法官裁定:五角大楼可在上诉期间要求记者由专人陪同


2026年4月27日 / 美国东部时间晚上8:57 / 哥伦比亚广播公司/美联社报道

美国一家上诉法院周一裁定,在特朗普政府就阻止实施一项新的媒体准入政策的法院判决提起上诉期间,国防部可以要求记者在五角大楼园区内必须由专人陪同。

这项由美国哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院三名法官组成的合议庭以分歧意见作出的裁决,并非《纽约时报》起诉五角大楼一案的最终判决。但合议庭多数意见认为,特朗普政府很有可能证明该政策中的陪同要求在法律上是站得住脚的。

该合议庭批准了政府的请求,暂停了美国地区法官保罗·弗里德曼4月9日作出的判决。弗里德曼此前裁定,国防部违反了此前恢复记者进入五角大楼权限的命令。

去年秋天,五角大楼要求报道军方事务的记者签署一系列限制条款,才能维持每日进入该大楼的权限。包括哥伦比亚广播公司新闻、美国广播公司新闻、全国广播公司新闻、有线电视新闻网和福克斯新闻在内的众多媒体机构均拒绝签署这项新规定。

《纽约时报》提起诉讼,弗里德曼上月站在该报一方,裁定该政策的部分条款无效。他认定多项限制措施违反宪法,其中包括一条规定,称从军方人员处“刺探”敏感信息的记者可能被视为安全风险并被驱逐出大楼。

随后在本月早些时候,弗里德曼裁定五角大楼发布了修订后的媒体政策,除非记者有政府人员陪同,否则一律禁止进入大楼,这违反了他此前的命令。

在周一的裁决中,由特朗普任命的巡回法官贾斯汀·沃克和拜登任命的布拉德利·加西亚写道,“行政机构可以针对不利裁决采取修订后的政策作为回应”。

由拜登任命的巡回法官J.米歇尔·蔡尔兹投下了反对票,反对2比1的多数意见。她写道:“身边有陪同人员盯着的话,记者几乎无法核实消息来源、收集信息或与国防部人员坦诚交流。”

国防部发言人肖恩·帕内尔表示,该部门欢迎合议庭的裁决,并期待在同一合议庭面前就其“完整案情”进行辩论。帕内尔在社交媒体发布的声明中称,未经陪同进入五角大楼导致了“敏感和机密国防信息的经常性未经授权披露”。

他写道:“自实施现行准入政策以来,国防部看到这类未经授权的披露大幅减少,而此类披露一旦发生,就会危及军人、情报人员以及我们盟友的生命。”

《纽约时报》的律师西奥多·布特罗斯表示,合议庭的裁决是“一项狭隘的初步裁决”,“丝毫不会削弱该报的宪法论据力度”。

他在给美联社的声明中说道:“我们期待在本次上诉中全面维护地区法院作出的有利于《纽约时报》的各项裁决。”

Pentagon can require reporters to be escorted during appeal process, judges rule

April 27, 2026 / 8:57 PM EDT / CBS/AP

The Defense Department can require journalists to be escorted on Pentagon grounds while the Trump administration appeals a judge’s decision to block its enforcement of a new press access policy, an appeals court ruled Monday.

The ruling by a divided three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit isn’t the final decision in The New York Times’ lawsuit against the Pentagon. But the panel’s majority opinion said the Trump administration is likely to succeed in showing that the policy’s escort requirement is legally valid.

The panel granted the government’s request to suspend an April 9 decision by U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman, who ruled that the Defense Department was violating an earlier order to restore access to the Pentagon for reporters.

Last fall, the Pentagon required reporters who cover the military to sign on to a host of restrictions in order to maintain daily access to the building. Many media organizations — including CBS News, ABC News, NBC News, CNN and Fox News — declined to sign on to the new rules.

The Times sued, and Friedman sided with the newspaper and struck down parts of the policy last month. He found that many of the restrictions were unconstitutional, including one that suggested reporters who “solicit” sensitive information from military personnel could be deemed a security risk and expelled from the building.

Then, earlier this month, Friedman ruled that the Pentagon violated his order by issuing a revised press policy that barred reporters from the building altogether unless they were accompanied by government escorts.

In Monday’s ruling, Circuit Judges Justin Walker and Bradley Garcia — Trump and Biden nominees, respectively — wrote that “an agency may respond to an adverse ruling by adopting a revised policy.”

Biden-appointed Circuit Judge J. Michelle Childs dissented from the 2-1 majority. “Reporters can hardly verify sources, gather information, or speak candidly with Department personnel with an escort looming over their shoulders,” she wrote.

Defense Department spokesperson Sean Parnell said it welcomes the panel’s decision and looks forward to arguing the merits of its “full case” before the same panel. In a statement posted on social media, Parnell said unescorted access to the Pentagon has led to the “regular unauthorized disclosure of sensitive and classified national defense information.”

“Since implementing the current access policy, the Department has seen a meaningful reduction in these unauthorized disclosures, which when they occur can endanger the lives of service members, intelligence personnel, and our allies,” he wrote.

Theodore Boutrous, an attorney for The Times, said the panel’s ruling is “a narrow, preliminary one” and “casts no doubt” on the strength of the newspaper’s constitutional arguments.

“We look forward to defending the full scope of the district court’s rulings in The Times’s favor in this appeal,” Boutrous said in a statement to The Associated Press.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注