特朗普政府EPA局长誓言不会接受民主党参议员的“道德说教”,此前双方爆发激烈冲突


2026年4月29日 美国东部时间晚上7:02 / 福克斯新闻网

EPA局长李·泽尔丁提及怀特长老参议员所在的排他性“全白人”海滩俱乐部成员身份争议

作者:利奥·布里塞尼奥

民主党参议员与特朗普政府的EPA署长就关闭燃煤电厂的成本效益问题展开唇枪舌战

美国环境保护署署长李·泽尔丁回击罗德岛州民主党参议员谢尔登·怀特长老,此前怀特长老称,淘汰“污染性”能源将改善美国的成本效益。

全新功能:您现在可以收听福克斯新闻的文章了!

收听本文
4分钟

罗德岛州民主党参议员谢尔登·怀特与美国环境保护署署长李·泽尔丁在周三一场激烈的参议院听证会上就燃煤电厂的成本效益分析展开激烈交锋,议题还包括特朗普领导下的EPA是否有足够依据来衡量医疗账单和保险索赔是否应纳入成本核算。

这场激烈的来回交锋结束后许久,泽尔丁仍对怀特进行了隐晦的抨击。

“我们只想坚守真相,”泽尔丁说道。

“我们只想遵循科学。如果你不同意这些科学,不认同其逻辑,他们就会诋毁你……我不会接受那些加入全白人乡村俱乐部的人的道德说教,”他补充道,此处指的是有关怀特家族曾是贝利海滩俱乐部(前身为“喷水岩海滩协会”)会员的报道。

EPA局长抨击流入美国海军海豹突击队训练水域的墨西哥“污水危机”

2025年3月13日,美国环境保护署署长李·泽尔丁在华盛顿特区白宫椭圆形办公室与唐纳德·特朗普总统及北约秘书长马克·吕特会面。(安德鲁·哈尼克/盖蒂图片社)

“我认为该俱乐部的管理人员仍在为此努力,很遗憾此事尚未解决,”怀特在2017年谈及允许少数族裔会员加入时说道。“这在罗德岛州是由来已久的传统,这类俱乐部有很多,我们只是需要逐步解决这些问题。”

此次交锋之际,议员们正在审议唐纳德·特朗普总统向EPA提出的2027财年预算申请,该预算案因提议削减该机构50%的资金而令民主党人忧心忡忡。

泽尔丁与怀特的冲突也凸显了本届政府与国会民主党人之间的尖锐分歧,分歧点在于气候变化究竟是否构成威胁,以及美国应该投入多少资源应对气候变化。

批评该预算提案的怀特辩称,泽尔丁忽视了化石燃料带来的间接成本。

“密歇根州的一座电厂已经让密歇根州民众多支出了6亿美元的医疗费用。这笔钱本应属于消费者口袋,却进了你们的化石燃料污染企业、特朗普的大额捐赠者的腰包。你们甚至在追踪这些燃煤电厂给消费者带来的成本吗?”怀特向泽尔丁问道。

“我们要来谈谈数学问题吗?”泽尔丁反驳道。“哦,这太棒了,我都不知道该从何说起。”

“你们甚至在追踪这些燃煤电厂给消费者带来的成本吗?”怀特再次问道。“回答这个问题:你们甚至在追踪这些燃煤电厂给消费者带来的成本吗?”

环保团体对特朗普的能源与环境任命意见不一

2025年1月16日,当选总统唐纳德·特朗普提名的美国环境保护署署长前众议员李·泽尔丁在华盛顿特区国会山出席参议院环境与公共工程委员会的确认听证会。(安娜·蒙尼梅克/盖蒂图片社)

泽尔丁起初回应称,EPA确实在追踪能源相关的消费者成本,但被怀特打断。

“你们到底在追踪这些燃煤电厂给消费者带来的成本吗?”怀特插话道。

泽尔丁暂且搁置了追踪成本这一话题,转而直面怀特关于全国范围内燃煤电厂成本效益的核心论点。

“你在开玩笑吗?即便燃煤电厂继续运营——你难道认为,关闭西弗吉尼亚州的燃煤电厂、让这些人失业,还告诉他们去学编程,这对西弗吉尼亚州更好吗?”泽尔丁说道。

“在你看来,这是在拯救西弗吉尼亚州吗?这能改善他们的能源获取情况吗?能保住他们的工作吗?”泽尔丁补充道。

怀特的分配发言时间所剩无几,他结束质询时暗示特朗普政府从与能源行业绑定的捐赠者那里获益。

参议员吉姆·贾斯蒂斯“完全”震惊于民主党对埃隆·马斯克披露狗狗币相关消息的反应

2023年5月4日,罗德岛州民主党参议员谢尔登·怀特在华盛顿特区德克森参议院办公楼主持参议院预算委员会听证会,主题为“《美国违约法案》:敲诈、边缘政策与亿万富翁的幕后交易”。(汤姆·威廉姆斯/CQ-罗尔公司)

