新闻


文字记录:参议员马克·华纳做客《与玛格丽特·布伦南直面全国》节目,2026年6月14日

2026-06-14T12:13:00-0400 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

以下是弗吉尼亚州民主党参议员马克·华纳的采访文字记录,该采访于2026年6月14日在《与玛格丽特·布伦南直面全国》节目中播出。

*
*
*

玛格丽特·布伦南: 我们现在邀请到了情报委员会民主党最高级别成员、弗吉尼亚州参议员马克·华纳。很高兴您能来到这里。

参议员马克·华纳: 谢谢你,玛格丽特。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 正如你从国务卿那里听到的,很多非常重要的细节仍有待谈判。不过,你对正在成形的停火协议有何看法?毕竟你一直支持外交手段。

参议员沃纳: 听着,如果总统能宣布胜利,那就这样吧。你听过皮特·赫格塞思的说法了。我们来看看真实情况。在唐纳德·特朗普发起的这场选择之战打响107天后,有谁能说我们或是我们的盟友比战争爆发前处境更好了?该政权的领导层比以往任何时候都更加激进。我认为,我们要把浓缩铀运出去,就需要地面部队,但我认为美国民众不会愿意这么做。所谓再给60天时间进行谈判,这能带来什么结果?60天后我们还是在这里,还是无法进入相关区域。很明显,赫格塞思说“我们已经摧毁了他们所有的作战能力”之后,他们仍有大量导弹和数千架无人机,而且霍尔木兹海峡会奇迹般重新开放的想法简直是天方夜谭。看看汽油价格吧,已经从2.80美元涨到了4.20美元,我认为还会继续上涨,因为全球整体储备都在下降。这对美国或是我们的盟友有什么好处?

玛格丽特·布伦南: 没错,正如我所说,这里面有很多细节仍有待谈判。而我们也要看看国会在部分撤销这些制裁方面能发挥什么作用,这在奥巴马政府时期就极具争议。你认为最终由史蒂夫·威特科夫、贾里德·库什纳以及副总统JD·万斯敲定的协议会提交国会批准吗?国会有发言权吗?

参议员沃纳: 首先,这三位先生几乎没有谈判或是核谈判技术层面的背景,却要和已经周旋了数十年的强硬伊朗谈判团队交锋。我也希望我们能有一些专家参与谈判,但我不确定这项协议会不会提交国会,而它理应被提交。我的意思是,如果总统想要发动这场这场选择之战,而伊朗当时并没有迫在眉睫的威胁,那他就应该来到国会,来到民众面前,阐明理由。但他没有这么做,我们也没有履行应有的监督职责。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 没错。

参议员沃纳: 我们正慢慢争取到越来越多共和党议员站出来反对《战争权力法案》,但国会的表现糟糕透顶。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 我——在继续其他话题之前,我想明确一点:美国的情报评估并非伊朗正在制造核武器,而是他们未来有可能制造核武器。考虑到他们现有的核原料、沙漠中的脏弹情况,这仍然让你担忧吗?美国民众应该有多担心?

参议员沃纳: 是的,我仍然感到担忧。尽管他百般批评《联合全面行动计划》,但当时我们有国际观察员,我们实际上拥有包括欧洲在内的盟友联盟,俄罗斯和中国也都是签署国。现在只有美国单独行动,或是只和以色列联手,这并不会让我们更安全。再说一次,如果伊朗在未来60天内交出浓缩铀,我会很高兴再来节目上收回我之前的话。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 没错,我们会关注后续进展。我想问问你关于国内监控以及关键权限失效的问题。周四,总统宣布任命杰伊·克莱顿——他说克莱顿将成为下一任国家情报总监——取代比尔·普尔特,我知道你反对普尔特——

参议员沃纳: 不仅我反对——

玛格丽特·布伦南: 没错——

参议员沃纳: 所有懂国家安全的共和党参议员也都反对。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 是的,有不少措辞激烈的表态,但克莱顿是现任纽约南区联邦检察官,前美国证券交易委员会主席。他能多快上任?我的意思是,他不一定具备——

(插话)

参议员沃纳: 他有执法背景,曾担任证交会主席,还担任过纽约南区检察官——我们在那里打击了大量恐怖分子。我认识杰伊,我认为他性情合适。但我有很多疑问,比如2020年大选是谁赢了,至少他承认了事实真相。但记住,玛格丽特,这完全是唐纳德·特朗普造成的。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 嗯——

参议员沃纳: 他本可以在一周前就提名杰伊·克莱顿——

玛格丽特·布伦南: 没错。

参议员沃纳: ——我们就不会陷入监控权限中断的局面了。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 这一系列事件非同寻常,我们需要在广告结束后花更多时间讨论。先说到这里,我们马上回来。

(广告时段)

玛格丽特·布伦南: 欢迎回到《直面全国》。我们继续和参议员马克·华纳的对话。广告休息前,参议员,我们正在讨论下一任国家情报总监的人选。杰伊·克莱顿的听证会定于下周,也就是本周三举行,对吗?他能多快获得确认?这会如何阻止比尔·普尔特接任该职位?

