2026年2月2日，美国东部时间上午6:00发布 / 来源：CNN
作者：莎拉·费里斯、艾琳·格雷夫
2小时前
众议院议长迈克·约翰逊1月21日在国会山举行新闻发布会。
凯尔西·库珀/路透社/资料图
众议院议长迈克·约翰逊本周重返华盛顿，向他的共和党同僚提出了一个艰难的要求：接受民主党推动的资金协议，否则将面临又一场痛苦而漫长的政府停摆。
在联邦资金部分暂停两天后，众议院周一返回国会，准备进行投票——许多共和党议员对此已经忧心忡忡。共和党人面临压力，需最终批准唐纳德·特朗普总统与参议院民主党人达成的协议，该协议暂时将国土安全部资金延长两周，并同时通过一项更广泛的全年支出协议，以便两党可以就民主党提出的限制移民和海关执法局（ICE）策略的要求进行谈判。
最终投票最早可能在周二进行，这将使联邦雇员避免感受到停摆带来的重大影响。
但即便特朗普支持这项一揽子计划，仍有几名共和党强硬派人士强烈反对。例如，佛罗里达州众议员安娜·保利娜·卢娜坚称，如果协议中不包含严格的选民ID法，她将不会支持任何资金协议——而参议院民主党人不会支持这一点。
民主党推动ICE执法改革的诉求，是在明尼阿波利斯最近发生Renee Nicole Good和Alex Pretti被杀事件之后提出的。白宫愿意与参议院民主党人达成协议，这凸显了特朗普政府希望避免又一场旷日持久的联邦资金斗争的愿望。这也暗中承认了在民众对这些杀戮事件的抗议声中存在的政治风险。
周五，共和党参议员在通过该协议后离开华盛顿，许多人相信他们的众议院同僚会接受这项法案，他们指出了白宫本身对此的支持。
“总统说，‘这是我们能做到的最好方案’，并且认为再次让政府运转起来非常重要，我认为这将对众议院的保守派朋友产生很大影响，”南达科他州共和党议员迈克·鲁兹周五表示。他强调，共和党人在谈判中也会提出自己的国土安全部相关要求，例如终止所谓的“庇护城市”——即地方官员不执行某些联邦移民法律的地区。
“我无法想象众议院的成员会说，‘不，我们要让政府停摆’，仅仅因为我们正在寻找一条既能推进庇护城市问题解决，又能找到前进道路的途径，”这位南达科他州共和党人表示。
在约翰逊微弱的多数优势下，每一票都至关重要。这位路易斯安那州共和党人在党内投票中最多只能失去两名反对票。这一优势很快就会缩小：众议院民主党人在周末的特别选举中赢得了德克萨斯州另一个席位——克里斯蒂安·梅内菲。一旦梅内菲宣誓就职，约翰逊最多只能容忍一名反对票。
另一方面，众议院高级民主党人向约翰逊表示，他们不愿意帮助他推进特朗普与参议院民主党人达成的协议。
据两名知情人士透露，众议院少数党领袖哈基姆·杰弗里斯周六在与约翰逊的通话中表示，如果共和党人试图在周一快速推进该法案，民主党人不会帮助共和党人通过该法案。在这一表态之后，共和党领袖决定不尝试这种快速推进程序，而是通过常规流程推进——这需要众议院共和党内部近乎一致的支持才能推进该法案。
这一流程中的关键步骤将于周一进行，届时众议院规则委员会将开会安排一项关键的程序性投票，允许约翰逊将该一揽子计划提交到众议院全体会议。该委员会的投票结果并不确定，因为该委员会包含像德克萨斯州的奇普·罗伊和南卡罗来纳州的拉尔夫·诺曼这样的强硬保守派成员。周末两人均未回复CNN的置评请求。
数十名众议院民主党人已经宣布反对这项协议，包括领导国会进步党团的德克萨斯州众议员格雷格·卡萨。
“我和进步党团的同事们一直很明确：在我们停止这种混乱和无法无天之前，不会向ICE多提供一分钱。如果该法案进入众议院，我投反对票，”卡萨周五在X平台上写道。
然而，根据三名知情人士透露，在周日晚上的党内核心小组会议上，一些民主党人表示支持这项政府资金协议。
一位知情人士告诉CNN，资深议员斯泰尼·霍耶和吉姆·克莱伯恩在会议上表示支持这项一揽子计划。
另一位知情人士表示，党内核心小组在如何就基本法案投票的问题上并非完全团结。然而，一些民主党人反对这类资金法案，而拨款委员会成员通常会支持，这种情况并不罕见。该人士预计，如果共和党人能够克服规则障碍，将有足够的民主党选票通过这项支出法案。
一旦国会投票重新开放政府，议员们将面临一个更为复杂的问题。两党必须就如何限制联邦移民执法人员达成协议，否则将面临2月份国土安全部再次停摆的前景。
谈判中一个关键的症结已经浮现：行政令与司法令状的使用。
行政令状由政府机构（此处为国土安全部）签发，是移民执法中的常见做法。司法令状是由法官或治安法官签署的法院命令，通常用于刑事调查中的搜查、扣押和逮捕。
民主党呼吁在移民执法中采用司法令状——共和党人称之为“行不通的条件”。
“这是不可能发生的，”南卡罗来纳州参议员林赛·格雷厄姆周日在福克斯新闻上表示。
然而，杰弗里斯表示，司法令状是“前进的绝对条件”。
“在我们看来，行政令状一文不值，”杰弗里斯在ABC的“本周”节目中表示。
约翰逊在NBC的“与媒体见面”节目中表示，司法令状只会增加另一层“官僚主义”。
CNN的马努·拉朱、艾莉森·梅因、安妮·格雷尔、劳伦·福克斯和维罗妮卡·斯特拉夸拉西对本文有贡献。
Speaker Johnson must sell conservatives on funding deal Democrats pushed for — or risk lengthy government shutdown
Published Feb 2, 2026, 6:00 AM ET / Source: CNN
By Sarah Ferris, Aileen Graef
2 hr ago
House Speaker Mike Johnson during a press conference on Capitol Hill on January 21.
