2026-06-27T10:06:28.811Z / 路透社
综述
绝大多数接受路透社采访的特朗普支持者都批评了6月14日与伊朗达成的临时协议
- 六名坚定支持特朗普的选民仍预计他会推翻伊朗政府
- 路透社/益普索民调显示，仅四分之一美国人认为伊朗战争是值得付出代价的
6月27日电——唐纳德·特朗普总统与伊朗结束战争的临时协议拉低了他的支持率，并引发了 across 政治光谱的批评——甚至来自他自己的支持者。
路透社自特朗普连任以来每月对2024年投票支持他的18名美国人进行采访，近期的访谈显示，大多数人对该协议持怀疑态度。该协议重新开放了霍尔木兹海峡，临时解除美国对伊朗的石油制裁，并批准设立3000亿美元基金用于伊朗重建。
订阅路透社美国政治简报，获取每周美国政治新闻及国际影响分析。点击此处注册
“我们需要真正削弱伊朗政权，而不是这种‘敲打他们一下就退一步，任由他们重建’的做法，”65岁的特里·阿尔伯塔说道，他是密歇根州的一名飞行员。
总体而言，根据最新的路透社/益普索民调，仅四分之一的美国人认为与伊朗的战争是值得的，多数人担心与德黑兰的休战难以持久。
许多特朗普选民担心，他对伊朗做出的不受欢迎的让步会让共和党更难在11月的中期选举中保住国会控制权。不过，那些对协议批评最激烈的选民，早在战争爆发前就已经对总统失去了信心。该群体中有六人认为，特朗普仍有推翻伊朗政府的计划。
该群体在战争初期大多支持动武，认为美国的空袭必要削弱伊朗的远程导弹库存并摧毁其核计划。
近四个月后，伊朗在政治上变得更加强硬，其许多军事能力仍完好无损，14名受访者批评了6月14日宣布的谅解备忘录的部分内容。大多数人对德黑兰能否信守任何协议表示怀疑，并对向伊朗提供数十亿美元重建资金的前景感到沮丧。
这笔3000亿美元的基金将是一个私人投资工具，而非政府资助计划，不过具体细节尚未公布。
26岁的胡安·里维拉表示，特朗普“此前批评前任与恐怖分子谈判，而他现在基本上在做同样的事。”
特朗普的中期选举背书如今是“死亡之吻”？
里维拉仍计划在中期选举中主要支持共和党候选人。但他表示，最近他在圣地亚哥附近社区为拉美裔选民拉票时，许多同为特朗普支持者的人对总统处理战争问题及其他议题感到非常失望，以至于他们没有动力在11月为共和党投票。
“很多人会说：‘既然总统没有兑现承诺，那我为什么还要投票？’”里维拉回忆道。
当被置评请求时，白宫发言人告诉路透社，特朗普在“战场和谈判桌上的成就堪称非凡，将在未来多年强化美国的安全”。
65岁的史蒂夫·伊根是坦帕市的促销产品经销商，2025年初关税引发的价格上涨影响了他的生意，此后他对特朗普的看法逐渐恶化。从一开始，伊根就对总统发动战争的理由持怀疑态度，并对战争进一步推高汽油和其他商品价格感到不满。
“现在看来，经历这一切似乎并不值得，”他说，并指出推翻政权的既定目标“并未实现”。伊根表示，他对总统的评价现在非常低，以至于在决定中期选举投票人选时，特朗普的背书对他来说会是“死亡之吻”。
37岁的布兰登·诺伊迈斯特是宾夕法尼亚州的一名惩教工作人员，曾是国民警卫队队员。他表示，这场冲突似乎只让石油公司受益。不过，早在战争爆发前，诺伊迈斯特就表示他不太可能在11月投票，因为他对政治感到厌恶。
来自华盛顿州的35岁的罗伯特·比勒普斯对和平协议能否持续持谨慎乐观态度。但他认为，这场战争引发了更多针对美国的敌意，而非让美国更安全。
负责领导美国与伊朗谈判的副总统JD·万斯在他心中的支持率有所下降，比勒普斯表示，他不再对共和党候选人有偏好。到了11月，“不管他们属于哪个党派，只要这次有更好的策略，我就会投票给他们，”他说。
“更大的计划”
尽管特朗普一直坚定地希望结束战争，但他的六名更忠诚的选民表示，希望他仍有秘密计划迫使伊朗屈服。
63岁的凯特·莫特尔是芝加哥郊区市政办公室的秘书，她说“摧毁”德黑兰政权似乎是避免未来冲突的唯一途径。
如果特朗普避免进一步的军事干预，那将“非常令人失望”，莫特尔说，并补充道她相信“这里有一个更大的计划”。
62岁的里奇·索莫拉是北卡罗来纳州的一名工程师，他也认同特朗普可能另有更激进的计划。“我无法想象他会经历这一切却找不到办法除掉那些毛拉，”他说。
然而，根据外交官和分析师的说法，这场战争只会强化伊朗神职统治者的控制。索莫拉说，如果他们再掌权一个月，他就会开始担忧。
在亚利桑那州普雷斯科特，74岁的退休人员乔伊斯·肯尼表示，她支持解除制裁，并认为恢复伊朗与其他国家的贸易能力将确保其领导人信守休战协议。
但重建基金超出了她的接受范围：“这不是我们的责任，”她说。
路透社朱莉娅·哈特报道；杰西·梅斯纳-哈奇、克劳迪娅·帕森斯编辑
Trump’s Iran deal falls short for these voters — and some fear it could cost Republicans the midterm
2026-06-27T10:06:28.811Z / Reuters
Summary
Most Trump voters interviewed by Reuters criticized the June 14 agreement with Iran
- Six who strongly back Trump still expect him to bring down Iran’s government
- Only a quarter of Americans say Iran war was worth the costs, a Reuters/Ipsos poll showed
June 27 – President Donald Trump’s interim agreement to end the war with Iran has dragged down his approval rating and garnered criticism across the political spectrum — even from his own supporters.
