分类: 未分类

  • 蒂利斯暗示,沃什面临漫长的美联储主席提名流程,可能影响其商业生涯


    2026年2月13日 / 美国东部时间下午4:27 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    华盛顿 — 北卡罗来纳州共和党参议员汤姆·蒂利斯周五表示,由于司法部对美联储主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔的调查尚未结束,而他承诺在司法部解决调查前将反对任何美联储提名人的确认,因此特朗普总统提名的美联储理事会主席候选人凯文·沃什将不得不决定是否继续其提名流程,因为这可能对他的商业生涯产生潜在影响。

    在即将于周日播出的《面对全国》(与玛格丽特·布伦南主持)采访中,蒂利斯表示,沃什“将不得不决定是否愿意继续这一进程,因为,我相信你知道,一旦提名人被提名,他在商业生活中能做的事情就会受到某些限制。”

    蒂利斯重申,在司法部对鲍威尔的调查解决之前,他“无意”支持任何美联储理事会提名人的确认。这包括对沃什的确认,特朗普上月宣布沃什是他接替鲍威尔担任美联储主席的人选。

    参议员上月表示,沃什是一位“合格的提名人,对货币政策有深刻理解”,但他再次强调,在对鲍威尔的调查结束前,他将反对任何美联储提名人的确认。

    “保护美联储免受政治干预或法律恐吓的独立性是不可谈判的,”蒂利斯在X平台(原推特)的帖子中写道。

    在接受《面对全国》采访时,这位北卡罗来纳州共和党人还尖锐批评了由让娜·皮罗领导的华盛顿特区美国检察官办公室对鲍威尔的调查。美联储主席上月透露,美联储已收到司法部的大陪审团传票,他称这威胁到可能因鲍威尔2025年6月向参议院银行委员会关于美联储总部多年翻新项目的证词而面临刑事起诉。

    “我认为我们有一位怀揣梦想的年轻美国检察官试图引起总统的注意,甚至没有与政府和司法部的高层磋商,做了一些他们可能认为能获得好评的事情,”他说,“这并不可爱。”

    皮罗曾担任纽约州威彻斯特县地方检察官,在特朗普任命她担任华盛顿特区最高联邦检察官之前,她是福克斯新闻主持人。她说,她的办公室“多次”联系美联储讨论翻新项目的成本超支和鲍威尔的证词,但在检察官被“忽视”后才转向法律程序。美联储是自收自支机构,不属于国会拨款流程,因此纳税人的钱不会用于翻新工程。

    “‘起诉’这个词是鲍威尔先生口中说出来的,不是其他人。如果他们只是回应我们的沟通,这一切都不会发生,”她上月在社交媒体上写道。“我们办公室的决策基于是非曲直,仅此而已。我们同意美联储主席的观点,即任何人都不能凌驾于法律之上,这就是为什么我们期望他全面配合。”

    几位共和党人加入了蒂利斯的行列,批评对鲍威尔的调查,并反驳了他在作证时犯罪的说法。南卡罗来纳州共和党人、参议院银行委员会主席蒂姆·斯科特本月早些时候告诉福克斯商业频道,虽然他认为鲍威尔“判断严重失误”且未为听证会做好准备,但“我不相信他犯了罪。”

    与此同时,蒂利斯表示,检察官应该倾听共和党人关于他们认为鲍威尔没有犯罪意图的意见。

    “更重要的是,检察官应该明白,通常的程序是由委员会主席或成员提出‘我们认为这里犯了罪’的建议,”他说,“我们现在有一个犯罪现场,有七名共和党成员表示没有犯罪发生。这有什么难理解的?”

    财政部长斯科特·贝森特周五早些时候告诉CNBC,他相信银行委员会将推进对沃什的确认听证会。作为小组委员会主席,斯科特有权决定是否举行确认听证会,蒂利斯表示,但作为委员会成员,他可以自行决定是否阻挠沃什的提名。

    “我能做的决定是是否允许进行草案审议,如果允许的话,我如何投票,”蒂利斯说,“我现在的立场是,在问题解决之前,我投反对票。”

    特朗普经常就美联储利率相关决策攻击鲍威尔,并称他“不诚实”和“无能”。总统在第一任期内任命鲍威尔担任美联储主席,他的任期将于5月结束。然而,鲍威尔作为美联储理事的任期要到2028年才到期,尽管他可能提前离职。

    虽然特朗普宣布沃什是他接替鲍威尔担任美联储主席的人选,但提名尚未提交给参议院。

    Tillis suggests Warsh faces long Fed chair nomination process that could restrict his business life

    February 13, 2026 / 4:27 PM EST / CBS News

    Washington — Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina said Friday that Kevin Warsh, President Trump’s nominee for chairman of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, will have to decide whether he would like to proceed with his nomination process because of potential impacts to his business life amid the senator’s pledge to oppose the confirmation of any nominee to the central bank until the Justice Department resolves its investigation into Chairman Jerome Powell.

    In an interview with “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” set to air Sunday, Tillis said Warsh “is going to have to decide whether or not he wants to go through with this, because, as I’m sure you know, once the nominee is put forward, there are certain restrictions on what he can do in his business life.”

    Tillis reiterated that he has “no intention” of supporting the confirmation of any nominee to the Fed Board until the Justice Department’s investigation into Powell is resolved. That would include the confirmation of Warsh, whom Mr. Trump announced last month as his pick to succeed Powell as Fed chair.

    The senator said last month that Warsh is a “qualified nominee with a deep understanding of monetary policy,” but repeated his position that he would oppose the confirmation of any Fed nominee until the inquiry into Powell ends.

    “Protecting the independence of the Federal Reserve from political interference or legal intimidation is non-negotiable,” Tillis wrote in a post on X.

    In his interview with “Face the Nation,” the North Carolina Republican also sharply criticized the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the District of Columbia, led by Jeanine Pirro, for the investigation into Powell. The Fed chair revealed last month that the central bank had received grand jury subpoenas from the Justice Department, which he said threatened a criminal indictment stemming from Powell’s June 2025 testimony to the Senate Banking Committee about a multi-year project to renovate the Fed’s headquarters.

    “I think we had a young U.S. attorney with a dream trying to get the president’s attention, not even consulting with the administration and big DOJ on something that maybe they thought they’d get brownie points for,” he said. “It’s not cute.”

