作者: root

  • 世卫:全球近四成癌症病例可预防


    发布/2026年2月4日 19:27 / 联合早报

    最新研究发现,吸烟是全球首要的可预防致癌因素,其他因素则包括体重超标、缺乏运动和紫外线辐射等。 (海峡时报档案照片)

    (日内瓦综合电)在世界癌症日前夕,世界卫生组织发布最新全球研究报告指出,如果人们避免吸烟、饮酒、使空气污染等一系列风险因素,近四成的癌症病例是可以预防的。

    世卫组织国际癌症研究署星期二(2月3日)发布的报告估计,2022年所有新发癌症病例中,约有37.8%(约710万起)与可预防的因素有关,这凸显了在减轻全球癌症负担方面,预防的巨大潜力。

    报告说,新研究调查30种可预防的致癌因素,包括吸烟、饮酒、身体质量指数(BMI)超标、缺乏体育锻炼、空气污染等,以及九种可致癌的感染。

    这项发表在《自然医学》杂志的研究涵盖全球多国和36种癌症类型数据,确定吸烟是全球首要的可预防致癌因素,它导致所有新发癌症病例的15%,其次是可致癌的感染(10%)和饮酒(3%)。

    撰写这份报告的伊尔巴维在声明中指出:“这是首项全球分析,揭示了有多少癌症风险源于可以预防的因素。”他也是世卫癌症控制组组长。

    他补充说:“通过分析不同国家和人群的癌症模式,我们可为各国政府和个人提供更具体信息,帮助预防许多癌症病例的发生。”

    根据研究结果显示,在全球,肺癌、胃癌和宫颈癌占所有可预防癌症病例的近一半。肺癌主要与吸烟和空气污染有关,胃癌在很大程度上归因于幽门螺旋杆菌(Helicobacter pylori)感染,宫颈癌绝大多数由人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)引起。

    另外,男性有45%的新发癌症可预防,女性为30%;男性新发癌症中,约23%与吸烟有关,女性则约11%与感染有关,其次是吸烟(6%)和高BMI(3%)。

    在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,感染因素占主导地位,约80%的女性可预防癌症与感染有关。这意味着,任何减少癌症的措施都要因地制宜。

    报告强调,预防策略包括采取有力的烟草控制措施、监管酒精使用、接种相关疫苗以预防HPV等病毒感染、改善空气质量、加强工作场所安全,以及提倡更健康的饮食方式等。

    非传染性疾病联盟首席执行官戴恩告诉法新社:“如果我们想减轻癌症负担,也须减轻非传染性疾病负担。毋庸置疑,烟草、酒精、超加工食品和空气质量是多种癌症的主要诱因。”

    世卫:全球近四成癌症病例可预防

    发布/2026年2月4日 19:27 / 联合早报

    最新研究发现,吸烟是全球首要的可预防致癌因素,其他因素则包括体重超标、缺乏运动和紫外线辐射等。 (海峡时报档案照片)

    (日内瓦综合电)在世界癌症日前夕,世界卫生组织发布最新全球研究报告指出,如果人们避免吸烟、饮酒、使空气污染等一系列风险因素,近四成的癌症病例是可以预防的。

    世卫组织国际癌症研究署星期二(2月3日)发布的报告估计,2022年所有新发癌症病例中,约有37.8%(约710万起)与可预防的因素有关,这凸显了在减轻全球癌症负担方面,预防的巨大潜力。

    报告说,新研究调查30种可预防的致癌因素,包括吸烟、饮酒、身体质量指数(BMI)超标、缺乏体育锻炼、空气污染等,以及九种可致癌的感染。

    这项发表在《自然医学》杂志的研究涵盖全球多国和36种癌症类型数据,确定吸烟是全球首要的可预防致癌因素,它导致所有新发癌症病例的15%,其次是可致癌的感染(10%)和饮酒(3%)。

    撰写这份报告伊尔巴维在声明中指出:“这是首项全球分析,揭示了有多少癌症风险源于可以预防的因素。”他也是世卫癌症控制组组长。

    他补充说:“通过分析不同国家和人群的癌症模式,我们可为各国政府和个人提供更具体信息,帮助预防许多癌症病例的发生。”

    根据研究结果显示,在全球,肺癌、胃癌和宫颈癌占所有可预防癌症病例的近一半。肺癌主要与吸烟和空气污染有关,胃癌在很大程度上归因于幽门螺旋杆菌(Helicobacter pylori)感染,宫颈癌绝大多数由人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)引起。

    另外,男性有45%的新发癌症可预防,女性为30%;男性新发癌症中,约23%与吸烟有关,女性则约11%与感染有关,其次是吸烟(6%)和高BMI(3%)。

    在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,感染因素占主导地位,约80%的女性可预防癌症与感染有关。这意味着,任何减少癌症的措施都要因地制宜。

    报告强调,预防策略包括采取有力的烟草控制措施、监管酒精使用、接种相关疫苗以预防HPV等病毒感染、改善空气质量、加强工作场所安全,以及提倡更健康的饮食方式等。

    非传染性疾病联盟首席执行官戴恩告诉法新社:“如果我们想减轻癌症负担,也须减轻非传染性疾病负担。毋庸置疑,烟草、酒精、超加工食品和空气质量是多种癌症的主要诱因。”

