隐秘资金涌入弗吉尼亚州 事关可能让民主党拿下众议院优势的重划选区公投


2026-04-21T12:53:00-04:00 / 福克斯新闻网

来自匿名捐赠者的隐秘资金为弗吉尼亚州重划选区公投的双方提供支持,选民即将前往投票
作者:保罗·施泰因豪泽 福克斯新闻网
发布于2026年4月21日 美国东部夏令时下午12:53

数千万美元——其中大部分来自匿名捐赠者的隐秘资金——今年涌入弗吉尼亚州,为周二的国会重划选区公投造势。若公投获得通过,将可能在今年的中期选举中,助力民主党在争夺美国众议院多数席位的战役中取得重大优势。

如果这项投票提案获得成功,将由民主党控制的弗吉尼亚州议会——而非目前的无党派委员会——掌握到2030年大选前的临时重划选区权力。这可能会让民主党在弗吉尼亚州国会代表团中的席位优势从当前的6比5扩大到10比1。

此次公投紧随唐纳德·特朗普总统推动共和党领导的州进行罕见但并非闻所未闻的中期重划选区之后,可能会让民主党在试图从共和党手中夺回众议院控制权的过程中占据优势,而共和党目前正守护着脆弱的多数席位。

支持重划选区的阵营在筹款和开支上都大幅领先于反对公投的团体,民主党盟友组织“弗吉尼亚公平选举”筹集的资金约为共和党盟友组织“弗吉尼亚公平地图”的三倍。但尽管民主党在资金上占据优势,民调显示,在周六结束的提前投票人数激增的情况下,支持这项投票提案的比例仅略微领先于反对比例。

索罗斯资助的隐秘资金团体推动弗吉尼亚重划选区

2026年4月20日,在弗吉尼亚州利斯堡,前弗吉尼亚州州长格伦·扬金(右)和前州检察长杰森·米亚雷斯带领众人高呼“反对”,领导共和党团队挫败民主党支持的国会重划选区公投。(保罗·施泰因豪泽/福克斯新闻网)

“他们的开支是我们的三倍。他们已经筹集了7000多万美元。但这场投票依然势均力敌,”领导共和党反对公投的领袖之一、前弗吉尼亚州州长格伦·扬金在选举前夜告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。

福克斯新闻数字频道对州竞选财务记录以及追踪弗吉尼亚州公共开支的弗吉尼亚公共访问项目(VPAP)的记录进行审查后发现,双方筹集的大部分资金都来自所谓的“隐秘资金”,即无需披露捐赠者身份的501(c)(4)类非营利公共政策团体。

“这凸显了此次公投的重要性,”弗吉尼亚州林奇堡大学政治学系主任大卫·理查兹告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,他强调了外部资金大量涌入该州的情况。

理查兹表示,这笔资金“也表明全国性资金如何会干扰这些全州范围的选举。弗吉尼亚州选民需要决定什么对他们有利,但现在这却变成了一个全国性议题,偏离了什么对弗吉尼亚州有利的核心。”

共和党就民主党在关键重划选区选举中的“夺权”行为敲响警钟

前总统巴拉克·奥巴马在提前投票开始时发布的视频信息中,敦促弗吉尼亚州选民为重划选区提案投“赞成票”,称这将有助于“平衡竞争环境”。(巴拉克·奥巴马/X平台)

根据2010年最高法院“公民联合”案的裁决,非营利公共政策团体可以在不披露捐赠者身份的情况下无限制开支,这往往掩盖了企业或富裕个人的大额捐款。

但隐秘资金长期以来因缺乏透明度而受到抨击,选民无法得知他们看到的政治宣传是由谁资助的。批评人士称,它允许富裕利益集团影响选举和政策,对民主构成威胁。

“这是因为你根本不知道资金来自何处,”圣安塞尔姆学院政治学系教授克里斯·加尔迪耶里告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。“有了隐秘资金,甚至无法追溯到特定的利益集团……这意味着选民不知道捐赠者的动机是什么。”

2026年民主进程:关注福克斯新闻选举中心获取最新动态

2026年4月21日,在弗吉尼亚州亚历山大市,一名民众走向莱尔-克劳奇传统学院投票站,参与弗吉尼亚州重划选区公投。(朱莉娅·德马雷·尼基森/美联社照片)

在“赞成”阵营,众议院多数派前进组织——众议院民主党主要的政治非营利分支,无需披露捐赠者身份——已投入近4000万美元。

其他为民主党推动公投投入巨资的团体,则获得了乔治·索罗斯资助的隐秘资金团体提供的数百万美元支持。

与此同时,“反对”阵营已从与科技亿万富翁彼得·蒂尔有关联的组织获得900万美元资金。蒂尔是共和党大捐助者,也是特朗普的长期盟友。

点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

尽管常遭诟病,但政治领域的隐秘资金使用正在加速。在2024年选举周期中,隐秘资金团体的总开支超过19亿美元。

“任何理性的人都可以看看弗吉尼亚州的选区地图,明白这不过是一场政治游戏,是为了让一个政党受益,而非民众,”资深共和党战略家和公关人员瑞安·威廉姆斯辩称。“他们根本不在乎用隐秘资金来为自己的行动筹资。这不过是这个过程中政治把戏的又一例证。”