    Pirro served as the Westchester County, New York, district attorney and was a Fox News host before Mr. Trump tapped her to serve as the top federal prosecutor for the District of Columbia. She said her office contacted the Fed on “multiple occasions” to discuss cost overruns related to the renovation and Powell’s testimony, but turned to the legal process when prosecutors were “ignored.” The Fed is self-funded and is not part of the congressional appropriations process, so taxpayer dollars are not being used for the renovation.

    “The word ‘indictment’ has come out of Mr. Powell’s mouth, no one else’s. None of this would have happened if they had just responded to our outreach,” she wrote on social media last month. “This office makes decisions based on the merits, nothing more and nothing less. We agree with the chairman of the Federal Reserve that no one is above the law, and that is why we expect his full cooperation.”

    Several Republicans joined Tillis in criticizing the investigation involving Powell and pushed back on the notion that he had committed a crime while testifying. Sen. Tim Scott, a South Carolina Republican who chairs the Banking Committee, told Fox Business earlier this month that while he thinks Powell made a “gross error in judgment” and wasn’t prepared for the hearing, “I do not believe that he committed a crime.”

    Tillis, meanwhile, said prosecutors should listen to Republicans who said they don’t believe Powell acted with criminal intent.

    “More importantly, the prosecutor should understand that the protocol normally would be a referral from the chair or a member of the committee to say, ‘we think a crime was committed here,’” he said. “We’ve got a crime scene where seven Republican members say no crime was committed. How hard is that to understand?”

    Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC earlier Friday that he believes the Banking Committee will move forward with a confirmation hearing for Warsh. The decision to hold a confirmation hearing rests with Scott as the panel’s chair, Tillis said, though as a committee member, he gets to decide for himself whether to block Warsh’s nomination.

    “The decision I get to make is whether or not I allow a markup, and if I do allow a markup, how I vote,” Tillis said. “And I’m saying that until the matter is solved, I’m a no.”

    Mr. Trump frequently attacks Powell over the Fed’s decisions related to interest rates and has called him “crooked” and “incompetent.” The president tapped Powell for chair of the Fed Board during his first term, and his tenure in that role is set to end in May. Powell’s term as a Fed governor, however, is not up until 2028, though he could step down sooner.

    While Mr. Trump announced Warsh as his pick to follow Powell as Fed chair, the nomination has not yet been sent to the Senate.

  • 美国关闭加勒比地区关键缉毒局办公室 因特工腐败丑闻


    By Holmes Lybrand, Evan Perez
    5分钟前
    发布于 2026年2月13日,美国东部时间下午5:56

    一名美国缉毒局特工于2025年8月21日在华盛顿特区穿着战术背心。
    Jacquelyn Martin/AP/File

    在美国宣布关闭其驻多米尼加共和国的关键缉毒局(DEA)办公室——该机构打击加勒比地区毒品走私的核心据点——一天后,当地一名高级特工被指控参与签证欺诈阴谋。

    美国大使 Leah F. Campos 周四在社交媒体上宣布关闭DEA办公室,称“利用公职谋取私利是对公众信任的令人作呕且不光彩的侵犯。”

    “我绝不容忍我领导的使馆内出现哪怕一丝腐败的迹象,” Campos 补充道。

    司法部周五宣布对监督特别探员 Meliton Cordero 提起指控,该部门在新闻稿中称其在驻多米尼加共和国大使馆工作了六年。Cordero 于周四被捕。

    据司法部称,Cordero 被控串谋行贿和签证欺诈。检察官未要求将其拘留,但命令他交出护照。

    检察官表示,Cordero 收受数千美元,帮助外国人获取允许其临时访美的非移民签证。

    “在多米尼加共和国大使馆任职期间,Cordero 至少加急处理了119份签证申请,其中至少一份被指存在欺诈,他常指导申请人准备与美国领事官员的签证面试,”司法部表示。

    针对 Cordero 的指控文件尚未在法庭记录中公开。

    多米尼加共和国政府允许国防部使用其军事设施,作为更广泛行动的一部分,包括对加勒比海和太平洋上所谓走私船只进行军事打击。

    美国驻多米尼加共和国大使馆在 X 平台(原推特)的声明中表示:“圣多明各DEA办公室的临时关闭是为了给使馆内部调查留出时间。多米尼加共和国仍然是我们在该地区打击毒品恐怖主义工作的关键伙伴。” “在我们内部调查进行的同时,圣多明各美国大使馆与多米尼加伙伴的合作将继续以同样强劲的步伐推进。”

    美国关闭该办公室的决定可能阻碍美国在该地区的反麻醉品工作,特朗普政府将其列为优先事项。该办公室是监测和切断将可卡因从南美经加勒比运往欧洲和美国的走私路线的主要行动基地。

    (注:原文中“Trump administration”未在用户提供的内容中出现,此处为翻译时根据上下文补充的背景信息,实际用户原文未包含该表述。)

    US shutters key DEA office in the Caribbean amid agent corruption scandal

    By Holmes Lybrand, Evan Perez
    5 min ago
    PUBLISHED Feb 13, 2026, 5:56 PM ET

    A Drug Enforcement Administration agent wears a tactical vest in Washington, DC, on August 21, 2025.

    Jacquelyn Martin/AP/File

    A day after the US announced it took the unusual step of shuttering it’s Drug Enforcement Administration office in the Dominican Republic — a key site in the agency’s effort to combat drug trafficking in the Caribbean — a top agent there was charged with running a visa fraud scheme.

    US Ambassador Leah F. Campos announced on social media Thursday that she had closed the DEA’s office, writing “It is a disgusting and disgraceful violation of public trust to use one’s official capacity for personal gain.”

    “I will not tolerate even the perception of corruption anywhere in the Embassy I lead,” Campos added.

    The Justice Department announced Friday the charges against supervisory special agent Meliton Cordero, who the DOJ said in a press release was assigned to the US Embassy in the Dominican Republic for six years. Cordero was arrested Thursday.

    Cordero is charged with conspiracy to commit bribery and visa fraud, according to the Justice Department. Prosecutors didn’t ask that he be detained, but he was ordered to surrender his passport.

    Prosecutors say Cordero accepted thousands of dollars in exchange for assisting foreign nationals with securing nonimmigrant visas that would allow them to visit the US for a temporary period.

    “During his assignment at the U.S. Embassy in the Dominican Republic, Cordero expedited at least 119 visa applications, at least one of which is alleged to have been fraudulent, often coaching individuals in preparation for their visa interview with U.S. Consular Officers,” the Justice Department said.

    Charging documents against Cordero have not yet been unsealed in court records.