参议员沃纳: 嗯,我有一些问题要问杰伊,比如,要确保他会维护选举的公正性,不会像图尔西·加巴德那样,在富尔顿县扣押选票,干预国内选举活动。我希望如果我们能获得一致同意,甚至可以在本周确认他的任命。我希望总统能告诉图尔西·加巴德——她会任职到本月底——至少留任到克莱顿获得确认,或是让二号人物留任。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 这对你来说是个令人意外的表态,因为你一直是图尔西·加巴德的严厉批评者。

(插话)

参议员沃纳: 我确实严厉批评过她。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 比尔·普尔特在短短几天内会造成多大的破坏?

参议员沃纳: 嗯,我担心的倒不是他在第702条款上造成的破坏,该条款有完整的审计追踪。如果他滥用职权,我们会查出来,但如果他连所有国家机密项目的安全许可都没有,出于无知,他可能会泄露信息。我们的情报机构负责人已经告诉我们,他们非常害怕向他透露信息。外国政府也表达了极大的担忧。我们对比尔·普尔特有一点很了解:他会不折不扣地按照唐纳德·特朗普的指示行事。他曾擅自利用私人抵押贷款保险信息,要是让他掌控18家情报机构,那将是一场灾难,也是国家安全威胁。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 所以,你的意思是你会否决重新授权《外国情报监控法》的投票?

参议员沃纳: 听着,我们必须重新授权《外国情报监控法》。我们原本进展顺利——

(插话)

玛格丽特·布伦南: 这是一项无证监控工具,针对的是境外外国人。

参议员沃纳: 针对的是境外外国人之间的通话监听。这一切本不会发生,只要唐纳德·特朗普——他直到大约六周前才公开支持这项工具。如果他在六周前就提名克莱顿或是其他合适的人选,如果他哪怕早几天提名杰伊·克莱顿。我实际上认为唐纳德·特朗普希望这项工具过期,因为如果真的发生什么不幸的事,他就可以把责任推给民主党人。而不同寻常的是,通常我们上节目都是民主党和共和党互相对立——

玛格丽特·布伦南: 没错。

参议员沃纳: ——这次不一样。我的共和党同事们也齐心协力。如果真的发生什么不幸的事,责任全在一个人身上:唐纳德·特朗普。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 你认为总统实际上希望这项工具无法使用,这是一个非常大胆的表态。国会授权已于周五到期。你的共和党同僚、参议员汤姆·科顿称,考虑到美国目前的各类大规模集会,后果会很严重,甚至可能致命。美国目前有多脆弱?谷歌、威瑞森等公司有没有表示,如果你要求他们提供信息,他们不会配合?

参议员沃纳: 已经启动的调查会继续进行。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 好的。

参议员沃纳: 我们继续监听境外恐怖分子之间通话的能力还在。问题在于能否启动新的监控行动,而我们现在正处于这个阶段。我还没收到报告,不知道电信公司和谷歌等企业是否会继续配合,或者因为没有赔偿,他们会不会停止合作。截至周日上午,我还没有得到这方面的答案。我希望司法部会动用一切所能的工具,鼓励他们继续配合这个项目,毕竟无论我们现在是否愿意,这都只是短期的权限中断。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 但民主党人正在利用《外国情报监控法》的授权来施压,迫使总统更换提名人选。他也确实这么做了,那为什么还有民主党人站出来,比如,甚至阻挠短期监控工具的授权一致同意程序?这似乎会带来巨大的国家安全风险。

参议员沃纳: 国家安全风险之所以出现,是因为唐纳德·特朗普直到最后一刻才提名克莱顿或是其他合适的人选。毫无疑问,在座的任何一位共和党同僚都会同意,这是白宫造成的问题。终于有人说服特朗普:“你必须任命一个理性的人,而不是那个连国家安全许可都没有的家伙。”我希望能尽快确认克莱顿的任命。之后我们会迅速推动《外国情报监控法》的重新授权。在此期间,我希望电信公司能继续配合政府。

玛格丽特·布伦南: 参议员马克·华纳,感谢你今天抽出时间。

参议员沃纳: 谢谢你,玛格丽特。

Transcript: Sen. Mark Warner on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” June 14, 2026

2026-06-14T12:13:00-0400 / CBS News

The following is the transcript of the interview with Sen. Mark Warner, Demcorat of Virginia, that aired on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” on June 14, 2026.

