2026年5月11日 美国东部时间7:37 / 福克斯新闻
特朗普预计“他们将在出生权公民身份案中作出不利于我们的裁决”
作者：埃里克·麦克 福克斯新闻
唐纳德·特朗普总统就两名最高法院大法官作出的1590亿美元关税反对裁决发表了长篇抱怨，称二人“对我们国家和人民如此缺乏尊重”，并预计他们“将在出生权公民身份案中作出不利于我们的裁决”。
“我不要求忠诚，但我确实希望并期待他们为我们的国家效忠，”特朗普周日晚间在Truth Social上发布的545字帖子中写道，表露了他对尼尔·戈萨奇大法官和艾米·科尼·巴雷特大法官的失望。“是的，我还有另一种征收关税的方式，但比起刚刚被一桩接近投票的裁决认定为‘非法’或‘违宪’的方式，这种方式要慢得多，也更费力，而这次裁决还附带了三份有力且极具说服力的反对意见！好吧，也许尼尔和艾米那天真的运气太差，但我们国家在垮掉、分裂之前，根本经不起那么多这类级别的裁决！！！”
“有时裁决必须以良好、坚定的常识为指导。”
特朗普称最高法院针对出生权公民身份的裁决将使中国受益
“针对出生权公民身份的负面裁决，再加上最近最高法院在关税问题上的灾难性裁决，对美利坚合众国来说在经济上是不可持续的！”
出生权公民身份案仍在最高法院待审，预计将于6月底或7月初作出裁决。特朗普一直试图终结“生育旅游”现象——即外国国民通过在美国境内生育子女，让孩子自动获得美国公民身份，以此为家族谋利。
“我挑选人才是为了帮助我们的国家，而不是伤害它，”特朗普在帖子中写道，“现在，基于我最近目睹的一切——我是历史上首位出席最高法院庭审的总统（出于对总统职位的尊重，最高法院甚至没有承认或认可这一事实！假新闻媒体对此也看在眼里！），他们将在出生权公民身份案中作出不利于我们的裁决，让我们成为世界上唯一一个实行这种不可持续、不安全且代价极高的‘灾难’的国家。”
约翰·罗伯茨大法官：我们不是“政治行动者”，对我们的“理解并不准确”
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6394802088112
今年2月下旬，最高法院以6票对3票的裁决反对特朗普根据《国际紧急经济权力法》（IEEPA）以国家安全和贸易为由征收关税的做法。戈萨奇、巴雷特和首席大法官约翰·罗伯茨与自由派大法官索尼娅·索托马约尔、埃琳娜·卡根和凯坦吉·布朗·杰克逊一同投票反对特朗普。
只有克拉伦斯·托马斯大法官、塞缪尔·阿利托大法官和布雷特·卡瓦诺大法官对在多场战争期间依据《国际紧急经济权力法》对外国商品和国家征收关税的合宪性提出了反对意见。
“我‘喜欢’尼尔·戈萨奇大法官！他是一个非常聪明且优秀的人，但他在关税问题上投了反对我的票，也反对我们的国家，这是一个毁灭性的决定，”特朗普在帖子开头写道，“我该如何调和这一点？这对我们国家来说太糟糕了，也太伤人了。同样，我一直都很喜欢和尊重艾米·科尼·巴雷特，但她也是如此。”
最高法院否决特朗普的“解放日关税”——但另有4项法律或可使其复活
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6386917609112
“他们都是我任命的，但却如此严重地伤害了我们的国家！我不认为他们是故意为之，但他们在关税问题上的裁决让美国损失了1590亿美元，我们不得不把这笔钱还给那些多年来一直敲诈我们的敌人、个人、企业和国家。这简直难以置信！”
特朗普补充说，如果他们只是没有给企业留下回头索要关税退款的口子，他本可以接受这项裁决。虽然裁决并未明确允许此类诉求，但最终还是迫使特朗普政府做出了回应。
“他们本可以用一句‘极小的’话就能解决这个问题：‘任何由他人支付给美国的款项都无需退还’，”特朗普写道，“他们为什么不这么做？”
特朗普抨击法院后，首席大法官罗伯茨警告称对法官的人身攻击“具有危险性”
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6392575600112
“凭借我们最高法院的某些共和党提名的大法官，民主党人实际上已经不需要再‘填塞法院’了。事实上，我才应该是那个想要填塞法院的人！”
特朗普暗示，一些保守派大法官应该像自由派大法官那样，根据其所代表的民众和意识形态，从政治角度解读法律。
“我一直在如此努力地‘让美国再次伟大’，但我任命的人却对我们的国家和人民表现出如此少的尊重，”他继续说道，“这背后的原因是什么？他们必须做正确的事，但他们忠于任命他们担任这个近乎美国最高职位的人——也就是美国最高法院大法官——这真的没问题吗？”
“民主党大法官始终忠于那些为他们获得这一极为特殊的提名而给予他们荣誉的人。无论案件是好是坏，他们都不会动摇，但共和党大法官常常特意反对我，因为他们想要展示自己有多‘独立’，或者‘超脱于政治之上’。”
埃里克·麦克是福克斯新闻数字频道的突发新闻撰稿人。
Trump criticizes 2 Supreme Court justices by name over tariff ruling
May 11, 2026 7:37am EDT / Fox News
Trump expects ‘they will be ruling against us on Birthright Citizenship’
By Eric Mack Fox News
President Donald Trump issued a lengthy lament for two of his Supreme Court justices’ $159 billion ruling against tariffs and likely “ruling against us on Birthright Citizenship” and showing “so little respect to our country, and its people.”
