2026-04-20T22:54:02.252Z / 美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）
作者：阿莱娜·特里恩、凯文·利普塔克
36分钟前
发布于 2026年4月20日 美国东部时间下午6:54
4月18日周六，唐纳德·特朗普总统在白宫椭圆形办公室听取汇报。
朱莉娅·德马雷·尼基森/美联社
随着周末临近，美国和伊朗似乎即将达成一项结束为期七周战争的协议。
随后唐纳德·特朗普总统做出了其幕僚多次强调绝不应做的事：他似乎试图通过媒体进行谈判，在社交媒体上发布有关正在进行的谈判的消息，并于周五上午通过电话接受了多名记者采访，当时巴基斯坦中间人正向他通报在德黑兰与伊朗官员的持续谈判情况。
他声称伊朗已同意一系列条款，但了解谈判情况的消息人士表示，这些条款尚未最终敲定。他还坚称德黑兰已同意美国提出的众多最具争议的要求——包括同意移交浓缩铀——并宣称战争即将结束。
伊朗官员公开驳斥了其中许多说法，否认他们正在为新一轮谈判做准备，这迅速打击了人们对达成协议日益高涨的乐观情绪。如今，和平谈判的未来走向不明。
特朗普政府的一些官员私下向CNN承认，总统的公开言论不利于谈判，他们指出谈判的敏感性以及伊朗对美国根深蒂固的不信任。更复杂的是：美国官员怀疑伊朗由议会议长穆罕默德·巴盖尔·加利巴夫和外交部长阿巴斯·阿拉克奇领导的谈判团队与伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队之间存在分歧，这引发了一个疑问：最终谁能批准一项协议。
“伊朗方面并不欣赏总统通过社交媒体进行谈判，也不喜欢让外界看起来他们已经同意了尚未敲定、且在国内不受民众欢迎的议题，”一位了解谈判情况的人士告诉CNN，并补充称伊朗方面尤其担心看起来显得软弱。
总统的部分说法包括：特朗普对彭博新闻社表示，伊朗已同意“无限期”暂停其核计划。他对哥伦比亚广播公司新闻台称，德黑兰“同意了所有条件”，并将与美国合作移除其浓缩铀。他还对Axios新闻网表示，一场会议“可能会在本周末举行”，并补充道：“我认为我们会在未来一两天内达成协议。”
周日，美伊之间脆弱的停火再次受到考验：美国一艘导弹驱逐舰在阿曼湾试图冲破美国海军封锁时，向一艘伊朗货船开火并将其扣押，这进一步激怒了伊朗。
如今，随着为期两周的停火协议到期日临近，特朗普再次面临抉择：是接受一项协议——哪怕并不完美——还是升级这场他曾说过早已该结束的冲突。
截至周一，伊朗官员对进一步谈判的态度有所缓和。但任何待决协议的具体细节仍不明朗。
“与奥巴马政府达成的糟糕协议不同，在特朗普总统的谈判能力加持下，美国距离与伊朗达成一份好协议从未如此之近，”白宫新闻秘书卡罗琳·莱维特说道，“任何看不到特朗普总统长期博弈策略的人，要么是愚蠢，要么就是故意视而不见。”
特朗普为谈判设定了多条红线，包括伊朗冻结铀浓缩活动并交出其接近武器级别的核材料库存。与此同时，德黑兰坚持要求其有权控制霍尔木兹海峡，并要求美国解除制裁。
一位了解谈判情况的消息人士称，在第一轮谈判中，美国谈判代表提议伊朗暂停铀浓缩活动20年。据一名美国官员透露，伊朗方面回应提出暂停五年的方案，该方案遭到了美国的拒绝。
据一位了解谈判情况的人士透露，伊朗方面最近的一项提议将涉及暂停浓缩活动10年，随后的十年里伊朗同意仅将铀浓缩至远低于武器级别的水平。与此同时，特朗普已向记者表示，他希望无限期停止铀浓缩活动，甚至反对20年的暂停期限。
正如CNN此前报道的那样，特朗普政府还考虑在与德黑兰的持续谈判中解冻200亿美元的伊朗资产。此举将作为伊朗交出其高浓缩铀库存的交换条件。
双方在条款上的灵活程度最终将决定能否达成协议。对特朗普而言，一项至关重要的要求是不能达成一份可与奥巴马时代的《联合全面行动计划》相提并论的协议——他于2018年退出了该伊朗核协议，并一直嘲讽其软弱无力。
至少，谈判代表希望能达成美伊之间的框架性谅解，进而在未来几周内就协议的细节展开更深入的谈判。不过，这一做法也有批评者，他们警告称，伊朗可能会拖延谈判，以此争取时间来挖掘其在战争期间掩埋的部分导弹系统。
尽管这场战争在美国公众中越来越不受欢迎，且推高了汽油价格，但特朗普周一坚称，他并未感受到达成协议的压力。
“我完全没有任何压力，不过一切都会相对快速地解决！”他在Truth Social平台上写道。
截至周一下午，尚不清楚是否有顾问向总统提出过担忧，称他沉迷发帖可能会损害谈判。到中午时分，他已经在Truth Social上多次发帖谈论这场战争，总字数超过900字。
他的公开言论只会加剧围绕谈判的不确定性。
周日上午的某个时刻，特朗普告诉多名来电者，副总统JD·万斯不会参与本轮谈判，理由是未具体说明的安全担忧。与此同时，他政府的两名高级官员——联合国大使迈克·沃尔茨和能源部长克里斯·赖特——在电视节目中表示，万斯实际上将率领代表团前往伊斯兰堡，正如他在第一轮谈判中所做的那样。
结果证明他们是对的，而特朗普错了。“情况发生了变化，”一位白宫官员在被问及发生了什么时告诉CNN。
一天后，特朗普又提供了另一个令人困惑的最新消息，这次是关于他的二号人物的行踪。他对一名来自《纽约邮报》的记者表示，万斯正在空中，准备在数小时内抵达巴基斯坦参与谈判。片刻之后，载有副总统的万斯的车队抵达了西翼办公楼。
“我们预计代表团很快就会启程，”一位白宫官员解释道。
熟悉相关计划的人士表示，万斯现在计划于周二离开华盛顿前往谈判，特朗普周日曾称谈判将于周一晚间举行。
但谈判现在有望于周三上午在伊斯兰堡开始。消息人士在某种程度上轻描淡写地警告称，局势仍然“不稳定”。
同样不稳定的还有即将到期的为期两周的停火协议的命运。根据特朗普周一与一名记者的电话交谈，其确切的截止日期似乎也发生了变化。他最初于美国东部时间4月7日下午6:32宣布停火，按此计算华盛顿时间的两周期限将于周二晚间到期。
但特朗普对彭博新闻社表示，停火协议将于“华盛顿时间周三晚间”结束，这为他在必须兑现威胁炸毁伊朗桥梁和发电站（这可能构成战争罪）之前，多争取了24小时的谈判时间。他补充称，“极不可能”进一步延长停火期限。
但此前他在是否同意延长停火期限的问题上反复无常。上周在一次记者问答环节中，记者五次询问他是否会延长停火期限，他给出了三种不同的答案：