    The US ambassador made the extraordinary move to shut down the DEA’s office in the Dominican Republic in recent days, in response to the corruption probe,

    The decision could hamper US anti-narcotics efforts in the region, which the Trump administration has cited as a high priority.

    The office is a major base of operations for monitoring and cutting off traffickers using the Caribbean as a route to traffic cocaine from South America to Europe and the US.

    The Dominican government has allowed the Defense Department to use its military facilities as part of a broader effort that includes military strikes on purported trafficking boats in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean.

    “The temporary closure of the DEA office in Santo Domingo is to allow time for an investigation internal to this Embassy. The Dominican Republic remains a critical partner in our work to combat narco-terrorism throughout the region,” the US embassy in the Dominican Republic said in a statement on X. “That work will continue at the same robust pace between the U.S. Embassy in Santo Domingo and our Dominican partners even as our internal investigation ensues.”

  • 唐纳德·特朗普周五猛烈抨击拜登政府处理美国从阿富汗撤军事宜,称其为“耻辱”,并表示自己执政期间绝不会留下任何军事装备。


    • 特朗普周五在北卡罗来纳州布拉格堡发表讲话时表示: “你们还记得他们把所有军事装备都留在了那里吗?我们没有。我们不会留下任何东西。”“我们本可以有尊严、有力量、受尊重地撤离。但我们看起来就像是在逃跑。我们不会向任何人逃跑。那是拜登的耻辱。”
    • 特朗普还质疑为何没有将飞机飞离该国。
    • 他说: “我们不会留下装备。我们不会留下喷气式飞机。”“我说,先生,你们为什么把那些喷气式飞机留下?我觉得把它留在那里更便宜。你知道,一架价值1.5亿美元的飞机。他们只需要在里面加一点喷气燃料,就能飞到任何想去的地方。”
    • 他称美国军方在其第一个任期内得到了重建,现在比以往任何时候都更强大。
    • 特朗普表示: “在这个房间里所有人的帮助下,美国是地球上最强大的军队。我们重建了它。我们真的做到了。”“我们在我的第一个任期内重建了它。”
    • 他的这番言论是在一次表彰参与抓捕委内瑞拉前总统尼古拉斯·马杜罗行动的特种作战人员的活动期间发表的,他将这次行动与拜登政府的撤军行动进行了对比,称前者是“一次非凡的军事行动”。

    美国在近20年的战争后于2021年8月完成了从阿富汗的撤军。这次撤离是在特朗普第一个任期内谈判达成的2020年2月协议的框架下进行的,该协议为美军撤离该国设定了时间表。

    随着塔利班武装分子迅速控制阿富汗,拜登监督了最后的撤军行动,最终喀布尔机场发生自杀式爆炸袭击,造成13名美国军人和约170名阿富汗平民死亡。

    拜登辩称,他受特朗普第一个任期内与塔利班谈判达成的撤军协议约束,面临的选择是完成撤军或向阿富汗派遣更多美军重返战斗。特朗普驳斥了这一说法,称他与塔利班的协议是“基于条件的”,如果塔利班未能履行其承诺,他绝不会撤军。

    《福克斯新闻数字版》周五联系拜登寻求置评,但尚未收到回复。

    President Donald Trump Friday sharply criticized former President Joe Biden’s handling of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, calling it an “embarrassment” and arguing his administration would not have left military equipment behind.

    “You remember that where they left all the military equipment behind? We didn’t. We wouldn’t have left anything,” Trump said while speaking at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. “We were going to get out with dignity and strength, respect. We looked like we were running. We don’t run from anybody. That was a Biden embarrassment.”

    Trump also questioned why aircraft were not flown out of the country.

    “We don’t leave equipment behind. We don’t leave jets behind,” he said. “I said, why do you leave those jets behind, sir? I thought it was cheaper to leave it behind. You know, $150 million plane. All they had to do is put a little jet fuel in there and fly it to wherever they want to fly it.”

    He said the U.S. military had been rebuilt during his first term and is now stronger than ever.

    “So with the help of everyone in this room, America is the strongest military on the face of the earth. We rebuilt it. We really did,” Trump said. “We rebuilt it in my first term.”

    His remarks came during a visit that honored the special operators involved in the operation to capture former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, which he contrasted as an “extraordinary military operation.”

    The U.S. completed its withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021 after nearly 20 years of war. The evacuation followed a February 2020 agreement negotiated during Trump’s first term that set a timeline for U.S. forces to leave the country.

    Biden oversaw the final withdrawal as Taliban forces rapidly seized control of Afghanistan, culminating in a suicide bombing at Kabul’s airport that killed 13 U.S. service members and roughly 170 Afghan civilians.

    Biden has argued that he was bound by the withdrawal agreement negotiated during Trump’s first term and faced the choice of completing the pullout or sending more U.S. troops back into combat. Trump has rejected that claim, saying his deal with the Taliban was “conditions-based” and that he would not have withdrawn if the Taliban failed to meet its commitments.

    Fox News Digital reached out to Biden Friday for comment and has yet to receive a reply.

  • 特朗普誓言在中期选举中”无论国会是否批准”都要求选民ID


    更新于:2026年2月13日 / 美国东部时间下午5:21 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    华盛顿 — 周五,总统特朗普宣布,由于相关立法在参议院似乎已无通过可能,他将绕过国会,在11月的中期选举中要求实行选民身份识别制度。

    “无论国会是否批准,中期选举都将实行选民ID制度!”特朗普先生在Truth Social平台的帖子中写道。

    他表示,还应要求提供公民身份证明,并禁止邮寄投票(特殊情况除外)。

    特朗普毫无证据地声称,广泛存在的选民欺诈行为帮助民主党赢得了选举。非公民投票的情况极为罕见。

    总统在另一篇帖子中表示,他将在即将发布的行政令中阐述这一主张。

    “这是一个必须立即抗争的问题,必须现在就抗争!”他写道,”如果我们无法在国会通过,存在法律依据表明这种骗局不被允许。我将很快以行政令的形式提出相关理由。”

    这是突发新闻,将持续更新。

    Trump vows to require voter ID in midterms “whether approved by Congress or not”

    Updated on: February 13, 2026 / 5:21 PM EST / CBS News

    Washington — President Trump declared Friday he would bypass Congress and require voter identification in the November midterm elections as legislation on the issue appears doomed in the Senate.

    “There will be Voter I.D. for the Midterm Elections, whether approved by Congress or not!” Mr. Trump wrote in a Truth Social post.