Recent interviews with 18 Americans who voted for Trump in 2024, a group that Reuters has interviewed monthly since he returned to office, show that most have doubts about the deal, which has reopened the Strait of Hormuz while temporarily lifting U.S. oil sanctions on Iran and authorizing a $300 billion fund for its reconstruction.
Get weekly news and analysis on U.S. politics and how it matters to the world with the Reuters Politics U.S. newsletter. Sign up here.
“We need to truly weaken the Iranian regime instead of this, ‘beat them up a little bit and then step back and let them rebuild’,” said Terry Alberta, 65, a pilot in Michigan.
Overall, only a quarter of Americans believe the war with Iran was worth the costs, and a majority worry that the truce with Tehran is unlikely to last, according to the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll.
Many of the Trump voters feared his unpopular concessions to Iran would make it harder for Republicans to retain control of Congress in November’s midterm elections, although those most critical of the deal had already begun to lose faith in the president before the war. Six in the group believed he still had plans to bring down the Iranian government.
The group largely supported the war during its early days, believing U.S. strikes were necessary to deplete Iran’s stockpile of long-range missiles and cripple its nuclear program.
Nearly four months later, with Iran politically emboldened and many of its military capabilities still intact, 14 of the voters criticized some aspects of the memorandum of understanding announced on June 14. Most were skeptical that Tehran could be trusted to honor any agreement and dismayed by the prospect of granting it billions of dollars to rebuild.
The $300 billion fund will be a private investment vehicle rather than a government-funded plan, though exact details have not been released.
Juan Rivera, 26, said Trump “criticized his predecessors about negotiating with terrorists, and he’s basically done the same exact thing.”
TRUMP’S MIDTERM ENDORSEMENT NOW ‘KISS OF DEATH’?
Rivera still plans to support mostly Republican candidates in the midterms. But he said that when he volunteered recently to canvass Latino voters in his community near San Diego, many fellow Trump supporters were so disappointed by the president’s handling of the war, among other issues, that they felt unmotivated to back his party in November.
“A lot of people say: ‘Why should I vote when the president’s not doing what he promised?’” Rivera recalled.
Asked for comment, a White House spokesperson told Reuters that Trump’s achievement “on the battlefield and at the negotiating table is nothing short of remarkable and will strengthen American security for many years.”
Steve Egan, 65, a promotional product distributor in Tampa, soured on Trump in early 2025 after tariff-triggered price hikes hurt his business. From the outset, Egan was skeptical of the president’s rationale for the war and upset that it further jacked up the price of gas and other goods.
“Right now it doesn’t seem like it’s been worth it to go through all that,” he said, noting that the stated goal of regime change “didn’t happen.” His opinion of the president is now so low, Egan said, that Trump’s endorsement would be “the kiss of death” for him when deciding which candidates to vote for in the midterms.
Brandon Neumeister, 37, a Pennsylvania state corrections worker and former National Guardsman, said the conflict seemed only to have benefited oil companies. Even before the war, though, Neumeister said he was unlikely to vote in November because he was disgusted with politics.
Robert Billups, 35, of Washington state, was cautiously optimistic the peace deal would hold. But he believed the war had spawned more hostility toward the United States rather than making the country safer.
Vice President JD Vance, tasked with leading U.S. negotiations with Iran, has fallen in his esteem, and Billups said he no longer feels preferential toward Republican candidates. Come November, “whoever has a better strategy this time, I’m gonna vote for them regardless of their party,” he said.
‘A BIGGER PLAN’
Though Trump has been adamant about wanting to end the war, six of his more loyal voters expressed hope that he still had secret plans to bring Iran to heel.
Kate Mottl, 63, a secretary at a municipal office in the Chicago suburbs, said that “destroying” the regime in Tehran seemed like the only way to avert future conflict.
It would be “very disappointing” if Trump refrained from further military intervention, Mottl said, adding that she believed “there’s a bigger plan here.”
Rich Somora, 62, an engineer in North Carolina, agreed that Trump probably had more aggressive plans up his sleeve. “I can’t imagine that he would have gone through all this and not found out a way to get rid of those mullahs,” he said.
According to diplomats and analysts, however, the war has only strengthened the grip of Iran’s clerical rulers. If they remain in power for another month, Somora said, he’ll start to worry.
In Prescott, Arizona, 74-year-old retiree Joyce Kenney said she supported lifting sanctions and believed restoring Iran’s ability to trade with other countries would ensure its leaders honored the truce.
But the reconstruction fund was a bridge too far: “That’s not our responsibility,” she said.
Reporting by Julia Harte; editing by Jesse Mesner-Hage and Claudia Parsons
发表回复