DOJ debunks social media claim of discrepancy in LA mayor voting count

2026-06-06 19:54:59 UTC / CNN

DOJ debunks social media claim of discrepancy in LA mayor voting count

By Kaanita Iyer

5 min ago

PUBLISHED Jun 6, 2026, 3:54 PM ET

Assistant US Attorney for the Central District of California Bill Essayli attends a news conference to discuss fraud prevention on January 9, 2026, in Los Angeles, California.

Patrick T. Fallon/AFP/Getty Images

A Los Angeles-based Justice Department official late Friday debunked a baseless claim of a discrepancy in the vote count of the city’s mayoral race that has circulated on social media.

The claim, which has been pushed by several right-wing figures on X, including billionaire Elon Musk, alleges a vote-count update on election night showed that Republican candidate Spencer Pratt received zero new votes.

First Assistant US Attorney Bill Essayli — an appointee of President Donald Trump who leads the Los Angeles-based US attorney’s office — addressed the conspiracy theory on Friday.

“There was a claim circulating on social media about an election night ballot update at the Los Angeles Registrar of Voters where one candidate received zero votes,” Essayli wrote. “We reviewed official county records. The claim is false. Each candidate received votes in every update.”

Several accounts posted a claim on social media suggesting there was election fraud in the race, alleging there was a vote count update in which Republican mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt received zero votes.

Pratt, a former reality TV star, ran against incumbent Mayor Karen Bass and City Councilwoman Nithya Raman, who are both Democrats, in Tuesday night’s nonpartisan primary election. CNN has projected that Bass will advance to the November general election but has yet to call whether she will face off against Pratt or Raman as votes continue to be counted.

A spokesperson for The Associated Press, which publishes vote counts in real time based on reports from election officials, told CNN in a statement that “there was a lag in an automated update such that some candidates’ votes were added in one update and the other candidates followed about a minute later.”

Pratt was in the second batch of candidates, the AP said, which means the vote counts were slightly delayed and, therefore, initially showed him appearing to gain zero additional votes in one of the updates that came in while two other leading candidates received thousands of votes.

“Exactly one minute later, the electronic update picked up the votes for another group of candidates including Spencer Pratt. Taken together, the updates included 21,870 votes for Pratt, 12,850 votes for Bass and 9,521 votes for Raman, along with votes for other candidates,” the AP spokesperson said.

CNN has reached out to the Los Angeles County clerk’s office for comment.

The conspiracy theory around the mayor’s race comes as the Trump administration continues to push false claims about election fraud in the US. Trump still baselessly alleges that the 2020 election, which he lost to former President Joe Biden, was rigged.

This week, Trump claimed repeatedly, without evidence, that the slow pace of the count from Tuesday’s primary was a sign of Democratic “cheating.” The Justice Department then sent one of its attorneys to observe ballot processing in Los Angeles, the county’s election office told CNN.

Earlier Friday, Essayli also alleged, “There is evidence of election fraud in California,” adding that “investigations are underway.”

California has long had a reputation for being slow to report the results. That’s because a significant number of the total votes come in as mail ballots are dropped off on Election Day, according to the California Voter Foundation, a nonprofit organization that seeks to improve the election process.

Under state law, mail ballots can be received at local election offices up to seven days after the election, as long as they are postmarked on or before Election Day. And officials must verify ballots before they can be counted. It’s typical for mail ballots counted in the days after the election to lean Democratic.