2026年6月5日 / 美国东部时间下午1:53 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
作者：卡米洛·蒙托亚-加尔韦斯 移民记者
卡米洛·蒙托亚-加尔韦斯是哥伦比亚广播公司新闻的移民记者，他的报道被多档节目和平台采用，包括全国广播节目、哥伦比亚广播公司新闻24小时频道、CBSNews.com以及该机构的社交媒体账号。
阅读完整简历
罗德岛州一名联邦法官于周五叫停了特朗普政府的一系列措施，这些措施曾阻止联邦官员向美国境内的许多移民提供庇护、绿卡及其他合法移民福利。
在一份长达135页的判决意见中，罗德岛州美国地区法院首席法官约翰·麦康奈尔认定，这些对合法移民福利的大范围限制具有专断和任意性，违反联邦法律。
麦康奈尔宣布无效的政策之一，是暂停所有来自特朗普所谓“旅行禁令”名单上39个国家公民提交的合法移民申请。该旅行禁令限制来自这些国家的公民入境，美国政府称这些国家的国民难以进行 properly screen（妥善背景审查）。
特朗普政府于去年末以国家安全为由出台了这些措施，此前华盛顿特区发生了两名国民警卫队成员遭枪击事件。一名2021年被带到美国、并于2025年获得庇护的阿富汗男子被控实施了这起枪击案。
数月来，这项暂停令基本禁止美国公民及移民服务局（USCIS）的官员向受影响国家的公民发放绿卡、工作许可、美国公民身份及其他福利，这些国家大多位于非洲和亚洲。
最初，这些政策还包括完全暂停美国公民及移民服务局负责的数十万件庇护案件，无论申请人的国籍为何。今年3月，美国公民及移民服务局部分解除了庇护申请暂停令，恢复处理大多数国籍申请人的庇护申请，但“旅行禁令”名单上39个国家的公民除外。
在判决中，麦康奈尔指出，被他认定为非法的政策所波及的移民“提交了相应的文书、缴纳了规定的申请费、按要求采集了生物识别信息，并参加了必要的面对面面谈”。
麦康奈尔称：“在出台最新移民政策时，美国公民及移民服务局：声称拥有其并不具备的法定和监管权限；作出决定却未提供必须具备的合理解释；无视申请人依赖利益，而这些利益本应被纳入考量；并以‘国家安全’作为借口，这一借口掩盖了反移民情绪，而这种情绪是禁止影响其决策的。”
美国国土安全部总法律顾问詹姆斯·珀西瓦尔在发给哥伦比亚广播公司新闻的一份声明中批评了这项裁决。
“自2017年以来，左翼一直在用所谓的‘敌意’主张玩同样的把戏，”珀西瓦尔说，“这是披着法律外衣的破坏行为。套路是这样的：(1) 政府是种族主义者；(2) 因此我不喜欢的某项政策是出于种族动机；(3) 因此该政策无效。他们几乎在特朗普时代国土安全部的每一项政策上都用了这一招。”
Judge blocks Trump policies that halted legal immigration cases for many immigrants
June 5, 2026 / 1:53 PM EDT / CBS News
By Camilo Montoya-Galvez Immigration Correspondent
Camilo Montoya-Galvez is the Immigration Correspondent at CBS News, where his reporting is featured across multiple programs and platforms, including national broadcast shows, CBS News 24/7, CBSNews.com and the organization’s social media accounts.
Read Full Bio
A federal judge in Rhode Island on Friday blocked a series of Trump administration measures that have prevented federal officials from granting asylum, green cards and other legal immigration benefits to many immigrants in the U.S.
In a 135-page opinion, Chief Judge John McConnell of the U.S. District Court in Rhode Island found the sweeping limits on legal immigration benefits to be arbitrary and capricious, contrary to federal law.
One of the policies McConnell invalidated had halted all legal immigration applications filed by citizens of 39 countries listed on President Trump’s so-called “travel ban” list, which restricts travel from countries whose nationals the administration says are too difficult to properly screen.
The Trump administration adopted the measures late last year on national security grounds, following the shooting of two National Guard members in Washington, D.C. An Afghan man who was brought to the U.S. in 2021 and granted asylum in 2025 has been charged with the shooting.
For months, the pause has largely banned officials at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services from giving out green cards, work permits, American citizenship and other benefits to citizens of the affected countries, many of them in Africa and Asia.
Initially, the policies also included a complete pause on the hundreds of thousands of asylum cases overseen by USCIS, regardless of the applicant’s nationality. In March, USCIS partially lifted the asylum pause, resuming the processing of applications filed by most nationalities, except for citizens of the 39 nations on the “travel ban” list.
In his order, McConnell noted the immigrants affected by the policies he found unlawful “filed the appropriate paperwork, paid the required filing fees, submitted to the requested biometrics collections, and attended the necessary in person interviews.”
“In enacting its latest immigration policies, USCIS: claims statutory and regulatory authority that it does not possess; makes decisions without the reasoned explanations that it must provide; acts without regard for the reliance interests of applicants that it must consider; and justifies its actions with pretextual concerns of ‘national security’ that mask anti-immigrant sentiments that it is forbidden from letting influence its decision-making,” McConnell said.
James Percival, general counsel for the Department of Homeland Security, criticized the ruling in a statement to CBS News.
“The Left has been running the same gambit with so called ‘animus’ claims since 2017,” Percival said. “It is sabotage dressed in legal clothing. It goes like this: (1) the admin is racist, (2) therefore a policy I don’t like is motivated by race, (3) therefore it is invalid. They have used it on virtually every Trump era Department of Homeland Security policy.”
发表回复