  • 新闻


    请提供需要翻译的英文新闻文章,我将按照要求进行高质量的简体中文翻译。

    No English content available

  • 民主党为何难以在美国众议院重现中期选举”蓝色浪潮”


    2026-02-04 / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)政治版

    作者:阿里特·约翰

    更新于16分钟前
    更新时间:2026年2月4日,美国东部时间上午7:56
    发布时间:2026年2月4日,美国东部时间上午6:00

    图片说明:Alberto Mier/CNN/Getty Images

    八年前,在数十名退伍军人和有服役背景的候选人的帮助下,民主党人以40多个席位的优势翻转了众议院控制权。这些候选人受激励参选,旨在制衡总统唐纳德·特朗普。

    然而,今年的中期选举不太可能重现这一情景。

    两党均认为,选举地图的竞争范围大幅缩小,部分原因是中期重新划分选区以及政治极化加剧。尽管民主党在选举周期开始时拥有固有优势,但他们的选民支持率却处于多年来的低位。明年控制众议院的政党可能仅以微弱多数掌权。

    “The wind is at Democrats’ back, but people underestimate how steep the hill to climb is,” said Jesse Ferguson, a strategist who has worked for House Democrats’ campaign arm. “If I was judging on the environment, I’d rather be us, and if I was judging on the terrain, I’d rather be them.”

    [相关文章 图片说明:Alberto Mier/CNN/美国参议院 决定美国参议院控制权的10场关键竞选 阅读时间11分钟]

    两党都希望选民风向转向对自己有利的方向。共和党人押注选民对经济的看法将在未来几个月改善,而民主党人则看到了移民政策上的机会——选民对政府处理移民问题的方式有所降温。

    联邦特工在明尼阿波利斯开枪打死两名抗议者(一名三个孩子的母亲和一名ICU护士)后,公众愤怒情绪加剧,而政府官员最初对枪击事件的情况发表了未经证实的声明。

    “我认为特朗普总统已经走在正确的道路上,但……我们不能再有更多类似明尼苏达州的情况了,”致力于选举共和党温和派的”共和党中间派伙伴关系”组织总裁萨拉·张伯伦表示。

    全国范围内的选区重划斗争仍在持续,距离11月选举仅剩九个月,但目前还远不清楚哪些议题会成为选民关注的焦点。以下是两党对选情的分析:

    民主党争取多数席位的路径

    • 理论优势:在纸上,民主党有理由对11月的选举感到乐观。自1938年以来,华盛顿的执政党在中期选举中除两次外,均能在众议院获得席位。选民对特朗普在经济问题上的信任度正在下降,其移民执法支持率也在下滑。此外,民主党在过去一年的补选中表现出色,最近在得克萨斯州参议院竞选中再次获胜。
    • 核心信息:民主党似乎找到了一条能引起选民共鸣的信息——”负担能力”。新泽西州、弗吉尼亚州和纽约市去年的选举表明,集中关注医疗保健、公用事业、食品杂货和住房成本上涨问题,对一个在2024年失去工人阶级和少数族裔选民支持的政党而言,是一条胜利之路。
    • 挑战:但民主党前路并非坦途。共和党团体(包括全国共和党国会委员会NRCC和共和党全国委员会)的筹款额已超过民主党对手。与特朗普结盟的超级政治行动委员会”MAGA Inc”截至2025年底拥有3亿美元资金。
    • 形象重建:民主党仍在努力重塑公众形象。虽然多数选民表示更愿意支持”普通民主党人”而非共和党人,但该党的领导人支持率却低于2018年中期选举前的水平。最新CNN/SSRS民调显示,民主党领导人的支持率在1月份落后44个百分点,而2017年9月这一差距为28个百分点。

    “那些认为民主党会赢得众议院的人正在犯错误,”弗格森表示,”这并非板上钉钉——存在获胜的路径,但绝不是轻而易举的。”

    共和党争夺中期选举意外胜利的理由

    • 选举地图优势:共和党将打破历史规律的希望寄托在选举地图上。如今的竞争性席位比八年前少得多。民主党试图将竞选范围扩大到更偏向共和党人的选区(如北卡罗来纳州第11选区,特朗普在2024年以近10个百分点的优势获胜),而共和党则在特朗普获胜的几个民主党席位中寻找进攻机会。
    • 2018年经验教训:2018年,共和党人在希拉里·克林顿2016年赢得的近24个现任议员选区(主要是郊区)进行防御战,这些摇摆选区是民主党获胜的关键。
    • 重划选区后的格局:在选区重划之前,共和党只需防御副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯赢得的3个席位,而民主党有13名现任议员在特朗普赢得的选区。共和党估计,目前有16名民主党人在特朗普的选区,7名共和党人在哈里斯的选区。
    • 民主党”跨党派”选区:这些包括缅因州第2选区(议员贾里德·戈尔登宣布退休)和俄亥俄州议员玛西·卡普图尔的第9选区(在去年通过的新选区地图下进一步右倾)。
    • 经济预期:共和党人还希望经济在11月选举前改善,从而获得选民认可。”2018年,从特朗普总统任期第一周开始,我们就背负着医保政策的沉重包袱,这种状况一直没有缓解,”2018年NRCC通讯主任马特·戈尔曼表示,”而现在的局面更加灵活。”
    • 特朗普效应:特朗普最近访问爱荷华州突显了共和党面临的另一挑战——总统的支持者不一定会支持其他共和党候选人,尤其是当其名字未出现在选票上时(如2024年情况)。尽管特朗普在2024年选举中以8个百分点的优势赢得爱荷华州第1选区,但共和党议员玛丽安内特·米勒-米克斯仅以799票的微弱优势保住了该席位。

