2026年5月7日 美国东部时间下午2:43 / 福克斯新闻
身为陆军退伍军人的巴雷特表示，国会必须“明确界定任务，附带保障措施与期限”
作者：亚当·帕克 福克斯新闻
KT·麦克法兰谈伊朗核协议、执行情况及中国的角色
前副国家安全顾问KT·麦克法兰就美国对伊朗的和平提议进行分析。她强调了伊朗一贯不遵守承诺的历史，以及任何核协议都必须具备“快速核查机制”的必要性。麦克法兰还指出，中国在伊朗石油供应及北京方面的外交努力中拥有重大利益，此次分析正值特朗普与习近平峰会前夕。
NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了！
收听本文
4分钟
一位面临激烈连任竞选的众议院共和党议员正着手对伊朗战争施加严格限制，这与特朗普政府所称的敌对行动已经结束的说法背道而驰。
密歇根州共和党众议员汤姆·巴雷特周四提出一项决议，授权将战争行动延续至7月底，以永久削弱伊朗的核计划、应对“迫在眉睫的威胁”、实施海上封锁并确保美国船只安全通过霍尔木兹海峡。
但该法案同时将对长期军事行动设定严格准则，限制地面部队部署，并禁止“国家建设”、占领或夺取伊朗领土。
“从一开始就有两点明确无误：绝不能让伊朗研发核武器，美国也绝不能被拖入另一场无休止的战争，”曾多次赴中东服役的陆军退伍军人巴雷特说道。“总司令拥有在战时统领我们军队的唯一权力，但我在战场上失去了太多战友，绝不能允许在国会不行使其宪法职责、明确界定任务并附带保障措施与期限的情况下开战。”
展示美国在与伊朗紧张局势下重新开放霍尔木兹海峡行动相关画面的唐纳德·特朗普总统。(萨尔万·乔治/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社)
共和党人让特朗普掌控伊朗政策——但出现了一条红线
“如果我们不从过去的外交政策失败中汲取教训，就必然会重蹈覆辙，”他补充道。
阿拉斯加州共和党参议员丽莎·穆尔科斯基也誓言将在参议院提出类似法案，授权在严格边界内使用武力，她将此描述为对特朗普的“约束”。
巴雷特的这项提议出台之际，白宫基本对周五的60天战争结束期限置之不理，辩称4月7日开始的停火实际上终止了1973年《战争权力决议》的倒计时。根据战争权力条款，未经国会批准，政府必须在60至90天内结束敌对行动。
“就《战争权力决议》而言，2月28日周六开始的敌对行动已经终止，”一位资深政府官员上周告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。
“双方于4月7日周二达成了为期两周的停火协议，此后该协议已得到延长，”该官员继续说道。“自4月7日周二以来，美国武装部队与伊朗之间没有发生交火。”
巴雷特办公室发布的新闻稿称，“美国军事行动仍在持续”。
密歇根州共和党众议员汤姆·巴雷特周四表示，美国军方不能被拖入“另一场无休止的战争”。(杰夫·科瓦尔/法新社)
前撒切尔顾问：特朗普对欧洲在伊朗问题上的背叛感到愤怒“合情合理”
国务卿马可·卢比奥周二辩称，1973年《战争权力决议》完全违宪，政府只是出于对国会的尊重才遵守其中部分条款。
“我们确实会遵照执行，比如通报情况，因为我们希望与国会保持良好关系，”卢比奥在新闻发布会上告诉记者。“我们确实会这么做。”
特朗普多次延长与伊朗的停火协议，双方正通过调解人努力永久结束战争。
巴雷特的决议还规定，如果特朗普政府打算将敌对行动延长至7月30日最后期限之后，可额外给予30天的“收尾期”。
国务卿马可·卢比奥周二表示，1973年《战争权力决议》“100%违宪”。(斯特凡尼·雷诺兹/彭博社 via 盖蒂图片社)
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序
这项决议出台之际，代表兰辛地区选区的 freshman议员巴雷特正面临11月中期选举前可能艰难的连任竞选。
前乔·拜登政府时期的美国驻乌克兰大使布里奇特·布林克与退役海军海豹突击队队员马特·马斯达姆正在竞争激烈的民主党初选中角逐，以在这个摇摆选区击败巴雷特。
无党派的库克政治报告将他的连任竞选评级为“势均力敌”。
目前尚不清楚巴雷特是否会加入民主党人，支持一项战争权力决议，该决议将在国会下周复会后，阻止在未经批准的情况下对伊朗采取军事行动。
白宫未立即回应置评请求。
Swing-district Republican breaks with Trump, pushes limits on Iran war
May 7, 2026 2:43pm EDT / Fox News
Barrett, an Army veteran, says Congress must ‘clearly define the mission with safeguards and a deadline’
By Adam Pack, Fox News
KT McFarland on Iran’s nuclear deal, enforcement, and China’s role
KT McFarland, former deputy national security advisor, analyzes the U.S. peace proposal to Iran. She emphasizes Iran’s history of non-compliance and the necessity of ‘snap inspections’ for any nuclear deal. McFarland highlights China’s vital interest in Iran’s oil supply and diplomatic efforts in Beijing before the Trump-Xi summit.