“I don’t want loyalty, but I do want and expect it for our Country,” Trump’s 545-word Truth Social post read Sunday night, showing his disappointment in Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett. “Yes, I have another way of doing Tariffs, but it is far slower, and more laborious than what was just determined, in a close decision, to be ‘illegal’ or ‘unconstitutional,’ with three powerful, and highly accurate, dissents! Well, maybe Neil, and Amy, just had a really bad day, but our Country can only handle so many decisions of that magnitude before it breaks down, and cracks!!!”
“Sometimes decisions have to be allowed to use Good, Strong, Common Sense as a guide.”
TRUMP SAYS SUPREME COURT RULING AGAINST BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP ORDER WOULD BENEFIT CHINA
President Donald Trump speaks during a “Make America Wealthy Again” trade announcement event in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, D.C., on April 2, 2025, where he launched the Liberation Day tariffs.(Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images)
“A negative ruling on Birthright Citizenship, on top of the recent Supreme Court Tariff catastrophe, is not Economically sustainable for the United States of America!”
The birthright citizenship ruling remains pending before the Supreme Court, with a decision expected before the end of June or in early July. Trump has sought to end the practice of “birth tourism,” where foreign nationals have put their family’s stake in automatic U.S. citizenship of their children born while in the U.S.
“I choose people to help our Country, not to hurt it,” Trump’s post read, “and now, based on what I witnessed recently by being the first President in History to attend a Supreme Court session (Which fact was not even recognized or acknowledged, out of respect for the position of President, by the Court — Something which did not go unnoticed by the Fake News Media!), they will be ruling against us on Birthright Citizenship, making us the only Country in the World that practices this unsustainable, unsafe,and incredibly costly DISASTER.”
JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS: WE’RE NOT ‘POLITICAL ACTORS,’ NOT AN ‘ACCURATE UNDERSTANDING’ OF US
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6394802088112
The Supreme Court delivered a 6-3 decision against Trump’s International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) use of tariffs for national security and trade in late February. Gorsuch, Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts ruled with liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson.
Only Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh dissented against the constitutionality of using IEEPA to levy tariffs on foreign goods and countries amid multiple wars.
“I ‘Love’ Justice Neil Gorsuch! He’s a really smart and good man, but he voted against me, and our Country, on Tariffs, a devastating move,” Trump’s post began. “How do I reconcile this? So bad, and hurtful to our Country. I have, likewise, always liked and respected Amy Coney Barrett, but the same thing with her.
SUPREME COURT KILLS TRUMP’S ‘LIBERATION DAY’ TARIFFS — BUT 4 OTHER LAWS COULD RESURRECT THEM
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6386917609112
“They were appointed by me, and yet have hurt our Country so badly! I do not believe they meant to do so, but their decision on Tariffs cost the United States 159 Billion Dollars that we have to pay back to enemies, and people, companies, and Countries, that have been ripping us off for years. It’s hardly believable!”
Trump added he was fine with the ruling if they had just not left the door open for companies to come back to ask for the tariffs money back, something the ruling did not expressly allow, but ultimately has forced the Trump administration to respond to.
“They could have solved that situation with a ‘tiny’ sentence, ‘Any money paid by others to the United States does not have to be paid back,’” Trump wrote. “Why wouldn’t they have done so?
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS WARNS AGAINST PERSONAL ATTACKS ON JUDGES AS ‘DANGEROUS’ AFTER TRUMP COURT TIRADE
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6392575600112
“With certain Republican Nominated Justices that we have on the Supreme Court, the Democrats don’t really need to ‘PACK THE COURT’ any longer. In fact, I should be the one wanting to PACK THE COURT!”
Trump suggested some of the conservative justices should follow the liberal justices’ political interpretations of the law on behalf of the people and ideology they represent.
“I’m working so hard to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, and then people that I appointed have shown so little respect to our Country, and its people,” he continued. “What is the reason for this? They have to do the right thing, but it’s really OK for them to be loyal to the person that appointed them to ‘almost’ the highest position in the land, that is, a Justice of the United States Supreme Court.”
“Democrat Justices always remain true to the people that honored them for that very special Nomination. They don’t waver, no matter how good or bad a case may be, but Republican Justices often go out of their way to oppose me, because they want to show how ‘independent’ or, ‘above it all,’ they are.”
Eric Mack is a writer for Fox News Digital covering breaking news.
发表回复