2026年4月28日 / 美国东部时间下午3:02 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
作者:卡米洛·蒙托亚-加尔韦斯
卡米洛·蒙托亚-加尔韦斯 移民事务通讯员
卡米洛·蒙托亚-加尔韦斯是哥伦比亚广播公司新闻的移民事务通讯员,其报道见于多个节目和平台,包括全国广播节目、哥伦比亚广播公司24小时新闻频道、CBSNews.com以及该机构的社交媒体账号。
阅读完整简历
卡米洛·蒙托亚-加尔韦斯
联邦上诉法院周二驳回了特朗普政府的一项政策,该政策要求移民海关执法局对众多待驱逐移民实施强制羁押,其中包括已在美国生活多年的移民。
总部位于纽约的第二巡回上诉法院的法官小组称这项政策是“我国历史上针对数百万非公民的最广泛的无保释大规模羁押命令”。
该法官小组写道,特朗普政府对强制移民羁押的解释“将给我们的移民羁押系统和社会带来巨大冲击,加剧本已过度拥挤的羁押基础设施负担,羁押数百万人,拆散家庭,并扰乱社区”。
这一裁决在移民海关执法局大规模羁押政策问题上造成了司法分歧。虽然美国国内大多数法官已裁定该政策非法,但分别位于路易斯安那州和密苏里州的第五巡回上诉法院和第八巡回上诉法院支持特朗普政府对强制羁押的解释。第二巡回上诉法院的裁决适用于康涅狄格州、纽约州和佛蒙特州。
周二的意见书由特朗普任命的美国巡回法官约瑟夫·比安科撰写,克林顿任命的何塞·卡巴内斯和拜登任命的艾莉森·内森联署。
去年,特朗普政府重新解读了一项20世纪90年代的移民法,取消了大批非法居住在美国的移民在被移民海关执法局逮捕后请求移民法官保释的权利。
此前,在美国生活多年的无证移民通常有资格获得保释听证会,并可以试图说服移民法官,由于他们不会潜逃或对公共安全构成威胁,应该允许他们在羁押中心之外对抗驱逐程序。
此前,强制羁押主要限于近期非法入境美国的人员,包括沿南部边境入境的人员,以及因特定罪名被定罪的被羁押者。
但特朗普政府的立场是,任何非法入境美国的人,无论入境时间多久,在其驱逐案件审理期间都应受到强制羁押。
这项影响范围广泛的政策变更导致移民海关执法局无限期羁押那些多年甚至数十年前非法入境美国、原本有资格获得保释的被羁押者,其中包括除涉嫌违反民事移民规定外没有犯罪记录的人员。
在周二的一份声明中,负责监管移民海关执法局的国土安全部表示,政府正在“按照法律的实际文本”执行移民羁押法,以保障美国安全。
“关于联邦法院针对强制羁押的裁决,司法激进主义者在这些问题上已多次被最高法院驳回,”国土安全部表示,“移民海关执法局占据法律和事实优势,将在更高一级法院获得胜诉。”
Appeals court rejects Trump administration’s mandatory ICE detention policy
April 28, 2026 / 3:02 PM EDT / CBS News
By Camilo Montoya-Galvez
Camilo Montoya-Galvez Immigration Correspondent
Camilo Montoya-Galvez is the Immigration Correspondent at CBS News, where his reporting is featured across multiple programs and platforms, including national broadcast shows, CBS News 24/7, CBSNews.com and the organization’s social media accounts.
Read Full Bio
Camilo Montoya-Galvez
A federal appeals court on Tuesday rejected the Trump administration’s policy of making many of the immigrants it is trying to deport subject to mandatory detention by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, including those who have lived in the U.S. for years.
A panel of judges from the New York-based 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals called the policy the “broadest mass-detention-without-bond mandate in our Nation’s history for millions of noncitizens.”
The panel wrote that the Trump administration’s interpretation of mandatory immigration detention would “send a seismic shock through our immigration detention system and society, straining our already overcrowded detention infrastructure, incarcerating millions, separating families, and disrupting communities.”
The ruling creates a judicial divide over the mass ICE detention policy. While most judges across the country have declared the policy illegal, the 5th Circuit and 8th Circuit Courts of Appeals, based in Louisiana and Missouri, respectively, have endorsed the Trump administration’s interpretation of mandatory detention. The 2nd Circuit’s decision applies to Connecticut, New York and Vermont.
Tuesday’s opinion was written by U.S. Circuit Judge Joseph Bianco, an appointee of President Trump, who was joined by Clinton appointee Jose Cabranes and Biden appointee Alison Nathan.
Last year, the Trump administration reinterpreted a 1990s immigration law to disqualify broad groups of immigrants living in the U.S. illegally from having the ability to ask an immigration judge to be released on bond after being arrested by ICE.
Previously, undocumented immigrants who had lived in the U.S. for years were generally eligible for bond hearings and could seek to convince an immigration judge that they should be allowed to fight their deportation outside of a detention center because they were not flight risks or threats to public safety.
Mandatory detention had previously been largely limited to those who had recently entered the U.S. illegally, including along the southern border, as well as detainees convicted of certain crimes.
But the Trump administration has taken the position that anyone who entered the U.S. illegally, irrespective of how long ago, is subject to mandatory detention while their deportation cases are decided.
The sweeping policy change has led ICE to indefinitely hold detainees who entered the U.S. illegally years or even decades ago and who previously would have been eligible for bond, including those without criminal records beyond alleged civil immigration violations.
In a statement Tuesday, the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE, said the administration is enforcing the immigration detention law “as it was actually written to keep America safe.”
“Regarding decisions from federal courts about mandatory detention, judicial activists have been repeatedly overruled by the Supreme Court on these questions,” DHS said. “ICE has the law and the facts on its side and will be vindicated by higher courts.”
发表回复