分类： 未分类

欧盟官员警告 欧盟经济面临滞胀风险

2026年3月28日 11:20 / 联合早报

分析表明，如果能源供应受阻情况更加严重且持续时间更久，欧盟经济受到的负面影响将更大。 （法新社）

欧盟委员会负责经济事务的委员东布罗夫斯基斯说，由于美以伊战争引发能源价格飙升，欧盟经济正面临滞胀风险。

新华社报道，欧元集团星期五（3月27日）就能源价格问题举行线上会议。东布罗夫斯基斯在会后召开的新闻发布会上说，“前景被高度的不确定性笼罩”，欧盟经济正面临滞胀风险，即经济增长放缓与通胀上升并存的局面。

他说：“即便能源供应受阻时间相对短暂，也会出现这种情况。”

分析表明，2026年欧盟经济增速可能较2025年秋季的预测低约0.4个百分点，同时通胀率可能上升1个百分点。如果能源供应受阻情况更加严重且持续时间更久，欧盟经济受到的负面影响将更大。2026年和2027年增长率可能下降0.6个百分点。

东布罗夫斯基斯说，由于欧盟国家经济此前已受到多重冲击，而且面临增加国防开支的迫切需要，大多数欧盟国家的政策空间已非常有限。

欧盟委员会去年11月发布报告预测，2026年欧盟经济将增长1.4%，欧元区经济将增长1.2%。

伊朗官员称是时候退出《不扩散核武器条约》

2026年3月28日 11:45 / 联合早报

3月26日拍摄的照片显示，在德黑兰某个地方竖立着一枚枚导弹。 （路透社）

伊朗议会国家安全与外交政策委员会发言人雷扎伊说，继续作为《不扩散核武器条约》缔约国对伊朗毫无益处，“是时候退出了”。

新华社报道，雷扎伊（Ebrahim Rezaei）星期五（3月27日）在X平台发文称，《不扩散核武器条约》（简称NPT）未能保护伊朗核设施免遭袭击，相关国际文件和协议事实上被完全无视。他重申，伊朗无意制造核武器，这一政策没有发生任何改变。

国际原子能机构（IAEA）总干事格罗西3月2日说，未发现伊朗有系统性制造核武器的计划。但他同时也说，伊朗储备大量接近武器级的浓缩铀，且拒绝IAEA进入核设施核查情况，引发严重关切。

Education Department tells 7.5 million student loan borrowers in “illegal” SAVE plan to prepare for repayment

2026-03-27T23:39:35-0400 / CBS/AP

More than 7 million student loan borrowers who have been enrolled in a Biden-era repayment plan will receive notices beginning Friday with instructions to seek a new plan to repay their debt, the Education Department said.

Borrowers enrolled in the SAVE plan, which was struck down by a federal court earlier this month, have been in forbearance since July 2024 as a legal battle played out in courts. Starting July 1, loan servicers will begin issuing notices giving borrowers 90 days to select a new repayment plan.

The available repayment plans will mean higher monthly payments for most of those borrowers.

The Education Department called the plan “illegal,” and said in a statement Friday it’s based on “the false promise of student loan forgiveness and artificially low monthly payments.”

“Today’s guidance, which every borrower enrolled in the defunct SAVE Plan will receive over the next week, puts the Biden Administration’s illegal student loan bailout agenda to rest once and for all,” Under Secretary of Education Nicholas Kent said in a statement. “For years, borrowers have been caught in a confusing cycle of uncertainty, but the Trump Administration’s policy is simple: if you take out a loan, you must pay it back.

When Alexis Arredondo graduated from the University of California, Los Angeles, in 2024 with a degree in microbiology, he struggled to find full-time work in research or public health. Instead, he began working part-time and freelancing for nonprofits in Southern California.

A first-generation college student, he took on roughly $40,000 in student debt and enrolled in the SAVE plan upon graduation. Now, he said, he has to choose between paying more per month, which would be a struggle to afford, or a longer repayment period, which would increase how much he pays in interest.

“It’s very difficult knowing where I’m going to be to able to get this money from,” he told The Associated Press.

The SAVE plan was among several initiatives launched by former President Joe Biden, a Democrat, to reduce Americans’ student debt burden.

