2026-05-08 17:51:14 UTC / 路透社
路透社
2026年5月8日 下午5:51 UTC 更新于39分钟前
2026年2月24日，美国加利福尼亚州奥克兰港的货轮上堆叠着集装箱。路透社/卡洛斯·巴里娅/资料图片 购买授权使用权
纽约5月8日路透电 — 特朗普政府于周五就一项法院裁决提起上诉，该裁决认定今年2月实施的10%全球关税不符合1970年代贸易法的相关规定。
美国国际贸易法院周四以2比1的投票结果作出裁决，认定1974年贸易法第122条并非用于应对美国进口多于出口所导致的贸易逆差。不过，该法院仅叫停了针对三名起诉方的关税措施——两家小企业和华盛顿州。
路透社伊朗简报新闻通讯将为您带来伊朗局势的最新动态与分析，点击此处订阅。
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
尽管此次裁决涉及的一批关税将在约两个月后到期，但这仍是特朗普全球关税计划的又一次挫折，且距他将于北京与中国国家主席习近平讨论贸易紧张局势仅一周时间。
这也为围绕价值数十亿美元关税退税的又一场长期法律战埋下伏笔，而就在三个月前，美国最高法院推翻了特朗普依据国家紧急状态法实施的大规模全球关税措施。
特朗普周四在对记者发表讲话时，将贸易法院的裁决归咎于“两名激进左翼法官”。美国贸易代表贾米森·格里尔周五表示，特朗普政府有望在上诉中获胜，同时他也对此前最终被美国最高法院判定无效的关税措施抱有信心。
广告 · 滚动继续阅读
最高法院今年2月裁定，特朗普无权依据《国际紧急经济权力法》实施此前的关税措施，这促使特朗普转而依据《贸易法》第122条对所有进口商品加征10%的替代关税。
此次新关税为临时性替代措施，原定于7月24日到期，除非国会延长其有效期。
特朗普政府仍计划援引另一项经受住多次法律挑战的法律——1974年《贸易法》第301条，对主要贸易伙伴实施更广泛的关税措施，该条款针对不公平贸易行为。目前有三项依据第301条发起的关税调查，预计将于7月完成。
迪特里希·克瑙特 纽约报道；罗德·尼克尔与桑吉夫·米格拉尼 编辑
我们的报道准则：汤森路透信任原则
Trump administration appeals latest court loss on tariffs
2026-05-08 17:51:14 UTC / Reuters
By Reuters
May 8, 2026 5:51 PM UTC Updated 39 mins ago
Shipping containers are stacked on a cargo ship at the port of Oakland in Oakland, California, U.S., February 24, 2026. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights
NEW YORK, May 8 (Reuters) – The Trump administration on Friday appealed a court ruling that found a 10% global tariff imposed in February was not justified under a 1970s trade law.
The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on Thursday in a 2-1 decision that Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act was not meant to address trade deficits that occur when the U.S. imports more goods than it exports. The court, however, only blocked the tariffs for three importers that sued – two small businesses and the state of Washington.
The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
While the ruling applies to a set of levies due to expire in about two months, it marks another setback for Trump’s global tariff ambitions and comes a week before he is due to discuss trade tensions with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing.
It also sets the stage for another protracted legal battle over billions of dollars’ worth of tariff refunds, three months after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Trump’s sweeping global tariffs imposed under a national emergencies law.
Trump blamed the trade court decision on “two radical left judges” when speaking to reporters on Thursday. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said on Friday the Trump administration expects to prevail in the appeal, although he also expressed confidence in earlier tariffs that were ultimately invalidated by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
The Supreme Court ruled in February that Trump had no authority to impose the earlier tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, leading Trump to impose replacement tariffs of 10% on all imports using Section 122 of the Trade Act.
The new tariffs were a temporary replacement, and they were due to expire on July 24 unless extended by Congress.
The Trump administration still plans broader tariffs on major trading partners by invoking a third law that has withstood numerous legal challenges, Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, which covers unfair trade practices. It has three Section 301 tariff investigations underway due for completion in July.
Reporting by Dietrich Knauth; Editing by Rod Nickel and Sanjeev Miglani
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
发表回复