2026年6月9日 / 美国东部时间下午3:59 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
华盛顿讯——民主党人指责特朗普总统在续签一项关键间谍授权的谈判中“扔出一枚手榴弹”,这项名为《外国情报监控法》第702条的法案将于周五到期。
两党国会议员都对特朗普任命住房监管官员比尔·普尔特尔担任代理国家情报总监的决定提出批评。普尔特尔同时还领导联邦住房金融局,在国家安全和情报事务方面缺乏相关经验。
就在民主党警告称只要普尔特尔继续负责国家情报机构,他们就不会支持续签第702条,而一些共和党人也因各种其他原因反对延长该法案之际,众议院议长迈克·约翰逊于周二上午与特朗普总统就该法案的续签举行了会谈。
“议长今天不在这里的原因之一是他正在白宫与总统合作,敲定《外国情报监控法》的相关协议,”众议院多数党领袖、路易斯安那州共和党人史蒂夫·斯卡利斯周二在众议院共和党领导人每周新闻发布会上表示。
一位知情人士透露,约翰逊计划与特朗普讨论普尔特尔的任命问题。但约翰逊回到国会大厦后几乎没有透露谈话内容。
“我不会讨论我们讨论过的任何内容,”这位路易斯安那州共和党人说道。
参议院多数党领袖、南达科他州共和党人约翰·图恩周二上午对记者表示,他认为政府正在“认真考虑为该职位任命长期人选”,与此同时共和党领导人正努力打破《外国情报监控法》续签谈判的僵局,并补充称他希望这项任命能尽快敲定。参议院共和党二号议员、怀俄明州参议员约翰·巴拉索周二表示,白宫始终明确表示普尔特尔不会担任全职提名人选,而共和党领导人已敦促总统任命一名将通过确认程序的永久提名者。
共和党领导人需要两党民主党议员的投票才能通过该法案。
众议院少数党领袖、纽约州民主党人哈基姆·杰弗里斯周一表示,早在特朗普宣布提名接替即将离任的国家情报总监图尔西·加巴德的人选之前,续签这项允许美国政府无需搜查令即可收集境外非公民通讯信息的法律就已经面临挑战。
“在特朗普宣布任命比尔·普尔特尔之前,相关谈判就已经处于非常敏感的阶段。然后唐纳德·特朗普就像他经常做的那样,通过提拔比尔·普尔特尔担任国家情报总监,向这些敏感的谈判扔出了一枚手榴弹,”杰弗里斯说道。
他呼吁“立即撤销”这一任命,并补充称,只要普尔特尔仍在任,他就绝不会支持延长这项监控授权。
上周,参议院少数党领袖查克·舒默抨击这一提名,不仅因为普尔特尔缺乏国家安全经验,还因为他“有滥用职权攻击特朗普政治对手的记录”。这位纽约州民主党人表示,“这一任命宣布的时机再糟糕不过了”。
“这一任命及其宣布时机显然让《外国情报监控法》的续签变得更加困难,”舒默说道。
在周末写给同时担任特朗普国家安全顾问的国务卿马可·卢比奥的一封信中,参议院情报委员会和参议院司法委员会的共和党主席指责民主党同行“放弃”了将第702条续签三年的协议。上周参议院民主党人投票反对推进《外国情报监控法》续签,另有7名共和党议员加入了他们的行列。
“我们相信这项妥协方案本可以在参议院获得近70票支持,在众议院也有不错的通过前景,”阿肯色州共和党参议员汤姆·科顿和爱荷华州共和党参议员查克·格拉斯利写道。
他们要求卢比奥“确定所有美国可能失去宝贵情报信息的情报目标”,并“确定其他合法且符合宪法的情报收集方法,使美国能够继续收集针对这些个人的情报”。他们还呼吁白宫“在必要时”起草一项行政命令,“以弥补法案到期后留下的情报缺口”。
卢比奥在回复中表示,允许这项监控授权到期将对国家安全产生“灾难性影响”。他敦促民主党人在“为时已晚之前”将“党派政治”搁置一旁。
参议院情报委员会民主党最高领导人、弗吉尼亚州参议员马克·华纳周日对美国有线电视新闻网表示,“要说服民主党人”将是一条“非常艰难的道路”,并表示特朗普的决定是“自作自受”。
“他为什么要在续签日期前10天,用这种有争议的任命扔出一枚活手榴弹?”华纳说道,质疑特朗普是否真的希望该法案获得续签。
众议院情报委员会民主党最高领导人、康涅狄格州众议员吉姆·希姆斯此前曾敦促同事支持此前的续签提案,他周一表示,参议院的妥协方案本可以比众议院4月通过的三年期延期法案获得更多民主党支持。众议院通过的延期法案有42名民主党议员投了赞成票,但因纳入了一项阻止美联储创建中央银行数字货币的无关条款而在参议院受阻。
“这是一个巨大的错失机会,因为参议院的法案实际上比众议院的法案有更强的保障措施,”希姆斯说道,并补充称普尔特尔的任命将众议院民主党对延期法案的支持票数削减至“最多个位数”。
希姆斯表示,如果普尔特尔继续担任代理总监,他很可能会投票反对延期。
“比尔·普尔特尔在华盛顿的唯一目标就是促进总统的政治利益,”希姆斯说道。“正确的做法是白宫今晚宣布比尔·普尔特尔不会担任国家情报总监,这样我们就能以更多民主党支持和更广泛的两党投票通过第702条法案。”
普尔特尔已向司法部提交了多份刑事举报,指控包括纽约州总检察长莱蒂蒂亚·詹姆斯、加利福尼亚州民主党参议员亚当·希夫、美联储理事丽莎·库克以及前加利福尼亚州民主党众议员埃里克·斯沃韦尔在内的多名特朗普政治对手存在抵押贷款欺诈行为。
曾多次与特朗普意见不合的内布拉斯加州共和党众议员唐·培根也表示,总统应该改变主意。
针对培根的这一要求,约翰逊周一对记者表示:“我不认为这是通过《外国情报监控法》的必要条件。”
“任何将这两件事联系起来的人都是在玩火,”约翰逊周一说道。
已有少数参议院共和党人表达了对普尔特尔担任情报职务的反对,理由是他缺乏相关经验,以及他发起针对特朗普政治对手的调查。北卡罗来纳州参议员汤姆·蒂利斯称普尔特尔是“最糟糕的马屁精”,并表示他“会损害总统的政治遗产”。
