2026-06-10T21:52:48.440Z / 美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）
- 唐纳德·特朗普总统多次对美国民众在伊朗战争中承受的经济痛苦和军事伤亡发表言论，被批评者称为冷漠无情。
- 最近一次，在伊朗战争推高通胀率突破4%之际，特朗普称“我喜欢通胀”。
- 他还称油价上涨“不值一提”，并表示在与伊朗谈判时不会考虑美国民众的财务状况。
周二上午，伊朗在停火期间击落一架美国陆军阿帕奇直升机后，特朗普对《华尔街日报》表示，这“没什么大不了的”。大约24小时后，针对通胀率三年来首次突破4%，他回应称“我喜欢通胀”。
这一连串轻率言论典型体现了特朗普处理美国民众对伊朗战争和经济担忧时日益麻木不仁的态度。
近几个月来，特朗普多次没有对民众日益加剧的担忧表示共情，反而假装他们的痛苦不存在——甚至声称那实际上是好事。
如今他已积累了一系列拙劣不堪的言论。
以下是其中一些最突出的例子，按其冷漠程度以及对特朗普所在政党在11月中期选举前可能造成的政治麻烦程度进行排名。
特朗普向来难以得体地谈论美军士兵的牺牲，如今他亲自将美军派往战场，情况更是如此。
伊朗战争首次有三名美军阵亡的消息传出后，特朗普立刻将死亡人数纳入成本收益分析。
“我们有三人阵亡，但我们预料到会有伤亡，”特朗普对NBC新闻表示，“但最终，这对全世界来说都将是一笔划算的交易。”
在随后的一段视频中，特朗普似乎即兴谈到了阵亡士兵，称“战争就是这样”，并赌定会有更多人员伤亡。
民主党人迅速抨击了这番言论。
特朗普偶尔会辩称油价上涨其实是好事，因为美国的石油产量更高。
“美国绝对是全球最大石油生产国，所以油价上涨时，我们能赚很多钱，”特朗普今年3月在社交媒体上写道。
当然，确实有部分人会从中获益。但绝大多数美国人并不从事石油行业，因此油价上涨对他们来说是一项负担。
去年，特朗普多次暗示，那些因关税上涨而生活成本上升的美国人可以少给孩子买玩偶和/或铅笔。
“也许孩子们会有两个玩偶，而不是30个，你懂的，”他在2025年4月说道。
后来他还就铅笔问题提出了类似观点。
“你知道，你可以放弃某些产品，”他说，“你可以不用铅笔，因为根据对华政策，你知道每个孩子都能拿到37支铅笔。他们其实只需要一两支。”
特朗普的民粹主义政治运动本应旨在帮助工人阶级，对抗财阀、大亨以及每年在瑞士达沃斯召开经济会议的全球主义者群体。
但今年1月，在国内经济困境显著之际，他却在达沃斯向在场人士吹嘘自己的政策让他们变得更加富有。
“我甚至都不会问你们现在过得怎么样，”特朗普对一群企业CEO说道，“仿佛每个人都赚得盆满钵满。”
他补充道：“我们为你们搭建了一个平台，让你们真正能够施展才华。”
他还向众人讲述了人们用新获得的财富进行不必要消费的故事。
不管你信不信，阿帕奇直升机被击落事件并非特朗普在所谓停火期间至少口头上对伊朗军事行动不屑一顾的唯一一次。
上周伊朗袭击了美国在科威特和巴林的军事基地以及科威特机场后，特朗普称这“没什么大不了的”，并将其驳斥为合理的报复性打击。
（特朗普经常淡化伊朗可能违反停火协议的行为，显然是希望维持停战状态并达成协议，尽管美国已于周二对伊朗发动袭击，并誓言周三将进一步打击伊朗。）
上个月，特朗普将油价上涨斥为“不值一提”。
“这简直不值一提，”特朗普对记者说，“感谢大家暂时忍耐一下。不会太久的。”
路透社-益普索最近的一项民调显示，近三分之二的美国人表示，油价上涨至少“有点”影响到了他们家庭的财务状况。
尤其是在去年，特朗普多次将民众对经济负担能力的担忧称为“骗局”或“诡计”。
“这就是个骗术，”特朗普某次说道，“我认为经济负担能力是史上最大的骗局。”
人们往往很难理解特朗普的真实意图，但他似乎是在暗示民主党人夸大了这一问题。不过民调显示，绝大多数美国人都认为经济负担能力确实是个问题——特朗普却对此置之不理。
特朗普有时还暗示，经济负担能力是个刚被造出来的概念，或者说他之前从未听说过这个词。尽管他在2024年竞选期间曾承诺要提高民众的经济负担能力。
这描绘出了一位不重视该问题的总统形象。民调显示，三分之二到四分之三的美国人认为特朗普确实如此。
可以肯定的是，特朗普的此番新言论将在2026年中期选举前受到大量关注。
当被问及三年来最高的通胀率——这场通胀由伊朗战争导致的能源成本上涨推动——时，特朗普回击称“数据表现很棒”。
https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/09/world/live-news/iran-war-trump-israel#cmq8b6fzn00003b6u2ssrjwsv
特朗普：“我喜欢通胀”
唐纳德·特朗普总统在椭圆形办公室发表讲话时称“我喜欢通胀”，对伊朗战争推高的通胀飙升置之不理，称“数据表现很棒”，并补充道，在年度通胀率达到三年来新高的新数据公布后，“我喜欢它”。
0:52 • 消息来源：CNN
特朗普：“我喜欢通胀”
0:52
“我喜欢它，”他谈到新数据时说道，“我喜欢通胀。”
特朗普或许会辩称，他并不是说通胀本身是好事。他更像是在辩称这些数据在某种程度上是积极的。他辩称战争结束后通胀就会大幅下降。
但这是一个相当荒谬的论调——制造出了一个极具压倒性的轻蔑式舆论片段。他可以辩称通胀是暂时的，但几乎没人会认为4.2%的通胀率实际上是好事，或是他们会“喜欢”的东西。
这仍位居榜首，因为它太过直言不讳，且直接反映了特朗普背弃了其此前的民粹主义立场。
上个月，有人问特朗普，美国民众对伊朗战争造成的经济损失的担忧，在多大程度上推动了他推动和平协议的努力。
他回应称，这“一点都没有”推动他。