    “我们需要他的支持者出来投票,这是显而易见的,”张伯伦说,”所以他会努力做到这一点,帮助我们。”

    选区重划对选情的影响

    根据CNN的分析,目前共和党在选区重划斗争中以微弱优势领先。新地图可能帮助共和党额外获得9个席位(得克萨斯州5个、俄亥俄州2个、密苏里州和北卡罗来纳州各1个);而民主党则可能在加利福尼亚州获得5个席位,犹他州获得1个席位。

    然而,选区重划的最终结果仍不确定。民主党希望在马里兰州(州议会正在考虑新地图)和弗吉尼亚州(立法者将请求选民批准可能为该党增加4个席位的地图)获得额外席位。密苏里州选民也可能通过公投推翻该州的现有选区地图。

    最大的变数是最高法院对《选举权法》的裁决时机。观察人士预计,该裁决可能削弱《选举权法》的部分条款。民主党正准备应对法院可能为南部各州消除少数族裔占多数的选区扫清道路。如果裁决在今年早些时候公布,共和党控制的州议会将有更多时间重新划分国会选区。

    关键选区焦点

    宾夕法尼亚州第8选区

    • 首次当选的共和党议员罗布·布雷斯诺汉以”朴实无华的温和派”形象击败民主党议员马特·卡特赖特,其竞选口号是反对国会股票交易。然而,自上任以来,布雷斯诺汉已成为国会中最活跃的股票交易者之一。他随后签署了一份解除国会交易限制的请愿书,并指示其财务顾问停止主动管理股票,但民主党人认为损害已经造成。斯克兰顿市长佩奇·科格内蒂去年以”佩奇反对机器”为竞选口号发起挑战,呼应她2019年独立参选市长时与当地民主党领导人的冲突。

    “民主党候选人的战略当务之急是揭露共和党现任议员如何导致物价高企,并明确民主党候选人与选民对民主党人的期望有何不同,”弗格森表示。

    纽约州第17选区

    • 共和党议员迈克·劳勒是2024年哈里斯赢得的两个共和党现任议员之一,而民主党有多名候选人计划在11月挑战他。但共和党人认为劳勒也是一名强大的候选人,筹款能力突出。他在2024年以超过6个百分点的优势击败前议员蒙德亚尔·琼斯。

    “他对选区非常了解,敢于采取激进策略,也勇于发声,”戈尔曼说。

    更正:本文已更正,马特·戈尔曼曾担任全国共和党国会委员会通讯主任。

    Why Democrats might struggle to achieve another midterm ‘blue wave’ in the US House

    2026-02-04 / CNN Politics

    By Arit John

    Updated 16 min ago
    Updated Feb 4, 2026, 7:56 AM ET
    PUBLISHED Feb 4, 2026, 6:00 AM ET

    Photo Illustration by Alberto Mier/CNN/Getty Images

    Eight years ago, Democrats flipped more than 40 seats with the help of dozens of veterans and candidates with service backgrounds motivated to run as a check on President Donald Trump.

    This year’s midterm elections are unlikely to go down quite like that.

    Both parties agree the map is much narrower due in part to mid-cycle redistricting and increased political polarization. And while Democrats enter the cycle with built-in advantages, they’re also less popular with voters than they’ve been in years. Whichever party controls the House next year might enjoy just a slim majority.

    “The wind is at Democrats’ back, but people underestimate how steep the hill to climb is,” said Jesse Ferguson, a strategist who has worked for House Democrats’ campaign arm. “If I was judging on the environment, I’d rather be us, and if I was judging on the terrain, I’d rather be them.”

    [Related article Photo Illustration by Alberto Mier/CNN/US Senate The 10 races that will decide control of the US Senate 11 min read]

    Both parties are hoping for shifts in their direction. Republicans are betting that voters’ views of the economy will improve in the coming months, while Democrats see an opening on immigration, where voters have cooled on the administration’s approach.

    Public outrage has grown after federal agents fatally shot two protesters in Minneapolis – a mother of three and an ICU nurse – and administration officials made unsubstantiated initial claims about the circumstances around the killings.

    “I think President Trump has started in the right direction, but … we cannot have any more Minnesotas,” said Sarah Chamberlain, the president and chief executive of the Republican Main Street Partnership, which works to elect GOP moderates.

    The nationwide redistricting fight is still ongoing, and it’s far too early to know what issues will be top of mind for voters in November. But here’s how the two parties see the field nine months out.

    The Democratic path to a majority


    On paper, Democrats have reasons to be bullish about November.

    The party out of power in Washington has picked up House seats in the midterm elections in all but two elections since 1938. The trust voters have long placed in Trump on the economy is waning, as are his approval ratings on immigration enforcement. And Democrats have been overperforming in special elections over the last year, most recently in a Texas state Senate race.