当被问及周一特朗普是否应该撤回普尔特尔的代理国家情报总监任命时,德克萨斯州共和党参议员约翰·科恩表示总统有选择权。
“如果他想让第702条法案获得续签,这听起来就是他们会要求的代价,”科恩说道,他最近在初选中被特朗普支持的挑战者击败。
他补充称,普尔特尔“显然不具备”担任该职位的资格。
妮科尔·基利翁、帕特里克·马奎尔、塞吉·山下、贾拉·布朗、詹妮弗·雅各布斯、艾伦·何和奥利维亚·加齐斯对本文亦有贡献。
Key spy power on verge of lapsing after Trump appoints Bill Pulte as intelligence chief
June 9, 2026 / 3:59 PM EDT / CBS News
Washington — Democrats have accused President Trump of throwing a grenade into negotiations to renew a key spy authority — known as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act — set to expire Friday.
Members of Congress in both parties have been critical of Mr. Trump’s decision to appoint housing regulator Bill Pulte as acting director of national intelligence. Pulte, who also leads the Federal Housing Finance Agency, lacks experience in national security and intelligence matters.
As Democrats warned that they’d withhold their support for reauthorizing Section 702 as long as Pulte remains in the role overseeing the nation’s intelligence agencies and some Republicans opposed an extension for various other reasons, House Speaker Mike Johnson met with President Trump on Tuesday morning about the law’s renewal.
“One of the reasons that the speaker’s not here right now is that he’s over at the White House working with the president to finalize this agreement on FISA,” House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, a Louisiana Republican, said Tuesday at House GOP leaders’ weekly news conference.
A source familiar with the meeting said Johnson planned to discuss Pulte with Mr. Trump. But Johnson disclosed little about the conversation when he returned to the Capitol.
“I’m not going to talk about anything we discussed,” the Louisiana Republican said.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, told reporters Tuesday morning that he thinks the administration is “weighing seriously making a long-term pick” for the post as GOP leaders work to break the deadlock on FISA reauthorization — adding that he hopes it comes sooner, rather than later. And Sen. John Barrasso of Wyoming, the No. 2 Senate Republican, said Tuesday that the White House has been consistent in saying that Pulte won’t be the full-time nominee, and GOP leaders have encouraged the president to name a permanent nominee who would go through the confirmation process.
