弗吉尼亚州选民就民主党重划国会选区方案投票,该方案或令4个共和党国会席位易主


2026-04-21T10:02:40.158Z / 路透社

记者 约瑟夫·阿克斯
2026年4月21日 美国东部时间上午10:02 更新于1小时前

节点运行失败

2024年9月12日,美国弗吉尼亚州盖恩斯维尔;罗伯特·特伦特·琼斯高尔夫俱乐部上空的美国国旗迎风飘扬。 必应图片来源:亚伦·多斯特-伊马根图片社

  • 内容提要
  • 企业
  • 民主党竞选开支远超共和党,多数资金来自匿名捐赠者
  • 共和党质疑公投合法性,州最高法院准许投票如期举行
  • 双方均援引奥巴马言论为这场公投争辩

(4月21日 路透电)—— 弗吉尼亚州选民将于周二前往投票,表决民主党主导重划的新国会选区方案。该方案将影响11月的中期选举,或令美国众议院中4个共和党席位易主。此前两党已为这场公投竞选花费数千万美元。

弗吉尼亚州是去年夏天爆发的史无前例的全国选区重划斗争的最新战场。当时美国总统唐纳德·特朗普成功敦促得克萨斯州共和党人推出新的国会选区方案,目标直指5名民主党在任议员。

路透社伊朗简报新闻通讯将为您带来伊朗局势的最新动态与分析,点击此处订阅。

广告 · 滚动继续阅读

自那以来,两党控制的州都各自启动了重划选区的行动,目前双方基本势均力敌。哪怕仅拿下数个席位都可能起到决定性作用:民主党若想在11月掌控拥有435个席位的美国众议院多数党地位,仅需翻转3个共和党选区,届时民主党便可牵头对特朗普政府展开调查,并阻挠其立法议程。

民主党目前在弗吉尼亚州11个众议院席位中占据6席,但新的选区方案将令他们在除1个席位外的所有选区都占据优势。

选区重划通常在每十年末进行,以反映美国人口普查记录的人口变化。州议员历来会利用这一程序划定更有利于本党的选区,这一策略被称为党派分赃式选区划分。

广告 · 滚动继续阅读

鉴于此次投票的利害关系,两党都在弗吉尼亚州的竞选中投入了大量资金,民主党开支远超共和党。大部分资金来自所谓的“暗钱”政治团体,这类团体无需披露捐赠者身份。

根据竞选财务报告,支持该方案的主要组织“弗吉尼亚州公平选举”截至4月13日已筹集6410万美元。其中超过3800万美元来自众议院多数党推动委员会——众议院民主党人的主要政治非营利分支组织。

共和党领导的主要反对组织“弗吉尼亚州公平地图”截至4月13日的筹款额接近2000万美元,名称与前者类似。

共和党还提起诉讼,质疑此次公投的合法性。州最高法院在审理这些诉讼的同时,准许投票如期进行。

多数公开民调显示,民主党支持“通过”的阵营以微弱优势领先。

弗吉尼亚州近年来逐渐向民主党倾斜,自2008年以来,民主党总统候选人在该州的历次总统选举中均获胜。周二的特别选举仅在民主党人阿比盖尔·斯潘伯格以15个百分点的优势赢得州长选举五个月后举行。

“在一个蓝色州,这场公投仍会被解读为对特朗普的直接信任投票,”弗吉尼亚大学政治中心分析师J.迈尔斯·科尔曼说道。

民主党辩称,新的选区方案是必要之举,用以制衡得克萨斯州及其他共和党州利用选区重划针对民主党席位的做法。共和党则指责民主党虚伪,指出其此前曾反对党派分赃式选区划分。