    Democrats also seem to have found a message that is resonating with voters: affordability. Elections in New Jersey, Virginia and New York City last year all showed that focusing intensely on the rising cost of health care, utilities, groceries and housing is a winning blueprint for a party that lost support with working class and minority voters in 2024.

    But the road ahead isn’t completely smooth for Democrats. Republican groups, including the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) and the Republican National Committee, have outraised their Democratic counterparts. And MAGA Inc, a Trump-aligned super PAC, ended 2025 with $300 million.

    Democrats are also still in the process of rebuilding their public image.

    While more voters say they would be likely to vote for a generic Democrat over a Republican, the party’s leaders are less popular than they were heading into the 2018 midterm elections. A recent CNN/SSRS poll found that Democratic leaders’ approval rating was 44 points underwater in January, compared to 28 points underwater in September 2017.

    “Those that are assuming Democrats will take the House are making a mistake,” Ferguson said. “It is not a foregone conclusion – there’s a path to victory. This is not a cakewalk.”

    Republicans’ case for a midterm surprise


    Republicans are tying their hopes of defying history to the electoral map.

    There are far fewer competitive seats now than there were eight years ago. While Democrats are seeking to expand their map into redder and redder territory like North Carolina’s 11th District, which Trump won by nearly 10 points in 2024, Republicans see offensive opportunities in the several seats held by Democrats in seats Trump won.

    In 2018, Republicans were defending nearly two dozen incumbents in districts Hillary Clinton won in 2016, mainly in suburban districts. Those purple districts were key to Democrats’ path to victory.

    Prior to the redistricting wars, Republicans were set to defend just three seats former Vice President Kamala Harris won, while Democrats had 13 incumbents in seats Trump won. Republicans estimate there are now 16 Democrats in Trump districts and seven Republicans in Harris seats.

    Those Democratic crossover districts include Maine’s 2nd District, where Rep. Jared Golden is retiring, and Ohio Rep. Marcy Kaptur’s 9th District, which moved further right under new maps adopted last year.

    Republicans are also hoping the economy will improve in a way voters appreciate ahead of November.

    “In 2018 we had a millstone around our necks in terms of healthcare from the very start of the first week of the Trump presidency, and it really didn’t let up,” said Matt Gorman, who served as the NRCC’s communications director in 2018. “Here, it’s far more fluid.”

    Gorman pointed to progress on inflation and fast economic growth. He said Republicans are betting voters will feel those changes ahead of Election Day.

    “The question is will it get to the public fast enough to satisfy them? That’s the key. That’s the bet that they laid down,” he said.

    Trump’s recent trip to Iowa highlighted another issue facing Republicans: the president’s voters don’t necessarily turn out for other Republicans, particularly when his name is not on the ballot as it was in 2024.

    While the president won Iowa’s 1st District by eight points in that election, Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks held onto the seat by a fraction of a point – just 799 votes. Trump also carried Rep. Zach Nunn’s 3rd District by a wider margin than the incumbent.

    Trump’s visit is part of what Republicans hope will be a broader, more sustained effort to convince his supporters to turn out. White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles has said Trump will campaign “like its 2024.”

    “We need his people to turn out, obviously,” said Chamberlain, of the Republican Main Street Partnership. “So he’s going to work on doing that, helping us.”

    How redistricting affects the map


    As of now, Republicans are narrowly winning the redistricting war, based on a CNN analysis. New maps could help Republicans pick up as many as nine additional seats – five in Texas, two in Ohio and one each in Missouri and North Carolina. Democrats, meanwhile, are in position to gain up to five seats in California and one in Utah under redrawn lines.

    But the midcycle redistricting wars are far from settled. Democrats are hoping to gain an additional seat in Maryland, where the legislature is considering a new map, and Virginia, where lawmakers will ask voters to approve a map that could deliver the party as many as four more seats. Voters in Missouri could also overturn that state’s map in a referendum process.

    The biggest question, however, is the timing of a Supreme Court decision that observers expect could undercut provisions of the Voting Rights Act. Democrats are bracing for the court to clear the way for southern states to eliminate majority-minority districts. The sooner the decision drops this year, the more time Republican-controlled legislatures will have to draw up new congressional districts.

    Race spotlight


    Pennsylvania’s 8th District: First-term Rep. Rob Bresnahan narrowly defeated Democratic Rep. Matt Cartwright by campaigning as a salt-of-the-earth moderate who opposed congressional stock trading. Since entering office, however, Bresnahan has become one of the chamber’s most prolific traders. He’s since signed onto a discharge petition to end congressional trading and told his financial advisors to halt active management of his stocks, but Democrats argue the damage has been done. Scranton Mayor Paige Cognetti launched her campaign last year with the slogan “Paige Against the Machine,” a nod to her 2019 mayoral campaign, during which she ran as an independent after clashing with local Democratic leaders.

    “The strategic imperative for Democratic candidates is to expose how the Republican incumbent is responsible for how expensive things are, and clarify how the Democratic candidate is different from what people have come to expect from Democrats,” Ferguson said.