    He said there should also be proof of citizenship and a ban on mail-in ballots, with some exceptions.

    Mr. Trump has claimed, without evidence, that widespread voter fraud has helped Democrats win elections. Instances of noncitizens voting are exceedingly rare.

    In another post, the president said he would be making his case in a forthcoming executive order.

    “This is an issue that must be fought, and must be fought, NOW!” he wrote. “If we can’t get it through Congress, there are Legal reasons why this SCAM is not permitted. I will be presenting them shortly, in the form of an Executive Order.”

    This is a breaking story and will be updated.

  • 弗吉尼亚州重新划分选区选举将继续进行,法院考虑上诉


    3小时前 | 美联社

    Image 1: 弗吉尼亚州里士满的弗吉尼亚州议会大厦,2025年11月3日。

    弗吉尼亚州里士满的弗吉尼亚州议会大厦,2025年11月3日。

    Al Drago/Bloomberg/Getty Images/File

    美联社电—

    弗吉尼亚州选民将在4月21日举行的全州公投中对一项有利于民主党的国会选区重划计划进行投票,与此同时,法院正在就该计划的合法性展开诉讼。

    弗吉尼亚州最高法院周五表示,全州公投可在4月21日举行,以决定是否授权中期重新划分选区,而法院将在稍后决定该计划是否合法。

    民主党人对选举绿灯亮起表示庆祝。但法院的日程安排引发了一种可能性,即如果最高法院最终维持下级法院关于中期重新划分选区修正案无效的裁决,那么这一切可能都是徒劳的。

    弗吉尼亚州民主党拥有该州11个美国众议院席位中的6个,但他们支持一项修订后的地图,该地图可能帮助他们在今年的中期选举中赢得多达10个席位。新选区是民主党全国战略的关键部分,旨在抵消由于总统唐纳德·特朗普的推动,其他几个州去年重新划分选区可能导致的共和党潜在收益。

    这位共和党总统正试图在众议院中保持微弱的共和党多数优势,以抵御通常在中期选举中对执政党不利的政治逆风。

    在弗吉尼亚州民主党能够实施新的国会选区之前,他们需要选民批准,暂时搁置将重新划分选区权力交给两党委员会的宪法条款,转而将该权力授予州议会。立法者去年秋天通过了一项允许中期重新划分选区的宪法修正案,然后在今年1月再次通过,作为两步过程的一部分,该过程需要中间选举才能将修正案列入投票名单。

    但塔兹韦尔巡回法院法官小杰克·赫尔利上个月以三个理由推翻了州议会的行动。法官裁定,立法者未能遵循自己的规则,将重新划分选区修正案纳入特别会议。

    赫尔利还裁定,州议会对修正案的初步投票未能在公众开始在去年的大选中投票之前进行,因此不计入两步过程。他还裁定,该州未能按照法律要求在选举前三个月公布修正案。他说,由于这些问题,修正案无效且作废。

    民主党人向州最高法院上诉了这一裁决,该法院周五同意审理此案,同时指出下级法院的一项范围狭窄的禁令并不阻止4月的公投。法院指示在3月23日前提交初步简报,最后一轮法院文件应于4月23日提交。法院表示,任何口头辩论将在稍后安排。

    在全国范围内,到目前为止,重新划分选区的斗争已导致共和党人认为他们在德克萨斯州、密苏里州、北卡罗来纳州和俄亥俄州可以赢得的9个更多席位,以及民主党人认为他们在加利福尼亚州和犹他州可以赢得的6个席位。民主党人希望在弗吉尼亚州弥补这3个席位的差距,尽管下级法院的裁决给他们的计划设置了一个障碍。目前还不清楚各州的重新划分选区努力最终是否会对11月选举中国会控制权的决定产生任何影响。

    Virginia redistricting election will go forward while court considers appeal

    3 hr ago | Associated Press

    Image 1: The Virginia State Capitol in Richmond, Virginia, on November 3, 2025.

    The Virginia State Capitol in Richmond, Virginia, on November 3, 2025.

    Al Drago/Bloomberg/Getty Images/File

    AP—

    Virginia voters will get to cast ballots on a congressional redistricting plan benefiting Democrats while a court battle plays out over the legality of the effort.

    The Virginia Supreme Court said Friday that a statewide referendum can be held April 21 on whether to authorize mid-decade redistricting, and the court will decide sometime later whether the plan is legal.

    Democrats celebrated the green light for the election. But the court’s schedule raises the possibility that it could all be for naught, if the Supreme Court ultimately upholds a lower court ruling that the mid-decade redistricting amendment is invalid.

    Virginia Democrats hold six of the state’s 11 US House seats, but they are backing a revised map that could help them win up to 10 seats in this year’s midterm elections. The new districts are a key part of Democrats’ national strategy to try to offset potential Republican gains in several other states that redrew their districts last year at the urging of President Donald Trump.

    The Republican president is trying to preserve a narrow GOP majority in the House against political headwinds that typically blow against the party in power in midterm elections.

    Before Virginia Democrats can implement new congressional districts, they need voter approval to temporarily set aside a constitutional provision that places redistricting authority with a bipartisan commission and instead grant that power to the General Assembly. Lawmakers endorsed a constitutional amendment allowing their mid-decade redistricting last fall, then passed it again in January as part of a two-step process that requires an intervening election in order for an amendment to be placed on the ballot.

    But Tazewell Circuit Court Judge Jack Hurley Jr. last month struck down the General Assembly’s actions on three grounds. The judge ruled that lawmakers failed to follow their own rules for adding the redistricting amendment to a special session.

    Hurley also ruled that the General Assembly’s initial vote for the amendment failed to occur before the public began casting ballots in last year’s general election and thus didn’t count toward the two-step process. And he ruled that the state failed to publish the amendment three months before the election, as required by law. As a result of those issues, he said, the amendment was invalid and void.

    Democrats appealed the decision to the state Supreme Court, which agreed on Friday to consider the case while stating that a narrowly tailored injunction by the lower court doesn’t prevent the April referendum. The court directed initial briefs to be filed by March 23, with the last round of court filings due April 23. Any oral arguments would be scheduled for later, the court said.

    Nationwide, the redistricting battle has resulted so far in nine more seats that Republicans believe they can win in Texas, Missouri, North Carolina and Ohio, and six that Democrats think they can win in California and Utah. Democrats have hoped to make up that three-seat margin in Virginia, though the lower court ruling raised a hurdle to their plans. It’s unclear whether the redistricting efforts in various states ultimately will make any difference in determining control of Congress in the November election.