有迹象表明,民主党为回应特朗普的选区重划策略调整了宣传口径,如今两党都在援引前民主党总统巴拉克·奥巴马的言论来为己方辩护。

共和党播出的反对该投票提案的广告中,使用了奥巴马此前反对选区分赃划分的言论,而奥巴马则录制视频敦促选民批准此次公投,以防止共和党“窃取”国会多数席位。

即便弗吉尼亚州的投票结束,全国范围内的选区重划斗争也不会终结;佛罗里达州共和党州长罗恩·德桑蒂斯已呼吁下周召开特别会议,审议重划该州的选区地图。

美国最高法院也将在未来数月内作出一项裁决,可能会允许南部各州的共和党人针对更多民主党席位采取行动。

约瑟夫·阿克斯 报道;大卫·格雷戈里奥 编辑

我们的报道准则:汤姆森路透社诚信原则。

Virginians vote on Democratic map targeting 4 Republican congressional seats

2026-04-21T10:02:40.158Z / Reuters

By Joseph Ax

April 21, 2026 10:02 AM UTC Updated 1 hour ago

节点运行失败

Sep 12, 2024; Gainesville, Virginia, USA; An American flag ripples on display at Robert Trent Jones Golf Club. Mandatory Credit: Aaron Doster-Imagn Images

  • Summary
  • Companies
  • Democrats outspend Republicans, with most funds from undisclosed donors
  • Republicans challenge referendum legality, state Supreme Court allows vote
  • Both sides use Obama’s statements to argue about the referendum

April 21 (Reuters) – Virginians head to the polls on Tuesday to vote on a new Democratic-drawn congressional map for November’s midterm ​elections that could flip four Republican seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, after both parties spent tens of millions ‌of dollars in a campaign over the referendum.

Virginia is the latest battleground in an unprecedented national redistricting fight that began last summer, when U.S. President Donald Trump successfully urged Texas Republicans to install a new congressional map that took aim at five Democratic incumbents.

The Reuters Iran Briefing newsletter keeps you informed with the latest developments and analysis of the Iran war. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Since then, states controlled by both parties have launched their own redistricting efforts, leading ​to a near-draw thus far. Even a few seats could prove decisive: Democrats need to flip only three Republican districts in ​the 435-seat U.S. House in November to capture a majority, which would allow the party to conduct investigations ⁠into Trump’s administration and block his legislative agenda.

Democrats currently hold six of Virginia’s 11 House seats, but the new map would give them ​the edge in all but one.

Redistricting typically occurs at the end of each decade to reflect population changes recorded in the U.S. Census. State lawmakers ​have historically used that process to draw districts that are more favorable to their party, a strategy known as partisan gerrymandering.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Reflecting the stakes, both parties have poured money into the Virginia race, with Democrats spending far more than Republicans. Most of the funds have come from so-called “dark money” political groups that are not required to ​disclose their donors.

The main organization backing the measure, Virginians for Fair Elections, raised $64.1 million through April 13, according to campaign finance reports. More ​than $38 million came from House Majority Forward, House Democrats’ main political nonprofit arm.

The leading Republican-led opposition group, the similarly named Virginians for Fair Maps, had brought in ‌nearly $20 million ⁠as of April 13.

Republicans have also filed lawsuits challenging the referendum’s legality. The state Supreme Court allowed the vote to proceed while it weighs those challenges.

Most public polls show the Democrats’ “yes” campaign narrowly ahead.

Virginia has swung toward Democrats in recent years, with the party’s nominee winning the state in every presidential election since 2008. Tuesday’s special election comes just five months after Democrat Abigail Spanberger won the governor’s race by a 15-point ​margin.

“In a blue state, it’s still ​going to be spun as ⁠an up-or-down vote on Trump,” said J. Miles Coleman, an analyst at the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics.

Democrats have argued the new map is necessary to counter Texas and other Republican states that have used ​redistricting to target Democratic seats. Republicans have accused Democrats of hypocrisy, pointing to their previous stances against partisan ​gerrymandering.

In a sign ⁠of how Democratic messaging has shifted in response to Trump’s redistricting gambit, Republicans and Democrats are both using the words of former Democratic President Barack Obama to make their case.

Republicans have aired ads opposing the ballot measure that feature Obama’s previous anti-gerrymandering statements, while Obama has recorded videos urging voters to approve ⁠the referendum ​to prevent a Republican “steal” of Congress.

Even after Virginia’s vote, the national redistricting fight is ​not over; Republican Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has called for a special session next week to consider redrawing that state’s map.

And the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to issue a ​decision in the coming months that could permit Republicans in Southern states to target additional Democratic seats.

Reporting by Joseph Ax; Editing by David Gregorio

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注