“我谈论伊朗时唯一在意的事，就是他们不能拥有核武器，”特朗普说，“我不会考虑美国民众的财务状况。我什么都不会考虑，我只考虑一件事：我们绝不能让伊朗拥有核武器。仅此而已。”
有人可能会辩称，这至少在达成协议方面是与伊朗谈判的正确姿态——透露缺乏决心会损害你的谈判筹码。
但特朗普的表述方式过于无情。
Trump’s most tone-deaf comments on Iran and the economy, ranked
2026-06-10T21:52:48.440Z / CNN
- President Donald Trump has repeatedly dismissed Americans’ economic pain and military casualties from the Iran war with comments critics call insensitive.
- Most recently, Trump said “I love the inflation” as it surged above 4%, driven by the war in Iran.
- He’s also said the increase in gas prices is “peanuts” and that he doesn’t think about Americans’ financial situation when negotiating with Iran.
On Tuesday morning, President Donald Trump responded to Iran downing a US Army Apache helicopter during a ceasefire by telling the Wall Street Journal that it “wasn’t a big deal.” About 24 hours later, he responded to inflation surging above 4% for the first time in three years by saying, “I love the inflation.”
The one-two punch of flippant comments epitomizes Trump’s increasingly tone-deaf approach to addressing Americans’ concerns about the Iran war and the economy.
Repeatedly in recent months, Trump has responded to Americans’ growing concerns not with empathy, but by pretending their pain didn’t exist — or that it was actually good.
And he’s now assembled a remarkable list of ham-fisted comments.
Below are some of the most prominent examples, ranked by how insensitive they were and how politically troubling they could be for Trump’s party ahead of November’s midterms.
Trump has often struggled to speak tactfully about the sacrifices of American troops, and that’s surely the case now that he’s personally sent them to war.
After the first three deaths in the Iran war were reported, Trump immediately seemed to insert the deaths into a cost-benefit analysis.
“We have three, but we expect casualties,” Trump told NBC News. “But in the end, it’s going to be a great deal for the world.”
In a later video, Trump seemed to ad-lib while talking about the deaths, saying, “That’s the way it is,” and wagering there would be more deaths.
Democrats quickly pilloried him for the quote.
Trump has occasionally suggested that rising oil prices are actually good because the US is producing more of it.
“The United States is the largest Oil Producer in the World, by far, so when oil prices go up, we make a lot of money,” Trump said on social media back in March.