    New York’s 17th District: Rep. Mike Lawler is one of two GOP incumbents running in a district Harris carried in 2024, and a crowded Democratic field has formed to take him on in November. But Republicans argue he’s also a strong candidate and prolific fundraiser. He won his 2024 race against former Rep. Mondaire Jones by more than six points.

    “He knows the district well. He’s not afraid to be aggressive, and he’s not afraid to get out there,” Gorman said.

    Correction:This story has been corrected to reflect that Matt Gorman was communications director at the National Republican Congressional Committee.

  • 西班牙希腊拟禁止未成年人使用社媒 | 联合早报


    发布时间 / 来源:2026-02-04T12:10:50.000Z | 联合早报

    为保护儿童免受网络风险,西班牙星期二(2月3日)宣布,拟立法禁16岁以下孩童使用社交媒体。 (路透社)

    (马德里综合电)继英国和法国之后,西班牙和希腊也计划禁止青少年和孩童使用社交媒体。

    西班牙首相桑切斯星期二(2月3日)宣布,西班牙政府有意禁止16岁以下孩童使用社媒,并立法要求社媒高管为平台上的仇恨言论承担责任。

    桑切斯在迪拜举行的世界政府峰会上说:“我们的孩子暴露在一个他们原本不该独自应对的空间……我们将不再接受这种情况。我们将保护他们,免受数字‘蛮荒西部’的侵害。”

    据了解,西班牙拟议法规将为家长设定使用限制提供明确支持,并缓解儿童因担心“错过社交”而承受的压力。

    希腊也即将宣布类似禁令,禁止15岁以下儿童使用社媒。此前,法国政府已表明,正在审议禁止15岁以下儿童使用社媒的立法;英国也在考虑类似措施。

    澳大利亚去年12月10日正式实施全球首创的强力措施,禁止16岁以下人群使用社交媒体。

    X平台的所有者马斯克愤怒回应桑切斯的宣布,把桑切斯形容为“暴君”。

    谷歌、TikTok、Snapchat和Meta等其他社媒平台则未回应置评请求。

    格拉纳达大学实验心理学教授佩拉莱斯说,学界并未一致认同社交媒体必然对青少年有害。

    近期,由人工智能(AI)生成内容激增,马斯克旗下xAI公司开发的生成式人工智能聊天机器人Grok因被滥用于生成女性及孩童裸体图像等色情内容,被印度尼西亚和菲律宾封锁。

    西班牙希腊拟禁止未成年人使用社媒 | 联合早报

    发布时间 / 来源:2026-02-04T12:10:50.000Z | 联合早报

    为保护儿童免受网络风险,西班牙星期二(2月3日)宣布,拟立法禁16岁以下孩童使用社交媒体。 (路透社)

    (马德里综合电)继英国和法国之后,西班牙和希腊也计划禁止青少年和孩童使用社交媒体。

    西班牙首相桑切斯星期二(2月3日)宣布,西班牙政府有意禁止16岁以下孩童使用社媒,并立法要求社媒高管为平台上的仇恨言论承担责任。

    桑切斯在迪拜举行的世界政府峰会上说:“我们的孩子暴露在一个他们原本不该独自应对的空间……我们将不再接受这种情况。我们将保护他们,免受数字‘蛮荒西部’的侵害。”

    据了解,西班牙拟议法规将为家长设定使用限制提供明确支持,并缓解儿童因担心“错过社交”而承受的压力。

    希腊也即将宣布类似禁令,禁止15岁以下儿童使用社媒。此前,法国政府已表明,正在审议禁止15岁以下儿童使用社媒的立法;英国也在考虑类似措施。

    澳大利亚去年12月10日正式实施全球首创的强力措施,禁止16岁以下人群使用社交媒体。

    X平台的所有者马斯克愤怒回应桑切斯的宣布,把桑切斯形容为“暴君”。

    谷歌、TikTok、Snapchat和Meta等其他社媒平台则未回应置评请求。

    格拉纳达大学实验心理学教授佩拉莱斯说,学界并未一致认同社交媒体必然对青少年有害。

    近期,由人工智能(AI)生成内容激增,马斯克旗下xAI公司开发的生成式人工智能聊天机器人Grok因被滥用于生成女性及孩童裸体图像等色情内容,被印度尼西亚和菲律宾封锁。

  • 联邦警务如何颠覆日常生活,动摇明尼阿波利斯的公众信任


    2026-02-04T07:00:11-0500 / CBS新闻

    明尼苏达州布鲁克林公园 — 当地官员表示,”地铁突击行动”已经改变了明尼阿波利斯北部这个繁华多元郊区的日常生活,导致 businesses 关闭,居民纷纷躲藏。

    布鲁克林公园警察局长马克·布鲁利和市长霍莉斯·温斯顿认为,联邦移民官员的临时激增造成了永久性损害,这种损害将持续到最终撤离双城的联邦探员之后。

    “我们很多社区居民都感到恐惧,”温斯顿描述了商业主干道上商店关门的情景,”许多社区成员因为太过害怕而不敢出门,”市长补充说,这种恐惧不仅限于无证居民。

    “我们谈论的是美国公民,他们却因为害怕而不敢在美国的城市街道上行走,”他说。

    市长称经济影响可能持续数年


    在这个约65%居民为少数族裔的城市,温斯顿表示,邻居们正在考虑是否完全避免外出,转而选择食品杂货配送。他将经济影响比作新冠疫情,并预测其影响可能持续数年。

    “从现在起五到十年,我们都将为此挣扎,”温斯顿说,除非在任何降级后开展”恢复工作”。

    温斯顿报告称,经济影响立竿见影且严重,部分企业收入下降50%,而另一些企业”干脆关门”。

    “这对我市所有行业都产生了寒蝉效应,”温斯顿警告称,”这种经济状况是不可持续的。”

