2026年5月15日 / 美国东部时间下午6:32 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
作者：梅根·塞鲁洛 记者，MoneyWatch栏目
梅根·塞鲁洛是哥伦比亚广播公司MoneyWatch驻纽约记者，报道小企业、职场、医疗保健、消费支出和个人理财话题。她定期做客哥伦比亚广播公司24小时新闻频道讨论相关报道。
阅读完整简历
据多位专家表示，特朗普总统与中国国家主席习近平本周举行的会晤可能在短期内缓解两国间的经济紧张局势，但未能达成任何突破性贸易协议。
“我原本预期中国会宣布大规模采购美国农产品、能源和飞机，”美国前贸易谈判代表温迪·卡特勒对哥伦比亚广播公司新闻表示，“到目前为止，特朗普及其团队似乎并未在此次访问中取得多少实质性成果。”
特朗普总统周五表示，在北京举行的会晤达成了“极佳的贸易协议”，并称此次访问是“令人难以置信的访问”，而中国官员则为美中两国新的合作领域敞开了大门。
“看起来双方都表示会晤取得了进展，但我们尚未看到具体成果——我们仍在等待，”政治风险咨询公司欧亚集团中国业务主管戴维·米尔说道，“双方都未发布明确的细节声明。我不认为这意味着会晤失败，或是这些协议不存在。他们只是需要在一些细节上完成收尾工作。”
此次会谈中可能受益的一家企业是波音公司。特朗普周五表示，中国已同意从这家美国航空巨头手中至少采购200架飞机，最终采购量可能增至750架。
但投资咨询公司凯投宏观表示，此次初步飞机订单规模小于部分峰会前分析师的预期。波音股价周五下跌3.8%，表明投资者对该交易消息反应平淡。
波音未立即回应置评请求。
特朗普还表示，中国同意购买更多美国石油和农产品，包括美国农民的“数十亿美元大豆”。
一名白宫官员告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻，特朗普此次访问达成了重要的农业协议，将扩大美国农民对华出口，同时达成的飞机采购协议将推动美国制造业就业岗位增长。该官员补充称，相关协议的更多细节即将公布。
白宫还表示，美国已成立所谓的“贸易委员会”和“投资委员会”，以管理美中两国的经济关系。
非约束性承诺
目前，能源和贸易专家指出，相关协议的具体细节仍十分匮乏。
“据我所知，这尚未得到证实，我们也未看到任何声明称中国计划每天从美国采购X桶石油，”哥伦比亚大学萨克勒公共卫生学院全球能源政策中心高级研究学者、中国能源政策专家埃丽卡·唐斯说道，“声称中国希望从美国采购更多能源会让特朗普满意，但这并不会让中国承担任何实际义务。”
现任专注于贸易和投资的智库亚洲协会政策研究所高级副总裁卡特勒表示，她原本期待看到更多关于中国重新承诺采购其他美国农产品的细节，包括玉米和牛肉。
经济学家还指出，特朗普所宣扬的对华贸易协议仍仅停留在口头承诺阶段，无法保证能够落实。
例如，特朗普2017年访华期间曾达成协议，中国国有能源投资公司将在西弗吉尼亚州投资近840亿美元用于页岩气和化工制造项目。但随着美中紧张关系升级，这些计划最终落空。
贸易专家强调，美中官员可能在未来几周和几个月内敲定此类协议。
“这并非两国的唯一一次会晤，这可能导致双方决定在宣布任何消息前先慢慢来，而非急于求成，”卡特勒指出。
稳定关系的框架？
卡特勒还强调了世界两大经济体举行建设性会谈的潜在价值。美中官员将此次会晤描述为稳定两国关系的举措，而去年特朗普对中国进口商品加征高达125%的关税，引发中国对美国产品采取反制措施，导致两国关系恶化。
“他们得以将两国关系重新定义为稳定关系，而且看起来我们将在经济领域建立新的接触框架，”卡特勒说道。
该框架包括新成立的贸易委员会，该委员会将调解两国间的贸易争端。据路透社报道，作为该机制的一部分，双方将考虑取消约300亿美元商品的关税。
但凯投宏观的数据显示，这一规模不到2025年美中贸易总额的10%。
据分析公共政策财政影响的宾夕法尼亚大学研究机构宾大沃顿预算模型显示，截至今年2月，中国商品面临的美国关税税率约为32%，而中国对美国出口商品的平均关税税率约为10%。
编辑：阿兰·谢特尔
Trump talks up trade deals with China, but experts see no big wins for U.S.