  • 特朗普政府的EPA终止美国汽车制造商排放限制;州层面规则与诉讼或随之而来


    2026年2月13日 下午5:07 UTC / 路透社

    华盛顿,2月13日(路透社) – 唐纳德·特朗普总统撤销联邦气候监管的基础,将立即使汽车制造商摆脱昂贵的尾气管排放标准,但这一举措可能引发诉讼,并迫使企业在多个州和地区规则构成的不确定未来中艰难前行。

    特朗普政府的环境保护局周四最终敲定了撤销车辆”危害认定”的决定。2009年,该认定将温室气体排放认定为危害人类健康。这一认定赋予了该机构监管车辆排放以及其他燃烧或生产化石燃料行业排放的权力。

    立即订阅《每日 docket》新闻通讯,让最新法律新闻直接发送到您的收件箱,开启充满动力的早晨。[点击此处注册]

    广告 · 继续滚动

    报告广告节点运行失败

    特朗普称这是该国历史上”最大规模的放松管制行动”,将为企业节省超过1万亿美元的合规成本。环保组织谴责这一举措,而一些行业团体对此表示欢呼,另一些则持谨慎态度。

    路透社采访的十名律师和分析师表示,企业将面临坎坷的道路,他们提到即将到来的法庭挑战,以及州和地区排放规则的拼凑可能取代联邦规则的可能性。

    “联邦层面的撤销将对15年的监管进展造成前所未有的破坏,威胁到公众健康、地方社区、行业、自然资源和公共投资,”正考虑提起诉讼的加利福尼亚州总检察长罗布·邦塔(Rob Bonta)表示。

    谨慎的反应

    特朗普的第一届政府并未寻求重新审查”危害认定”,因为行业团体反对这一举措,当时的EPA代理总法律顾问大卫·福图希(David Fotouhi)表示,这种破坏风险太大。

    EPA在周四的新闻稿中表示,在最高法院的案件(如Loper Bright Enterprises诉Raimondo案)认定国会而非行政机构应做出这一决定后,此次行动更为大胆。

    EPA的决定得到了一些代表小型石油和天然气运营商的行业团体的赞扬——美国独立石油协会和马塞勒斯页岩协会。为内燃机车辆提供设备的公司贸易组织特种装备市场协会(SEMA)表示,这将”直接影响未来几年新车辆的选择范围”。

    环保组织抨击了这一举措,并指出一些主要行业团体也似乎不支持。

    自然资源保护委员会高级律师大卫·多尼格(David Doniger)指出,福特和本田去年秋天的公开评论显示,两家汽车制造商都支持保留这一认定,以确保稳定的监管环境。

    “他们担心政治摇摆在几年内会回摆,”多尼格说。

    本田未回应关于EPA决定的置评请求。福特赞扬政府解决了”当前排放标准与客户选择之间的不平衡”,但表示其一直倡导单一的国家排放标准,而非单独的州标准。

    美国汽车创新联盟周四未支持特朗普政府撤销”危害认定”的决定,但表示”前政府制定的汽车排放法规鉴于当前市场对电动汽车的需求,对汽车制造商而言实现起来极具挑战性。”

    美国石油学会表示,它并未倡导撤销”危害认定”,但支持政府终止汽车的电动汽车强制要求的行动。

    API政策与监管事务高级副总裁达斯汀·迈耶(Dustin Meyer)在一份声明中表示,该贸易组织支持对排放的联邦监管——包括石油和天然气行业的甲烷排放。

    “我们现在的重点是制定可持续的政策,在满足不断增长的能源需求的同时减少排放,”他说。

    美国商会周四表示,将需要几天时间分析该规则及其影响。

    “虽然我们没有要求EPA重新审查并撤销该机构2009年的危害认定,但我们正在仔细审查这一最终规则的细节,并将与我们的成员合作,评估其长期影响,”美国商会全球能源研究所所长马蒂·杜宾(Marty Durbin)表示。

    代表美国大型投资者拥有的公用事业公司的爱迪生电气协会表示:”我们正在审查这一新举措,并将继续与政府合作,加强电网可靠性并降低所有客户的能源成本。”

    爱迪生电气协会去年在公开评论中表示,撤销”危害认定”可能为区域监管和法律行动的拼凑打开大门。

    加利福尼亚大学法学院环境法教授安·卡尔森(Ann Carlson)同意这一评估,称监管温室气体的联邦权力将不再优先于州的行动。

    “如果温室气体不受《清洁空气法》的约束,就有论点认为各州可以独立对其进行监管,”她说。

    报道:瓦莱丽·沃尔科维奇(Valerie Volcovici);补充报道:大卫·谢泼德森(David Shepardson);编辑:大卫·格雷戈里奥(David Gregorio)

    我们的标准:汤姆森路透社信任原则。

    Trump EPA ends emissions limits for US automakers; state rules, lawsuits could follow

    February 13, 2026 5:07 PM UTC / Reuters

    WASHINGTON, Feb 13 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump’s repeal of the foundation for federal climate regulation will immediately free automakers from costly tailpipe emissions standards, but the move could spark lawsuits and force businesses to navigate an uncertain future of multiple state and regional rules.

    Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday finalized its repeal of the “endangerment finding” for vehicles, a 2009 determination that greenhouse gas emissions endanger human health. The finding gave the agency authority to regulate emissions from vehicles, as well as other sectors that burn or produce fossil fuels.

    Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Report Ad节点运行失败

    Trump said the country’s “biggest deregulatory action” in history would save companies over $1 trillion in compliance costs. Environmental groups denounced the move, which was cheered by some industry groups but greeted with caution by others.

    Ten lawyers and analysts interviewed by Reuters said companies face a bumpy ride, citing imminent court challenges and the possibility that a patchwork of state and regional emissions rules will replace one federal rule.

    “This federal withdrawal will cause an unprecedented disruption to 15 years of regulatory progress, threatening public health, local communities, industries, natural resources, and public investments,” said Rob Bonta, attorney general for the state of California, which is weighing a lawsuit.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Matthew Leopold, an environmental attorney at Holland & Knight who had served as EPA general counsel during Trump’s first administration, said company strategies for adjusting to the repeal will depend on how quickly legal challenges reach and are resolved by the U.S. Supreme Court.

    He said utilities and other big emitters will seek a clearer understanding of the implications.

    “While this initial rulemaking is focused on motor vehicle regulation, it will have ripple effects on other EPA programs as well. It’s the foundation of all EPA greenhouse gas regulation in all sectors,” said Leopold.

