juries interpret evidence.
She added that venue can influence how a case is received, especially in a highly polarized environment, making it an important factor in how cases are ultimately decided.
“In a perfect country, the prosecution should be able to present evidence to any jury nationwide and receive a verdict based strictly on the evidence,” she said. “More than ever before, venue does matter because in this current state of polarization in our nation – it is not just what evidence is presented but where the evidence is presented.”
SEN LINDSEY GRAHAM: COMEY’S FBI INVESTIGATED ME AND 8 COLLEAGUES IN ANTI-TRUMP CRUSADE
Former FBI Director James Comey appears in a courtroom sketch during his arraignment in Virginia, Oct. 8, 2025.(Federal Court, sketch artist Dana Verkouteren)
The case is being brought in the Eastern District of North Carolina, a venue that could factor into how the evidence is evaluated by a jury.
Parker, who worked under Comey during her time at the FBI, said she believes his history with Trump provides important context surrounding the case.
“Many from the bureau believe Comey has a bruised ego and has never gotten over the fact that he was fired in May 2017 by President Donald Trump while on a trip to the Los Angeles Field Office,” Parker said. “Director Comey was perceived by many as arrogant and untouchable.”
GREGG JARRETT: SHOULD PROSECUTORS BE PROSECUTED FOR THEIR LAWFARE CAMPAIGN AGAINST TRUMP?
Former FBI Director James Comey testifies before the Senate Intelligence Committee.(Cheriss May/NurPhoto via Getty Images, File)
She added that, in her view, the social media post at the center of the case crossed a line, particularly given Comey’s former role leading the FBI.
“Around the same time frame of Comey’s ‘86 47’ seashell Instagram post, he posted an announcement on X regarding his latest mystery novel that was coming out. This would have been a ridiculous post if he was simply trying to drum up attention for his book,” Parker said. “A former FBI director should know better than this.”
“He claims innocence regarding these allegations in the indictment, but it seems that Comey never knew when to stop,” she added.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Parker said questions surrounding intent and interpretation are common in threat-related cases and are ultimately decided in court based on the totality of the evidence.
As the case moves forward, Comey is expected to contest the charges, setting up a legal battle that could test how courts interpret statements made on social media and where the line is drawn between protected speech and criminal threats.
Greg Wehner is a breaking news reporter for Fox News Digital.
Story tips and ideas can be sent to Greg.Wehner@Fox.com and on Twitter @GregWehner.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6394156927112
发表回复