GOP leaders will need votes from Democrats in both chambers for passage.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a New York Democrat, said Monday that there were already challenges in renewing the law, which allows the U.S. government to collect the communications of noncitizens abroad without a warrant, even before Mr. Trump announced his pick to replace outgoing Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.
“The negotiations prior to Trump’s announcement with respect to Bill Pulte were already in a very sensitive place. And then Donald Trump, as he often does, tosses a hand grenade into those sensitive negotiations by elevating Bill Pulte as a director of national intelligence,” Jeffries said.
He called for the appointment to be “reversed immediately” and added that there is no scenario in which he would support an extension of the surveillance authority with Pulte still in place.
Last week, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer railed against the pick for not just for his lack of national security experience, but also his “record of abusing his office to attack Trump’s political enemies.” The New York Democrat said “the timing of this announcement could not be worse.”
“This announcement and its timing clearly make passing an extension of FISA much harder,” Schumer said.
In a letter over the weekend to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who also serves as Mr. Trump’s national security adviser, the Republican chairmen of the Senate Intelligence Committee and Senate Judiciary Committee accused their Democratic counterparts of “walking away” from an agreement to extend Section 702 for three years. Senate Democrats voted against moving forward with a FISA extension last week, joined by seven Republicans.
“We believe this compromise would’ve received nearly seventy votes in the Senate and had a promising path in the House of Representatives,” Republican Sens. Tom Cotton of Arkansas and Chuck Grassley of Iowa wrote.
They asked Rubio to “identify all intelligence targets on which the United States may lose valuable intelligence information,” and “determine alternative lawful and constitutional intelligence-collection methods by which the United States could continue collecting intelligence on these individuals.” They also called on the White House, “if necessary,” to draft an executive order “to remedy the gap left by the lapse.”
Rubio wrote in response that allowing the surveillance authority to lapse would have “dire impacts” on national security. He urged Democrats to put “partisan politics” aside “before it is too late.”
Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, told CNN on Sunday that it will be a “very uphill path to convince Democrats” and said Mr. Trump’s decision was “self-inflicted harm.”
“Why would he throw a live hand grenade with this kind of controversial pick 10 days before its renewal date?” Warner said, questioning whether Mr. Trump wants the law to be reauthorized.
Rep. Jim Himes of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, who urged his colleagues to support prior extensions, said Monday that the Senate compromise could have secured more Democratic support than the three-year extension the House passed in April. The House-passed extension, which had 42 Democrats voting in favor, stalled in the Senate over the inclusion of an unrelated measure that prevented the Federal Reserve from creating a central bank digital currency.
“It’s a huge lost opportunity because the Senate bill had actually stronger safeguards than the House bill did,” Himes said, adding that Pulte’s appointment reduces potential Democratic votes in the House down to “single digits at best.”
Himes said he would likely vote against an extension if Pulte remains as acting director.
“Bill Pulte’s sole objective here in Washington is to promote the president’s political interests,” Himes said. “The right thing to do is for the White House to say tonight that Bill Pulte will not be DNI, and we pass 702 probably with more Democrats and a stronger bipartisan vote.”
Pulte has issued several criminal referrals to the Justice Department alleging mortgage fraud by a number of Mr. Trump’s political foes, including New York Attorney General Letitia James, Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff of California, Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook and former Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell of California.
Republican Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska, who at times has been at odds with Mr. Trump, also said the president should reverse course.
Responding to Bacon’s request, Johnson told reporters Monday, “I don’t think that’s a necessary requirement of passing FISA.”
“Anybody that equates those two things is just playing with a dangerous situation,” Johnson said Monday.
A handful of Senate Republicans have also expressed opposition to Pulte’s intelligence role over his lack of experience, along with his efforts to launch probes into Mr. Trump’s political enemies. Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina referred to Pulte as “the worst form of sycophant” and said he would “hurt the president’s legacy.”
Asked Monday whether Mr. Trump should withdraw Pulte as acting DNI, GOP Sen. John Cornyn of Texas said the president has a choice.
“If he wants to get 702 reauthorization passed, that sounds like the price that they’re going to demand,” said Cornyn, who was recently defeated in his primary by a Trump-backed challenger.
He added that Pulte “has no obvious qualification” for the job.
Nikole Killion, Patrick Maguire, Seiji Yamashita, Jaala Brown, Jennifer Jacobs, Alan He and Olivia Gazis contributed to this report.
发表回复