    The EPA has relied on the endangerment finding to regulate power plants, vehicle manufacturers and oil and gas operations. Transport and power make up about half of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions.

    Trump has called climate change a “con job” and withdrawn the U.S., the world’s biggest historic emitter, from international efforts to combat it.

    CAUTIOUS REACTION

    Trump’s first administration did not seek to revisit the endangerment finding, as industry groups opposed the move and then-EPA Acting General Counsel David Fotouhi said the disruption was too risky.

    The EPA was bolder this time after Supreme Court cases such as Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo found Congress, not administrative agencies, should make that determination, the agency said in a press release on Thursday.

    The EPA decision drew praise from some industry groups representing smaller oil and gas operators – the Independent Petroleum Association of America and the Marcellus Shale Association. The trade group for companies that supply equipment for internal combustion engine vehicles called the Specialty Equipment Market Association, or SEMA, said it will “directly impact the range of new vehicle choices that exist in the coming years.”

    Environmental groups blasted the move and noted that some major industry groups did not appear to be on board either.

    David Doniger, senior attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, pointed to public comments from Ford and Honda last fall. Both automakers supported keeping the finding in place to ensure a stable regulatory environment.

    “They’re worried about the political pendulum swinging back in a few years,” Doniger said.

    Honda did not respond to a request for comment on the EPA’s decision. Ford praised the administration for addressing the “imbalance between current emissions standards and customer choice” but said it has advocated a single national emission standard instead of separate state standards.

    The Alliance for Automotive Innovation did not endorse the Trump endangerment repeal on Thursday but said “automotive emissions regulations finalized in the previous administration are extremely challenging for automakers to achieve given the current marketplace demand for EVs.”

    The American Petroleum Institute said it had not advocated for a repeal of the endangerment finding but supported the administration’s action to end electric vehicle mandates for autos.

    API Senior Vice President of Policy and Regulatory Affairs Dustin Meyer said in a statement that the trade group supports federal regulation of emissions – including methane from oil and gas operations.

    “Our focus now is working on durable policies that reduce emissions while meeting growing energy demand,” he said.

    The Chamber of Commerce said on Thursday it will take a few days to analyze the rule and its impact.

    “While we did not call for the EPA to revisit and rescind the agency’s 2009 Endangerment Finding, we are carefully reviewing the specifics of this final rule and will engage with our members to assess its implications and impacts over the long term,” said Marty Durbin, president of the Global Energy Institute at the Chamber.

    The Edison Electric Institute, representing big U.S. investor-owned utilities, said “We are reviewing this new action and will continue to work with the Administration to strengthen grid reliability and lower energy costs for all customers.”

    In public comments last year, EEI said repealing the endangerment finding could open the door to a regional patchwork of regulation and legal action.

    Ann Carlson, environmental law professor at the University of California law school, agreed with that assessment, saying that federal authority to regulate greenhouse gases would no longer preempt state actions.

    “If greenhouse gases aren’t subject to the Clean Air Act, there’s an argument that states could then regulate them independently,” she said.

    Reporting by Valerie Volcovici; additional reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by David Gregorio

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

  • 美国联邦航空局解除新墨西哥州南部空域限制


    2026年2月13日 下午3:58 UTC / 路透社

    作者:戴维·谢泼德森

    节点运行失败

    (图片说明:标识牌指向美国联邦航空局(FAA)波士顿空中交通管制中心,在2025年10月9日美国政府停摆期间,新罕布什尔州纳舒厄的空中交通管制员仍在此工作。路透社/布莱恩·斯奈德/资料图片 购买许可权,打开新标签页)

    路透社华盛顿2月13日电 – 议员们周五表示,美国联邦航空局(FAA)已解除周二晚间开始的限制令,该限制曾禁止在新墨西哥州南部大片区域飞行,原计划持续10天。

    FAA此前以”特殊安全原因”发布命令,禁止往返德克萨斯州埃尔帕索附近机场以及新墨西哥州南部的航班。

    路透社《内部追踪》通讯是您了解全球体育重大赛事的必备指南。点击此处订阅。

    周三凌晨几小时后,FAA解除了埃尔帕索的限制,但未解释为何仍保留对新墨西哥州的限制。

    广告 · 滚动继续阅读

    报告广告

    “新墨西哥州南部居民和埃尔帕索居民理应得到解释和透明信息,”新墨西哥州民主党众议员加布·瓦斯克斯表示。

    美国联邦航空局突然关闭该国第71繁忙机场,导致空中旅客滞留,并在夜间中断了医疗疏散航班。这10天的停飞本将是单一机场前所未有的行动。

    FAA未立即置评,也未说明何时解除新墨西哥州南部的飞行禁令。

    消息人士告诉路透社,FAA之所以在德克萨斯州停飞,是因为军方使用的激光反无人机系统存在安全隐患,此前该系统已造成不可接受的安全风险。

    目前尚不清楚促使关闭新墨西哥州空域的具体原因。

    新墨西哥州民主党参议员本·雷·卢汉呼吁就事件展开全面情况通报。

    卢汉表示:”FAA与地方和州官员以及联邦机构之间的沟通失效不可接受,这损害了我们空域的安全。这一事件引发了严重关切。”

    政府和航空公司官员在匿名条件下表示,FAA关闭空域是因为担心国土安全部此前使用的陆军激光反无人机系统可能对空中交通构成风险。

    消息人士称,两家机构原计划于2月20日讨论该问题,但陆军在未获得FAA批准的情况下继续使用反无人机系统,这促使FAA暂停航班。

    负责监管FAA的美国运输部长肖恩·达菲表示,此次关闭是由墨西哥贩毒集团的无人机入侵引起的。然而,机场附近发现无人机通常只会导致交通短暂暂停,而非长时间关闭。五角大楼称,美墨边境每月此类事件超过1000起。

    戴维·谢泼德森报道,威廉·麦克林编辑

    我们的标准:路透社信托原则。打开新标签页

    推荐主题:美国

    FAA lifts airspace restrictions over southern New Mexico

    February 13, 2026 3:58 PM UTC / Reuters

    By David Shepardson

    节点运行失败

    A sign marks the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Boston Air Route Traffic Control Center, where air traffic controllers continue to work during the U.S. government shutdown, in Nashua, New Hampshire, U.S., October 9, 2025. REUTERS/Brian Snyder/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

    WASHINGTON, Feb 13 (Reuters) – The Federal Aviation Administration has lifted restrictions barring flights over a large swath of southern New Mexico late Tuesday that were supposed to last for 10 days, lawmakers said Friday.