Kylie Cooper/Reuters/File
House Speaker Mike Johnson is back in Washington this week with a tough ask for his fellow Republicans: accept a funding deal that Democrats pushed for or risk another painful, prolonged government shutdown.
Two days after a partial lapse in federal funding, the House returns Monday to prepare a vote that many GOP lawmakers are already dreading. Republicans are under pressure to give final approval to a deal between President Donald Trump and Senate Democrats that temporarily extends Department of Homeland Security funding for two weeks — alongside a broader, full-year spending deal — so the two parties can negotiate over Democrats’ demands to rein in Immigration and Customs Enforcement tactics.
The final vote is expected as early as Tuesday, which would allow federal workers to avoid feeling any major effects of the shutdown.
But even with Trump endorsing the package, several GOP hardliners are revolting against the idea. One, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida, has been adamant that she will not support any funding deal if it doesn’t include a strict voter ID law — something Senate Democrats would not support.
The push by Democrats to enact reforms to ICE practices comes after the recent killings of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis. The fact that the White House was willing to cut the deal with Senate Democrats underscores the Trump administration’s desire to avoid another drawn-out federal funding fight. It also served as a tacit acknowledgement of the political risks of ignoring the public outcry in the wake of the killings.
As GOP senators left town Friday after passing the deal, many were confident their House counterparts would accept the bill, pointing to the White House’s own approval.
“The president saying, ‘This is the best that we can do’ and that it’s really important to get government going once again, I think that’s going to carry a lot of weight with our conservative friends in the House,” Sen. Mike Rounds said Friday. He stressed that Republicans would have their own DHS demands during negotiations, such as ending so-called sanctuary cities, where local officials do not enforce certain federal immigration laws.
“I just can’t imagine the folks in the House are going to say, ‘No we’re going to shut down government,’ just simply because we’re trying to find a path forward where we can actually address sanctuary cities as well,” the South Dakota Republican said.
Every vote matters in Johnson’s slim majority. The Louisiana Republican can afford to lose only two defections on a party-line vote. That margin will soon be even lower: House Democrats elected another member from Texas — Christian Menefee — in a special election over the weekend. Once Menefee is sworn in, Johnson can afford only a single defection.
Top House Democrats, for their part, have communicated to Johnson they are not inclined to help him advance the deal that Trump made with Senate Democrats.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told Johnson during a call Saturday that Democrats won’t help Republicans pass the bill if they attempted to fast-track the measure Monday, according to two sources familiar with the call. After that move, Republican leaders decided not to attempt that fast-tracked process and will instead proceed through regular order — which will require near-unanimity within the House GOP to advance the bill.
A key step in that process will take place Monday, when the House Rules Committee meets to tee up a critical procedural vote that allows Johnson to bring the package to the floor. That committee vote is not guaranteed to pass, as the panel includes hardline conservatives like Reps. Chip Roy of Texas and Ralph Norman of South Carolina. Neither member returned CNN’s requests for comment over the weekend.
Dozens of House Democrats have already declared they would oppose the deal, including Texas Rep. Greg Casar, who leads the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
“My Progressive Caucus colleagues and I have been clear: not another cent to ICE until we stop the chaos and the lawlessness. If this comes to the House, I’m voting no,” Casar wrote on X on Friday.
However, on a private caucus call Sunday evening, some Democrats voiced support for the government funding deal, according to three sources familiar with the call.
Reps. Steny Hoyer and Jim Clyburn, senior lawmakers who previously served in leadership, said on the call that they support the package, one of the sources told CNN.
Another source on the call said the caucus was not totally united on how to vote on the underlying bill. It’s not unusual, however, for some Democrats to vote against these funding bills while appropriators often back them. If the Republicans can overcome the rule hurdle, the source expected there would be enough Democratic votes to pass the spending bill.
Once Congress votes to reopen the government, lawmakers will confront a far more complex problem. Both parties must come to a deal on how to rein in federal immigration enforcement officers, or face the prospect of another DHS shutdown in February.
Already, a key sticking point in negotiations is emerging: the use of administrative versus judicial warrants.
An administrative warrant is issued by a government agency, in this case by DHS, and is common practice in immigration enforcement. A judicial warrant is a court order signed by a judge or magistrate and is typically used in criminal investigation for search, seizure and arrest.
Democrats are calling for the adoption of judicial warrants in immigration enforcement — a condition Republicans say is a nonstarter.
“Ain’t going to happen,” Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said Sunday on Fox News.
Jeffries, however, said judicial warrants were needed “absolutely as a condition of moving forward.”
“The administrative warrants, in our view, aren’t worth the paper they are written on,” Jeffries said on ABC’s “This Week.”
Johnson said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that judicial warrants would just add another level of “bureaucracy.”
CNN’s Manu Raju, Alison Main, Annie Grayer, Lauren Fox and Veronica Stracqualursi contributed to this report.