2026年6月4日 美国东部时间上午10:22 / 福克斯新闻
两党参议员希望废除反武器化基金，“投票马拉松”正式开启
作者：亚历克斯·米勒 福克斯新闻
福克斯新闻首席国会记者查德·珀格拉姆在《底线》节目中报道了针对唐纳德·特朗普总统“反武器化基金”的反对声浪。
新增功能：您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了！
唐纳德·特朗普总统提出的近700亿美元移民执法法案正陷入不确定境地，参议院即将展开多轮投票，可能彻底摧毁该法案。
争议的核心是美国司法部（DOJ）现已废止的近20亿美元“反武器化”基金。这是又一个罕见的两党共同对本届政府感到不满的案例，也可能让整个 broader 法案付诸东流。
原因在于，民主党和共和党都在提出修正案，不同程度地确保该基金彻底作废。
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6397459411112
参议院搁置边境与移民海关执法局拨款投票
共和党推动移民海关执法局拨款法案，迫使特朗普颇具争议的20亿美元基金妥协
2026年5月27日，唐纳德·特朗普总统在华盛顿白宫内阁会议室的内阁会议上听取汇报。（温·麦克Name / 盖蒂图片社）
参议院共和党领导层希望在新启动的“投票马拉松”中阻止这些修正案通过，但能否成功尚无定论。对共和党来说的一个好消息是，周三下午的首次程序性投票中，所有共和党议员都投了支持该法案。
“我对接下来的投票充满信心，”参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩（南达科他州共和党）说道，“但如你所知，我们和众多议员进行了大量沟通，他们清楚当前的利害关系，也明白击败那些会破坏法案或以任何方式削弱其特权的修正案有多关键。”
一个棘手的问题是，如果针对该基金的修正案获得通过，可能会剥夺该和解法案仅以简单多数票推进的权限。这实际上将让民主党彻底扼杀该法案。
这些修正案将以简单多数还是60票门槛进行表决，可能改变局势，最终将由参议院规则裁判决定它们是否符合《伯德规则》——该规则是和解程序的基础。
共和党要求特朗普先废除颇具争议的20亿美元基金，再重启移民海关执法局拨款法案
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6397359877112
特朗普政府不再推进“反武器化”基金
共和党人认为，这些附加修正案将达到60票门槛，为他们争取到一定的回旋空间。
“我的意思是，你永远无法百分百准确预判，”图恩说道，“起草修正案的方式有很多种，但我们相当有信心，其中大多数修正案需要60票才能通过。”
该基金是上个月作为特朗普家族与美国国税局和解协议的一部分宣布的，遭到了共和党人的强烈反对。他们担心，如果没有适当的保障措施，2021年1月6日国会山骚乱期间袭击警察的定罪人员可能会动用纳税人的资金。
参议院多数党党鞭约翰·巴拉索（怀俄明州共和党）的主要职责是游说和说服持观望态度的共和党议员支持该法案。随着共和党内部裂痕显现，他将主要责任归咎于参议院民主党人。
共和党利用移民海关执法局拨款法案，让特朗普颇具争议的20亿美元基金“彻底消失”
“民主党人一直在谈论他们想讨论的一切，除了真正 securing 边境和保护美国人民，”巴拉索说道，“他们会提出各种各样的议案，无非就是为了拖延我们支持美国人民、保障他们安全与稳定的努力。”
但也有共和党议员提出自己的反武器化基金修正案。截至目前，北卡罗来纳州共和党参议员汤姆·蒂利斯和路易斯安那州共和党参议员比尔·卡西迪——这两位越来越倾向于与特朗普分道扬镳的议员——已经准备好提出相关修正案来处理该基金。
也可以在和解程序之外解决该基金的问题。
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序
刚刚被特朗普成功赶下台的卡西迪没有说明他更倾向于哪种方式，但他希望“出台一项能确保不会有人在白宫改变主意、让该基金死灰复燃的方案”。
蒂利斯认为，有足够多的共和党人对该基金存在担忧，因此必须采取行动，但他希望这是一项由共和党主导的举措。他也不介意自己的修正案是否能获得表决机会。
“我不在乎是不是我自己的修正案，”蒂利斯说道，“现在已经有好几个相关提案了，只要有一个涉及该问题的修正案能进入表决程序就行。我不会拖累领导层的节奏，也不会做任何破坏核心法案、导致其失去特权的事情。但我们必须解决这个问题。”
亚历克斯·米勒是福克斯新闻数字频道负责报道美国参议院的撰稿人。
Both parties target Trump’s $2B fund as ICE funding package enters danger zone
June 4, 2026 10:22am EDT / Fox News
Senators from both parties want to eliminate the anti-weaponization fund as vote-a-rama kicks off
By Alex Miller Fox News
Fox News chief congressional correspondent Chad Pergram reports on the pushback against President Donald Trump’s ‘anti-weaponization fund’ on ‘The Bottom Line.’