福克斯新闻的亚历克·谢梅尔和利奥·布里塞诺对本文亦有贡献。

保罗·施泰因豪泽是驻摇摆州新罕布什尔州的政治记者,全程报道全美竞选活动。

Dark money floods Virginia ahead of redistricting vote that could hand Democrats House edge

2026-04-21T12:53:00-04:00 / Fox News

Dark money from undisclosed donors fuels both sides of Virginia’s redistricting referendum as voters head to polls

By Paul Steinhauser Fox News

Published April 21, 2026 12:53pm EDT

Tens of millions of dollars — much of it dark money from undisclosed donors — poured into Virginia this year ahead of Tuesday’s vote on a congressional redistricting referendum that, if passed, could give Democrats a significant boost in the battle for the U.S. House majority in this year’s midterm elections.

If the ballot measure is successful, it would give the Democrat-controlled Virginia legislature — rather than the state’s current nonpartisan commission — temporary redistricting power through the 2030 election. It could result in a 10-1 advantage for Democrats in Virginia’s congressional delegation, up from their current 6-5 edge.

The referendum, which follows President Donald Trump’s push for rare but not unheard-of mid-decade redistricting in Republican-led states, could give Democrats an edge as they try to win back control of the House from Republicans, who are defending a fragile majority.

Supporters of redistricting have dramatically outraised and outspent groups opposed to the referendum, with Democrat-aligned Virginians for Fair Elections raising roughly three times as much as GOP-allied Virginians for Fair Maps. But despite the Democrats’ funding advantage, public opinion polling suggests support for the ballot initiative is only slightly ahead of opposition amid a surge in early voting, which ended Saturday.

SOROS-BACKED DARK MONEY GROUPS FUEL VIRGINIA REDISTRICTING PUSH

Former Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin, right, and former state Attorney General Jason Miyares lead a chant of “no” as they lead Republican efforts to defeat a Democrat-backed congressional redistricting referendum, on April 20, 2026, in Leesburg, Virginia.(Paul Steinhauser/Fox News)

“They have outspent us three to one. They’ve raised over $70 million. And yet this is a close vote,” former Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin, one of leaders of the GOP effort to defeat the referendum, told Fox News Digital on the eve of the election.

Much of the funding raised by both sides came from so-called “dark money” from nonprofit public policy groups known as 501(c)(4) organizations that are not required to disclose their donors. This according to a Fox News Digital review of state campaign finance records and records from the Virginia Public Access Project (VPAP), which tracks public spending in Virginia..

“It points to the importance of this referendum,” David Richards, political science chair at the University of Lynchburg in Virginia, told Fox News Digital, as he highlighted the influx of outside money pouring into the state.

Richards said the funding “also shows how national money can cloud these statewide elections. Virginians need to decide what’s good for them and instead, it becomes a national issue that takes away from what is good for Virginia.”

REPUBLICANS SOUND ALARM ON DEMOCRATS’ ‘POWER GRAB’ IN CRUCIAL REDISTRICTING ELECTION

Former President Barack Obama urged Virginians to vote “yes” in a redistricting measure, saying it would help “level the playing field,” in a video message released as early voting began.(Barack Obama/X)

Given the green light from the 2010 Citizens United Supreme Court ruling, nonprofit public policy groups can spend unlimited funds without disclosing their donors, which often masks large contributions from corporations or wealthy individuals.

But dark money has long come under attack over a lack of transparency, with voters not knowing who is funding the political messages they are seeing. It’s been criticized as a threat to democracy for allowing wealthy interests to influence elections and policy.

“it’s because you don’t actually know where the money is coming from,” Chris Galdieri, a professor in the political science department at Saint Anselm College, told Fox News Digital. “With dark money, it’s not even traceable to a particular interest…it means that voters don’t know what the motives of the donors are.”

DEMOCRACY ’26: STAY UP TO DATE WITH THE FOX NEWS ELECTION HUB

A person walks to vote in the Virginia redistricting referendum at Lyles-Crouch Traditional Academy, Tuesday, April 21, 2026, in Alexandria, Virginia.(Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP Photo)

On the “yes” side, House Majority Forward, which as the chief political nonprofit wing of House Democrats does not have to disclose its donors, has contributed nearly $40 million.

Other groups pumping big bucks into the Democrat effort to pass the referendum were fueled with millions of dollars from George Soros-backed dark money groups.

Meanwhile, the “no” effort has received $9 million from a group tied to tech billionaire Peter Thiel, a GOP megadonor and longtime Trump ally.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

While often frowned upon, the use of dark money in politics is accelerating. Dark money groups shelled out more than $1.9 billion during the 2024 election cycle.

“Any rational person can look at the maps in Virginia and understand that this is a political game being played. It’s to benefit one party, not people,” veteran Republican strategist and communicator Ryan Williams argued. “What do they care if they finance their effort with dark money. It’s just another example of political gamesmanship in this process.”

Fox News’ Alec Schemmel and Leo Briceno contributed to this report.

Paul Steinhauser is a politics reporter based in the swing state of New Hampshire. He covers the campaign trail from coast to coast.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注