国会并未终止特朗普18亿美元“反武器化”基金 该基金目前处境如何?


2026年6月5日 美国东部时间下午1:55 / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)
作者:卡尼塔·艾尔

2025年5月21日,在华盛顿国会山,代理司法部长托德·布兰奇出席一场与共和党参议员的闭门会议。此前,因未获得足够党内支持,参议员们预计将放弃一项为白宫建筑群和唐纳德·特朗普总统官邸提供10亿美元安保资金的提案。
J. 斯科特·阿普怀特/美联社

参议院共和党人否决了多项旨在终止唐纳德·特朗普总统近18亿美元“反武器化”基金的提案,尽管两党均存在担忧,且有一项临时法院裁决叫停了该基金。

特朗普政府上月宣布设立这笔17.76亿美元的基金。该计划将允许政府使用纳税人资金,向那些声称自己遭拜登政府政治迫害的受害者支付赔偿。

该基金的批评者称,这将成为特朗普盟友的“黑金账户”。包括关键共和党议员在内的一些立法者担忧,该基金缺乏监管保障。议员们尤其担心,赔偿金可能会流向2021年1月6日国会山骚乱事件中的冲击者,包括那些袭警的骚乱者,而特朗普政府并未排除这种可能性。

以下是该基金目前的处境:

该基金已面临至少两起法律诉讼,起诉方包括一个监督组织以及在骚乱中保卫国会山的警察。

上周,弗吉尼亚州一名联邦法官临时阻止特朗普政府启动该基金的相关行动,并禁止政府从该基金中拨付任何资金。但该裁决技术性极强:它并未涉及该计划的合法性,而是旨在争取法院时间,以全面审理要求终止该计划的诉讼。

特朗普政府预计将于周五向法院提交针对该诉讼的答辩状。

与此同时,该问题在国会共和党内部造成了分歧,一些议员拖延审议一项移民拨款法案,直到白宫承诺取消该赔偿基金。

为说服国会投票支持移民法案,代理司法部长托德·布兰奇周二对众议院议员表示,司法部将“彻底终止该基金的运作”。

民主党众议员格蕾丝·孟随即问道:“是永远不再推进了吗?”布兰奇回答:“没错。”

最终,共和党人不想破坏特朗普的一项关键立法优先事项,在共和党领导层与持反对立场的共和党议员进行数小时谈判后,于周五早些时候推进了移民法案,未加入任何正式终止该基金的条款。不过仍有一名本党议员倒戈投了反对票。

与此同时,总统本人的态度并不明确,就该基金的未来发出了混杂信号。

在布兰奇向议员作出承诺的次日,特朗普称自己不清楚该基金是否已被终止,这引发了人们对其处境的困惑。

“我得问问律师,我不清楚,”当被问及该基金是彻底终止还是仅暂停时,他说道,“在我看来,这是件很棒的事。”

该基金源于美国国税局与特朗普、特朗普的两个儿子及特朗普集团之间的和解协议。此前特朗普曾提起100亿美元的诉讼,指控国税局未能保护其隐私,导致其报税记录被未经授权泄露。

司法部表示,特朗普本人不会获得任何赔偿,但将收到正式道歉。

截至目前,该基金仍处于法院临时禁令之下——但至于其未来走向,答案取决于你询问的对象。

美国有线电视新闻网的德文·科尔、艾琳·格雷夫、莎拉·费里斯、劳伦·福克斯、马努·拉朱、特德·巴雷特、艾莉森·梅因、亚当·坎林、凯特兰·柯林斯、汉娜·拉比诺维茨、蒂尔尼·斯尼德、凯西·甘农和宝拉·里德为本报道撰稿。

Congress didn’t kill Trump’s $1.8 billion ‘anti-weaponization’ fund. So where does it stand?

2026-06-05 1:55 PM ET / CNN

By Kaanita Iyer

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche arrives for a closed-door meeting with Republican senators who are expected to abandon a proposal for $1 billion in security money for the White House complex and President Donald Trump’s ballroom after it has failed to win enough party support, at the Capitol in Washington, DC, on May 21.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

Senate Republicans rejected multiple attempts to kill President Donald Trump’s nearly $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund amid bipartisan concerns and a temporary court ruling against it.

The Trump administration announced the creation of the $1.776 billion fund last month. The effort would allow the government to use taxpayer money to pay those who claim they were victims of political prosecutions by the Biden administration.

Critics of the fund have said it would serve as a slush fund for Trump’s allies. Some lawmakers, including key Republicans, raised concerns that the fund lacks guardrails. Lawmakers were particularly concerned that payouts would go to rioters, including those who assaulted police officers, at the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol, which the Trump administration didn’t rule out.

Here’s where the status of the fund stands.

The fund has faced at least two legal challenges, including from a watchdog group and from police officers who defended the Capitol during the riot.

Last week, a federal judge in Virginia temporarily blocked the administration from taking steps to set up the fund and barred it from releasing any funds from it. But that ruling was highly technical: It didn’t address the legality of the program but was instead intended to get the court time to review a lawsuit seeking to kill the program in full.

The Trump administration is expected to file its response to the lawsuit in court on Friday.

In the meantime, the issue created a rift among Republicans in Congress with some stalling on considering an immigration funding bill until the White House committed to dropping the compensation fund.

In an attempt to convince Congress to vote for the immigration bill, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told House lawmakers on Tuesday that the Justice Department will not be “moving forward with the fund, period.”

Democratic Rep. Grace Meng then asked, “Not moving forward, ever?,” to which Blanche responded, “Correct.”

Ultimately, Republicans didn’t want to derail one of Trump’s key legislative priorities, and advanced the immigration bill without any language formally killing the fund early Friday after hours of talks between GOP leaders and Republican holdouts. One party member still defected.

Meanwhile, the president has not been so unequivocal, giving mixed signals about the future of the fund.

Trump, a day after Blanche’s vow to lawmakers, said that he doesn’t know if the fund is dead, which has led to confusion about its status.

“I’d have to ask the lawyers, I don’t know,” he said when asked whether the fund is fully dead or just on hold. “As far as I’m concerned, it was a beautiful thing.”

The fund is a result of a settlement between the Internal Revenue Service and Trump, two of his sons and the Trump Organization, after the president dropped his $10 billion lawsuit alleging that the IRS failed to protect them from an unauthorized leak of their tax returns.

Trump himself will not receive any payments, but will receive a formal apology, the Justice Department has said.

So far, the fund remains temporarily blocked by a court — but its future ultimately depends on who you ask.

CNN’s Devan Cole, Aileen Graef, Sarah Ferris, Lauren Fox, Manu Raju, Ted Barrett, Alison Main, Adam Cancryn, Kaitlan Collins, Hannah Rabinowitz, Tierney Sneed, Casey Gannon, and Paula Reid contributed to this report.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注