2026年5月15日 世界标准时间22:40 / 路透社
作者:约翰·克鲁泽尔
更新于13分钟前
2026年4月11日,在弗吉尼亚州布里奇沃特举行的4月21日公投特别选举前夕,反对弗吉尼亚州民主党提议的州重划选区宪法修正案的竞选集会上,支持者离场。路透社/肯·塞德诺/档案照片
摘要
弗吉尼亚州选民4月批准支持民主党人的地图
重划地图是全国范围内重划选区斗争的一部分
美国11月大选将决定国会控制权归属
华盛顿5月15日路透电 — 美国最高法院周五驳回了弗吉尼亚州民主党人的一项诉求,该诉求旨在恢复一份旨在帮助民主党在11月中期选举中从总统唐纳德·特朗普所在的共和党手中夺回美国众议院控制权的选举地图。
大法官们拒绝叫停弗吉尼亚州最高法院的一项裁决,该裁决阻止了这份经选民批准的、有利于民主党人的中期选举地图,同时驳回了该州民主党人的请求。最高法院以简短的无署名命令作出了这一裁决,未给出任何理由。没有大法官公开表示异议。
路透社伊朗简报通讯将为您带来伊朗局势的最新动态与分析,点击此处订阅。
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
民主党人推动的这份经过修改的选举地图旨在将共和党把持的4个美国众议院席位转归民主党所有,这是特朗普去年发起的全国性政治斗争的一部分,该斗争旨在为党派利益重划美国选举区边界。
以保守派占多数的美国最高法院在周一为阿拉巴马州共和党人在中期选举前推行更有利于本党的国会选举地图扫清障碍后,对弗吉尼亚州的这起案件采取了行动。
中期选举将决定国会控制权归属,目前共和党在众议院和参议院都仅保有微弱多数席位。弗吉尼亚州在拥有435个席位的众议院中占有11个席位。
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
弗吉尼亚州最高法院在5月8日以4比3的投票结果推翻了该州经选民批准的选举地图,裁决支持提起诉讼的共和党人。法院认定,民主党议员去年在州议会匆忙批准该公投时未遵循正当程序,未能及时将这项投票倡议在中期选举前提交选民投票。
弗吉尼亚州众议院议长唐·斯科特和其他民主党议员周一请求美国最高法院叫停该州最高法院的这项裁决,称其“剥夺了选民、候选人以及弗吉尼亚州联邦依法设立国会选区的权利”。
他们援引了美国最高法院2023年的一项裁决,该裁决称州法院“不得逾越司法审查的普通界限,以免篡夺州立法机构管理联邦选举的权力”。
弗吉尼亚州的公投是一项复杂立法策略的最后一步,该策略旨在规避2020年经选民通过的州宪法修正案,该修正案将重划选区的权力交给两党委员会。
该案的原告之一、弗吉尼亚州参议院共和党领袖瑞安·麦克道格尔对周五的法院裁决表示欢迎。
“美国最高法院肯定了我们一直以来的认知:你不能为了修改宪法而违反宪法,”麦克道格尔说道。
弗吉尼亚州选民在4月21日的特别选举中以51.7%对48.3%的优势批准了民主党支持的选举地图,投票人数约为310万。
在被称为“重划选区”的程序中,美国各地的立法选区边界会根据每10年一次的全国人口普查结果进行重新调整,以反映人口变化。传统上,重划选区工作由各州议会在每个新十年伊始开展。
在目前这场不同寻常的中期重划选区斗争中,共和党占据明显优势。
在特朗普的敦促下,由共和党执政的得克萨斯州去年重新划定了其选举地图,旨在将5个民主党把持的美国众议院席位转归己方,这促使由民主党执政的加利福尼亚州重新调整了其国会选区地图,以争取5个共和党把持的席位。其他多个州也加入了这场争斗。
今年4月,美国最高法院以6比3的保守派多数票削弱了1965年《投票权法案》的一项关键条款,为共和党领导的南方各州在11月选举前拆除民主党把持的非裔和拉丁裔占多数选区打开了大门,这给民主党带来了沉重打击。非裔和拉丁裔选民通常支持民主党候选人。
凸显弗吉尼亚州重划选区斗争的重要性的是,支持两党的团体在这场公投竞选活动中花费了近1亿美元。
这场公投面临多起法律挑战。除了提交至美国最高法院的这起纠纷外,共和党全国委员会提起的另一桩诉讼中的一名法官也在4月22日叫停了这份有利于民主党的地图。
约翰·克鲁泽尔 报道;威尔·邓纳姆 编辑
本报准则:汤姆森路透社信任原则。
US Supreme Court rebuffs Virginia Democrats in bid for new voting map
May 15, 2026 10:40 PM UTC / Reuters
By John Kruzel
Updated 13 mins ago
Supporters depart a campaign rally against Virginia Democrats’ proposed state redistricting constitutional amendment ahead of the referendum special election on April 21, in Bridgewater, Virginia, April 11, 2026. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno/ File Photo
Summary
Virginia voters approved pro-Democratic map in April
Redrawn map is part of nationwide redistricting battle
Control of Congress at stake in November US elections
WASHINGTON, May 15 (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday rejected a bid by Virginia Democrats to revive a voting map designed to help their party wrest control of the U.S. House of Representatives from President Donald Trump’s fellow Republicans in November’s midterm elections.