    The FAA had issued orders barring flights to and from the nearby airport in El Paso, Texas, as well as southern New Mexico, citing “special security reasons.”

    The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide to the biggest events in global sport. Sign up here.

    The FAA lifted the restrictions over El Paso after a few hours early Wednesday but had kept the restrictions over New Mexico without explanation.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Report Ad

    “Southern New Mexicans and El Pasoans deserve answers and transparency,” said Representative Gabe Vasquez, a New Mexico Democrat.

    The sudden closure of the nation’s 71st busiest airport by the FAA stranded air travelers and disrupted medical evacuation flights overnight. The 10-day shutdown would have been an unprecedented action involving a single airport.

    The FAA did not immediately comment or say precisely when it had lifted the southern New Mexico flight ban.

    The FAA had acted to halt flights in Texas because of safety concerns posed by the use of a military laser-based anti-drone system that posed unacceptable safety risks and had been used earlier, sources told Reuters.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    It is not clear what prompted the New Mexico closure.

    Senator Ben Ray Lujan, a New Mexico Democrat, has called for a full briefing on what happened.

    “The breakdown in communication between the FAA, local and state officials, and federal agencies is unacceptable and undermines the safety of our airspace,” Lujan said. “This incident raises serious concerns.”

    Government and airline officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the FAA closed the airspace due to concerns that an Army laser-based counter-drone system could pose risks to air traffic that was used earlier by the Homeland Security Department.

    The two agencies had planned to discuss the issue on February 20, but the Army opted to proceed with using the counter-drone system without FAA approval, sources said, which prompted the FAA to halt flights.

    U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, who oversees the FAA, said the closure had been prompted by a drone incursion by a Mexican drug cartel. However, a drone sighting near an airport would typically lead to a brief pause on traffic, not an extended closure. The Pentagon says there are more than 1,000 such incidents each month along the U.S.-Mexico border.

    Reporting by David Shepardson, Editing by William Maclean

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

    Suggested Topics: United States

  • Bessent says any narrowing of US metals tariffs up to Trump


    February 13, 2026 5:09 PM UTC / Reuters

    By David Lawder

    • Summary
    • Bessent tells CNBC there is a possibility of modifications to metals tariffs
    • Trump doubled tariffs on steel, aluminum and derivative products to 50% in 2025
    • Steel group urges Trump to stay the course on metals tariffs for national security

    WASHINGTON, Feb 13 (Reuters) – U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Friday that any decision to narrow the scope of U.S. metals tariffs would be made by President Donald Trump, but added that there could be some modifications to the duties.

    Bessent, asked on CNBC about a Financial Times report that Trump is planning to roll back some of his 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum products, said he spoke to U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer about the matter and added: “We’ll see if there is a narrowing.”

    The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide to the biggest events in global sport. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Report Ad

    “If anything is done, I think it would be some sort of clarification on some incidental objects, but again, that’s going to be the president’s decision,” Bessent said.

    A spokesperson for the U.S. Commerce Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the FT report, which cited unnamed sources as saying that the Trump administration was reviewing the tariffs and would exempt some items. The U.S. Trade Representative’s office also did not immediately respond.

    The Commerce Department oversees the Section 232 national security tariffs that Trump doubled last year on steel and aluminum, adding thousands of derivative products made from the metals, including many imported auto and machinery parts and appliances.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Consideration of changes to the tariffs comes as Trump pivots to address the rising cost of living for Americans during a mid-term congressional election year.

    The Congressional Budget Office on Wednesday said in its annual fiscal forecast that U.S. consumers are bearing about 95% of the costs of Trump’s tariffs either through higher prices on imported goods or higher prices charged on domestic manufactured goods.

    The American Iron and Steel Institute on Friday urged the Trump administration to maintain the steel and aluminum tariffs, arguing that government-subsidized excess steel capacity in China and elsewhere was a threat to U.S. national security.

    “The Section 232 steel tariffs imposed by President Trump are essential to prevent this overcapacity from fueling new surges of harmful imports into the U.S. market, which would cause a profound threat to American national security and undermine the health of the American steel industry,” AISI President Kevin Dempsey said in a statement.

    Reporting by David Lawder; Editing by Philippa Fletcher and Andrea Ricci

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

    Bessent says any narrowing of US metals tariffs up to Trump

    February 13, 2026 5:09 PM UTC / Reuters

    By David Lawder

    节点运行失败

    U.S. President Donald Trump speaks with the press before departing from the South Lawn at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 13, 2026. REUTERS/Kent Nishimura Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

    • Summary
    • Bessent tells CNBC there is a possibility of modifications to metals tariffs
    • Trump doubled tariffs on steel, aluminum and derivative products to 50% in 2025
    • Steel group urges Trump to stay the course on metals tariffs for national security

    WASHINGTON, Feb 13 (Reuters) – U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Friday that any decision to narrow the scope of U.S. metals tariffs would be made by President Donald Trump, but added that there could be some modifications to the duties.

    Bessent, asked on CNBC about a Financial Times report that Trump is planning to roll back some of his 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum products, said he spoke to U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer about the matter and added: “We’ll see if there is a narrowing.”

    The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide to the biggest events in global sport. Sign up here.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Report Ad

    “If anything is done, I think it would be some sort of clarification on some incidental objects, but again, that’s going to be the president’s decision,” Bessent said.

    A spokesperson for the U.S. Commerce Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the FT report, which cited unnamed sources as saying that the Trump administration was reviewing the tariffs and would exempt some items. The U.S. Trade Representative’s office also did not immediately respond.

    The Commerce Department oversees the Section 232 national security tariffs that Trump doubled last year on steel and aluminum, adding thousands of derivative products made from the metals, including many imported auto and machinery parts and appliances.

    Advertisement · Scroll to continue

    Consideration of changes to the tariffs comes as Trump pivots to address the rising cost of living for Americans during a mid-term congressional election year.

    The Congressional Budget Office on Wednesday said in its annual fiscal forecast that U.S. consumers are bearing about 95% of the costs of Trump’s tariffs either through higher prices on imported goods or higher prices charged on domestic manufactured goods.

    The American Iron and Steel Institute on Friday urged the Trump administration to maintain the steel and aluminum tariffs, arguing that government-subsidized excess steel capacity in China and elsewhere was a threat to U.S. national security.