    警察局长称便衣警察被拦截,一人”被持枪围困”


    布鲁利表示,在得知美国移民和海关执法局(ICE)探员不仅拦截了社区成员,还拦截了布鲁克林公园的警察和文职人员——他称这些人是美国公民和”有色人种”——并要求出示公民身份证明后,他决定公开表态。

    布鲁利说,在一个案例中,手持武器的ICE探员”围困”了一名车内有孩子的警官,并”要求出示证明他们是美国公民的文件”。

    布鲁利表示,他最初犹豫是否公开,因为他担心人们会认为只有当联邦探员针对他自己的员工时他才会在意,而事实并非如此。他说,作为警察局长,他不能仅仅依靠口碑或社交媒体片段。

    “当我的员工……那些能够上法庭作证的人……含泪告诉我,他们因为肤色被拦截,枪支对准他们,被要求出示文件……这让我确认了整个都会区和全州都在发生类似情况,”布鲁利告诉CBS新闻。

    警察局长称,其他执法官员,包括圣保罗警察局长,也报告了类似经历。”这些每天执行执法工作的警官告诉我,其他执法人员已经失控,”他说。”全国人民都应该停下来想想,哇,到底发生了什么?”

    联邦探员存在侵蚀当地执法部门信任,市长警告


    温斯顿表达了对信任的更深层次担忧——以及对联邦战术的不信任如何蔓延到当地警察的合法性。

    市长警告称,联邦存在有瓦解多年来在社区警务和替代应对方法方面投入的风险,他说这项工作有助于降低犯罪率并改善关系。

    “不是每个人都能区分我们当地警察的工作和他们在联邦政府看到的情况,”温斯顿说。

    根据布鲁克林公园市长和警察局长的说法,国土安全部称”地铁突击行动”是此类行动中规模最大的一次,这与过去其他联邦执法行动也有所不同。

    “我们没有看到那种合作,而我们知道这种合作是什么样子,因为我们一直都有。我们有着良好的合作关系,”布鲁利说。”这次完全不同。”

    去年,当明尼苏达州众议院前议长梅丽莎·霍特曼在其布鲁克林公园的家中遇刺时,该市与联邦执法部门合作。布鲁利局长称,他为其警察部队与联邦部队在他所谓的”极其艰难的任务”中的执法合作感到自豪。

    温斯顿市长表示,建立牢固的合作关系将有助于缓和社区紧张局势,该市对当地执法部门充满信心:”我们知道如何做得好。这就是我们作为一个州真正要求的。我认为这将在全国范围内建立合法性。”

    关于ICE随身摄像头:”晚了10年”


    周一,国土安全部部长克里斯蒂·诺姆宣布,明尼阿波利斯的联邦移民官员将立即开始佩戴随身摄像头。

    温斯顿表示,他欢迎随身摄像头带来的内在问责制,承认这一举措来得晚了,但称之为”一个缓和局势并开始讨论如何建立长期问责制的机会”。

    布鲁利称新的随身摄像头”晚了10年”,认为这项技术可以提高警务透明度和合法性。尽管如此,他表示自边境负责人汤姆·霍曼抵达明尼苏达州以来,他注意到了变化。

    “气氛有了明显改善……他们表现得更好了,”警察局长说,并补充说”我们看到的很多行为在霍曼抵达后都停止了”。

    布鲁利表示,他对联邦官员的核心反对不是针对移民执法本身,而是这种突击行动的执行方式。他描述了他认为一些联邦团队在行动中带来的心态。他认为,这种”结果证明手段正当”的做法与美国警务的根本原则不相容。

    “逮捕15个人并不重要,但你违反了宪法。这是错误的,”布鲁利强调了第四修正案的保护——即免受”因肤色而被接触、搜查或讯问”的权利——并说”这种行为在美国街头是不能容忍的”。

    布鲁利描述的最不寻常的动态之一是居民拨打911请求当地警察帮助,因为他们认为ICE”在监视他们、跟踪他们、试图进入他们的公寓”。

    他回忆起一个事件,一名男子冲进警察局大厅”求救”,因为ICE探员在追捕他并将其拘留。

    警察局长警告这不是”蓝州问题”


    警察局长还警告了他所谓的”任务蔓延”,即行动最初目标的所谓扩大。

    “这不仅仅是暴力人员,”他说,”所有人都被拦截,包括美国公民,被要求出示文件。”

    当被问及他们会对那些将此视为”蓝州问题”的领导人说什么时,布鲁利表示,无论政党如何,这种情况都是不可接受的:”美国公民……因为肤色而被从街上抓走,被要求出示文件。”

