众议院民主党人提交针对赫格斯西的弹劾条款


2026年4月15日 / 美国东部时间下午12:58 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

华盛顿讯——众议院民主党人周三公布了针对国防部长皮特·赫格斯西的弹劾条款,就其处理伊朗战争事宜以及整体领导能力提出严重指控。

这项由亚利桑那州众议员亚萨明·安萨里牵头的决议列出了六项弹劾条款:

  • 未经授权对伊朗开战,鲁莽危及美军士兵安全;
  • 违反武装冲突法, targeting平民;
  • 疏忽大意且随意处理敏感军事信息;
  • 阻挠国会监督;
  • 滥用职权,将武装部队政治化;
  • 行为玷污美国及其武装部队声誉。

弹劾动议今年几乎肯定无法在众议院获得进展,因为共和党在众议院仅占微弱多数席位。但如果民主党在中期选举后掌控众议院,发起弹劾的民主党议员可能会再次推动相关进程。

这份长达7页的弹劾决议称,赫格斯西犯下了“重罪和轻罪”——这是弹劾的宪法依据。决议称他“表现出对宪法的故意漠视,滥用职权,行事方式与法治严重不符”。

Axios率先报道了这项决议。

决议还指控赫格斯西未能以符合武装冲突法的方式防止军事力量的使用,并提及平民伤亡事件,包括2月28日伊朗一所女子学校遭轰炸造成168人死亡。美国的初步评估认为,美国“很可能”是此次袭击的责任方,但并非故意以该学校为目标,可能是误炸。

弹劾决议指出,赫格斯西发表的“对敌人不留余地、毫不留情”的言论,表明他的行为“严重违反《日内瓦公约》以及美国其他具有约束力的义务”。

国防部长皮特·赫格斯西2026年3月3日在美国国会山出席针对伊朗的国会全体简报会。格雷姆·斯隆 / 彭博社通过盖蒂图片社拍摄

弹劾条款援引了赫格斯西去年在Signal私人群聊中分享美国在也门军事行动细节的行为,称其“在处理敏感和机密军事信息方面表现出严重疏忽”。决议还声称,他通过扣留有关委内瑞拉和伊朗军事行动的信息,试图阻挠宪法规定的监督。此外,决议称他“削弱了公众对国防部诚信和能力的信心”,部分原因是他破坏了美国对北约的承诺。

五角大楼新闻主任金斯利·威尔逊表示,此次弹劾行动“不过是又一名民主党人试图制造头条新闻,而此时国防部正果断且彻底地实现总统在伊朗的目标”。

“赫格斯西部长将继续保护国土,以实力谋求和平,”威尔逊在一份声明中说道。“这不过是又一场闹剧,企图转移美国民众对国防部所取得重大成就的注意力。”

这项决议得到了多名民主党议员的联名附议,包括特拉华州众议员萨拉·麦克布莱德、伊利诺伊州众议员劳伦·安德伍德、德克萨斯州众议员阿尔·格林、田纳西州众议员史蒂夫·科恩、德克萨斯州众议员贾斯敏·克罗克特、佐治亚州众议员尼基玛·威廉姆斯、内华达州众议员迪娜·提图斯、加利福尼亚州众议员戴夫·明、密歇根州众议员什里·塔内亚尔、新墨西哥州众议员梅兰妮·斯坦斯伯里、伊利诺伊州众议员迈克·奎格利以及科罗拉多州众议员布里塔妮·佩特森。

安萨里上周首次透露了这项计划,当时特朗普总统正日益威胁称,如果未能达成重新开放霍尔木兹海峡的协议,就将袭击伊朗的基础设施。作为首位当选国会议员的伊朗裔美国人,安萨里在X平台上发帖称,相关“言论已经越过所有红线”,并声称“赫格斯西是共犯”。

“我此前曾呼吁启动第25修正案,如今正在提交针对赫格斯西的弹劾条款,”安萨里补充道。

弹劾是罢免行政和司法部门官员程序的第一步。众议院负责批准弹劾条款,这类似于起诉书中的指控。参议院负责举行审判,以确定被告是否有罪并应被罢免公职。

历史上仅有两名内阁官员遭到弹劾:1876年的战争部长威廉·贝尔纳普,以及2024年的国土安全部长亚历杭德罗·马约卡斯。贝尔纳普最终被宣告无罪。而马约卡斯一案中,参议院民主党多数党在审判开始后不久就驳回了相关指控。

House Democrats file articles of impeachment against Hegseth

April 15, 2026 / 12:58 PM EDT / CBS News

Washington — House Democrats unveiled articles of impeachment against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Wednesday, making serious allegations about his handling of the war in Iran and his leadership more broadly.

