2026-05-22T17:51:12.896Z / 路透社
2025年10月7日，美国纽约曼哈顿，哥伦比亚大学毕业生马哈茂德·哈利勒在哥伦比亚大学校外参加亲巴勒斯坦抗议活动，当天是哈马斯从加沙地带对以色列发动致命袭击的两周年纪念日。REUTERS/瑞安·墨菲
- 摘要
- 上诉法院以6票对5票的投票结果拒绝重新审议哈利勒的拘留相关裁决
- 哈利勒的律师计划向最高法院提起上诉，称该裁决“危险”
- 上诉法院的投票结果沿意识形态阵营分裂
5月22日（路透社）——哥伦比亚大学毕业生马哈茂德·哈利勒的律师周五表示，将把案件提交至美国最高法院，此前一家意见分歧的联邦上诉法院拒绝重新考虑一项裁决，该裁决为唐纳德·特朗普政府重新逮捕并驱逐这名亲巴勒斯坦活动人士打开了大门。
美国第三巡回上诉法院
以6票对5票的意识形态阵营分裂投票结果，驳回了哈利勒要求重新审议该法院费城合议庭今年1月作出的裁决的申请。该合议庭以2票对1票的结果认定，下级法院法官无权下令将哈利勒从移民拘留所释放。
路透社伊朗简报通讯将为您带来伊朗局势的最新动态与分析。在此注册。
哈利勒是去年特朗普政府时期因在大学校园开展亲巴勒斯坦活动而被移民当局拘留的多名外国学生中最知名的人物之一。
如果第三巡回法院的裁决生效，哈利勒可能会面临再次被捕并被驱逐的风险，因为移民上诉委员会在4月驳回了他对移民法官将其驱逐至阿尔及利亚或叙利亚的命令的上诉。
哈利勒的律师、宪法权利中心的巴赫尔·阿兹米在一份声明中承诺，将请求美国最高法院审理哈利勒的案件，并推翻第三巡回法院的“危险”裁决。
“这项裁决批准了在无法获得有意义的司法审查的情况下，将某人长期关押在恶劣的拘留条件中，以惩罚他们并威慑其他人反对美国的外交政策，”他说。
美国国土安全部未立即回应置评请求。
作为反对以色列在加沙战争的亲巴勒斯坦抗议活动的知名人物，哈利勒于2025年3月在曼哈顿他的大学宿舍大厅被移民特工逮捕。
今年6月，在新泽西州的美国地区法官迈克尔·法比亚兹——民主党总统乔·拜登任命的官员——下令国土安全部将哈利勒释放后，他从路易斯安那州的一个移民拘留中心获释。
今年1月，第三巡回法院的一个合议庭推翻了法比亚兹的裁决，称根据《移民和国籍法》，哈利勒的主张不能通过地区法院审理，而应在对移民法官的驱逐令提起上诉时提出。
周五，六名由共和党总统任命的法官投票反对重新审议该裁决。
五名由民主党总统任命的法官支持重审此案，其中包括美国巡回法官谢丽尔·安·克劳斯，她表示法院的裁决限制了司法机构保护哈利勒这类非公民公民自由的能力。
“如果我们放弃自己的职责，任由行政部门自我监督，我们就无法履行这一职责，”由民主党总统巴拉克·奥巴马任命的克劳斯写道。
内特·雷蒙德在波士顿报道；露西·科恩和乔纳森·艾伦补充报道；比尔·伯克罗特编辑
Pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil to appeal to US Supreme Court to avoid re-arrest
2026-05-22T17:51:12.896Z / Reuters
Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil attends a pro-Palestinian protest outside Columbia University, on the two-year anniversary of the deadly October 7, 2023 attack on Israel by Hamas from Gaza, in Manhattan in New York City, U.S., October 7, 2025. REUTERS/Ryan Murphy
- Summary
- Appeals court on 6-5 vote declines to revisit ruling on Khalil’s detention
- Khalil’s lawyers plan Supreme Court appeal, calling ruling ‘dangerous’
- Appeals court was divided along ideological lines
May 22 (Reuters) – Lawyers for Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil vowed on Friday to take his case to the U.S. Supreme Court, after a divided federal appeals court declined to reconsider a ruling that opened the door to President Donald Trump’s administration re-arresting and deporting the pro-Palestinian activist.
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
split 6-5 along ideological lines to reject Khalil’s request to revisit a ruling a 2-1 panel of the Philadelphia-based court delivered in January that had concluded a lower-court judge had no jurisdiction to order his release from immigration detention last year.
The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.
He was among the most prominent of a number of foreign students detained last year by immigration authorities under the Trump administration after engaging in pro-Palestinian activism on their college campuses.
If the 3rd Circuit’s ruling is allowed to take effect, Khalil could face the prospect of being arrested again and deported, after the Board of Immigration Appeals in April rejected his appeal of an immigration judge’s order that he be removed to Algeria or Syria.
Baher Azmy, a lawyer for Khalil at the Center for Constitutional Rights, in a statement promised to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear Khalil’s case and overturn the 3rd Circuit’s “dangerous” decision.
“That ruling greenlights holding someone in prolonged, brutal detention conditions without access to meaningful judicial review in order to punish them and deter others from dissenting from U.S. foreign policy,” he said.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Khalil, a prominent figure in pro-Palestinian protests against Israel’s war in Gaza, was arrested in March 2025 by immigration agents in the lobby of his university residence in Manhattan.
He walked out of a Louisiana immigrant detention center in June, after U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz, an appointee of Democratic President Joe Biden, in New Jersey, ordered the Department of Homeland Security to release him from custody.
In January, a 3rd Circuit panel overturned Farbiarz’s decision, saying that under the Immigration and Nationality Act, his claims could not be addressed through a district court and instead could be raised in an appeal of a removal order from an immigration judge.
Six judges appointed by Republican presidents on Friday voted against reconsidering that decision.
Five appointed by Democrats favored rehearing the case, including U.S. Circuit Judge Cheryl Ann Krause, who said the court’s decision handcuffed the judiciary’s ability to protect the civil liberties of non-citizens like Khalil.
“We cannot fulfill that role if we write ourselves out of relevance and leave the Executive Branch to check itself,” wrote Krause, who was appointed by Democratic President Barack Obama.
Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; additional reporting by Luc Cohen and Jonathan Allen; Editing by Bill Berkrot
发表回复