2026-06-02 00:01:23 UTC / 路透社
路透社
2026年6月2日 世界标准时间00:01 更新于3小时前
2024年3月19日，美国俄亥俄州代顿市一处投票站的投票箱，当日两党正在举行初选。路透社/梅根·耶林格 档案照片
纽约6月1日路透电 — 民主党在周一提交的法庭文件中表示，将就上周法官驳回其立即阻止唐纳德·特朗普总统收紧邮寄投票规则行政令的裁决提起上诉。
通过《每日案卷》新闻简报接收晨间最新法律资讯，点击此处订阅。
- 特朗普3月31日签署的行政令要求其政府编制一份美国公民确认名单，并要求美国邮政总局仅向各州批准的邮寄投票名单上的选民递送选票。
- 民主党对该行政令提起诉讼，称其违宪，可能导致数百万选民被剥夺投票权。
- 5月28日，华盛顿联邦地区法官卡尔·尼科尔斯作出裁决，认为民主党提出的初步禁令请求为时过早，因为联邦机构尚未采取措施落实特朗普的行政令。
- 尼科尔斯的裁决未就特朗普3月31日的行政令是否合法作出评判，目前也未改变美国人的投票方式。
- 美国司法部未立即回应就民主党提起上诉置评的请求。
- 5月29日，美国邮政总局提出一项新规则，要求各州提供已收到邮寄选票的选民名单。在特朗普政府敲定该规则前，公众有30天时间对该方案提出意见。
- 波士顿另一名联邦法官将于周二就民主党州联盟提起的类似诉讼听取辩论意见，该诉讼同样针对这项行政令。
- 多年来，特朗普一直虚假宣称自己在2020年大选中败选是大规模选民欺诈所致，并一直批评邮寄投票。
- 邮寄投票普遍被认为是一种安全可靠的投票方式。
- 特朗普所在的共和党正与民主党激烈角逐，以期在11月的中期选举中保住对美国国会的控制权。
露西·科恩 纽约报道；马修·刘易斯 编辑
我们的报道准则：汤森路透信任原则。
Democrats appeal judge’s decision not to block Trump’s mail-in voting executive order
2026-06-02 00:01:23 UTC / Reuters
By Reuters
June 2, 2026 12:01 AM UTC Updated 3 hours ago
Voting booths are pictured in a polling location as the Democratic and Republican parties hold primary elections in Dayton, Ohio, U.S. March 19, 2024. REUTERS/Megan Jelinger/File Photo
NEW YORK, June 1 (Reuters) – The Democratic Party indicated in a court filing on Monday that it is appealing a judge’s decision last week not to immediately block President Donald Trump’s executive order tightening rules on mail-in voting.
Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.
- Trump’s March 31 executive order directed his administration to compile a list of confirmed U.S. citizens and required the U.S. Postal Service to deliver ballots only to voters on each state’s approved mail-in ballot list.
- Democrats challenged the order, arguing it was unconstitutional and could disenfranchise millions of voters.
- In a May 28 ruling, Washington-based U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols said Democrats’ request for a preliminary injunction was premature because federal agencies had not yet taken steps to comply with Trump’s order.
- Nichols’ ruling did not address whether Trump’s March 31 executive order was lawful, and also did not, for now, change how Americans vote.
- The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the Democrats’ appeal.
- On May 29, the Postal Service proposed a new rule that would require states to provide lists of voters who received mailed ballots. The public has 30 days to comment on the plan before the Trump administration can finalize it.
- A different federal judge in Boston is due to hear arguments on Tuesday in a similar lawsuit challenging the executive order brought by a coalition of Democratic states.
- Trump has for years pushed the false claim that his 2020 election defeat was the result of widespread voter fraud and has criticized voting by mail.
- Mail-in voting is largely seen as a secure and trustworthy way of casting ballots.
- Trump’s Republicans are in a tight battle to keep control of the U.S. Congress in the November midterm elections.
Reporting by Luc Cohen in New York; Editing by Matthew Lewis
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
发表回复