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
Listen to this article
4 min
A House Republican facing a tough re-election fight is moving to impose strict limits on the Iran war, breaking with the Trump administration’s claim that hostilities have ended.
Rep. Tom Barrett, R-Mich., introduced a resolution Thursday that would authorize the war through the end of July to permanently degrade Iran’s nuclear program, address “imminent threats,” enforce a naval blockade and ensure safe passage of U.S. ships through the Strait of Hormuz.
But the measure would also set stringent guidelines on prolonged military operations by limiting boots on the ground and prohibiting “nation-building” or occupying or seizing Iranian territory.
“Two things have been clear from the very beginning: Iran cannot be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the United States of America cannot be dragged into another endless war,” Barrett, an Army veteran who served multiple tours in the Middle East, said. “The commander in chief has the sole authority to lead our troops in wartime, but I’ve lost too many friends on the battlefield to allow that to happen without Congress exercising its constitutional role to clearly define the mission with safeguards and a deadline.”
President Donald Trump is shown in an image related to the U.S. operation to reopen the Strait of Hormuz amid tensions with Iran.(Salwan Georges/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
REPUBLICANS HAND TRUMP THE WHEEL ON IRAN — BUT ONE RED LINE EMERGES
“If we don’t learn from our foreign policy failures of the past, we are bound to repeat them,” he added.
Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, has also vowed to introduce a similar measure in the upper chamber authorizing the use of military force within strict boundaries, which she has described as a “restraint” on Trump.
Barrett’s measure follows the White House largely shrugging off a 60-day deadline to end the war on Friday by arguing that the ceasefire that began on April 7 effectively stopped the clock on the 1973 War Powers Resolution’s countdown. Under the war powers provision, the administration is required to end hostilities within 60 to 90 days absent congressional approval.
“For War Powers Resolution purposes, the hostilities that began on Saturday, February 28 have terminated,” a senior administration official told Fox News Digital last week.
“Both parties agreed to a two-week ceasefire on Tuesday, April 7 that has since been extended,” the official continued. “There has been no exchange of fire between U.S. Armed Forces and Iran since Tuesday, April 7.”
A press release issued by Barrett’s office stated that “U.S. military operations are ongoing.”
Rep. Tom Barrett, R-Mich., said the U.S. military cannot be dragged into “another endless war” on Thursday.(Jeff Kowalsky/AFP)
TRUMP ‘RIGHT TO BE OUTRAGED’ BY EUROPE’S BETRAYAL ON IRAN, SAYS FORMER THATCHER ADVISOR
Secretary of State Marco Rubio argued Tuesday that the 1973 War Powers Resolution is unconstitutional, and the administration was only complying with parts of it out of respect for Congress.
“We comply with it in terms of, like, notification because we want to preserve good relations with Congress,” Rubio told reporters during a news conference. “And we do that.”
Trump has repeatedly extended the ceasefire with Iran as both parties are working with mediators to permanently end the war.
Barrett’s resolution would also allow for an additional 30-day “wind-down period” if the Trump administration intended to extend hostilities past the July 30 deadline.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Tuesday that the 1973 War Powers Resolution is “100% unconstitutional.”(Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The resolution comes as Barrett, a freshman lawmaker representing a Lansing-area district, is facing a potentially bruising re-election bid ahead of November’s midterm elections.
Bridget Brink, the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine under former President Joe Biden, and retired Navy SEAL Matt Maasdam are vying in a crowded Democratic primary to unseat Barrett in the swing seat.
The nonpartisan Cook Political Report rates his re-election bid as a “toss-up.”
It is unclear whether Barrett will join Democrats in supporting a war powers resolution that would block military action against Iran absent congressional approval when lawmakers return to Washington next week.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
发表回复