The resolution, led by Rep. Yassamin Ansari of Arizona, lists six impeachment articles:

  • Unauthorized war against Iran and reckless endangerment of U.S. service members;
  • Violations of the law of armed conflict and targeting of civilians;
  • Negligence and reckless handling of sensitive military information;
  • Obstruction of congressional oversight;
  • Abuse of power and politicization of the armed forces;
  • Conduct bringing disrepute upon the U.S. and its armed forces.

The impeachment push almost certainly won’t go anywhere in the House this year, since Republicans have a narrow majority. But its Democratic sponsors could renew their efforts if the party takes control of the chamber following the midterm elections.

The seven-page impeachment resolution claims Hegseth engaged in high crimes and misdemeanors, the constitutional basis for impeachment. It says he has “demonstrated a willful disregard for the Constitution, abused the powers of his office, and acted in a manner grossly incompatible with the rule of law.”

Axios first reported on the resolution.

The resolution also accuses Hegseth of failing to prevent the use of military force “in a manner inconsistent with the law of armed conflict,” pointing to civilian casualties, including the Feb. 28 bombing of a girls’ school in Iran that killed 168 people. A preliminary U.S. assessment suggested that the United States was “likely” responsible for the attack but did not intentionally target the school and may have hit it in error.

The impeachment resolution argues that Hegseth has engaged in conduct “that raises serious concerns of violations of the Geneva Conventions,” along with other binding U.S. obligations, citing his comments about giving “no quarter, no mercy for our enemies.”

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth attends an all-Congress briefing on Iran at the U.S. Capitol on March 3, 2026. Graeme Sloan / Bloomberg via Getty Images

The impeachment articles cite Hegseth’s sharing of details about U.S. military operations in Yemen in a private Signal group chat last year, saying he has “demonstrated gross negligence in the handling of sensitive and classified military information.” The resolution claims he has engaged in efforts to obstruct constitutional oversight by withholding information on the Venezuela and Iran operations. And it claims he has “shaken public confidence in the integrity and ability of the Department of Defense” in part by undermining the U.S. commitment to NATO.

Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson said the impeachment effort represents “just another Democrat trying to make headlines as the Department of War decisively and overwhelmingly achieved the Presidents’ objectives in Iran.”

“Secretary Hegseth will continue to protect the homeland and project peace through strength,” Wilson said in a statement. “This is just another charade in an attempt to distract the American people from the major successes we have had here at the Department of War.”

The resolution is co-sponsored by a number of Democrats, including Reps. Sarah McBride of Delaware, Lauren Underwood of Illinois, Al Green of Texas, Steve Cohen of Tennessee, Jasmine Crockett of Texas, Nikema Williams of Georgia, Dina Titus of Nevada, Dave Min of California, Shri Thanedar of Michigan, Melanie Stansbury of New Mexico, Mike Quigley of Illinois and Brittany Pettersen of Colorado.

Ansari teased the plan last week amid President Trump’s increasing threats to target Iranian infrastructure if a deal was not reached to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Ansari, the first Iranian-American Democrat elected to Congress, said in a post on X that the “rhetoric has crossed every line,” claiming “Hegseth is complicit.”

“I’ve called for the 25th Amendment and am introducing Articles of Impeachment against Hegseth,” Ansari added.

Impeachment is the first step in the process of removing executive and judicial branch officials from office. The House is responsible for approving impeachment articles, which are akin to charges in an indictment. The Senate is tasked with holding a trial to determine whether the accused is guilty and should be removed from office.

Only two Cabinet officials have ever been impeached: Secretary of War William Belknap in 1876, and Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas in 2024. Belknap was ultimately acquitted. In Mayorkas’ case, the Senate’s Democratic majority dispensed with the charges shortly after the trial began.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注