Of course, certain people will benefit. But the vast majority of Americans don’t work in the oil industry, and thus the rising prices are a burden.
Trump last year repeatedly suggested that Americans dealing with rising prices in part due to tariffs could simply buy their children fewer dolls and/or pencils.
“Maybe the children will have two dolls instead of 30 dolls, you know,” he said in April 2025.
Trump later made a similar argument about pencils.
“You know, you can give up certain products,” he said. “You can give up pencils, because under the China policy, you know every child can get 37 pencils. They only need one or two.”
Trump’s populist political movement is supposed to be about helping the working class and pushing back on the moneyed interests, the fat cats and the globalist crowd that gathers for an annual economic conference in Davos, Switzerland.
But there he was in Davos in January, amid significant economic pains back home, bragging about his policies were enriching those assembled.
“I don’t even ask anybody how you’re doing now,” Trump told a gathering of CEOs. “It’s like everybody is making so much money.”
He added that “we’ve given you a platform where you can really put your genius to work.”
Trump also regaled them with stories about people making frivolous purchases with their newfound wealth.
Believe it or not, the incident with an Apache helicopter wasn’t the only time Trump has shrugged off, rhetorically at least, military action with Iran during the supposed ceasefire.
After Iran targeted US bases in Kuwait and Bahrain and Kuwait’s airport last week, Trump called it “not a big deal” and dismissed it as a legitimate retaliatory strike.
(Trump has frequently downplayed potential Iranian ceasefire violations, apparently in hopes of keeping the truce going and cutting a deal, although the US attacked Iran on Tuesday and he’s vowed further attacks Wednesday.)
Last month, Trump dismissed the increase in gas prices as “peanuts.”
“This is peanuts,” Trump told reporters. “I appreciate everybody putting up with it for a little while. It won’t be much longer.”
A recent Reuters-Ipsos poll showed nearly two-thirds of Americans said the increase in gas prices had affected their households’ finances at least “somewhat.”
Last year especially, Trump repeatedly pitched the concept of affordability as a “hoax” or a “scam.”
“It’s a con job,” Trump said at one point. “I think affordability is the greatest con job.”
It was often difficult to grasp Trump’s meaning, but he seemed to be suggesting Democrats were exaggerating the problem. Polls show Americans overwhelmingly believe affordability is a problem, though — and that Trump has neglected the issue.
Trump also at times suggested affordability was a concept that had just been created, or that he had never heard the term before. This despite him having campaigned on making things more affordable in 2024.
It paints a picture of a president not taking the issue seriously. And polling shows between two-thirds and three-quarters of Americans think Trump hasn’t.
You can bet Trump’s new comment will get plenty of attention going into the 2026 midterm elections.
When asked Wednesday about the highest inflation in three years — inflation spurred by rising energy costs due to the Iran war — Trump shot back that the “the numbers were great.”
https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/09/world/live-news/iran-war-trump-israel#cmq8b6fzn00003b6u2ssrjwsv
Trump: ‘I love the inflation’
President Donald Trump said “I love the inflation,” in remarks from the Oval Office, brushing off a spike in inflation driven by his war in Iran, saying that “the numbers were great,” adding, “I love it,” of the new data that showed annual inflation hitting a three-year high.
0:52 • Source: CNN
Trump: ‘I love the inflation’
0:52
“I love it,” he said of new data. “I love the inflation.”
Trump might argue he wasn’t saying that inflation itself is good. It more seemed that he was arguing the data was somehow good. He argued that inflation would shoot down once the war was over.
But it was a pretty nonsensical argument — one that created an overwhelmingly dismissive soundbite. He could argue inflation is temporary, but almost nobody would say 4.2% inflation is actually good or something they “love.”
This still ranks at the top, because of how blunt it was and how directly it speaks to Trump’s abandonment of his former populism.
Trump was asked last month how much Americans’ concerns about the economic toll of the Iran war were motivating his push for a peace deal.
He responded that they motivated him “not even a little bit.”
“The only thing that matters when I’m talking about Iran [is] they can’t have a nuclear weapon,” Trump said. “I don’t think about Americans’ financial situation. I don’t think about anybody. I think about one thing: We cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon. That’s all.”
One could argue that this is the right negotiating posture to have with Iran, at least when it comes to getting a deal — that telegraphing a lack of resolve hurts your leverage.
But the way Trump said it was brutal.
发表回复