2026年6月2日 下午5:03 美东时间 / 福克斯新闻
代理司法部长托德·布兰奇周二对众议员格蕾丝·孟表示，美国司法部不会推进其提议的反武器化基金。
作者：伊莱恩·马伦，福克斯新闻
发布时间：2026年6月2日 下午5:03 美东时间 | 更新时间：2026年6月2日 下午6:27 美东时间
托德·布兰奇：司法部不会推进反武器化基金
代理司法部长托德·布兰奇告诉议员，美国司法部正在放弃设立反武器化基金的计划，在一名联邦法官临时叫停该基金的设立后，这一努力就此告终。
全新功能：你现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了！
代理司法部长托德·布兰奇在周二众议院拨款委员会的听证会上宣布，美国司法部将放弃设立反武器化基金的努力。
该基金源于总统唐纳德·特朗普与美国国税局之间的一起诉讼，在一名联邦法官发布临时禁令阻止其设立后被搁置。布兰奇作证称，原定于6月12日举行的关于反武器化基金法律依据的听证会将不再举行。
“我们不会推进该基金的设立，就是这样，”布兰奇说。“设立该基金的初衷，特朗普总统已经谈论了很长时间，也就是这个国家有很多人遭遇政府武器化针对他们的情况。我认为，设立该基金的理由依然和以前一样重要，但我们不会推进该基金的设立。”
法官临时叫停特朗普司法部近20亿美元的“反武器化”基金
2026年6月2日，美国华盛顿特区，代理司法部长托德·布兰奇在雷伯恩众议院办公楼举行的众议院拨款委员会商业、司法、科学及相关机构小组委员会听证会上作证。原定于5月19日举行的司法部监督听证会已改期。（安德鲁·哈尼克 / 盖蒂图片社）
今年5月中旬宣布设立该基金时，美国司法部将其描述为一个机会，让被此前几届政府认定为法律战受害者的个人获得赔偿，无论其政治派别如何。反武器化基金是特朗普政府与美国国税局就泄露特朗普税单问题达成的和解协议的一部分。
和解协议并未直接提供赔偿，而是要求设立一个17.76亿美元的基金。分配将由布兰奇任命的五人委员会决定，资金将来自“判决基金”，该基金用于支付联邦政府的和解款项。批评者称这是一个“黑金基金”，将使总统及其支持者受益。
特朗普政府放弃有争议的20亿美元基金，为停滞的共和党移民法案扫清障碍
美国总统唐纳德·特朗普与第一夫人梅拉尼娅·特朗普离开华盛顿白宫。（曼努埃尔·巴利克·塞纳/美联社照片）
在听证会上，布兰奇表示，在诉讼 ongoing 期间，尚未开展任何设立反武器化基金的工作。截至目前，已有三起针对该基金的诉讼被提起。
“民主向前”组织对美国司法部提起诉讼，质疑反武器化基金的设立，辩称政府不当试图利用联邦判决基金——该基金旨在支付针对政府的法院判决和和解款项——来设立一个新的赔偿项目，且未获得国会批准。这起诉讼成为对该基金最重大的挑战，并导致美国地区法官莱奥妮·布林克马于5月29日发布临时禁令，在法院审理此案期间暂停该计划的实施。
大卫·马库斯：他险些在拜登的法律战中幸存，现在理应获得赔偿
2026年1月3日，美国纽约市，美国打击委内瑞拉并于当晚抓获委内瑞拉总统尼古拉斯·马杜罗及其妻子西莉亚·弗洛雷斯后，司法部联邦官员在布鲁克林大都会拘留中心旁的司法部大楼外站岗。路透社/爱德华多·穆尼奥斯（REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz）
在发布临时限制令时，布林克马认定，原告提出了严肃的法律问题：行政部门是否有权在未经国会批准的情况下设立和资助反武器化基金。她还表示，允许该计划推进可能导致在法院有机会全面审查该基金的合法性之前，纳税人的资金就已被拨付。
点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP
美国司法部尚未宣布是否会正式解散该基金、撤回相关文件，或在布兰奇宣布后撤销待决诉讼。
伊莱恩·马伦是福克斯新闻数字频道和福克斯商业频道的记者，报道全国政治新闻。
Acting AG Blanche reveals fate of Trump’s ‘anti-weaponization fund’ under pressure from House lawmakers
2026-06-02 5:03pm EDT / Fox News
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told Rep. Grace Meng Tuesday that DOJ will not move forward with its proposed anti-weaponization fund
By Elaine Mallon, Fox News
Published June 2, 2026 5:03pm EDT | Updated June 2, 2026 6:27pm EDT
Todd Blanche says DOJ will not move forward with Anti-Weaponization Fund
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told lawmakers the Justice Department is abandoning plans for the Anti-Weaponization Fund, ending the effort after a federal judge temporarily blocked its creation.
