德克萨斯州公立学校拟将圣经故事列为必读,引发争议


2026年4月8日 / 美国东部时间早上7:02 / 哥伦比亚广播公司/美联社

根据一项将该州置于美国课堂宗教角色新一轮激烈争论中心的提案,约拿与鲸鱼等圣经故事将成为德克萨斯州公立学校学生的必读内容。

宗教领袖、教师、家长和学生周二在州教育委员会面前就该州540万幼儿园至12年级学生的阅读清单展开了数小时的辩论。这场辩论是美国各地将宗教纳入学校课程的扩大努力的一部分,此类努力大多出现在共和党领导的州,推动了相关立法和法律诉讼。

在全国范围内,特朗普总统已承诺保护并扩大公立学校的宗教表达空间。而作为美国每10名公立学校学生中就有1名就读的红色州,德克萨斯州经常主导教育议程。

德克萨斯州于2023年成为首个允许配备牧师的州。就在去年,一项由共和党推动的要求在公立学校展示十诫的 mandate 正式生效,尽管约有24个学区因诉讼将其拆除。

但尽管围绕德克萨斯州阅读清单的辩论可能具有全国性影响,对发言者而言,问题的核心在于这些段落是否是理解美国历史和道德的关键——或者是否违宪。

“我们的孩子需要真相,”来自德克萨斯州默特尔斯普林斯的牧师、八个孩子的父亲内森·欧文说道。“真相是唯一不会贬值的通货。向我们的孩子灌输真相是我们能为他们做的最有爱的事。这就是真相。这个国家和本州是建立在基督教世界观之上的。不管你喜不喜欢,这都是事实。”

该清单的最终投票预计将于6月举行,如果获得德克萨斯州教育委员会的批准,这些 changes 将从2030年开始生效。

反对提案的理由

哥伦比亚广播公司德克萨斯分社报道称,周二有数十人在委员会作证,其中许多人认为将圣经文本纳入公立学校课程违反了政教分离原则。其他人则表示该清单内容过多,很难在一个学年内完成全部教学,还有人担心这会限制教师选择自有教学材料的权利。

在给哥伦比亚广播公司德克萨斯分社的一份声明中,学校董事会成员蒂芙尼·克拉克表示,拟议的清单缺乏多样性。

休斯顿改革会堂埃曼努埃尔会堂的拉比约什·菲克勒告诉委员会,这份清单“是一种传教工具,在我们的公立学校中没有立足之地。教授宗教和讲授宗教是有区别的,而这份清单将迫使教师越过这条界线。”

来自德克萨斯州登顿市的三个孩子的母亲梅根·博伊登将其描述为对她个人信仰的直接攻击。

“作为一名基督教母亲,教导我们家庭的宗教信仰是我的权利和责任,”她说。“这不是国家的工作,也不应由持有不同信仰的教师来主导。圣经段落的教学会不会与我的信仰相悖?”

“那,”她问道,“非基督教的学生怎么办?”

这份清单源自2023年通过的一项州法律,该法律要求创建一份经州批准的优质教学材料清单。

三年级学生将学习大马士革之路,讲述保罗从早期迫害基督徒者转变为信徒的故事。与此同时,高年级学生将学习《约伯记》,讲述一个人在失去一切后信仰受到考验的故事。

该清单还包括苏斯博士的《戴帽子的猫》等经典作品、关于美国民间英雄丹尼尔·布恩的故事。还有弗雷德里克·道格拉斯和马丁·路德·金等著名非裔美国人的作品,以及一本关于地下铁路著名人物哈丽特·塔布曼的书籍。

倾向共和党的委员会此前批准了一项新的融入圣经内容的课程,供学校在幼儿园至五年级自愿采用。该课程将引入基于圣经的课程,例如黄金法则,并将《创世记》等书籍中的故事带入课堂。虽然采用该课程是自愿的,但实施该课程的学校将获得额外资金。

委员会还在考虑一些社会研究课程标准,这些标准因过于以州为中心、对世界事件关注不足以及充斥着美国例外论暗流而受到批评。标准要求学生“将德克萨斯州旗帜视为德克萨斯州自豪感的象征”,并认可州歌《德克萨斯,我们的德克萨斯》。

学生还应该能够理解关于德克萨斯独立的故事。

课程标准的争论偶尔会出现。多年来,堪萨斯等地的州委员会一直在争论进化论教学是否应该反映对这一成熟科学理论的质疑——并为宇宙复杂性指向智能设计的论点留出空间。

四年级学生的母亲、五年级社会研究教师艾莉森·卡德韦尔敦促委员会重新考虑这些标准。她说,在高中之前,五年级可能是大多数德克萨斯州学生接受美国历史教学的唯一阶段。

“我们必须扪心自问:如果我们不能确保学生真正理解这些基础,我们怎么能期望培养出珍视自由、责任和这个国家建国原则的公民?”她说。

Bible stories would be required reading under controversial proposal for Texas public schools

April 8, 2026 / 7:02 AM EDT / CBS/AP

Biblical stories like Jonah and the whale would be required reading for Texas public schools students under proposals that are putting the state at the center of renewed contentious wrangling over the role of religion in classrooms.

