2026-05-26T18:23:05.638Z / 路透社
法庭裁决对共和党人不利 阿拉巴马州保留重要的黑人联邦众议院选区
南卡罗来纳州共和党议员否决新选区地图
该州党内初选已开始投票
5月26日(路透社)——唐纳德·特朗普总统推动共和党领导的州在11月中期选举前绘制更有利于其政党的选举地图的计划周二遭遇双重挫折,南卡罗来纳州和阿拉巴马州重塑联邦众议院选区的努力受阻。
南卡罗来纳州多名共和党州参议员与民主党人一道投票否决了旨在拆除联邦众议院议员詹姆斯·克莱伯恩所持席位的新地图,这是特朗普党内成员罕见地与他决裂。克莱伯恩是黑人民主党人,三十多年前首次当选该席位。
通过《每日案卷》时事通讯将最新法律新闻直接发送到您的收件箱,开启您的早晨。点击此处注册。
另外,由三名联邦法官组成的小组否决了阿拉巴马州共和党人推出的新地图,该地图将取消该州两个黑人人口占多数的选区之一。裁决称,州议员在重新划分边界时故意歧视黑人选民。
在特朗普的敦促下,美国南部多个州的共和党人已赶在4月美国最高法院一项削弱对黑人和拉丁裔人口占比显著的联邦众议院选区保护措施的裁决后,匆忙实施新的选区地图。
田纳西州已批准一项新地图,将位于孟菲斯的民主党控制的多数黑人选区分割;路易斯安那州则推进一项计划,取消该州两个黑人人口占比可观的选区之一。
黑人选民通常支持民主党。
民主党和民权倡导者称共和党人的这些做法存在种族歧视。共和党支持者则表示,他们关注的是党派优势,而非种族问题。
共和党人正寻求在中期选举中保住他们在联邦众议院的微弱多数席位,而目前特朗普在民意调查中的支持率低迷,部分原因是不受欢迎的伊朗战争以及由此导致的汽油价格上涨。
南卡罗来纳州选区计划失败
南卡罗来纳州的拟议地图原本旨在让共和党人在拆分85岁的民主党实权人物克莱伯恩所持有的席位后,包揽该州全部7个联邦众议院选区。
周二的投票是该计划第二次在州参议院受阻。本月早些时候,五名共和党人与民主党人一道,未能达到推进该计划所需的三分之二多数票,导致该计划在参议院常规会议期间搁浅。
南卡罗来纳州共和党州长亨利·麦克马斯特此前曾拒绝白宫要求召开特别会议的压力,此次却改变立场,召集议员回来审议该选区地图。
该州党内初选的提前投票已于周二启动。一些共和党参议员表示,一旦选票已经开始投放,他们无法支持更改地图并推迟初选。
“据我所知,立法机构在投票开始后更改选举日期并重新划分选区地图,没有任何历史先例可循,”参议员理查德·卡什在参议院辩论期间说道。
卡什指出,截至中午已有数万张选票被投出。
阿拉巴马州选区地图被认定非法
在阿拉巴马州,由三名法官组成的小组裁定,共和党支持的选区地图故意歧视黑人选民,不能用于2026年的选举。法院表示,阿拉巴马州必须继续使用保留两个黑人人口占比可观的选区的地图,而非仅保留一个。
阿拉巴马州共和党官员随即表示,他们将向保守派占多数的美国最高法院提起上诉。
阿拉巴马州共和党州长凯·艾维此前已将四个联邦众议院席位的党内初选推迟至8月,这些席位是根据这份有争议的地图重新划分的,该地图于2023年首次获得通过。
该地图拆分了一个黑人人口占比接近50%的选区。白人约占该选区人口的40%,其余部分由亚裔和西班牙裔等其他少数族裔填补。黑人约占阿拉巴马州总人口的四分之一。目前该选区由黑人议员绍马里·菲格尔斯代表。
该法官小组曾在2023年就认定该地图存在歧视行为并予以否决。两周前,最高法院批准了阿拉巴马州取消该禁令的请求,并指示法官们根据其4月的裁决重新审议他们的结论,该裁决提高了基于种族质疑选举地图的门槛。
但该小组得出了相同的结论:该地图故意且非法地针对黑人选民。
“最终,我们无法认可让阿拉巴马州选民在2026年选举中使用带有故意基于种族歧视污点的选区划分计划,”该小组写道。该小组包括两名由特朗普任命的法官和一名由民主党前总统比尔·克林顿任命的法官。
民主党人掌控阿拉巴马州两个黑人人口占比可观的选区。共和党人控制该州其余五个选区。
约瑟夫·阿克斯报道;保罗·托马施编辑
Trump’s redistricting push suffers setbacks in Alabama, South Carolina
2026-05-26T18:23:05.638Z / Reuters
Court ruling goes against Republicans in Alabama
Judges preserve significantly Black US House district
Republican South Carolina lawmakers balk at new map
Voting already underway in party primaries in the state
May 26 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump’s push for Republican-led states to draw electoral maps more favorable to his party ahead of November’s midterm elections suffered twin setbacks on Tuesday, when efforts in South Carolina and Alabama to reshape U.S. House of Representatives districts were stymied.