The SAVE plan provided more lenient terms than other repayment plans, reducing loan payments to as little as 5% of a borrower’s discretionary income and offering forgiveness for borrowers who made payments for at least 10 years and originally borrowed $12,000 or less.

While the court challenges played out, borrowers enrolled in the plan have not been required to make payments. But debt balances began accruing interest following a court ruling last summer that blocked implementation of the SAVE plan, meaning some students will see increases in the amount they owe.

Borrowers have felt whiplash as the challenges to the SAVE plan worked their way through court, said Mike Pierce, executive director of the Student Borrower Protection Center.

“Over and over again, education officials of both parties made promises about fixing the broken student loan system and called student debt a crisis,” he told The Associated Press. “And yet today, these same borrowers are being told it’s time to pay and you have no good options.”

Starting July 1, the Education Department said that a new income-driven repayment plan called the Repayment Assistance Plan will be an option for borrowers. The plan ties monthly payments based on a borrower’s income and number of dependents with fixed terms and timelines between 10 and 25 years to repay.

Last year, the Trump administration and Congress made several changes to student loan repayment options that will take effect over the next two years. For one, new student loans will no longer have the option of deferment because of unemployment or economic hardship.

“You’re talking about a pressing current affordability crisis, and you took away the most affordable plan option,” said Alexander Lundrigan, policy and advocacy manager at Young Invincibles, an advocacy group.

Earlier this month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit struck down the SAVE plan. The Education Department’s notices to borrowers beginning Friday will direct them to enroll in a plan and resume making payments as soon as this summer.

Borrowers will be contacted by their loan servicers in stages, with a new group receiving word every two weeks. Those who had been enrolled in the SAVE plan the longest will be the first to receive notices.

伊朗官员称是时候退出《不扩散核武器条约》

发布时间：2026年3月28日 11:45 | 来源：联合早报

3月26日拍摄的照片显示，在德黑兰某个地方竖立着一枚枚导弹。 （路透社）

伊朗议会国家安全与外交政策委员会发言人雷扎伊说，继续作为《不扩散核武器条约》缔约国对伊朗毫无益处，“是时候退出了”。

新华社报道，雷扎伊（Ebrahim Rezaei）星期五（3月27日）在X平台发文称，《不扩散核武器条约》（简称NPT）未能保护伊朗核设施免遭袭击，相关国际文件和协议事实上被完全无视。他重申，伊朗无意制造核武器，这一政策没有发生任何改变。

国际原子能机构（IAEA）总干事格罗西3月2日说，未发现伊朗有系统性制造核武器的计划。但他同时也说，伊朗储备大量接近武器级的浓缩铀，且拒绝IAEA进入核设施核查情况，引发严重关切。

张成中任中国应急管理部党委书记

2026年3月28日 07:16 / 联合早报

中共河北省委常委、唐山市委书记张成中，被任命为应急管理部党委书记。

据中国应急管理部网站消息，中央组织部有关负责人星期五（3月27日）下午出席应急管理部领导干部会议，宣布中央决定，张成中任应急管理部党委书记。

公开资料显示，张成中出生于1970年10月，曾任辽宁省阜新市委常委、常务副市长，阜新市委副书记、市长，盘锦市委书记等职务。

2021年12月，辽宁省委换届，张成中任辽宁省委常委，后兼任省委秘书长。

2023年7月，张成中跨省履新，任河北省委常委、常务副省长。2024年11月，他担任唐山市委书记，至此次调职应急管理部。

前任应急管理部党委书记、部长王祥喜，今年1月31日被官宣落马，他是应急管理部组建后的第三任部长，也是首个被查的该部“一把手”。

节点运行失败
节点运行失败
节点运行失败
节点运行失败

U.S. appears to drop anti-tank mines in Iranian village near Shiraz, analysts say

March 27, 2026 / 4:08 PM EDT / CBS News

The U.S. may have dropped anti-tank mines over a village in southern Iran, the open-source research group Bellingcat reported Thursday, as images posted on social media appeared to show American BLU-91/B scatterable anti-tank landmines in the southern suburbs of Shiraz.

Iranian state media reported that “explosive packages” slightly larger than tuna cans had been dropped by aircraft over the area, and that some had exploded after being handled.