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche announced that the Justice Department is abandoning its efforts to create the Anti-Weaponization Fund during a House Appropriations Committee hearing Tuesday.
The fund, which stemmed from a lawsuit between President Donald Trump and the Internal Revenue Service, was put on hold after a federal judge issued a temporary injunction blocking its creation. A hearing on the Anti-Weaponization Fund’s legal basis had been scheduled for June 12, but it will no longer take place, Blanche testified.
“We are not moving forward with the fund, period,” Blanche said. “The reasons for the fund are something that President Trump has talked about for a long time, which is the fact that there were a lot of people in this country who had their government weaponized against them. The reasons for the fund, I think, remain as important as they were before, but, we are not moving forward with the fund.”
JUDGE TEMPORARILY BLOCKS TRUMP DOJ’S NEARLY $2B ‘ANTI-WEAPONIZATION’ FUND
Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche testifies during a House Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies hearing in the Rayburn House Office Building on June 2, 2026, in Washington, D.C. The Justice Department oversight hearing was rescheduled from its original date of May 19.(Andrew Harnik / Getty Images)
When announcing the fund’s creation in mid-May, the Justice Department described it as an opportunity for individuals deemed to be victims of lawfare by previous administrations to receive restitution, regardless of their political affiliation. The Anti-Weaponization Fund was created as part of a settlement between the Trump administration and the Internal Revenue Service over the disclosure of Trump’s tax returns.
Rather than receiving direct compensation, the settlement called for the creation of a $1.776 billion fund. Distributions would be determined by a five-member board appointed by Blanche, and the funding would come from the Judgment Fund, which is used to pay for federal government settlements. Critics called it a “slush fund” that would benefit the president and his supporters.
TRUMP ADMIN BACKS OFF CONTROVERSIAL $2B FUND, CLEARING PATH FOR STALLED GOP IMMIGRATION BILL
President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump depart the White House in Washington.(Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP Photo)
During the hearing, Blanche stated that no work on establishing the Anti-Weaponization Fund had begun amid ongoing litigation. To date, three separate lawsuits have been filed challenging the fund.
Democracy Forward filed a lawsuit against the Justice Department challenging the creation of the Anti-Weaponization Fund, arguing that the administration improperly sought to use the Federal Judgment Fund — which is intended to pay court judgments and settlements against the government — to establish a new compensation program without congressional approval. The lawsuit became the most significant challenge to the fund and led U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema to issue a temporary injunction on May 29, halting the program’s implementation while the court considered the case.
DAVID MARCUS: HE BARELY SURVIVED BIDEN LAWFARE, AND NOW HE DESERVES TO GET PAID
Department of Justice Federal Officers stand guard outside the Department of Justice next to the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn (MDC Brooklyn) after the United States struck Venezuela and captured its President Nicolas Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores overnight, in New York City, U.S., January 3, 2026. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz(REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz)
In granting the temporary restraining order, Brinkema found that the plaintiffs had raised serious legal questions about whether the executive branch had the authority to create and fund the Anti-Weaponization Fund without congressional approval. She also expressed concern that allowing the program to move forward could result in taxpayer money being distributed before the court had an opportunity to fully review the fund’s legality.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The Justice Department has not yet announced whether it will formally dissolve the fund, withdraw related filings or seek dismissal of the pending lawsuits following Blanche’s announcement.
Elaine Mallon is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business covering national politics.
发表回复