In a rare break with Trump from members of his own party, several Republican state senators in South Carolina voted with Democrats to abandon a new map aimed at dismantling the U.S. House district held by congressman James Clyburn, a Black Democrat first elected to the seat more than three decades ago.
Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.
Separately, a panel of three federal judges blocked Alabama Republicans from installing a new map that would eliminate one of the state’s two districts with major Black populations, ruling that state lawmakers intentionally discriminated against Black voters in reconfiguring the boundaries.
At Trump’s urging, Republicans in several Southern states have rushed to implement new maps following a U.S. Supreme Court decision in April that weakened protections for U.S. House districts with significant Black or Latino populations.
Tennessee already has approved a new map that broke up a majority-Black, Democratic-held district based in Memphis, while Louisiana is advancing a plan to eliminate one of two districts with sizable Black populations in that state.
Black voters typically support Democrats.
Democrats and civil rights advocates have called the Republican efforts racially discriminatory. Republican backers have said they are focused on partisan advantage, not race.
Republicans are seeking to retain their narrow U.S. House majority in the midterms at a time when Trump is registering low approval ratings in public opinion polls, thanks in part to the unpopular Iran war and the higher gasoline prices it has caused.
SOUTH CAROLINA MAP FAILS
The proposed map in South Carolina would have positioned Republicans to sweep all seven U.S. House districts in the state after taking apart the seat held by Clyburn, 85, a Democratic power broker.
Tuesday’s vote was the second time that the effort stalled in the state Senate. Five Republicans joined Democrats earlier in the month to deny the two-thirds majority needed to advance the plan during a regular session of the chamber.
Republican South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster, who had previously had rejected White House pressure to call a special session, reversed course and brought lawmakers back to consider the map.
Early voting began in the state on Tuesday in party primaries. Some Republican senators said they could not support changing the map and postponing the primaries once ballots had already been cast.
“As far as I can tell, there is no historical precedent for a legislature to change the date of an election and redraw the maps once voting has begun,” Senator Richard Cash said during floor debate.
Cash noted that tens of thousands of votes had been recorded by midday.
ALABAMA MAP DEEMED ILLEGAL
In Alabama, a three-judge panel decided that a Republican-backed map intentionally discriminated against Black voters and could not be used for the 2026 elections. Instead, the court said, Alabama must continue to use a map that has two districts with sizable Black populations, not just one.
Republican officials in Alabama immediately said they would appeal to the conservative-majority U.S. Supreme Court.
Republican Alabama Governor Kay Ivey previously postponed until August the party primaries for four U.S. House districts that were redrawn as part of the disputed map, which was first approved in 2023.
The map breaks up a district in which Black people comprise just shy of 50% of the population. White people make up about 40% of the district, with other minorities including Asian and Hispanic people filling out the balance. Black people make up about a quarter of Alabama’s population. The district is currently represented by congressman Shomari Figures, who is Black.
The same panel of judges found the map discriminatory in 2023 and blocked it. Two weeks ago, the Supreme Court granted Alabama’s request to lift that block, and directed the judges to reconsider their findings in light of its April decision that raised the bar for challenging electoral maps on the basis of race.
But the panel reached the same conclusion: that the map purposefully and unlawfully targeted Black voters.
“Ultimately, we cannot see our way clear to requiring Alabamians to cast their votes in the 2026 elections under a districting plan tainted by intentional race-based discrimination,” wrote the panel, which includes two judges appointed by Trump and one appointed by Democratic former President Bill Clinton.
Democrats hold Alabama’s two districts with sizeable Black populations. Republicans control the state’s other five districts.
Reporting by Joseph Ax; editing by Paul Thomasch
发表回复