May 15, 2026 / 6:32 PM EDT / CBS News
By Megan Cerullo Reporter, MoneyWatch
Megan Cerullo is a New York-based reporter for CBS MoneyWatch covering small business, workplace, health care, consumer spending and personal finance topics. She regularly appears on CBS News 24/7 to discuss her reporting.
Read Full Bio
This week’s summit between President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping could ease economic tensions between the countries in the short term, but failed to deliver any breakthrough trade deals, according to some experts.
“I was expecting that China would announce mega purchases of U.S. agriculture, energy and airplanes,” Wendy Cutler, a former negotiator in the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, told CBS News. “So far, it doesn’t seem like Trump and his team have a lot to show for the visit.”
President Trump on Friday said the meeting in Beijing had produced “fantastic trade deals” and characterized the trip as an “incredible visit,” while Chinese officials opened the door to new areas of cooperation with the U.S.
“It looks like both sides are saying they got somewhere, but we are not there yet — we are still waiting,” said David Meale, head of the China practice at Eurasia Group, a political risk consulting firm. “Neither side has come out with a clear statement of details. I don’t think that means it’s a failure or that those deals don’t exist. They just need to cross the Ts and dot the Is on a few things.
One winner likely to emerge from the talks is Boeing. Trump said on Friday that China had agreed to purchase at least 200 aircraft from the U.S. aviation giant and that the number could eventually grow to 750 planes.
Yet the initial aircraft order is smaller than some analysts expected before the summit, according to investment advisory firm Capital Economics. Boeing shares fell 3.8% on Friday, a sign that investors were underwhelmed by the deal news.
Boeing didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
Mr. Trump also said that China agreed to buy more U.S. oil and agricultural products, including “billions of dollars of soybeans” from American farmers.
A White House official told CBS News that Mr. Trump’s trip had delivered important agricultural agreements that expand U.S. farmers’ exports to China and an aircraft purchase agreement that will boost U.S. manufacturing jobs. More details on the agreements are forthcoming, the official added.
The White House also said the U.S. has established what it called a “Board of Trade” and “Board of Investment” to manage the U.S.’s economic relationship with China.
Non-binding commitments
For now, specifics on the deals remain scant, energy and trade experts noted.
“As far as I can tell, this isn’t confirmed, and we haven’t seen a statement saying that China wants to buy X barrels of oil per day from the U.S.,” said China energy policy expert Erica Downs, a senior research scholar at the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University SIPA. “Saying that China wants to buy more energy from the U.S. will please Trump, but it doesn’t bind China to anything.”
Cutler, now senior vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute, a think tank focused on trade and investment, said she was expecting more details on renewed Chinese commitments to buy other U.S. farm products, including corn and beef.
Economists also noted that the deals with China Mr. Trump touted remain only verbal commitments, with no guarantee they will materialize.
For example, Mr. Trump’s 2017 trip to China led to an agreement for the state-owned China Energy Investment Corporation to invest nearly $84 billion in shale gas and chemical manufacturing projects in West Virginia. But the plans dissolved as U.S.-China tensions grew.
Trade experts emphasized that U.S. and Chinese officials could iron out such deals in the coming weeks and months.
“This is not their one and only meeting, which could lead to both sides deciding to take their time before they announce anything, rather than rushing,” Cutler noted.
Framework for stability?
Cutler also underlined the potential value of the world’s two largest economies holding constructive talks. Chinese and U.S. officials described the meeting as a way to stabilize the relationship, which deteriorated last year after Mr. Trump imposed tariffs of up to 125% on Chinese imports, prompting countermeasures from China on U.S. products.
“They get to relabel the relationship as stable, and it feels like there is a new framework for how we’re going to engage on the economic front,” Cutler said.
That framework includes the new Board of Trade, which would mediate trade disputes between the countries. As part of that mechanism, the sides would consider lifting tariffs on roughly $30 billion in goods, Reuters reported.
Still, that number is less than 10% of the value of trade between the U.S. and China in 2025, according to Capital Economics.
As of February, China faced a U.S. tariff rate of roughly 32%, according to the Penn Wharton Budget Model, a University of Pennsylvania research group that analyzes the fiscal impact of public policies. Chinese tariffs on U.S. experts average around 10%.
Edited by Alain Sherter
发表回复