2026年4月15日美国东部时间早上6:00 / 福克斯新闻
核专家：美国退出会谈迫使伊朗陷入守势，将德黑兰塑造成这场冲突中的失利方
作者：本杰明·温塔尔，福克斯新闻
JD·万斯：伊朗决定下一步行动
副总统JD·万斯做客《特别报道》，讨论巴基斯坦境内的伊朗和平谈判、唐纳德·特朗普总统对霍尔木兹海峡的海军封锁等议题。
NEW 您现在可以收听福克斯新闻文章！
收听本文
时长4分钟
美伊两国本周可能就伊朗非法核武器项目举行第二轮会谈，德黑兰核项目问题的顶尖专家表示，特朗普政府退出会谈的决定是正确的。
在近一天的会谈后，副总统JD·万斯的团队叫停了在巴基斯坦举行的谈判，这一做法受到了该领域专家的欢迎。
“在明确伊朗不会同意华盛顿的核心核要求后，美国团队退出会谈是明智之举。德黑兰保留浓缩铀库存和铀浓缩能力，显然为其制造核武器提供了途径，”国防民主基金会防扩散项目副主任安德里亚·斯特里克告诉福克斯新闻数字频道。
美伊之间的核心争端在于德黑兰希望开展铀浓缩活动——而铀正是制造核武器的原料。
威特科夫警告：特朗普权衡行动之际，伊朗距“制造炸弹的材料”仅“一周之遥”
2026年4月12日，副总统JD·万斯在与巴基斯坦和伊朗代表会晤后，于巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡举行的新闻发布会上发言。贾里德·库什纳和和平使团特使史蒂夫·威特科夫在活动中旁听。（杰奎琳·马丁/美联社）
2018年，唐纳德·特朗普总统退出巴拉克·奥巴马总统与伊朗达成的核协议，因其政府认为该协议的正式名称《联合全面行动计划》允许伊朗制造原子弹。
当被问及一份好的核协议应具备哪些要素时，斯特里克表示：“一份好的协议不仅要求该政权交出核燃料、拆除关键设施，承诺永久禁止浓缩活动，还要求配合国际原子能机构的调查，全面彻底说明并拆除伊朗与核武器相关的设施、设备、文件、离心机及相关生产能力。”
斯特里克承认这一过程可能需要数年时间，但指出“国际原子能机构具备完成这一任务的充足能力，且在伊拉克、利比亚和南非拆除核武器项目方面拥有经验。任何低于此标准的协议，伊朗都可能违反承诺，重新获得突破门槛的途径。”
特朗普透露伊朗在最后通牒后提出“重大提案”，但“不够好”
参议员林赛·格雷厄姆周一表示，他反对美国据报道提出的、将伊朗铀浓缩禁令期限设为20年的潜在协议提案。
“我赞赏唐纳德·特朗普总统以和平外交方式结束伊朗冲突的决心。但我们必须牢记我们正在与伊朗打交道的对象：恐怖分子、骗子和作弊者，”格雷厄姆在X平台上发帖称。
“如果相关报道属实，在我看来，我们同意暂停浓缩活动而非彻底禁止浓缩活动，将是一个错误，”他说。
“我们会同意基地组织暂停浓缩活动吗？绝不会。”
在这张由伊朗原子能组织发布的照片中，技术人员在阿拉克重水反应堆的二次回路工作，官员和媒体于2019年12月参观了位于首都德黑兰西南150英里处的阿拉克附近的该场址。（伊朗原子能组织/美联社）
一位中东地区官员向福克斯新闻数字频道证实，美国提出了为期20年的浓缩铀暂停期限提案，但遭到了伊朗伊斯兰共和国的拒绝。
华盛顿特区科学与国际安全研究所创始人兼所长、物理学家戴维·奥尔布赖特对美国在巴基斯坦终止会谈的决定表示赞赏。他在深受伊朗问题观察者关注的X账号上写道：“美国在伊斯兰堡退出会谈的做法是正确的。”
奥尔布赖特告诉福克斯新闻数字频道，美国谈判代表的这一举措“明确表明，这不是为了谈判而谈判。离开谈判桌让伊朗陷入守势，将其标记为这场冲突中的失利方。此外，伊朗不会在任何重大方面改变立场。他们通常毫无灵活性。但伊朗原本希望继续谈判，以试图束缚美国和以色列的手脚，同时试图将自己描绘成胜利者。如今，伊朗必须决定是接受美国的提议，还是冒着冲突重启的风险。”
他补充道，对美国而言，一份好的核协议意味着“不得开展浓缩活动，不得拥有高浓缩铀和低浓缩铀库存；伊朗配合核查人员，可核查地终止其核武器项目，并提供完整的核申报文件，而这是伊朗从未做过的。”
点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用
2026年4月11日，伊朗议会议长穆罕默德·巴盖尔·加利巴夫和外交部长阿巴斯·阿拉克奇在巴基斯坦拉瓦尔品第的努尔可汗空军基地受到巴基斯坦外交部长伊沙克·达尔和陆军参谋长陆军元帅阿西姆·穆尼尔的迎接。（巴基斯坦外交部/美联社）
奥尔布赖特继续说道：“如果伊朗表示愿意接受美国的立场，再次举行会谈是合理的。
“伊朗完全没有必要开展浓缩活动。其民用需求仅为少量用于小型研究反应堆的20%浓缩铀，即德黑兰研究反应堆，且根据《联合全面行动计划》的安排，伊朗国内和俄罗斯储存的燃料或即将制成燃料的20%浓缩铀已足够使用20年。”
他总结道：“不妨直白一点，套用阿比·霍夫曼的话来说，我有权在拥挤的火场里大喊大叫，但我不会这么做。伊朗强调其拥有浓缩活动的权利，这一点无关紧要，偏离了主题。”
本杰明·温塔尔报道以色列、伊朗、叙利亚、土耳其和欧洲事务。您可以在推特@BenWeinthal上关注本杰明，或通过邮箱benjamin.weinthal@fox.com联系他。