“如果没有达成协议，战斗就会恢复，”他曾明确表态。后来，他表示必要时会提供延长：“如果我们需要的话，我会这么做。”在另一个回答中，他暗示鉴于谈判的现状，这个问题无关紧要：“我们拭目以待。我不认为我们有这个必要。理想情况下，我们不会延长。”
A deal to end the Iran war seemed close. Then Trump started posting on social media
2026-04-20T22:54:02.252Z / CNN
By Alayna Treene, Kevin Liptak
36 min ago
PUBLISHED Apr 20, 2026, 6:54 PM ET
President Donald Trump listens in the Oval Office of the White House, on Saturday, April 18.
Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP
As the weekend approached, the US and Iran appeared to be closing in on a deal to end the seven-week war.
Then President Donald Trump did exactly what his staffers have repeatedly said they wouldn’t do: He seemed to try negotiating via the press, posting about ongoing talks on social media and speaking to several reporters by phone Friday morning as Pakistani intermediaries updated him on ongoing talks with Iranian officials in Tehran.
He claimed Iran had agreed to a host of provisions that sources familiar with the talks said have not yet been finalized. He also asserted that Tehran had agreed to many of the most contentious US demands — including that it had agreed to hand over the enriched uranium — and declared an imminent end to the war.
Iranian officials outwardly rejected many of those assertions and denied they were preparing for another round of talks, rapidly tanking the rising optimism for a deal. Now, it’s unclear where the peace talks go from here.
Some Trump officials privately acknowledged to CNN that the president’s public commentary has been detrimental to talks, noting the sensitivity of the negotiations and the Iranians’ deep mistrust of the US. Compounding matters: American officials suspect there is a divide between Iran’s negotiating team, led by Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, and Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, leading to questions about who can ultimately sign off on a deal.
“The Iranians didn’t appreciate POTUS negotiating through social media and making it appear as if they had signed off on issues they hadn’t yet agreed to, and ones that aren’t popular with their people back home,” one person familiar with the talks told CNN, adding that the Iranians are particularly concerned about appearing to look weak.
Among the president’s claims: Trump told Bloomberg that Iran had agreed to an “unlimited” suspension of its nuclear program. He told CBS News Tehran “agreed to everything,” and would work with the US to remove its enriched uranium. And he told Axios a meeting would “probably take place over the weekend,” adding, “I think we will get a deal in the next day or two.”
