2026年6月24日 / 美国东部时间晚上11:25 / 哥伦比亚广播公司（CBS）新闻
美国参议院周三晚间否决了一项旨在限制特朗普总统对伊朗发动战争权力的议案，这对特朗普和参议院共和党领导层而言是一场胜利，他们正试图平息国会对特朗普政府伊朗战略的不满。
这项程序性动议以50票赞成、47票反对的结果未能通过。两名共和党议员——参议员苏珊·柯林斯和丽莎·穆尔科斯基——投票支持推进民主党参议员蒂姆·凯恩提出的该决议，与大多数民主党议员立场一致。共和党参议员兰德·保罗投了弃权票，民主党参议员约翰·费特曼投了反对票。
就在一天前，四名共和党议员投票支持众议院通过的另一项限制特朗普战争权力的决议，使该决议以微弱优势通过。这四名共和党议员在上个月的一次程序性投票中也曾投票支持推进凯恩的决议——这是七次尝试失败后，伊朗战争权力决议首次在参议院获得推进。
凯恩的决议原本将要求特朗普“将美国武装部队从针对伊朗的敌对行动中撤出”，除非得到国会授权。该决议若在参众两院通过，将需要总统签署；而周二通过的决议则不同，不会提交总统签署。
由于即便该决议通过，特朗普也很可能会否决它，因此凯恩决议的实际影响尚不明确。特朗普政府还辩称，自美伊双方达成停火协议以来，美国已不再与伊朗处于敌对状态。此外，该政府表示，他们认为1973年《战争权力决议》——这部法律为国会制衡总统使用军事权力设立了程序——本身是违宪的。
尽管如此，特朗普仍在公开和私下场合对战争权力投票表达不满，辩称国会的批评破坏了他与伊朗谈判的努力。
正如哥伦比亚广播公司此前报道的，这些不满情绪在周三早些时候爆发，特朗普在与参议院共和党人的一场紧张的午餐会议上表达了不满。其间，总统严厉要求曾投票支持周二战争权力决议的路易斯安那州共和党参议员比尔·卡西迪坐下。会议结束后，卡西迪告诉记者，“[特朗普]提高了嗓门”，“我也动了怒”。
不过，当天晚些时候有迹象显示，一些此前曾投票限制特朗普战争权力的参议院共和党议员正在重新考虑。
卡西迪在X平台上证实，他在白宫听取了副总统J·D·万斯和特别特使史蒂夫·威科夫关于伊朗问题的简报，并写道，此次对话“解决了我的诸多担忧”。卡西迪在周三晚间的程序性投票中投了反对票。
而兰德·保罗尽管此前曾多次投票支持伊朗战争权力决议，但此次投了弃权票。他在X平台上表示，他的目标是“给总统更多空间和筹码，以谈判达成持久和平”。
“我对战争与行政权力辩论的看法并未改变，我也曾多次投出那样的票，”他说，“但既然敌对行动似乎已经结束，且总统要求我考虑他的谈判立场，我会照做。”
一位知情人士告诉哥伦比亚广播公司，参议院多数党党鞭、怀俄明州共和党议员约翰·巴拉索在与一些关键共和党议员的沟通中“促成了此事”。
此次投票拉锯发生在特朗普与伊朗签署谅解备忘录之后，该备忘录将两国停火协议延长60天，并启动有关伊朗核计划的谈判，旨在结束一场民调显示大多数美国人认为不值得付出代价的战争。
Senate rejects measure to restrict Trump’s Iran war powers as key Republicans shift votes
June 24, 2026 / 11:25 PM EDT / CBS News
The Senate late Wednesday rejected a measure aimed at restricting President Trump’s power to wage war against Iran, in a victory for the president and Senate GOP leadership as they seek to quell congressional discontent with the Trump administration’s Iran strategy.
The procedural motion failed in a 50 to 47 vote, with two Republicans — Sens. Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski — voting in favor of advancing the resolution by Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine, siding with most Democrats. Republican Sen. Rand Paul voted present, and Democratic Sen. John Fetterman voted no.
Just one day earlier, four Republicans voted yes on a separate House-passed resolution to restrict Mr. Trump’s war powers, allowing it to narrowly pass. Those same four GOP lawmakers had voted to advance the Kaine resolution in an earlier procedural vote last month — the first time an Iran war powers resolution had moved forward in the Senate after seven failed attempts.
Kaine’s resolution would have directed Mr. Trump to “remove the United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Iran,” unless authorized by Congress. It would have required the president’s signature if it had passed the House and Senate, unlike Tuesday’s resolution, which will not go to the president’s desk.
The Kaine resolution’s practical impact was unclear since the president would likely have vetoed the measure even if it passed. The Trump administration has also argued the U.S. is no longer engaged in hostilities with Iran since the two sides entered into a ceasefire. And the administration has said it believes the 1973 War Powers Resolution — the law that set up a process for Congress to push back on presidential uses of military force — is itself unconstitutional.
Still, Mr. Trump has publicly and privately vented about the war powers votes, arguing the rebukes from Congress have undermined his efforts to negotiate with Iran.
Those frustrations boiled over earlier Wednesday, when Mr. Trump expressed his discontent during a testy lunch meeting with Senate Republicans, CBS News previously reported. At one point, the president sternly told Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana — who had voted in favor of Tuesday’s war powers resolution — to sit down. Cassidy told reporters after the meeting that “[Mr. Trump] raised his voice” and “I lost my temper.”
Later in the day, however, signs emerged that some of the Senate Republicans who had previously voted to constrain Mr. Trump’s war powers were reconsidering.
Cassidy was briefed on Iran at the White House by Vice President JD Vance and special envoy Steve Witkoff, the senator confirmed on X, writing that the conversation “address[ed] many of my concerns.” Cassidy voted against advancing the resolution Wednesday night.
And Paul voted present on Wednesday, despite voting in favor of the last several Iran war powers resolutions. He said on X his goal was to “give the President more space and leverage to negotiate a lasting peace.”
“My opinion on the debate over war and executive power has not changed and I have voted that way several times,” he said. “But since hostilities seem to be over and the President asked me to give consideration to his negotiating position, I will do so.”
Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, a Wyoming Republican, helped “seal the deal” in conversations with some key GOP members, a person familiar with the matter told CBS News.
The back and forth comes after Mr. Trump signed a memorandum of understanding with Iran to extend the two countries’ ceasefire for 60 days and launch talks on Iran’s nuclear program, aiming to wrap up a war that polling shows most Americans do not believe was worth the cost.
发表回复