President Trump’s negotiating team praised by nuclear experts for walking away from Pakistan talks
April 15, 2026 6:00am EDT / Fox News
Nuclear expert: US exit from talks forced Iran onto the defensive, framing Tehran as the losing state in the war
By Benjamin Weinthal, Fox News
JD Vance: The Iranians determine what’s next
Vice President JD Vance joins ‘Special Report’ to discuss Iranian peace talks in Pakistan, President Donald Trump’s naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz and more.
NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!
Listen to this article
4 min
With a second round of talks likely to take place between the U.S. and Iran’s regime this week over its illicit nuclear weapons programs, leading experts on Tehran’s program say the Trump administration was right to walk away.
After nearly a day of talks, Vice President JD Vance’s team pulled the plug on the negotiations taking place in Pakistan, something welcomed by experts in the field.
“The U.S. team was wise to walk away once it became clear the Iranians would not agree to Washington’s core nuclear demands. Tehran maintaining enriched uranium stocks and uranium enrichment capabilities provides it with a pathway to nuclear weapons, plain and simple,” Andrea Stricker, deputy director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies’nonproliferation program, told Fox News Digital.
A core dispute between the U.S. and Iran is over Tehran’s desire to enrich uranium — the material used to build nuclear weapons.
WITKOFF WARNS IRAN IS ‘A WEEK AWAY’ FROM ‘BOMB-MAKING MATERIAL’ AS TRUMP WEIGHS ACTION
Vice President JD Vance spoke during a news conference in Islamabad, Pakistan, on April 12, 2026, after meeting with representatives from Pakistan and Iran. Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, special envoy for peace missions, listened during the event.(Jacquelyn Martin/AP)
In 2018, President Donald Trump withdrew from President Barack Obama’s nuclear weapons deal with Iran because his administration argued that the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the formal name of the deal, permitted Iran to build an atomic bomb.