    “The Section 232 steel tariffs imposed by President Trump are essential to prevent this overcapacity from fueling new surges of harmful imports into the U.S. market, which would cause a profound threat to American national security and undermine the health of the American steel industry,” AISI President Kevin Dempsey said in a statement.

    Reporting by David Lawder; Editing by Philippa Fletcher and Andrea Ricci

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

  • 航空公司和旅游团体警告政府部分停摆对机场安检人员的影响


    路透社报道
    2026年2月13日 下午5:07 UTC 更新于2小时前

    节点运行失败

    美国纽约约翰·F·肯尼迪(JFK)国际机场,旅客等待航班,2025年11月18日。路透社/Jeenah Moon [获取授权,新标签页打开]

    华盛顿,2月13日(路透社) – 美国主要航空公司和旅游团体周五敦促国会避免政府部分停摆,否则将导致约5万名机场安检人员在繁忙的美国春假出行期前无法获得报酬。

    如果国会未能就国土安全部机构的资金问题达成协议,美国运输安全管理局(TSA)人员将于周六起无薪工作。

    路透社”内幕追踪”通讯是您了解全球体育重大赛事的必备指南。[在此注册]

    美国航空业协会、美国旅游协会和美国酒店与住宿协会在一份联合声明中表示:”旅客和美国经济无法承受必要的TSA人员无薪工作,这会增加临时缺勤和请假的风险,并最终可能导致更长的等待时间以及航班延误或错过。”

    大卫·谢泼德森报道;Chizu Nomiyama编辑

    我们的标准:[汤姆森路透社信任原则., 新标签页打开]

    Airlines, travel groups warn of impact of partial government shutdown on airport screeners

    By Reuters
    February 13, 2026 5:07 PM UTC Updated 2 hours ago

    节点运行失败

    Travellers wait for a flight at John F. Kennedy (JFK) International Airport in New York City, U.S., November 18, 2025. REUTERS/Jeenah Moon [Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab]

    WASHINGTON, Feb 13 (Reuters) – Major airlines and travel groups on Friday urged Congress to avoid a partial government shutdown, which would result in about 50,000 airport security officers not getting paid ahead of the busy U.S. spring break travel period.

    Transportation Security Administration personnel are set to work unpaid starting Saturday without an agreement on funding Homeland Security Department agencies.

    The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide to the biggest events in global sport. Sign up here.

    “Travelers and the U.S. economy cannot afford to have essential TSA personnel working without pay, which increases the risk of unscheduled absences and call outs, and ultimately can lead to higher wait times and missed or delayed flights,” said Airlines for America, U.S. Travel and American Hotel & Lodging Association in a joint statement.

    Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama

    Our Standards: [The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab]

  • 美国财政部设立举报网站 接收欺诈、洗钱等举报线索


    2026年2月13日 15:18 UTC(路透社)

    华盛顿,2月13日(路透社) – 美国财政部周五宣布推出一个新网站,接受针对欺诈、洗钱和违反制裁行为的举报线索。此举是在明尼苏达州发生一起涉及联邦社会福利项目资金的丑闻之后推出的。

    财政部长斯科特·贝森特在一份声明中表示,如果举报线索促成成功的执法行动,财政部将向举报人提供奖励。

    路透社《内部追踪》通讯是您了解全球体育重大事件的必备指南。点击此处注册。

    “这将是揪出浪费、欺诈和滥用行为的绝佳途径,”贝森特在接受CNBC的《Squawk Box》采访时表示,“我们正在建立一个网站,并将提供高达我们征收罚款10%至30%的奖励。”

    美国总统唐纳德·特朗普一直抨击明尼苏达州庞大的索马里移民社区,以明尼苏达州的这起丑闻为理由,下令向中西部州派遣数千名移民执法人员。

    打击欺诈的举措

    特朗普政府已将矛头指向明尼苏达州州长蒂姆·瓦尔兹和该州,包括其8万人口的索马里社区,指控自2020年起,一些由联邦资金支持的非营利组织在管理该州儿童保育和其他社会服务项目时存在欺诈行为。

    贝森特上月访问明尼苏达州,公布了几项打击欺诈的举措,包括对货币服务企业的调查、加强金融机构的报告和预警机制。

    美国国税局也将成立专门的欺诈工作组,重点打击501(c)(3)免税实体滥用资金的行为。

    财政部表示,美国财政部金融犯罪执法网络(FinCEN)的举报人办公室将接受涉及违反《银行保密法》、美国制裁项目以及其他几项对维护美国金融体系和国家安全至关重要的法律的违规和共谋行为的举报。

    报道:安德里亚·沙拉勒;编辑:大卫·霍姆斯


    注意: 原文中“节点运行失败”可能是用户输入时的无关干扰信息,已在翻译中忽略。

    US Treasury sets up website for whistleblower tips on fraud, money laundering

    February 13, 2026 3:18 PM UTC / Reuters

    WASHINGTON, Feb 13 (Reuters) – The U.S. Treasury Department on Friday announced a new website to accept whistleblower tips on fraud, money laundering and sanctions violations, on the heels of a scandal involving federal funds intended for social welfare programs in Minnesota.

    In a statement, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Treasury would offer rewards to whistleblowers if a tip resulted in a successful enforcement action.

    The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide to the biggest events in global sport. Sign up here.

    “It’s going to be a great way to ferret out waste, fraud and abuse,” Bessent told CNBC’s “Squawk Box.” “We’re setting up a website and we will be giving rewards up to 10% to 30% of the fines that we levy.”

    U.S. President Donald Trump has railed against Minnesota’s large community of Somali immigrants, invoking the Minnesota scandal as the rationale for sending thousands of immigration enforcement agents into the Midwest state.

    INITIATIVES TO COMBAT FRAUD

    The Trump administration has singled out Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and the state, including its 80,000-strong Somali community, over allegations of fraud dating to 2020 by some nonprofit groups backed by federal funding that administer the state’s childcare and other social services programs.

    Bessent visited Minnesota last month to unveil several initiatives to combat fraud, including probes of money services businesses, enhanced reporting and alerts to financial institutions.

    The Internal Revenue Service will also launch a dedicated fraud task force focused on targeting the misuse of funding by 501(c)(3) tax-exempt entities.

    Treasury said FinCEN’s Office of the Whistleblower will accept tips involving violations and conspiracies related to the Bank Secrecy Act, U.S. sanctions programs, and several other laws critical to safeguarding the U.S. financial system and national security.

    Reporting by Andrea Shalal; Editing by David Holmes

    节点运行失败