Several people were killed by the devices, Iranian state TV said, and it urged members of the public to report the items’ locations to authorities and not touch them.

CBS News was unable to independently verify the images, and U.S. Central Command declined to comment when asked if the U.S. had deployed the munitions.

Bellingcat cited three independent weapons experts as saying the munitions shown by Iranian state media appeared to be BLU-91/B mines, which are delivered by American Gator anti-tank mine systems. It noted that the U.S. is the only party in the Iran war known to have Gator Scatterable Mines, the system that uses the BLU-91/B devices.

BLU-91/B anti-tank mines are designed to be triggered by a large vehicle driving by and disrupting the mine’s magnetic field, Richard Weir, a senior adviser in the Crisis, Conflict and Arms Division at Human Rights Watch, told CBS News.

Weir warned, however, that the mines could be detonated by other types of vehicles, and they have a self-destruct setting which could mean they explode hours or even days after being dropped.

“So there’s a number of different things about this mine that make it very dangerous for people who may come across it, anybody who comes across it, including the fact that it could just spontaneously detonate for anybody who’s nearby that doesn’t know it’s present,” Weir said.

File photo: U.S. Marines disassemble a BLU-91/B anti-tank mine during a training exercise on Oct. 21, 2020. U.S. Marine Corps photo by Staff Sgt. Laiqa Hitt

The BLU-91/B mines are anti-vehicle mines, as opposed to anti-personnel mines, which are banned under the U.N. Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their Destruction. Over 100 countries are signatories of that convention, though the U.S. is not.

Anti-personnel mines “are typically smaller,” Weir said, explaining, “they are devices that are triggered by an individual, by their presence or their proximity to the weapon.”

“Anti-tank and anti-vehicle mines aren’t covered as part of the treaty itself, but they do present similar risks, because they don’t discriminate between their target,” he said.

The U.S. hasn’t used anti-tank mines in any meaningful way since the first Gulf War in 1991, Weir said, and it hasn’t used anti-personnel mines since 2002 in Afghanistan.

“This is something that is very rare,” Weir told CBS News. “And so the consequences of this are almost invariably more civilian harm. And these are the kinds of things, their effects for affected communities extend not just for days or even months but oftentimes for many, many years.”

Many losers, few winners in political battle over ICE funding

2026-03-27T23:13:11.95Z / Reuters

By Richard Cowan and Nolan D. McCaskill

March 27, 2026 11:13 PM UTC Updated 47 mins ago

节点运行失败

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents patrol at Washington Reagan National Airport in Arlington, Virginia, U.S., March 24, 2026. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo

• Summary

• Democrats want a deal that allows them to claim they stood up to Trump on ICE
• Republicans would like to paint Democrats as weak on immigration
• Both parties are skirting blame for wait times at airports across the country

WASHINGTON, March 27 (Reuters) – Democrats in Congress have waged a battle to place new legal restrictions on President Donald Trump’s immigration agents, knowing that they were unlikely to win Republican ​support but hopeful they might win a bigger prize: control of Capitol Hill in the November elections.

The exact outcome was still unknown as House of Representatives Republicans on Friday rejected a ‌Senate compromise bill passed in the early morning hours to end the partial government shutdown. House Republicans then crafted their own remedy that Senate Democrats vowed to reject.

Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Throughout the standoff, Democrats were steadfast in sending a message against the aggressive tactics used by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents across the country.

“We’ve been clear from day one: Democrats will fund critical homeland security functions, but we will not give a blank check to Trump’s lawless and deadly immigration militia without reforms,” Senate Democratic Leader Chuck ​Schumer said on Friday.

The White House and congressional Republicans have framed the stepped-up enforcement as carrying out the president’s pledge to deport people in the country illegally.

Democrats have high expectations for seizing ​control of the House and in recent months have been heartened by races in some Republican-held Senate seats becoming more competitive. Democrats cite their success in ⁠a series of special elections and polling that has shown Trump’s approval rating sinking to 36% amid rising gas prices and the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

DEMOCRATS AVOID VOTING TO FUND ICE

Despite taking a stand on ICE, Democrats ​are likely to come away with little else they wanted, such as requiring ICE agents to identify themselves and stop wearing masks; ceasing stakeouts at churches, hospitals and schools; and obtaining judicial warrants before entering private homes.