    温斯顿也提出了更广泛的观点,即首先针对边缘化社区使用的强制战术往往”蔓延”到其他人,以禁毒战争为例。他警告说,如果这种做法在明尼苏达州行得通,”当它符合某些人的目的时,它就可以在全国任何地方使用”。

    对于其他正准备应对类似激增的城市,布鲁利提出了直言不讳的建议,称虽然”没有现成的手册”,但领导人必须”做正确的事”,记录他们能做的事情,并推动透明度。

    “移民执法需要进行,”他说,”但我们也可以说,其执行方式——包括蒙面行动——是不可接受的执法方式。”

    How federal policing upended daily life, public trust in Minneapolis

    2026-02-04T07:00:11-0500 / CBS News

    Brooklyn Park, Minn. — “Operation Metro Surge” has transformed daily life in the bustling, diverse suburb north of Minneapolis, with businesses shuttering and residents now in hiding, local officials say.

    Brooklyn Park Police Chief Mark Bruley and Mayor Hollies Winston argue the temporary surge of federal immigration officers has created permanent damage that will outlast the federal agents who will eventually pick up and leave the Twin Cities.

    “A lot of our community is terrified,” Winston said, describing critical business corridors where shops have closed. “Many community members are not coming out of their house because they’re so fearful,” the mayor said, adding that the fear is not limited to undocumented residents.

    “We’re talking about citizens of the United States [who] are too scared to come out on a city street in America,” he said.

    Economic impact could last for years, mayor says


    In a city where roughly 65% of residents are people of color, Winston said neighbors are weighing whether to avoid going outside altogether, opting for grocery delivery. He compared the economic impact to the COVID pandemic and predicted the effects could linger for years.

    “We will be grappling with this five to ten years from now,” Winston said, unless a “recovery effort” follows any de-escalation.

    Winston reported that the economic impact has been immediate and severe, with some businesses seeing revenue down 50%, while others “just closed up.”

    “It’s having a chilling impact across all sectors of our city,” Winston said, warning the economics are “just not sustainable.”

    Police chief says off-duty officers stopped, one “boxed in” at gunpoint


    Bruley said he decided to speak publicly after learning that Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents had stopped not only community members, but also Brooklyn Park police officers and civilian staff — people he said were U.S. citizens and “people of color” — and demanded proof of citizenship.

    In one case, Bruley said, ICE agents with guns drawn “boxed in” an officer who had a child in the vehicle and “demanded paperwork to prove that they were essentially a U.S. citizen.”

    Bruley said he initially hesitated to go public because he feared people would assume he only cared once federal agents targeted his own staff, adding that is not the case. He said that as a police chief, he could not rely solely on word-of-mouth or social media clips.

    “When my staff … people that can go to court and testify… come to me in tears … telling me they’re stopped because of the color of their skin, guns drawn on them, demanding [their] paperwork … It just affirmed how much of this is going on all over the Metro area and throughout the state,” Bruley said.

    The police chief said similar experiences have since been reported by other law enforcement officials, including the St. Paul police chief. “These are police officers that do the job of law enforcement every day telling me that other law enforcement are out of control,” he told CBS News. “Everybody in the nation should step back and go, whoa, what is going on?

    Federal agents’ presence eroding trust in local law enforcement, mayor warns


    Winston expressed a deeper concern about trust — and how mistrust of federal tactics can spill over onto local police legitimacy.

    The mayor warned the federal presence risks unraveling years of investment in community policing and alternative response approaches, saying that work has helped drive crime down and improve relationships.

    “Not everyone can differentiate between what our local police do and what they see at the federal government,” Winston said.

    Operation Metro Surge, which the Department of Homeland Security says is the largest operation of its kind, has also been different from other federal law enforcement operations in the past, according to the Brooklyn Park mayor and police chief.

    “We’re not seeing that partnership, and we know what it looks like, because we’ve had it forever. We’ve had great partnerships,” Bruley said. “This has been different.”

    The city partnered with federal law enforcement last year when former Speaker of the Minnesota House of Representatives Melissa Hortman was assassinated at her home in Brooklyn Park. Chief Bruley said he was proud of the law enforcement partnership between his police force and the federal force on what he called “an incredibly difficult mission.”

    Mayor Winston said having a strong partnership would serve to de-escalate tensions in the community, and the city has faith in its local law enforcement: “We know what it looks like for it to be done well. And so that’s all we’re really asking for as a state here. And I think that just builds legitimacy across the entire country.”

    On ICE body cameras: “Late by 10 years”


    On Monday, Homeland Secretary Kristi Noem announced federal immigration agents in Minneapolis will begin wearing body cameras effective immediately.

    Winston said he welcomed the built-in accountability of body cameras, conceding the move came late but calling it “an opportunity to de-escalate and start talking about how is there gonna be long-term accountability.”

    Bruley called the new bodycams “late by 10 years,” arguing the technology improves transparency and legitimacy in policing. Still, he said he has noticed a change since Border Czar Tom Homan arrived in Minnesota.

    “There has been a noticeable difference in the temperature… they’re just acting better,” the police chief said, adding that “a lot of the behaviors that we’ve seen stopped,” when Homan arrived.

