2026年3月23日 / 美国东部时间下午12:31 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
基辅— 白宫希望国会再提供至少2000亿美元资金用于伊朗战争，总统特朗普称部分原因是援助乌克兰已耗尽美国在抵御俄罗斯持续全面入侵时的武器库存。
“这是一个非常动荡的世界，”特朗普周四表示，“我们希望拥有大量弹药，目前我们确实有很多弹药，但因为给了乌克兰太多，库存被消耗得差不多了。”
在其第二个任期内，特朗普一直批评拜登政府向乌克兰提供了美国国防工业无法迅速补充的武器。
去年夏天，在对库存进行审查后，美国暂停了对乌克兰的部分武器运输。这些武器转移最终在一项新计划下恢复，北约盟友承担了大部分费用，但这一事件清楚表明，白宫认为支持乌克兰国防是确保美国自身防御库存满足未来冲突需求的障碍。
然而，现在乌克兰正提供理由重新审视这一观点。随着伊朗战争耗尽美国的拦截导弹库存，乌克兰官员提出协议以帮助补充这些库存。周六，乌克兰官员与特朗普政府代表会面，讨论两国共同生产无人机及无人机拦截器等议题。
一名乌克兰士兵在2026年2月22日，乌克兰第聂伯罗彼得罗夫斯克州的一次试飞前手持“ Sting”拦截无人机。Alex Nikitenko/Global Images Ukraine/Getty
泽连斯基总统表示，该协议价值可能在350亿至500亿美元之间。他还表示，与美国海湾盟友还有其他几项潜在协议正在酝酿中，在伊朗无情袭击期间，海湾盟友对乌克兰无人机拦截器的迫切需求已成为公开议题。
但专家表示，目前正在形成的协议超出了中东地区即时防空需求，可能为美乌长期国防工业合作奠定基础。
伊朗战争消耗“爱国者”拦截导弹速度远超乌克兰
2022年美国开始从自身军火库向乌克兰提供武器后，人们很快担心美国国防工业能否及时补充。最令人担忧的是“爱国者先进能力-3”（PAC-3）拦截导弹可能短缺，这类导弹是击落来袭弹道导弹最有效的武器之一。
“我们意识到，我们现在的国防工业基础没有过剩产能来满足战时需求，”曾在多届政府担任五角大楼顾问的国防分析师马特·塔瓦雷斯告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻，“我们提供给乌克兰的部分装备无法立即由国防工业填补。”
2025年特朗普重返权力时，其政府承诺加速防空弹药生产，并更谨慎地向盟友分发。从去年夏天开始，一些军事装备被重新调配，包括原本用于乌克兰的2万枚反无人机导弹被送往美国空军驻中东部队。
今年1月，五角大楼宣布与洛克希德·马丁公司达成协议，将“爱国者”拦截器产量提高三倍。
但伊朗战争使国防部的武器储备保护工作复杂化。
泽连斯基指出，仅在战争第一周，美国中东盟友就消耗了800枚“爱国者”拦截导弹，而乌克兰在对俄四年战争中仅使用了600枚。
专家表示，这些昂贵弹药的快速消耗可能至少部分推动了白宫向国会请求额外2000亿美元——这几乎是2022年以来对乌克兰军事援助700亿美元的近三倍。
“美国库存的消耗更多与过去九个月中东局势有关，而非乌克兰发生的事，”华盛顿战略与国际研究中心导弹防御项目主任托马斯·卡拉科告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻。
乌克兰能否提供长期解决方案以补充美国武器库存？
随着伊朗战争耗尽拦截导弹库存，美国及其海湾盟友转向乌克兰寻求无人机防御专业知识。泽连斯基总统上周表示，乌克兰已向中东派遣200多名无人机专家，帮助防御军事设施和民用中心免受伊朗攻击。
作为回报，乌克兰希望获得更多西方拦截导弹，这些导弹对其防空至关重要。上周在基辅被记者问及美欧对乌导弹运输是否可能因伊朗战争进一步中断时，泽连斯基称“风险非常高”，并强调获得更多“爱国者”导弹是“我们的首要任务”。
2015年3月21日，在波兰索查切夫，美国军队与波兰军队联合演习期间，在试验场部署“爱国者”防空导弹发射系统。Getty
但基辅与华盛顿、基辅与海湾国家正在酝酿的协议短期内可能不会直接进行武器交换以加强乌克兰或中东防空。
“问题在于我们实际能多快生产‘爱国者’拦截器。我想，海湾国家现在希望保留所有拦截器库存，因为他们不知道何时能补充，”卡内基国际和平基金会高级研究员达拉·马西科特告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻。
她说，对乌克兰而言，这可能更多是长期收益。
“这里存在一种可能性：乌克兰通过合作生产无人机获得资本投资，而流入国防部门的资金可用于发展远程打击或防空等专业技术，”马西科特表示。
这种安排对基辅的政治利益也可能同样有益，即使不能满足其即时战争需求。
“这可能是乌克兰在这里提供帮助获得美国善意的时刻，表明他们是贡献者而非仅消耗安全资源的一方，”卡拉科说。
Trump says Ukraine war depleted U.S. weapons stockpiles, but as Iran takes that mantle, Kyiv sees opportunities
March 23, 2026 / 12:31 PM EDT / CBS News
Kyiv— The White House wants Congress to provide at least $200 billion more in funding for the war in Iran, and President Trump says that’s partly due to aid for Ukraine having depleted U.S. weapons stockpiles as it fends off Russia’s ongoing full-scale invasion.