Religious leaders, teachers, parents and students spent hours Tuesday before the state education board arguing about the reading list for the state’s 5.4 million kindergartners to 12th-graders. The debate is part of widening efforts in the U.S. to incorporate religion in schools, mostly in Republican-led states, driving legislation and legal action.

Nationally, President Trump has pledged to protect and expand religious expression in public schools. And Texas, a red state that is home to about one in 10 of the nation’s public school students, often helps set the agenda.

Texas became the first state to allow chaplains, in 2023. And just last year, a Republican-led mandate that the Ten Commandments be displayed in public schools took effect in the state, although around two dozen districts took them down because of a lawsuit.

But while the debate over Texas’ reading list could have national implications, to the speakers, the issue boiled down to whether the passages are essential to understanding the nation’s history and morals – or unconstitutional.

“Our children need truth,” said Nathan Irving, a pastor and father of eight from Myrtle Springs, Texas. “Truth is the only currency that never devalues. Investing truth into our children is the most loving thing that we can do for them. This is the truth. This country and this state were founded upon a Christian worldview. Like it or not, it is true.”

A final vote on the list is expected in June, and if approved by the Texas State Board of Education, the changes would take effect in 2030.

The case against the proposals

CBS News Texas reports that dozens of people testified before the board Tuesday, with many arguing that including Biblical texts in public school curriculums violates the separation of church and state. Others said the list is too extensive and would be difficult to fully teach within a school year, while some raised concerns that it limits teachers’ ability to choose their own materials.

In a statement to CBS News Texas, one school board member, Tiffany Clark, said the proposed list lacks diversity.

Rabbi Josh Fixler, of Congregation Emanu El, a reform synagogue in Houston, told the board the list “is a tool of proselytization that has no place in our public schools. There is a difference between teaching about religion and teaching religion, and this list will force teachers to cross that line.”

Megan Boyden, a mother of three from Denton, Texas, described is as a direct attack on her private faith.

“As a Christian mother, it is my right and responsibility to teach our family’s religion,” she said. “It is not the state’s job to shed through the lens of a teacher who may not share the same beliefs I do. Will Bible passages be taught in conflict with my beliefs?

“What,” she asked, “of non-Christian students?”

The list stems from a state law passed in 2023 that called for the creation of a state-approved list of high-quality materials.

Third graders would learn about the Road to Damascus, which tells the story of Paul’s transformation from an early persecutor of Christians into a follower. Seniors, meanwhile, would learn about the Book of Job, a story about a man whose faith is tested when he looses everything.

The list also includes classics like Dr. Seuss’ “The Cat in the Hat,” stories about the national folk hero Daniel Boone. And there are also works by famous African Americans like Frederick Douglass and Martin Luther King, Jr. and a book about Harriet Tubman of the Underground Railroad fame.

The GOP-leaning board previously approved a new Bible-infused curriculum that is optional for schools to incorporate in kindergarten through fifth grades. It introduces Bible-based lessons, such as the Golden Rule, and stories from books sources such as the Book of Genesis into classrooms. While adopting the curriculum is optional, schools implementing it receive additional funding.

The board also is considering social studies standards that have been criticized as too state-centric, not focused enough on world events and rife with an undercurrent of American exceptionalism. They call for students to “identify the Texas flag as a symbol of Texas pride,” and recognize the state song “Texas, Our Texas.”

Students also are supposed to be able to understand stories about Texas Independence.

Curriculum debates crop up occasionally. Over the years, state boards in places such as Kansas have debated whether the teaching of evolution should reflect doubt about the well-established scientific theory – and leave room for arguments that the universe’s complexity points to an intelligent design.

Allison Cardwell, a mother of a fourth grader and a fifth grade social studies teacher, urged the board to rethink the standards. She said fifth grade would be the only time most Texas students would receive instruction in U.S. history until high school.

“We have to ask ourselves, How can we expect to create citizens who value liberty, responsibility, and the principles this country was founded on, if we don’t ensure that they truly understand those foundations?” she said.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注