The justices declined to halt a ruling by Virginia’s top court that blocked a voter-approved pro-Democratic map for the midterms, denying a request by Democrats in the state. The court’s action came in a brief and unsigned order that provided no rationale. No justice publicly dissented.
The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
Democrats pursued the revised electoral map – crafted to flip four Republican-held U.S. House of Representatives seats to Democrats – as part of a nationwide political battle initiated last year by Trump to redraw the boundaries of U.S. electoral districts for partisan benefit.
The conservative-majority U.S. Supreme Court acted in the Virginia case after clearing the way on Monday for Alabama Republicans to pursue a congressional voting map more favorable to their party ahead of the midterms.
Control of Congress is at stake in the midterms, with Republicans holding slim majorities in the House and Senate. Virginia has 11 seats in the 435-member House.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
The Virginia Supreme Court in a 4-3 decision on May 8 threw out the state’s voter-approved map, ruling in favor of Republicans who challenged it. The court found that Democratic lawmakers had not followed proper procedures last year when they rushed to approve the referendum in the state legislature in time to put the ballot initiative before voters ahead of the midterms.
Don Scott, the speaker of the Virginia House of Delegates, and other Democratic legislators asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday to halt the ruling by the state’s top court, saying it had “deprived voters, candidates and the Commonwealth (Virginia) of their right to the lawfully enacted congressional districts.”
They cited a 2023 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that stated that state courts “may not transgress the ordinary bounds of judicial review such that they arrogate to themselves the power vested in state legislatures to regulate federal elections.”
The Virginia referendum was the final step in a complicated legislative maneuver to sidestep a state constitutional amendment that was passed by voters in 2020 to put redistricting in the hands of a bipartisan commission.
Virginia Senate Republican Leader Ryan McDougle, one of the plaintiffs in the case, welcomed the court’s ruling on Friday.
“The Supreme Court of the United States has affirmed what we always knew: you cannot violate the Constitution to change the Constitution,” McDougle said.
Virginia voters approved the Democratic-backed electoral map in an April 21 special election by a 51.7% to 48.3% margin, with about 3.1 million votes cast.
In a process called redistricting, the boundaries of legislative districts across the United States are reconfigured to reflect population changes as measured by the national U.S. census every 10 years. Redistricting traditionally has been carried out by state legislatures at the start of each new decade.
In the unusual mid-decade redistricting fight now unfolding, Republicans hold a clear advantage.
At Trump’s urging, Republican-governed Texas redrew its electoral map last year in a bid to flip five Democratic-held U.S. House seats, prompting Democratic-led California to reconfigure its congressional map to target five Republican-held seats. Multiple other states have joined the fray.
Democrats suffered a blow when the U.S. Supreme Court’s 6-3 conservative majority in April gutted a key provision of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, opening the door for Republican-led Southern states to dismantle Democratic-held majority-Black and majority-Latino districts ahead of the November elections. Black and Latino voters tend to support Democratic candidates.
Underscoring the stakes of the Virginia redistricting effort, Democratic- and Republican-affiliated groups spent close to $100 million on the referendum campaign.
The referendum has faced multiple legal challenges. In addition to the dispute before the U.S. Supreme Court, a judge in a separate case on April 22 also blocked the pro-Democratic map, acting in a lawsuit filed by the Republican National Committee.
Reporting by John Kruzel; Editing by Will Dunham
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
发表回复