罗德岛州法官就司法部律师处理跨性别医疗调查事宜提请纪律处分


2026年6月5日 / 美国东部时间下午3:09 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

华盛顿——罗德岛州一名联邦法官于周五就司法部律师处理该州一家医院的跨性别青少年医疗调查事宜提请对其进行纪律处分,此前该法官已认定这些律师误导法庭并隐瞒信息。

此次提请纪律处分的背景是,美国地区法官玛丽·麦克罗伊撤销了司法部向该医院发出的行政传票。该传票要求获取罗德岛医院为每一位接受过医疗服务的未成年跨性别患者提供的多年敏感医疗信息,这是针对性别确认治疗的全面调查的一部分。

2019年由特朗普总统任命的麦克罗伊在上月的一项裁决中写道,该传票缺乏国会授权的目的,且是“出于不当目的、恶意”发出的。她还在裁决中严厉批评了司法部,称检察官应有的“光荣操守”与司法部在本案中的策略之间的差距“令人不安”。

她在5月14日的意见书中写道:“司法部拥有巨大的检察权和自由裁量权。作为公民,我们相信联邦检察官在对州政府、企业,当然还有弱势儿童行使这一强大权力时,会公平行事,并对其对应方和司法机构保持诚实。但在本案中,司法部在各个方面都不配获得这份信任。”

麦克罗伊继而指责司法部律师在宣誓后歪曲事实,并向她的法庭和得克萨斯州北部地区的联邦法院隐瞒信息。她称政府律师这么做“显然是为了掩盖其近期的调查策略——此前所有审查过该策略的法院都予以驳回——以避免本法庭审查,转而选择司法部认为符合其政治立场的遥远法庭”。

这位法官所指的是司法部决定向得克萨斯州沃斯堡的一名法官寻求命令,迫使罗德岛医院交出去年行政传票所要求的文件。

在试图从得克萨斯州法院获得该命令的过程中,一名名叫丽莎·萧的司法部律师在一份声明中称,罗德岛医院未能遵守传票,并于2月停止与司法部沟通。但罗德岛州法官麦克罗伊表示,这一说法“即便不是完全虚假,也显然具有误导性”,因为罗德岛医院的代表曾回复过司法部律师关于搜索合规传票条款的电子邮件。

“这种无视对联邦法院应尽的坦诚义务的鲁莽漠视行为令人震惊,”麦克罗伊写道。

这位法官还对司法部选择在得克萨斯州寻求强制执行传票的决定提出质疑,指出萧和其他似乎负责该调查的政府律师都位于华盛顿特区。尽管如此,得克萨斯州法院还是批准了司法部强制执行传票的请求,并于4月下旬命令罗德岛医院交出所有符合传票要求的记录。该医院已就该判决提起上诉。

司法部民事司在本周早些时候的一份声明中否认了麦克罗伊对其律师的指控。

“这种针对司法部律师的指控罕见且性质严重。司法部对此高度重视,并承诺在有必要时采取一切适当的补救措施,”声明称。

司法部补充道:“民事司已全面审查了地区法院的指控,并认定其毫无根据。我们的律师并未歪曲事实、隐瞒相关信息或以其他方式误导法庭。”

Rhode Island judge refers DOJ lawyers for possible discipline over handling of transgender care investigation

June 5, 2026 / 3:09 PM EDT / CBS News

Washington — A federal judge in Rhode Island referred Justice Department lawyers for possible discipline on Friday over their handling of an investigation into transgender youth care at a hospital in the state, after previously finding that the lawyers misled the court and withheld information.

The referral came after U.S. District Judge Mary McElroy quashed an administrative subpoena that the Justice Department issued to the hospital seeking years of sensitive medical information for every minor transgender patient who received medical care at Rhode Island Hospital, as part of a sprawling investigation into gender-transition treatments.

McElroy, who was appointed by President Trump in 2019, wrote in a decision last month that the subpoena lacked a congressionally authorized purpose and was issued “for an improper purpose in bad faith.” She also lambasted the Justice Department in her ruling, calling the difference between the “honorable conduct” expected of prosecutors and the department’s tactics in the case “unsettling.”

The Justice Department, she wrote in her May 14 opinion, “possesses immense prosecutorial authority and discretion. As citizens, we trust that federal prosecutors, when wielding this awesome power against a state, a company, or certainly against vulnerable children, will play fair and be honest with its counterparts and the judiciary. DOJ has proven unworthy of this trust at every point in this case. “

McElroy went on to accuse Justice Department lawyers of misrepresenting facts under oath and withholding information from her court and a federal court in the Northern District of Texas. She accused government lawyers of doing so “in an obvious effort to shield its recent investigative tactics — previously rejected by every other court to review them — from this Court’s review, in favor of a distant forum that DOJ deems friendly to its political positions.”

The judge was referring to the Justice Department’s decision to seek an order from a judge in Fort Worth, Texas, that would compel Rhode Island Hospital to turn over the documents sought by the administrative subpoena last year.

In its effort to obtain the order from the Texas court, a Justice Department lawyer named Lisa Hsiao said in a declaration that Rhode Island Hospital failed to comply with the subpoena and stopped communicating with the department in February. But McElroy, the Rhode Island judge, said that claim was “clearly misleading, if not utterly false,” because representatives from Rhode Island Hospital had responded to an email from Justice Department lawyers about search terms for compliance with the subpoena.

“This reckless disregard for the duty of candor owed to a federal court is appalling,” McElroy wrote.

The judge also questioned the Justice Department’s decision to pursue enforcement of the subpoena in Texas, noting that Hsiao and other government lawyers who appear to be assigned to the investigation are based in Washington, D.C. Still, the Texas court went on to grant the Justice Department’s bid to enforce compliance with the subpoena and ordered Rhode Island Hospital in late April to turn over all records covered by the demand. The hospital has appealed the decision.

The Justice Department’s Civil Division denied McElroy’s claims about its lawyers in a statement earlier this week.

“Such accusations against Department attorneys are rare and serious. The Department treats them accordingly and is committed to taking all appropriate remedial action where warranted,” it said.

The Justice Department continued: “The Civil Division has thoroughly reviewed the District Court’s allegations and concluded that they are without merit. Our attorneys did not misrepresent facts, withhold relevant information, or otherwise mislead the Court.”

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注