2026年4月14日 美国东部时间上午10:57 / 美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）
作者：德文·科尔
35分钟前发布
发布于2026年4月14日，美国东部时间上午10:57
唐纳德·特朗普 移民 国家安全 航空新闻
查看所有主题
2023年3月16日，美国地区法官詹姆斯·博阿斯伯格在华盛顿特区E.巴雷特·普雷特曼联邦法院拍摄肖像。
卡罗琳·范·豪滕/《华盛顿邮报》/美联社/资料图
当地时间周二，意见出现分歧的联邦上诉法院下令美国地区法官詹姆斯·博阿斯伯格停止其试图追究特朗普政府官员责任的行动，原因是这些官员在一桩备受关注的移民案件中无视他的法庭命令。
该裁决出台的时间距离博阿斯伯格——华盛顿特区联邦初审法院首席法官——作出一项重磅裁决刚好过去一年，当时他在裁决中称“有合理理由认定政府存在刑事藐视法庭行为”，因其拒不遵守他下达的、以唐纳德·特朗普总统援引的强有力战时权力为由暂停驱逐移民的命令。
特朗普政府曾多次向哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院提起上诉，因此藐视法庭程序始终未能正式启动，在法院审议博阿斯伯格是否有权推进这项调查期间，法官的相关工作被迫暂停。
但如今，两名由特朗普任命的上诉法院法官决定彻底叫停博阿斯伯格的计划，他们在一份措辞尖锐的判决意见中表示，鉴于特朗普政府此前已明确时任国土安全部部长克里斯蒂·诺姆是负责决定是否继续执行相关遣返行动的官员，博阿斯伯格开展的藐视法庭调查属于“明显的权力滥用”。
“该地区法院试图深入调查行政部门高层就国家安全与外交事务作出的审议。这些程序明显属于滥用自由裁量权，”上诉法院法官妮奥米·劳和贾斯汀·沃克在未具名的判决意见中写道。
“该地区法院已启动一项侵入性的刑事藐视法庭调查，以审查政府在将涉嫌阿拉瓜列车组织成员移交萨尔瓦多羁押时是否存在故意行为。但这项调查的最终结果注定是死路一条，”法院表示。
前总统乔·拜登任命的法官米歇尔·蔡尔兹对此提出异议。
本文正在持续更新中。
Court orders DC judge to end criminal contempt inquiry into Trump officials involved in deportation flights
2026-04-14 10:57 AM ET / CNN
By Devan Cole
35 min ago
PUBLISHED Apr 14, 2026, 10:57 AM ET
Donald Trump Immigration National security Aviation news
See all topics
US District Judge James Boasberg stands for a portrait at E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Courthouse in Washington, DC, on March 16, 2023.
Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post/AP/File
A divided federal appeals court on Tuesday ordered US District Judge James Boasberg to end his efforts to hold Trump administration officials accountable for flouting his orders in a high-stakes immigration case.
The decision comes almost exactly a year after Boasberg, the chief judge of the federal trial-level court in Washington, DC, said in a blockbuster ruling that “probable cause exists to find the government in criminal contempt” for defying his orders to temporarily halt the deportation of migrants under a powerful wartime authority invoked by President Donald Trump.
The Trump administration appealed several times to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals so the contempt proceedings never fully got underway, halting the judge’s work while it considered whether he had the power to move ahead with the inquiry.
But now, a pair of Trump appointees on the appellate court has decided to fully stamp out Boasberg’s plans, saying in a sharply worded opinion that his contempt probe represented “a clear abuse” of power given that the administration had previously identified then-DHS Secretary Kristi Noem as the official responsible for deciding to allow the deportations in question to continue.
“The district court proposes to probe high-level Executive Branch deliberations about matters of national security and diplomacy. These proceedings are a clear abuse of discretion,” Neomi Rao and Justin Walker, who are appeals court judges, said in the unsigned opinion.
“The district court has launched an intrusive criminal contempt investigation into whether the government acted willfully when it transferred suspected Tren de Aragua members to Salvadoran custody. But the end of this investigation is a legal dead end,” the court said.
Judge Michelle Childs, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, dissented.
This story is developing and will be updated.
发表回复