该命令要求国土安全部编制公民名单，并要求美国邮政总局仅向名单上的人员递送邮寄选票
2026年5月28日 美国东部时间上午10:20 / 福克斯新闻
作者：罗伯特·施马德
唐纳德·特朗普总统承认针对其邮寄选票行政命令可能存在法律挑战，但他签署该命令时预计会遭到“ rogue法官”的反对。
NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章！
一名联邦法官周四拒绝叫停唐纳德·特朗普总统针对邮寄选票的行政命令，这对声称该命令可能剥夺数百万选民投票权的民主党人来说是一记重击。
这项于3月31日签署的行政命令要求国土安全部编制一份居住在每个州的所有美国成年公民名单，并要求美国邮政总局仅向出现在该名单上的个人递送邮寄选票。由特朗普任命的美国地区法官卡尔·尼科尔斯裁定，原告要求暂停该命令的请求为时过早。
“鉴于该行政命令并未要求原告做任何事情，且目前尚无任何机构根据该命令采取可能损害原告的行动，因此原告目前并未遭受任何损害，”尼科尔斯写道。“基于上述原因，法院驳回原告的初步禁令动议。”
特朗普签署选民数据库命令数分钟内，民主党州就威胁提起诉讼
唐纳德·特朗普总统于2026年3月31日在白宫椭圆形办公室展示签署完成的针对邮寄选票的行政命令。(亚伦·施瓦茨/CNP/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社)
民主党和投票权组织辩称，根据美国宪法，规范联邦选举的责任在于州议会和国会，而非总统。原告认为，该命令还可能迫使美国邮政总局制定超出其权限范围的选举相关规则。
与此同时，特朗普的行政命令将自身定位为执行联邦选举法的尝试，特朗普称根据宪法第二条，行政部门有义务执行这些法律。
尽管民主党原告在法庭上声称该命令可能侵犯各州规范自身选举的宪法权利，但尼科尔斯裁定，就目前而言，这一主张过于推测。不过，这位法官并未就民主党论点的实质内容作出裁决，并表示一旦联邦政府开始实际执行该行政命令，原告可以再次申请禁令。
共和党参议员谴责民主党在《选举安全拯救法案》问题上“散布恐惧”
唐纳德·特朗普总统长期以来一直声称邮寄投票容易遭受大规模欺诈，而选举官员和投票专家则表示此类欺诈极为罕见。(邦妮·卡什/合众国际社/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社)
“法院承认，邮政总局最终可能会发布直接影响原告或其成员的最终规则，或者政府可能会编制存在特定缺陷、遗漏特定个人的州公民名单，”这位法官写道。
“当然，如果未来出现这些情况，原告可以重新提出动议。但在此之前，原告无法证明有必要提供初步禁令救济，”他补充道。
特朗普命令陷入法律纠纷，美国邮政总局卷入邮寄选票之争
2025年9月19日，弗吉尼亚州一名妇女在利斯堡的劳登县选举与选民登记办公室投票，这是州长竞选提前投票的第一天。(格雷姆·斯隆/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社)
民主党提出的主要担忧之一是，该行政命令要求国土安全部使用社会保障管理局的数据，他们称这些数据存在错误，因此可能导致符合资格的选民无法收到选票。
特朗普的命令要求在联邦选举后60天内将公民名单传送给各州，并为个人和各州提供必要的更正名单的机会，以解决数据不准确的担忧。
特朗普长期以来一直声称邮寄投票容易遭受大规模欺诈，而选举官员和投票专家则表示此类欺诈极为罕见。
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序
两大政党的大量选民都表示曾通过邮寄方式投票，但民主党人使用邮寄投票的比例更高。
周四，福克斯新闻数字频道联系白宫寻求置评，但未收到回应。
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6392351884112
Judge hands Trump mail-ballot win for now as Democrats’ next move looms
The order directs DHS to compile citizenship lists and USPS to only deliver mail ballots to those on them
May 28, 2026 10:20am EDT / Fox News
By Robert Schmad
President Donald Trump acknowledges potential legal challenges to his mail-in voting executive order, but signs it in anticipating of objection by ‘rogue judges.’
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
A federal judge declined Thursday to block President Donald Trump’s executive order targeting mail ballots, delivering a blow to Democrats who claim the order could disenfranchise millions of voters.
The executive order, signed March 31, directs the Department of Homeland Security to compile a list of all adult U.S. citizens living in each state and would direct USPS to deliver mail ballots only to individuals appearing on the lists. U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, a Trump appointee, ruled that the plaintiffs’ request for an injunction against the order came too early.
“Given that the Executive Order does not command Plaintiffs to do anything, and that no agency has yet acted pursuant to the Order in a way that could harm Plaintiffs, they have not suffered any harm at present,” Nichols wrote. “For the foregoing reasons, the Court denies Plaintiffs’ Motions for a Preliminary Injunction.”
WITHIN MINUTES OF TRUMP SIGNING VOTER DATABASE ORDER, DEM STATES THREATEN LAWSUITS
President Donald Trump displays a signed executive order targeting mail-in ballots in the Oval Office of the White House on March 31, 2026.(Aaron Schwartz/CNP/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Democrats and voting rights groups argued that, under the Constitution, state legislatures and Congress are responsible for regulating federal elections, not the president. The order, according to the plaintiffs, could also force USPS to make rules about elections that go beyond its authority.
Trump’s executive order, meanwhile, frames itself as an attempt to enforce federal voting laws, which the president says the executive branch is obligated to do under Article II of the Constitution.
Though Democratic plaintiffs claimed in court that the order could infringe on the constitutional rights of states to regulate their own elections, Nichols ruled the claim too speculative at the current moment. The judge, however, did not rule on the merits of the Democratic arguments and said they could demand an injunction again once the federal government begins the process of actually implementing the executive order.
REPUBLICAN SENATORS BLAST DEMOCRATS FOR ‘FEAR-MONGERING’ OVER ELECTION SECURITY SAVE ACT
President Donald Trump has long claimed mail voting is vulnerable to widespread fraud, while election officials and voting experts have said such fraud is rare.(Bonnie Cash/UPI/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
“The Court recognizes that the Postal Service may ultimately issue a final rule that directly affects Plaintiffs or their members, or that the Government may develop State Citizenship Lists that omit specific individuals due to particularized flaws,” the judge wrote.
“Plaintiffs may, of course, renew their motions if and when those future actions occur. Until then, however, Plaintiffs cannot show that preliminary injunctive relief is warranted,” he added.
POSTAL SERVICE THRUST INTO MAIL-IN BALLOT FIGHT AS TRUMP ORDER GETS TIED UP IN COURT
A Virginian woman casts her ballot at the Loudoun County Office of Elections and Voter Registration in Leesburg on Sept. 19, 2025, the first day of early voting in the gubernatorial race.(Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
One of the primary concerns raised by Democrats is that the executive order directs DHS to use Social Security Administration data, which they claim contains errors and could therefore deprive eligible voters of ballots.
Trump’s order requires that the citizenship lists be transmitted to states within 60 days of federal elections and provides opportunities for individuals and states to correct the lists as necessary in order to address concerns about data inaccuracies.
Trump has long claimed mail voting is vulnerable to widespread fraud, while election officials and voting experts have said such fraud is rare.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Large numbers of voters identifying with both major parties have reported voting by mail, but Democrats do so more often.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment when reached by Fox News Digital on Thursday.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6392351884112
发表回复