2026-06-09T21:27:24.632Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/09/politics/house-passes-ice-border-patrol-funding-trump
- 众议院共和党人周二通过一项700亿美元的移民执法法案,结束了党内长达数月的内部分歧。
- 部分共和党人曾试图在法案中加入禁令,叫停特朗普备受争议的18亿美元“反武器化”基金,但最终未能纳入这项立法提案。
- 尽管政府官员多次推动,法案仍未包含特朗普白宫舞厅翻新项目的拨款。
AI生成的摘要已由CNN编辑审核。
众议院共和党人周二将一项700亿美元的移民执法法案送交总统唐纳德·特朗普签署,这场持续数月的争斗暴露了共和党内部的重大裂痕。
此举将为国土安全部——尤其是美国移民及海关执法局(ICE)和美国海关与边境保护局——在特朗普第二任期剩余时间内提供全额资金支持。今年春季,在联邦特工在明尼苏达州枪杀两名美国公民后,民主党成功阻止国会为ICE或边境巡逻拨款一分钱,共和党随后将这项法案作为春季立法首要议程。
但推进过程并不顺利。共和党两大领导层曾多次就政府停摆策略爆发激烈分歧。由于共和党议员反对特朗普提出的司法部和解基金,法案险些在参议院胎死腹中,批评人士称该基金将成为特朗普盟友的“ slush fund(黑金基金)”。周二最终投票前,众议院也出现戏剧性场面:尽管众议院席位微弱多数的共和党内部存在反对声音,强硬派议员仍要求党领袖承诺推进一项严格的移民镇压法案。
众议院以214票对212票的党派立场投票通过该法案,加利福尼亚州无党派众议员凯文·凯利投下反对票。
凯利表示,他之所以未与共和党团投票支持该法案,是因为法案未对联邦移民执法设置限制,且法案通过的程序存在问题。
“我们没有看到:随身摄像头、培训、身份核查、进入住宅的司法令状,以及学校周边非执法区的规定,”他说,“我认为绝大多数美国人都支持这些举措。”
凯利还指出,议员们未采用正常的拨款程序审批这笔开支,而是借助了名为预算协调的变通手段。“目前国会的两极分化已达到历史最高水平,我认为这会让情况变得更糟,”他说。
尽管最近几周国会山越来越多的普通共和党议员倒戈,法案最终还是获得通过。数月的谈判和紧张局势凸显了共和党多数席位的脆弱性,当前议员们因总统支持率低迷而愈发担忧自己的政治前途。
最终,特朗普几乎获得了最初寻求的所有目标。共和党在未对该机构进行任何新改革或监督的情况下批准了ICE的拨款,该机构在致命枪击事件后已遭到严格审查。
“这项法案打破了民主党对ICE和CBP拨款的垄断,”加利福尼亚州共和党众议员汤姆·麦克林托克在众议院发言时表示。
共和党最终未通过任何取消总统“反武器化”基金的议案,党内成员曾警告该基金可能会向在2021年1月6日国会山骚乱中袭击警察的暴乱者发放赔偿。代理司法部长托德·布兰奇已告知议员,该基金不会推进,但部分参议院共和党人仍试图将该基金禁令纳入立法。
华盛顿州众议员普拉米拉·贾亚帕尔是长期的移民权利活动家,她指责共和党在通过这项法案时“毫无保障措施”,同时向ICE额外拨款700亿美元。
“有700亿美元,我们本可以解决美国的无家可归问题,”肯塔基州民主党众议员摩根·麦加维说,“几乎任何事情都比把这笔钱交给ICE要好。”
一项被放弃的特朗普优先事项:他推动的10亿美元白宫安全升级计划,其中包括2亿美元用于东翼舞厅翻新项目。
参议院共和党最初的法案文本包含近10亿美元用于“安全调整和升级”,用于白宫舞厅项目以及今年春季白宫记者晚宴枪击事件后的其他安保资金。政府官员曾试图澄清,仅约2亿美元将用于东翼项目,其余资金将用于其他安保工作。但多名参议院共和党议员反对该计划,参议院规则仲裁员也否决了这项提案。
两院最终通过前的数小时出现了重大戏剧性场面,共和党持不同意见者寻求法案的最后时刻承诺。
在参议院,多名共和党议员最初因反对特朗普的“反武器化”基金而搁置法案,但最终还是表态支持并投了赞成票。最终仅有阿拉斯加州参议员丽莎·穆尔科斯基投下反对票。
在众议院,十多名共和党强硬派议员在周二的关键程序性投票中暂缓投票,以进行最后一搏争取让步。但他们最终也表示支持。
据两名知情人士透露,强硬派议员曾搁置这项700亿美元法案的所有众议院议事进程,以争取单独就他们自己的强硬移民政策法案进行投票。
目前尚不清楚他们是否争取到了推进该移民镇压法案的承诺——该法案如果真的进行 floor vote(全院投票),几乎肯定会失败。
本文已更新补充更多细节。
Republicans send $70 billion in ICE and border patrol funding to Trump’s desk
2026-06-09T21:27:24.632Z / https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/09/politics/house-passes-ice-border-patrol-funding-trump
- House Republicans passed a $70 billion immigration enforcement package Tuesday after months of internal party conflict.