*
*
*

MARGARET BRENNAN: We’re joined now by the top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, Virginia Senator Mark Warner. It’s good to have you here.

SENATOR MARK WARNER: Thank you, Margaret.

MARGARET BRENNAN: As you heard from the Secretary, a lot of these very important details have to still be negotiated. What do you think, though, of the emerging ceasefire and agreement, because you favored diplomacy?

SEN. WARNER: Listen, if the President can declare victory, so be it. You heard Pete Hegseth’s pitch. Let’s look at the real facts. 107 days into Donald Trump’s war of choice, can anyone make the case that we, or our allies, are in a better spot than before this war? The regime’s leadership is more radical than ever. The ability for us to get the enriched uranium out, I believe, will require troops on the ground, which I don’t think America wants to do. The idea that we have a 60 day additional negotiation, where does that lead? We’ll be here 60 days, still won’t have access to it. Clearly, after Hegseth had said, “We’ve destroyed all their capabilities,” they still have plenty of missiles and thousands of drones, and the idea that the strait is suddenly going to be magically reopened. Look at the gas prices, they went from $2.80 to $4.20 and I believe they’ll go up more because the overall world reserves have all come down. How is that better for America or better for our allies?

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, it’s- there are a lot of details in here that, like I said, still have to be negotiated, and when we look at Congress’s role in terms of peeling back some of these sanctions, this was hugely controversial during the Obama administration. Do you think ultimately that whatever is hammered out by Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and JD Vance, the Vice President, will come up for approval? Do you get any say?

SEN. WARNER: Well, first of all, the idea that these three gentlemen that have very little background in terms of negotiations or the technical nature of nuclear negotiations going against a hardened Iranian team that’s been doing this for decades. I wish we had some of our experts at the table as well, but I’m not sure any of this will be coming before Congress, and it should. I mean, if the President wanted to start this war, a war of choice, there was no imminent threat from Iran. Come to the Congress, come to the people, and lay out the case. He has not, and we have not done the kind of oversight that is required.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

SEN. WARNER: We are slowly moving along and getting additional Republicans to say stop on the War Powers Act, but Congress has failed miserably.

MARGARET BRENNAN: I- before I move on to other things, I just want to put a fine point on the U.S. intelligence assessment was not that Iran was creating a nuclear weapon, but that they wanted the possibility to make one in the future. Given what they have, the nuclear dust, the dirty bomb in the desert scenario, does that still worry you? How concerned should Americans be?

SEN. WARNER: Yes, I’m still worried. And for all his critique of JCPOA, we had international observers, we actually had an alliance there that included the Europeans, and Russia and China were all signatories. Now it is America going alone or going with Israel only, and that does not make us safer. And again, I will be happy to come back on the show and eat my words if the Iranians over the next 60 days give up that enriched uranium.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah, well, we’ll watch for whatever happens next. I want to ask you about surveillance here and the lapse of a key authority. On Thursday, the President did appoint Jay Clayton, he said, who will be the next Director of National Intelligence, instead of Bill Pulte, to who I know you oppose–

SEN. WARNER: Not only I oppose–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah–

SEN. WARNER: –but all of the Republican senators who will know anything about national security opposed as well.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yes, there are some pretty colorful statements, but Clayton is the current US attorney for the Southern District of New York, a former SEC chair. How quickly can he move into the role? I mean, he doesn’t necessarily have the kind of extensive national security background that–

(CROSSTALK)

SEN. WARNER: Law enforcement, he was head of the SEC, and as Southern District of New York, that’s where we pursue a lot of our terrorists. I know Jay. I think he’s got the right temperament. I’ve got a lot of questions, like who won the election in 2020, so he at least acknowledges that truthfulness. But remember, Margaret, this was totally caused by Donald Trump.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well–

SEN. WARNER: He could have nominated Jay Clayton a week ago–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

SEN. WARNER: –and we wouldn’t have gone dark.

MARGARET BRENNAN: This is an extraordinary series of events that we have to take more time to talk about on the other side of the break. Let me take it, and we’ll finish it. We’ll be right back.