Republicans, who narrowly control ​the Senate, rejected most of those proposals, saying they would hobble deportation efforts.

But despite losing those battles, Democrats can say they refused to fund ICE operations, as well as claim other recent wins on immigration such as the drawdown of ICE agents in Minneapolis, where two U.S. citizens were shot and killed by federal agents.

Representative Salud Carbajal, a California Democrat, said simply not voting to fund ICE is “absolutely” a win for Democrats “because we have made it clear that we are not willing to give ​another cent or dime or penny to ICE and CBP until they make all the reforms that we have been asking for.”

This will have little effect on ICE, which is currently fully funded through the One ​Big Beautiful Bill Act passed last summer.

REPUBLICANS FUND ICE, BUT LOSE VOTING REFORMS

Congressional Republicans have not been able to carry out Trump’s demand to jam a major voting reform bill, the SAVE America Act, through Congress by attaching it ‌to Department of ⁠Homeland Security funding.

That bill would have required proof of citizenship to register to vote and possibly eliminated mail-in voting, if Trump got his way on the version of the bill he has been pushing.

They also failed to secure full funding for all ICE and Customs and Border Protection operations through September, even though both agencies have plenty of money to continue their operations.

“I’ll be honest, they (Democrats) won in the Senate bill,” House Republican Conference Chair Lisa McClain told Reuters. “We were surprised we got the bill that we got.”

But Republicans can still go to voters with a tough election-year message, the kind that resonated with much of the electorate in the ​2024 presidential election when Trump’s vow to ramp up ​immigration enforcement was key to his victory.

“I think ⁠Democrats have put the interests of illegal aliens, their desire to keep illegal aliens, even criminal illegal aliens in this country rather than putting the interests of the American people first,” said Republican U.S. Representative Bob Onder of Missouri.

A four-day Reuters/Ipsos opinion poll completed on Monday showed that while most Americans view Republicans as ​the better party on immigration, they disapprove of the Trump administration’s tactics for rounding up migrants, including, in some cases, U.S. citizens.

BOTH PARTIES SKIRT BLAME FOR ​AIRPORT DELAYS

Should they reach a ⁠deal, both parties would be able to end a chaotic situation at the nation’s airports, where nearly 500 Transportation Security Administration agents have quit their jobs over a lack of pay.

Voters “care most about not having to wait four hours and miss their flights,” said Republican Senator John Cornyn, who is in a tight primary runoff race in Texas. “They want us to do our job. Unfortunately, it’s easier said than done.”

In addition to long waits, Trump’s dispatch of ICE ⁠agents to ​more than a dozen U.S. airports to assist the TSA has rattled some travelers.

Diane Price, who flew on Monday from Oregon to ​Arizona, said she found it “intimidating” and “scary” to see ICE agents inside the Phoenix airport.

“Because of what’s going on in our country, it’s so hard, all of this happening. I just, I don’t know what to say,” she said as she fought back tears.

She and ​her husband, Mike, expressed relief that ICE agents were not masked, as they have been at other operations.

Reporting by Nolan D. McCaskill and Richard Cowan; Additional reporting by Jason Lange; Editing by Michael Learmonth and Lisa Shumaker

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

WATCH: Trump goes viral for illustrating how to cut government waste with his favorite White House pen

March 27, 2026 6:28pm EDT / Fox News

President Donald Trump went viral for going on a tangent during Thursday’s Cabinet meeting to describe his favorite White House pen.

NEW You can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump turned heads again this week for a viral Cabinet meeting tangent about a favorite custom White House Sharpie. He said the marker is an example of how he can get “better” results for less cost.

The president brought up the pen while criticizing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell over a new headquarters, which he said costs the government $4 billion.

“If it was properly done and planned, you would have done that building for — I would have done it — for $25 million, and it would be better,” he said.

He then reached for a marker on a table and said, “See this pen right here? This pen is an interesting example.”

Trump said he was having issues with the old Oval Office pens, which he said were inlaid with gold and silver, running out of ink. He said he also felt “guilty” about wasting money by handing them out to as many as 40 people every time he signed an executive action.