点击此处下载福克斯新闻APP

“你故意抬高成本,因为消费者为此多付的钱会流入特朗普的大额化石燃料捐赠者的口袋,”怀特说道。

EPA在2026财年获得了约88.2亿美元的拨款。特朗普在2027财年的拨款请求仅为42亿美元,同比降幅达52%。

利奥·布里塞尼奥是福克斯新闻数字频道国会团队的政治记者,此前曾供职于《世界杂志》。

Trump EPA chief vows he won’t take ‘morality lessons’ from Dem senator after heated clash

April 29, 2026 7:02pm EDT / Fox News

EPA’s Lee Zeldin invoked Sen Whitehouse’s controversial membership at exclusive ‘all-white’ beach club

By Leo Briceno

Democratic senator trades barbs with Trump’s EPA administrator over the cost-benefit of closing coal plants

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin claps back at Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-RI, for suggesting country’s cost benefit would be improved by eliminating “polluting” energy sources.

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

Listen to this article

4 min

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., traded barbs with Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin in a fiery Senate hearing on Wednesday over cost-benefit analysis of coal plants — and whether the EPA, under Trump’s leadership, had enough to weigh whether hospital bills and insurance claims should factor into the calculus.

The heated back-and-forth left Zeldin taking a thinly-veiled dig at Whitehouse long after the Democratic environmentalist had concluded his line of questioning.

“We just want to stick to the truth,” Zeldin said.

“We want to stick to the science. If you don’t agree with them, you don’t follow their logic, then they’ll want to vilify you… and I’m not going to take morality lessons from people who join all-white country clubs,” he added, referring to reports of Whitehouse’s family membership at Bailey’s Beach Club, a beach club formerly known as Spouting Rock Beach Association.

EPA CHIEF TAKES ON MEXICAN ‘SEWAGE CRISIS’ FLOWING INTO US WATERS WHERE NAVY SEALS TRAIN

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin attends a meeting with President Donald Trump and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on March 13, 2025.(Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

“I think the people who are running the place are still working on that and I’m sorry it hasn’t happened yet,” Whitehouse said in 2017, referring to allowing minority members. “It’s a long tradition in Rhode Island and there are many of them and we just need to work our way through the issues.”

The interaction comes as lawmakers weigh President Donald Trump’s 2027 budget request for the EPA, a framework that has alarmed Democrats for its proposed 50% slash to the agency’s funding.

Zeldin’s clash with Whitehouse also underscores sharp divisions between the administration and Democrats in Congress over what threat, if any, climate change poses and what resources the U.S. should devote to combating it.

Whitehouse, who panned the proposed budget, argued that Zeldin was ignoring secondary costs brought on by fossil fuels.

“One plant in Michigan has already cost Michiganders $600 million in excess health costs. That is money out of consumers’ pockets, and into the pockets of your fossil fuel polluters, Trump’s big donors. Are you even tracking the consumer costs of those coal plants?” Whitehouse asked Zeldin.

“We’re going to get to talk about math?” Zeldin retorted. “Oh, this is great; I don’t even know where to start.”

“Are you even tracking the consumer costs of those coal plants?” Whitehouse asked again. “Answer that question: Are you even tracking the consumer costs of those coal plants?”

ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS PRESENT DIFFERING OPINIONS OF TRUMP’S ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT APPOINTEES

Former Rep. Lee Zeldin, President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for EPA administrator, speaks during his Senate Environment and Public Works confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 16, 2025.(Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Zeldin began replying that the EPA did, in fact, track consumer costs of energy but was cut off.

“Where are you tracking the consumer costs of those coal plants?” Whitehouse interjected.

Zeldin, setting aside the matter of tracking, turned to confront Whitehouse’s underlying argument about the cost-benefit of coal across the country.

“Are you kidding me? Coal plants even staying open – you think that the math is that it’s better for West Virginia if you close down their coal plants and put these people out of work and tell them to learn how to code?” Zeldin said.

“According to you, in your mind, that’s saving West Virginia? Is it saving them on energy access? Is it saving them on jobs?” Zeldin added.

Whitehouse, running out of his allotted time, closed his line of questioning by proposing that Trump’s administration stood to gain from energy-aligned donors.

NEW SEN. JIM JUSTICE ‘ABSOLUTELY’ SHOCKED BY DEMOCRATS’ RESPONSE TO ELON MUSK’S DOGE REVELATIONS

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., conducts the Senate Budget Committee hearing titled “The Default on America Act: Blackmail, Brinkmanship, and Billionaire Backroom Deals” in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on May 4, 2023.(Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“You’re raising costs on purpose because the money that you get when you raise costs from consumers goes to Trump’s big fossil fuel donors,” Whitehouse said.

The EPA was given roughly $8.82 billion in the 2026 fiscal year. For 2027, Trump has requested just $4.2B for 2027 — a drop that would represent a 52% decrease year over year.

Leo Briceno is a politics reporter for the congressional team at Fox News Digital. He was previously a reporter with World Magazine.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注