The fragile ceasefire between Washington and Tehran was tested once again on Sunday when a US guided-missile destroyer fired on and seized an Iranian cargo ship after it tried to get past the US naval blockade in the Gulf of Oman, further angering the Iranians.
Now, as the expiration date of a two-week ceasefire looms, Trump is again facing a decision: whether to accept a deal, even an imperfect one, or to escalate a conflict he once said would be over by now.
By Monday, officials in Iran sounded less resistant to more negotiations. But the contours of any pending agreement remained unclear.
“The United States has never been closer to a good deal with Iran, unlike the horrible deal made by the Obama Administration, thanks to President Trump’s negotiating ability,” said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. “Anyone who cannot see President Trump’s tactics to play the long game are either stupid or willfully ignorant.”
Trump has set several red lines for the negotiations, including that Iran freeze its uranium enrichment and surrender its stockpile of near-bomb-grade material. Tehran, meanwhile, insists it be allowed to maintain control over the Strait of Hormuz while also demanding the US lift sanctions.
During the first round of talks, American negotiators proposed a 20-year pause on Iran enriching uranium, a source familiar with the discussions said. Iran responded with a proposal for a five-year suspension, which the US has rejected, according to a US official.
One recent proposal from the Iranian side would involve a 10-year pause on enrichment, followed by another decade where Iran would agree to only enrich to levels well below weapons grade, according to a person familiar with the discussions. Meanwhile, Trump has told reporters that he wants no enrichment indefinitely and is against even the 20-year pause.
The Trump administration is also considering unfreezing $20 billion in Iranian assets as part of ongoing negotiations with Tehran, CNN previously reported. The step would come in exchange for Iran turning over its stockpile of highly enriched uranium.
How flexible each side is on their terms will ultimately dictate whether a deal can be reached. For Trump, one imperative is not agreeing to a deal that could be likened to the Obama-era Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, an Iran nuclear deal he withdrew from in 2018 and has continuously derided as weak.
At the least, negotiators hope to produce a framework understanding between the US and Iran that would then lead to more detailed talks over the coming weeks on the finer points of a deal. That approach has its detractors, however, who warn that Iran could be drawing out the discussions as a play for time as it unearths some of its missile systems that have been buried over the course of the war.
Trump insisted Monday he wasn’t feeling pressure to reach a deal, despite the war’s rising unpopularity among the American public and the role it’s played in higher gas prices.
“I am under no pressure whatsoever, although, it will all happen, relatively quickly!” he wrote on Truth Social.
It was unclear as of Monday afternoon whether any advisers had shared concerns with the president that his penchant for posting could be damaging to the talks. By midday, he had posted multiple times on Truth Social about the war, totaling more than 900 words.
His public comments have only continued to add to the uncertainty surrounding negotiations.
At one point Sunday morning, Trump told a series of callers that Vice President JD Vance would not participate in this round of talks, citing unspecified security concerns. Simultaneously, two senior officials in his government — United Nations Ambassador Mike Waltz and Energy Secretary Chris Wright — appeared on television to say Vance would, in fact, be leading the delegation in Islamabad, as he had for the first round.
It turned out they were right and Trump was wrong. “Things changed,” a White House official told CNN when asked what had happened.
A day later, Trump offered another confusing update, this time about the whereabouts of his No. 2. He told a reporter calling from the New York Post that Vance was in the air and preparing to touch down in Pakistan within hours for the talks. Moments later, Vance’s motorcade — with the vice president inside — arrived at the West Wing.
“We expect the delegation to be on the road soon,” a White House official explained.
People familiar with the plans said Vance is now planning to depart Washington on Tuesday for the talks, which Trump claimed on Sunday would occur Monday evening.
But negotiations are now on track to commence Wednesday morning in Islamabad. In something of an understatement, the sources cautioned the situation remains “fluid.”
So, too, is the fate of the two-week ceasefire, which is set to expire soon. When, exactly, its deadline falls has also seemingly changed, based on a phone conversation Trump had with a reporter on Monday. He originally announced the ceasefire at 6:32 p.m. ET on April 7, putting the two-week mark on Tuesday evening in Washington.
But Trump told Bloomberg the truce ends “Wednesday evening Washington time,” allowing for an extra 24 hours of talks before he must choose whether make good on his threat to blow up Iranian bridges and power plants, a possible war crime. He added that it was “highly unlikely” that he would extend it further.
But he previously went back and forth on whether he would agree to extend the ceasefire. During one question-and-answer session with reporters last week, he was asked five separate times whether he would extend the ceasefire, and offered three different answers:
“If there’s no deal, fighting resumes,” he said definitively at one point. Later, he offered that he would offer an extension if necessary: “If we need to, I would do that.” In another answer, he suggested the question was moot, given the state of negotiations: “We’ll see. I don’t know that we’ll have to. Ideally, we won’t.”
发表回复