(ANNOUNCEMENTS)

MARGARET BRENNAN: Welcome back to Face the Nation. We return to our conversation now with Senator Mark Warner. Before the break, Senator, we were talking about the next Director of National Intelligence. The hearing for Jay Clayton is next week, this Wednesday, right? How quickly can he get confirmed, and what does that do in terms of blocking Bill Pulte from ever taking the job?

SEN. WARNER: Well, I’ve got questions for Jay, like, want to make sure that he’s going to maintain the integrity of our elections, not try to pull the things that Miss Gabbard did, where she was interfering in domestic election activities with the seizure of the ballots in Fulton County. My hope is, if we can get unanimous consent, we could even get him confirmed this week. I would hope that the President would then say to Tulsi Gabbard, who is going to stay till the end of the month, stay at least until Clayton is confirmed, or allow the number two to stay.

MARGARET BRENNAN: That’s a shocking statement from you, because you are a huge critic of Tulsi Gabbard.

(CROSSTALK)

SEN. WARNER: I am a huge critic.

MARGARET BRENNAN: How much damage could Bill Pulte actually do in a matter of days?

SEN. WARNER: Well, my fear is not so much the damage he could do on Section 702, which has a full audit trail. If he misuses that, we’ll figure it out, but having him exposed where he doesn’t even have a security clearance to all our nation’s classified programs, out of ignorance, he might give away information. I’ve had heads of our intelligence communities say to us they’re terrified of showing him information. I’ve had foreign governments express huge concern. The one thing we know about Bill Pulte is he will do whatever Donald Trump says. He was able to weaponize private mortgage insurance information, giving them the keys to the 18 intelligence agencies would be a disaster and a national security threat.

MARGARET BRENNAN: So, I’m understanding you will withhold your vote to reauthorize FISA based on this.

SEN. WARNER: Listen, we have to get FISA reauthorized. We were on a glide path–

(CROSSTALK)

MARGARET BRENNAN: This is a warrantless surveillance tool. This is a foreigner concern abroad.

SEN. WARNER: Foreigners listening in on foreigners talking to foreigners abroad. None of this needed to happen if Donald Trump had- he didn’t even come out in support of this tool until about six weeks ago. If he put forward Clayton or somebody else six weeks ago, if he would have done even Jay Clayton a few days earlier. I actually think Donald Trump wants this tool to expire because he would then try to blame Democrats if, God forbid, if anything happens. And the remarkable thing on this is normally we come on here and it’s Democrats versus Republicans–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.

SEN. WARNER: –this one is not. My Republican colleagues have worked hand in glove. If there is something that happens, God forbid, the responsibility lies with one man, Donald Trump.

MARGARET BRENNAN: That is a tremendous statement that you think the president actually wants this tool to not be accessible. I mean, it’s the congressional authorization expired on Friday. Your Republican counterpart, Senator Tom Cotton, described the consequences as severe, potentially fatal, considering all the mass gatherings in America right now. How vulnerable is the US right now? Have Google and Verizon and the rest said, if you come and ask me for information, I won’t hand it over?

SEN. WARNER: What has happened is those investigations that have already started continue.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay.

SEN. WARNER: Our ability to continue to listen to bad guys talking to bad guys abroad continues. The question is whether you can start new actions, and we are now, and I’ve not gotten a report yet whether the telcos and the Googles are going to continue to adhere or whether, because they don’t have the indemnification, they’ll stop participating. We don’t have, I don’t- as of Sunday morning, I don’t have an answer on that. I hope the Justice Department would use all the tools they can to try to encourage them to continue this program, for what will be, whether we like it now or not, a short-term lapse.

MARGARET BRENNAN: But Democrats are using their leverage here with FISA to force the president to change his nominees. He did that, so why do we have a Democrat standing up, and for example, blocking unanimous consent in regard to reauthorizing even a short-term surveillance too? This seems to be national security risk of huge proportion.

SEN. WARNER: National security risk caused because Donald Trump did not put forward Clayton or anyone else that was legitimate until the clock had run out. There is no question. If you got any of my Republican colleagues here, they would agree this was a White House-created problem. And finally, somebody got to Trump and said, “You got to put a rational person in, not this guy who’s not even got a national security clearance.” We will get Clayton, I hope, confirmed as quickly as possible. We will then move very quickly to get FISA reauthorized. In the interim, I hope the telcos will continue to cooperate with the government.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Senator Mark Warner, thank you for your time today.

SEN. WARNER: Thank you, Margaret.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注