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
President Donald Trump’s nearly $70 billion immigration enforcement package has entered uncertain waters as the Senate embarks on a marathon of votes that could blow up the legislation.
At the heart of the issue is the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) now-defunct nearly $2 billion “anti-weaponization” fund. It’s another rare instance where both sides of the aisle are frustrated with the administration, and it could spell doom for the broader bill.
That’s because Democrats and Republicans are lining up amendments to ensure the fund is dead, to varying degrees.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6397459411112
Senate scraps border and ICE funding vote
GOP ADVANCES ICE FUNDING PACKAGE AFTER FORCING TRUMP’S CONTROVERSIAL $2B FUND INTO RETREAT
President Donald Trump listens to members of his Cabinet during a meeting in the White House Cabinet Room in Washington, D.C., on May 27, 2026.(Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Senate Republican leadership is hopeful that they can prevent those amendments from surviving during the newly launched “vote-a-rama,” but success isn’t guaranteed. One positive for the GOP is that every Republican voted for the package in its first procedural hurdle Wednesday afternoon.
“I feel good going into it,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said. “But, you know, you got a lot of conversations with our members [who] understand what’s at stake, how critical it is that we defeat amendments that would be corrosive to the bill or undermine in any way its privilege.”
One issue is that should an amendment targeting the fund pass, it could remove the reconciliation package’s ability to advance with just a simple majority of votes. That would effectively give Democrats a win in killing the package outright.
Whether the amendments will be considered under a simple majority or 60-vote threshold could change the landscape and will ultimately be up to the Senate rules referee to determine whether they comply with the Byrd rule, which undergirds the reconciliation process.
GOP DEMANDS TRUMP KILL CONTROVERSIAL $2B FUND BEFORE REVIVING ICE FUNDING PACKAGE
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6397359877112
Trump administration not moving forward with ‘anti-weaponization’ fund
Republicans believed that those add-ons would hit that 60-vote mark, giving them a little bit of breathing room.
“I mean, you never know with 100% accuracy,” Thune said. “There are a lot of creative ways of drafting amendments, but we feel pretty confident that most of those would be at 60.”
The fund, announced last month as part of a settlement between the Trump family and the Internal Revenue Service, received strong pushback from Republicans who feared that without proper guardrails, people convicted of assaulting police officers during the Jan. 6, 2021, riot on Capitol Hill could access the taxpayer funds.
Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo., whose main job is to wrangle and twist the arms of wary Republicans to vote for the package, put the primary blame on Senate Democrats as fractures in the GOP simmered.
GOP LEVERAGES ICE FUNDING PACKAGE TO MAKE TRUMP’S CONTROVERSIAL $2B FUND ‘NEVER EXIST’
“The Democrats continue to talk about everything they want to talk about, except actually securing the border and protecting the American people,” Barrasso said. “They’re gonna come with all sorts of things, all in an effort to delay our efforts to support the American people and keep them safe and secure.”
But there are Republicans who will have their own anti-weaponization fund amendments. So far, Sens. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., and Bill Cassidy, R-La., two lawmakers who are increasingly prone to break with Trump, have teed up add-ons to address the fund.
There is the option to deal with the fund outside of reconciliation, too.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Cassidy, who Trump successfully just ousted from office, didn’t say which route he would prefer, but wanted “something which just makes it sure that somebody doesn’t change their mind in the White House, it doesn’t come back.”
Tillis contended that there were enough Republicans with concerns over the fund that something needed to be done, but wanted it to be a GOP-led initiative. He’s not picky about whether his amendment gets a shot either.
“I don’t care about my own personal amendment,” Tillis said. “There’s a few out there, as long as one touching on the issue gets there. I’m not gonna slow leadership down. I wouldn’t do anything to make it as corrosive to the underlying bill so that it loses privilege. But we gotta do this.”
Alex Miller is a writer for Fox News Digital covering the U.S. Senate.
发表回复