“This is a very volatile world,” Mr. Trump said Thursday. “We want to have vast amounts of ammunition, which we have right now — we have a lot of ammunition, but it was taken down by giving so much to Ukraine.”
Throughout his second term, Mr. Trump has criticized the Biden administration for, in his view, providing armaments to Ukraine that America’s defense industry could not quickly replenish.
Last summer, after a review of stockpiles, the U.S. paused the shipment of some weapons to Ukraine. Those weapons transfers were eventually reinstated under a new initiative that sees NATO allies foot much of the bill, but the episode made it clear the White House considers support for Ukraine’s defense an obstacle to ensuring America’s own defensive stockpiles remain up to the demands of any future conflict.
Now, however, Ukraine is offering reasons to reassess that viewpoint. As the war in Iran depletes U.S. stocks of interceptor missiles, Ukrainian officials are offering deals to help replenish them. On Saturday, Ukrainian officials met Trump administration representatives to discuss, among other topics, a deal for the two countries to co-produce drones and drone interceptors.
A Ukrainian soldier holds a Sting interceptor drone before a test flight, Feb. 22, 2026, in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, Ukraine. Alex Nikitenko/Global Images Ukraine/Getty
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said the agreement could be worth between $35-50 billion. He’s also said there are several other potential deals in the works with America’s Persian Gulf allies, whose urgent need for Ukrainian drone interceptors has become a public matter amid Iran’s relentless attacks.
But experts say the deals currently materializing extend beyond immediate air defense needs in the Middle East, and they could lay the foundation for longer-term U.S.-Ukraine defense industrial partnerships.
Iran war eating up Patriot interceptor missiles much faster than Ukraine
Soon after the U.S. began providing weapons from its own arsenal to Ukraine in 2022, concerns emerged over the ability of America’s defense industry to replace them. Most alarming were potential shortages of Patriot Advanced Capability-3 (PAC-3) interceptor missiles, which are among the most effective weapons to shoot down incoming ballistic missiles.
“We realized that we now had a defense industrial base with no excess capacity to ramp up for wartime requirements,” Matt Tavares, a defense analyst who served as a Pentagon adviser for multiple administrations, told CBS News. “Some of the equipment that we gave to the Ukrainians could not be immediately backfilled by the defense industry.”
When President Trump returned to power in 2025, his administration promised to jumpstart production of air defense munitions and to be more judicious about doling them out to allies. Beginning last summer, some military shipments were redirected, including 20,000 anti-drone missiles originally intended for Ukraine that were instead sent to U.S. Air Force units in the Middle East.
In January, the Pentagon announced a deal with Lockheed Martin to triple production of Patriot interceptors.
But the war in Iran has complicated the Defense Department’s weapons conservation efforts.
America’s Middle East allies burned through 800 Patriot interceptors as they fended off Iran’s retaliatory attacks during the first week of the war alone, according to Zelenskyy, who noted that his country had used only 600 of the Patriots during four years of war with Russia.
Experts have said the rapid use of these expensive munitions is likely driving, at least in part, the White House’s request for another $200 billion from Congress — which is nearly four times the $70 billion in military aid provided to Ukraine since 2022.
“To the extent that U.S. stockpiles are being depleted, it has much more to do with what has been going on in the Middle East over the last nine months than what has happened in Ukraine,” Thomas Karako, director of the Missile Defense Project at the Washington D.C.-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, told CBS News.
Can Ukraine offer long-term solutions to shore up U.S. weapons stockpiles?
As the Iran war drains interceptor stockpiles, the U.S. and its Gulf allies have turned to Ukraine for its drone defense expertise. President Zelenskyy said last week that Ukraine had sent more than 200 drone experts to the Middle East to help defend military installations and civilian centers from Iranian attacks.
In return, Ukrainians hope to receive more of the Western interceptor missiles that have been so crucial to their own air defense. Asked by journalists in Kyiv last week whether missile shipments from the U.S. and Europe to Ukraine could be further disrupted due to the Iran war, Zelenskyy said, “the risk is very high,” and stressed that getting more Patriot missiles was “our priority.”
U.S. troops place a Patriot air and missile defense launching system at a test range in Sochaczew, Poland, in a March 21, 2015 file photo, during a joint exercise with Polish troops. Getty
But the deals now in the works between Kyiv and Washington, and Kyiv and Gulf states, likely won’t yield direct swaps of armaments to bolster Ukrainian or Middle Eastern air defenses in the short-term.
“The problem is how quickly we can actually produce Patriot interceptors. I would imagine that the Gulf, right now, they want to hold onto all of their interceptor stocks because they don’t know when they’ll be backfilled,” Dara Massicot, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, told CBS News.
She said it could be, for Ukraine, more about long-term gains.
“There is a way here where they could partner on drones, get that capital investment, and then that money that flows into the defense sector can be used to develop niche things like long-range strike or air defense know-how,” Massicot said.
That kind of arrangement could also prove just as beneficial politically for Kyiv, even if it doesn’t help with its immediate war needs.
“This could be a moment where the Ukrainians helping out here elicit some good will on the part of the United States, and show that they are a contributor, and not merely a drain on security resources,” said Karako.
布雷恩·德皮施、香农·布里姆、比尔·米尔斯 报道