So, he decided to replace the expensive pens with customized White House Sharpies.

President Donald Trump signs funding legislation to reopen the U.S. government in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington Nov. 12, 2025.(Bonnie Cash/UPI/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

“It’s the same thing,” he told his Cabinet and members of the press. “This pen is very inexpensive, but it writes well; I like it.

“I came here, and they have thousand-dollar pens, and you hand pens out. You’re signing, and you’re handing them out. You’re handing them out with all these people. Sometimes, you have 30, 40 people, and they were a thousand dollars apiece,” he said.

“Beautiful pen, ballpoint, a thousand. There was gold, silver. Gorgeous. But I’m handing it out to kids that don’t even know what they are. ‘What is this, Mommy?’ It’s kids, they’re getting a pen for a thousand dollars, and they have no idea what it is.”

He said he felt “guilty” because “I want to save money.”

“So, I’m saying this is crazy,” he explained. “And it had another problem. They didn’t write well.”

However, despite his preference for Sharpies, Trump said he couldn’t “have the pen the way it was.”

President Donald Trump throws a pen during a rally on the inauguration day of his second presidential term in Washington, D.C., Jan. 20, 2025.(Mike Segar/Reuters)

The president said he considered signing documents in a separate room, or “I could do like Biden did, you know, give it to somebody else to sign or an autopen.

“This is when I called the guy. I said, ‘I’d like to use your pen, but I can’t have a grey thing with a big ‘S’ on it saying ‘Sharpie’ as I’m signing a trillion-dollar airplane contract to buy brand-new fighter jets – brand new B-2 bombers, of which we just ordered plenty. I can’t do that with the press, use your pen, but I like the pen the best.”

According to Trump, a Sharpie representative then said, “Well, I could make it nicer.”

“I said, ‘What can you do?’ He said, ‘I’ll paint it black.’ I said, ‘That’s nice,’” Trump related.

President Donald Trump holds up a pen given by Qatar’s Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani as they exchange documents during a signing ceremony at the Amiri Diwan in Doha, Qatar, May 14, 2025.(Alex Brandon/AP)

The president said the representative even offered to paint the White House and Trump’s signature on it “in gold, almost real gold, not bad.”

After relating the story, Trump noted, “By the way, this was not staged.”

“I just saw the pen sit there; I thought that this is an example of how $25 million spent by me at the Federal Reserve building would be a better job than the $4 billion that they’re spending.”

Peter Pinedo is a politics writer for Fox News Digital.

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6391872230112

New York City passes buffer zones limiting protests at schools and houses of worship

3 hr ago / CNN

New York—

The New York City Council approved legislation Thursday that would require police to publish plans to establish buffer zones at schools and houses of worship during protests.

The move places Mayor Zohran Mamdani in the middle of another political fight. He declined Friday to say whether he would sign or veto the legislation, citing concerns that the bills could limit New Yorkers’ constitutional rights.

The first bill was spearheaded by New York City Council Speaker Julie Menin and passed 44-5, enough votes to override a potential Mamdani veto.

New York City lawmakers introduced the bill following a November pro-Palestinian protest outside of Park East Synagogue on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. The synagogue was hosting an event for Nefesh B’Nefesh, a nonprofit that works to facilitate and support North American Jews moving to Israel.

Dozens of pro-Palestinian protesters gathered wearing keffiyehs and waving Palestinian flags just steps outside of the synagogue. The group chanted slogans including “Death to the IDF,” or Israel Defense Forces, and “globalize the intifada,” an Arabic term for rebellion and a reference to Palestinian uprisings around the turn of the century, and one that Jewish leaders warn normalizes violence against Jews.

Menin’s initial proposal in January included up to a 100-foot buffer zone from houses of worship. The version that passed would require Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch to establish a plan for control of protests at places of religious worship while still protecting free speech. The plans would include considerations for the New York Police Department to use in determining whether, when, and the extent to which security perimeters may be used, according to the bill. Tisch would be required to submit a proposed plan to Mamdani and Menin shortly after the bill’s effective date.

“The council is proud to take immediate and impactful steps to uphold safety and freedom that should be guaranteed to everyone. That’s what it takes to protect New Yorkers, and that’s what our legislation delivers,” Menin said during a press conference Thursday.

