2026年4月16日 / 美国东部时间下午1:58 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
华盛顿——周四，众议院就阻止特朗普总统对伊朗采取进一步军事行动的最新投票以微弱差距失败。目前这场战争已接近第三个月，而停战的可行途径仍不明朗。
这项由纽约州民主党众议员格雷戈里·米克斯提出的战争权力决议以213票对214票、1票弃权的结果未能通过。一名共和党议员与几乎所有民主党议员站在一起，该决议距离通过所需的支持票数仅差一票。
这是国会对这场战争支持率的最新一次考验，特朗普几周来一直声称这场战争将“很快”结束。
特朗普上周威胁要摧毁伊朗“整个文明”，除非伊朗政权同意重新开放霍尔木兹海峡——这条全球石油贸易的关键航道，参众两院的民主党议员因此再次强调限制总统对伊朗动武权限的紧迫性。自那以后，美伊和谈在巴基斯坦宣告破裂，此前双方仅维持了脆弱的两周停火，而美国已对使用伊朗港口的船只实施封锁。
特朗普上周威胁要袭击伊朗民用基础设施的举动，引发了部分共和党议员的不安，但并未对他们就总统战争权力授权的投票产生太大影响。参议院一项由民主党主导的决议也在周二的投票中失败，仅有一名共和党议员表示支持。
众议院民主党人上周曾试图在一场简短的形式主义会议上通过一致同意程序来推进米克斯的议案，但 presiding 共和党议员迅速宣布散会，连提案都未能提交。
米克斯的决议原本旨在指示总统将美国武装部队撤出对伊朗的敌对行动，除非国会明确授权。
三名在3月初的上次战争权力决议投票中投下反对票的民主党议员——得克萨斯州众议员亨利·奎尔、俄亥俄州众议员格雷格·兰兹曼和胡安·巴加斯——在周四限制特朗普对伊朗动武的投票中转而支持这项举措。缅因州众议员贾里德·戈尔登是唯一一名投下反对票的民主党议员。
“不作为的代价太高，令人无法容忍，但现在是时候结束这一切了，”兰兹曼在上月宣布改变立场的声明中说道。
奎尔表示，他改变主意并非对总统的指责，而是“重申国会的宪法角色”。但他也将这一决定归因于政府缺乏明确的撤军战略以及对其作战目标的解释模糊不清。
肯塔基州共和党众议员托马斯·马西也投了赞成票，而俄亥俄州共和党众议员沃伦·戴维森投了弃权票。马西和戴维森是3月投票中仅有的两位与特朗普分道扬镳的众议院共和党议员。
米克斯在投票后表示，他原本预计戴维森会继续支持该决议。他对记者说：“我以为他会坚持立场，但现在我要和他谈谈。”米克斯补充说，他一直以来都在努力说服戈尔登，这类对话还将继续下去。
戈尔登在一份声明中表示，这项决议可能会破坏美伊结束战争的谈判。
“这项以及其他战争权力决议的所谓目的是停止敌对行动。值得庆幸的是，美国和伊朗目前处于停火状态，我们正在就国家安全和国际秩序的关键问题进行谈判，”他说。“在这个时刻，这样的决议会削弱我们的谈判地位。”
一些共和党议员表示，如果战争持续到5月1日的法定60天期限之后，他们可能会改变投票立场。1973年的《战争权力决议》——国会为回应越南战争通过，旨在制约总统未经立法机构同意就卷入武装冲突的权力——将未经授权的军事行动时限设定为60天。但两党多位总统均普遍认为该法律违宪。
米克斯周四表示，他计划提交另一项战争权力决议。
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/white-house-insists-iran-peace-talks-will-continue-despite-rising-tensions-over-strait-of-hormuz/
Latest effort to rein in Trump on Iran falls short in House vote
April 16, 2026 / 1:58 PM EDT / CBS News
Washington— The latest vote in the House to block President Trump from taking further military action against Iran narrowly failed Thursday as the war approaches its third month and the off-ramp remains uncertain.
The war powers resolution, introduced by Democratic Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York, failed in a 213 to 214 vote, with one voting present. One Republican voted with nearly all Democrats, just shy of the support it needed for passage.
It’s the latest test of Congress’ support for the war that Mr. Trump has claimed for weeks would be over “soon.”
Democrats in both the House and Senate stressed a renewed urgency to reining in the president’s authority on Iran after he threatened last week to eradicate a “whole civilization” unless the regime agreed to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a critical channel for global oil trade. Since then, peace talks between the U.S. and Iran collapsed in Pakistan amid a fragile two-week ceasefire and the U.S. has placed a blockade on vessels using Iranian ports.
Last week’s episode, in which Mr. Trump threatened to attack Iran’s civilian infrastructure, prompted some Republicans to express unease, but had little effect on how they voted on the president’s war powers authority. A Democratic-led resolution in the Senate also failed in a Tuesday vote, with just one Republican supportive of it.
House Democrats tried to pass Meeks’ measure last week via unanimous consent during a brief pro forma session, but were blocked from even offering it as the presiding Republican quickly gaveled out of session.
Meeks’ resolution would have directed the president to remove U.S. armed forces from hostilities against Iran, unless explicitly authorized by Congress.
Three Democrats who voted against the last war powers resolution in early March — Reps. Henry Cuellar of Texas, Greg Landsman of Ohio and Juan Vargas — backed Thursday’s effort to limit Mr. Trump on Iran.Rep. Jared Golden of Maine was the lone Democrat in opposition.
“The cost of inaction was far too high to tolerate. But now it’s time to be done,” Landsman said in a statement last month announcing his switch.
Cuellar said his change of heart was not a rebuke, but a “reaffirmation of Congress’ constitutional role.” But he also attributed his decision to a lack of clear exit strategy and answers from the administration about its objectives.
Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky also voted in favor, while Republican Rep. Warren Davidson of Ohio voted present. Massie and Davidson were the only two House Republicans to break with Mr. Trump in the March vote.
Meeks said after the vote he expected Davidson to remain supportive. He told reporters, “I expected him to hold, but I’ll have a conversation with him now.” Meeks added that he’s been trying to flip Golden “for a period of time” and those conversations will continue.
In a statement, Golden said the resolution could undermine negotiations with Iran to end the war.
“The purported aim of this and other war powers resolutions is to stop the hostilities. Thankfully, the United States and Iran are currently in a ceasefire, and we are negotiating over critical questions of national security and international order,” he said. “At this moment, a resolution like this would weaken our hand.”
Some Republicans have indicated they could shift their votes if the war continues beyond the statutory 60-day deadline, which falls on May 1. The 1973 War Powers Resolution — which Congress passed in response to the Vietnam War as a check on the president’s power to enter armed conflict without consent from the legislative branch — capped any unauthorized engagement at 60 days. But the law has widely been viewed as unconstitutional by presidents from both parties.
Meeks said Thursday that he planned to file another war powers resolution.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/white-house-insists-iran-peace-talks-will-continue-despite-rising-tensions-over-strait-of-hormuz/
发表回复