When asked what a good nuclear agreement would look like, Stricker said, “A good deal requires the regime to not only turn over its nuclear fuel, dismantle key facilities, and commit to a permanent ban on enrichment, but to cooperate with an IAEA investigation that fully and completely accounts for and dismantles Iran’s nuclear weapons-relevant facilities, equipment, documentation, centrifuges and related production capabilities.”
Stricker acknowledged that the process could take several years, but noted that “the IAEA is well-equipped for this mission and has experience dismantling nuclear weapons programs in Iraq, Libya and South Africa. Anything less and Iran will likely cheat on its commitments and reconstitute a breakout pathway.”
TRUMP REVEALS IRAN MADE ‘SIGNIFICANT PROPOSAL’ AFTER ULTIMATUM, BUT ‘NOT GOOD ENOUGH’
Sen. Lindsey Graham said Monday he opposes a reported proposal by the U.S. for a 20-year ban on Iran’s uranium enrichment under a potential deal.
“I appreciate President Donald Trump’s resolve to end the Iranian conflict peacefully and through diplomacy. However, we have to remember who we’re dealing with in Iran: terrorists, liars, and cheaters,” Graham posted on X.
“If this reporting is accurate, the idea that we would agree to a moratorium on enrichment rather than a ban on enrichment would be a mistake in my view,” he said.
“Would we agree to a moratorium for al Qaeda to enrich? No.”
节点运行失败
In this photo released by the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, technicians work at the Arak heavy water reactor’s secondary circuit, as officials and media visit the site, near Arak, 150 miles southwest of the capital of Tehran, in December 2019.(Atomic Energy Organization of Iran/AP)
A regional official from the Mideast confirmed to Fox News Digital that a 20-year moratorium on enriched uranium was made by the U.S. and rejected by the Islamic Republic.
David Albright, a physicist who is the founder and president of the Institute for Science and International Security in Washington, D.C., praised the U.S. decision to end the talks in Pakistan. Writing on his X account, which is closely followed by Iran watchers, he stated: “The U.S. was Right to Walk Away in Islamabad.”
Albright told Fox News Digital the move by the U.S. negotiators “makes it clear that this is not negotiating for negotiating’s sake. And leaving threw Iran on the defensive, signaling it as the losing state in the war. Moreover, the Iranians would not have shifted their positions in any significant way. They usually have no flexibility. But Iran wanted to have negotiations continue in order to try to tie the hands of the U.S. and Israel, while trying to portray themselves as victors. Now, Iran has to decide whether to accept the U.S. offer or risk war resuming.”
He added that a good nuclear deal for the U.S. would mean “no enrichment and no stocks of HEU [Highly Enriched Uranium] and LEU [Low Enriched Uranium ]; Iran cooperating with the inspectors and verifiably ending its nuclear weapons program and providing a complete nuclear declaration, something it has never done.”
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Iran’s Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi were greeted by Pakistan Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar and Army Chief Field Marshal Gen. Asim Munir upon their arrival at Nur Khan airbase in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, on April 11, 2026.(Pakistan Ministry of Foreign Affairs/AP)
Albright continued that “If Iran signals willingness to accept the U.S. position, meeting again makes sense.
“Iran has absolutely no need to enrich. Its only civil need is for a small amount of 20% enriched for its small research reactor, the Tehran Research Reactor, and it has enough 20% enriched uranium in fuel or nearly made into fuel stored in Iran and in Russia under JCPOA [Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action] arrangements for 20 years.”
He concluded, “To be flip, and paraphrase Abbie Hoffman, I have the right to yell theater in a crowded fire, but I don’t. Iran’s emphasis on its right to enrich is as irrelevant and beside the point.”
Benjamin Weinthal reports on Israel, Iran, Syria, Turkey and Europe. You can follow Benjamin on Twitter @BenWeinthal, and email him at benjamin.weinthal@fox.com
发表回复