“This is a deeply personal issue for me. I am the daughter of a Holocaust survivor. I’m the daughter and granddaughter of Holocaust survivors. My grandfather was killed in the Holocaust,” Menin added.

The second bill, which was sponsored by Council Member Eric Dinowitz, a former public-school teacher, requires the NYPD to establish similar plans at educational facilities across NYC.

“It is incredibly important that we are protecting our students as they are entering and leaving schools. This bill is the culmination of listening to student voices, and it creates a thoughtful strategy that preempts tragic occurrences,” Dinowitz told reporters during a press conference.

On Friday, Mamdani wouldn’t commit to whether he would veto either bill.

“I’ll say that when it comes to this legislation, I’m aware of the serious concerns that New Yorkers have raised regarding these bills limiting New Yorkers constitutional rights, and I will consider those concerns in my decision making,” he said, reading from a statement at an unrelated press conference.

City Hall chief counsel Ramzi Kassem said in an interview with NY1 that Mamdani has made clear, “he does not view protest as a security concern, and he does not think that there is any kind of contradiction between prayer and protest in New York City, both rights coexist, and we can continue to uphold both rights.”

The New York Democratic Socialists of America chapter has been vocal in their opposition to the bills. Gustavo Gordillo, the co-chair of the NYC DSA, fears the bills would “severely limit our first amendment right to protest, our right to organize, and our right to picket and take action as workers,” he said in a statement. “These bills fail to combat hate – they aren’t evidence-based solutions. In a time of rising repression, it is crucial that our representatives safeguard the right to protest, not erode it.”

Council Member Shahana Hanif, an ally of Mamdani’s, said during a hearing on Thursday that the bills “give the NYPD too much power to police speech and raise constitutional concerns.”

Last year, following the protests outside of the Park East Synagogue, then mayor-elect Mamdani faced backlash for his response to the demonstrations.

Issuing a statement that condemned the language used by demonstrators but also noted that “sacred spaces should not be used to promote activities in violation of international law,” a reference to Israeli settlements on land Palestinians hope to have for a future state. His team issued a follow-up statement making clear the mayor-elect’s commitment to protecting Jewish spaces.

Mamdani has 30 days to decide on the bills. When asked at a press conference on Friday when he will announce make his decision, the mayor said, “By the legal timeline.”

中共广东省委表态拥护中央对郭永航审查调查决定

2026-03-27T23:51:00.000Z / 联合早报

中共广州市委原书记郭永航被官宣落马后，广东省委开会表态，坚决拥护中央对郭永航进行审查调查的决定，并强调要严明政治纪律和规矩，做到“党中央提倡的坚决响应、党中央决定的坚决执行、党中央禁止的坚决不做”。

郭永航是中共政治局委员马兴瑞的旧部，他在退居二线两个月后，星期五（3月27日）被官宣落马。中共中央纪委国家监委官网发布消息称，广东省政协党组成员、副主席郭永航被指涉嫌严重违纪违法，目前接受纪律审查和监察调查。

据南方+客户端消息，广东省委常委会当晚召开会议，通报郭永航被查的有关情况。广东省委书记黄坤明主持会议并讲话。

与会人员表示，坚决拥护中共中央决定，中央纪委国家监委对郭永航进行纪律审查和监察调查，充分彰显反腐败无禁区、全覆盖、零容忍的鲜明立场。

会议强调，全省各级党组织和广大党员要坚持以更高标准推进全面从严治党，持续涵养风清气正的政治生态，为广东在推进中国式现代化建设中走在前列提供坚强政治保障。

会议指出，要始终把党的政治建设摆在首位，严明政治纪律和政治规矩，做到“党中央提倡的坚决响应、党中央决定的坚决执行、党中央禁止的坚决不做”，以实际行动诠释对党忠诚。

会议也提出，要强化制度治党、依规治党，加强对权力运行的制约和监督，强化制度执行，更加科学有效地把权力关进制度笼子；并要求各级领导干部从严要求自己，带头强化理论武装、严守纪律规矩、廉洁自律、接受监督，做到严于律己、严负其责、严管所辖。

官宣被查前，郭永航1月28日才当选广东省政协副主席。