- Some Republicans sought to enact a prohibition on Trump’s controversial $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund, but that ultimately did not make it into the legislative package.
- The package also does not include funding for Trump’s White House ballroom project, despite a push from administration officials.
AI-generated summary was reviewed by a CNN editor.
House Republicans on Tuesday sent a $70 billion immigration enforcement package to President Donald Trump’s desk, ending a months-long fight that exposed major cracks in the party.
The move will now fully fund the Department of Homeland Security — specifically, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement and US Customs and Border Protection funding — for the rest of Trump’s second term. Republicans made the measure their top legislative priority this spring, after Democrats successfully blocked Congress from approving a single dollar for ICE or border patrol after federal agents killed two US citizens in Minnesota.
But the push wasn’t easy. The top two GOP leaders were at times sharply at odds over shutdown strategy. The package nearly collapsed in the Senate because of Republican opposition to Trump’s push for a Justice Department settlement fund that critics say would act as a slush fund for his allies. Ahead of the final vote Tuesday, the bill ran into drama in the House as hardliners demanded that party leaders promise to take up a strict immigration crackdown bill — despite GOP opposition inside the narrowly divided House.
The House passed the bill by a 214-212 party-line vote, with independent Rep. Kevin Kiley of California voting against it.
Kiley cited the lack of limits on federal immigration enforcement and the process taken to pass the bill as part of his decision to note vote with with GOP conference on the package.
“We didn’t see that: body cameras, training, identification, judicial warrants to enter homes, not enforcement zones around schools,” he said. “I think the vast majority of Americans support this.”
And, Kiley noted, instead of relying on the normal appropriations process to approve the spending, lawmakers relied on a workaround called budget reconciliation. “Polarization in Congress is at an all-time high right now, and I think that this is going to make things worse,” he said.
The bill’s final passage comes despite a growing number of rank-and-file defections on Capitol Hill in recent weeks. Those months of negotiation — and tension — underscored the frailty of the Republican majorities, at a time when lawmakers are increasingly worried about their political futures amid the president’s approval ratings.
Ultimately, Trump is getting nearly everything he had initially sought. Republicans are approving the ICE money without any new reforms or oversight for an agency that’s drawn heavy scrutiny in the wake of the fatal shootings.
“This bill breaks the Democrats’ stranglehold over ICE and CBP funding,” GOP Rep. Tom McClintock of California said on the House floor.
Republicans in the end did not pass any measures to kill the president’s “anti-weaponization” fund, which members of his party warned could grant payouts to rioters who attacked police officers during the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche has told lawmakers that the fund would not move forward, but some Senate Republicans had still sought to enact a prohibition on the fund as part of the legislation.
Rep. Pramila Jayapal of Washington, a long-time immigration rights activist, accused Republicans of passing the bill with “no guardrails” — while throwing $70 billion more to ICE.
“With $70 billion, we could end homelessness in America,” said Democratic Rep. Morgan McGarvey of Kentucky. “Just about anything would be better than giving it to ICE.”
One major Trump priority that was dropped: His push for $1 billion in security upgrades for the White House, including $200 million for his East Wing ballroom project.
The Senate GOP’s initial text included nearly $1 billion for “security adjustments and upgrades” to the White House ballroom project, as well as other pots of security money after the White House Correspondent’s dinner shooting this spring. Administration officials had sought to clarify that only about $200 million would go toward the East Wing project, with the rest going toward other security efforts. But a number of Senate Republicans balked at the plan, which was also ruled against by the chamber’s rules’ referee.
The final hours ahead of passage in both chambers saw significant drama as Republicans hold-outs sought last-minute promises on the package.
In the Senate, multiple GOP senators initially held up the package over opposition to Trump’s “anti-weaponization” fund — but ultimately fell in line and voted for the bill. In the end, only Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska voted against it.
In the House, more than a dozen GOP hardliners withheld their votes for a key procedural vote on Tuesday as they made a last-ditch push to secure concessions. But they, too, ultimately fell in line.
The hardliners had stalled all House floor action on the $70 billion bill in an effort to secure a separate vote on their own hardline immigration policy bill, according to two people familiar with the discussions.
It’s unclear if they secured that promise to bring up the immigration crackdown bill — which would almost certainly fail if it ever came up for a floor vote.
This story has been updated with additional details.
发表回复