    Bruley said that his core objection to federal officers isn’t to immigration enforcement itself, but rather the way this surge has been carried out. He described a mindset he believes some federal teams brought to the operation. That “ends justify the means” approach, he argued, is fundamentally incompatible with American policing.

    “It doesn’t matter if you arrest 15 people, but you violated the Constitution. It was wrong,” Bruley said, emphasizing Fourth Amendment protections — the right to be free from being “contacted, searched [or] interrogated because of the color of their skin” — and said “that type of behavior cannot be tolerated in our streets in this country.”

    One of the most unusual dynamics Bruley described was residents calling 911 asking for local police help because they believe ICE is “watching them, following them, trying to get in their apartment.”

    He recounted an incident where a person ran into the police department lobby “begging” for help as ICE agents chased the individual inside and took them into custody.

    What’s happening is not a “blue state problem,” police chief warns


    The police chief also warned about what he called “mission creep,” or a so-called broadening of the original objective of the operation.

    “It’s not just violent people,” he said. “Everybody’s getting stopped, including the U.S. citizens and demanded paperwork.”

    Asked what they would tell leaders who see this as a “blue state problem,” Bruley said that’s happening is unacceptable regardless of party: “American citizens … are being snatched up off the street, demanding their paperwork, just because of color of their skin.”

    Winston also made the broader argument that coercive tactics used first against marginalized communities often “creep” outward to others, pointing to the war on drugs as an example. He cautioned that if the justification works in Minnesota, “it can be used anywhere in the country when it serves anybody’s purpose.”

    For other cities preparing for a similar surge, Bruley offered blunt advice, saying that while there is “no playbook,” leaders must “do what’s right,” document what they can and push for transparency.

    “Immigration enforcement needs to happen,” he said. “We also can say that the way it’s being executed – with faces being covered … is an unacceptable way to do law enforcement.”

  • 决定美国参议院控制权的10场关键竞选


    2026-02-04T11:00:47.907Z / 美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)

    在争夺美国参议院控制权的斗争中,多数席位的归属可能取决于哪个因素更具影响力:席位分布地图还是选举环境。

    席位分布地图与数学计算

    共和党目前在参议院拥有53个席位,民主党47个(其中包括两位与民主党团结合作的独立议员)。由于副总统JD·万斯(JD Vance)可能成为关键的打破平局者,民主党需要赢得4个席位才能获得多数。而对民主党而言,席位分布地图对共和党更为有利,这使得这一任务更加艰巨。

    11月将有35个席位面临改选,民主党只有一个目标州是前副总统卡玛拉·哈里斯(Kamala Harris)在2024年获胜的(缅因州),而他们需要在特朗普(Donald Trump)获胜的战场州(佐治亚州和密歇根州)中捍卫两个席位。从那里开始,民主党可能的机会转向北卡罗来纳州——该州自2008年以来就没有选出过民主党参议员——然后延伸至更深红的政治地盘。

    选举环境因素

    共和党人认为,对他们有利的选举环境将更有利于特朗普的议程,包括去年颁布的大规模税收和支出立法。

    民主党领导人则因招募人才的成功而感到鼓舞,去年11月在主要中期选举中横扫各场比赛,很大程度上是因为选民对生活成本问题的关注。他们认为,选民对总统的不满情绪(尤其是对其经济管理的不满)将成为今年选举的主要驱动力,这将帮助民主党克服其在许多美国人眼中自身品牌形象的挑战。

    两党都同意经济和可负担性问题将成为中期选举轮廓的核心,但也有共识认为,在未来九个月中,其他问题可能会影响选民的决定。特朗普政府在明尼阿波利斯联邦探员枪杀两名抗议者后,移民执法行动的处理已成为政治争议焦点。

    民主党还希望利用选民的积极性——最近的CNN民调显示,尽管民主党选民普遍对党内领导人不满,但民主党登记选民今年的投票积极性远高于共和党。与此同时,共和党候选人需要努力应对总统名字未出现在选票上时如何动员基础选民的问题——这在特朗普时代一直是个重大挑战。

    中期选举周期将于下月在德克萨斯州和北卡罗来纳州的初选中拉开帷幕。以下是距离选举日九个月时关键参议院竞选的现状:

    关键州竞争格局

    参议院控制权集中在四个竞争最激烈的州:佐治亚州、缅因州、密歇根州和北卡罗来纳州。

    民主党必须保住佐治亚州和密歇根州,并拿下另外两个州,才有机会获得多数席位。如果在任何一个州失利,意味着他们需要在对共和党更为有利的地形上再赢一个席位。

    佐治亚州

    参议员乔恩·奥索夫(Jon Ossoff)是唯一一位在特朗普2024年获胜州寻求连任的民主党参议员。他于2021年通过决选首次当选,是一位强大的筹款人,并利用了选民对特朗普执政第一年在经济和医疗保健等问题上的不满。

    虽然奥索夫已经进入大选模式,但共和党内部展开了激烈的初选,候选人包括众议员巴迪·卡特(Buddy Carter)、迈克·柯林斯(Mike Collins)以及前田纳西大学橄榄球教练德里克·杜利(Derek Dooley),后者得到了州长布莱恩·肯普(Brian Kemp)的支持。

    特朗普尚未在此次竞选中表态,但所有共和党候选人都紧密围绕总统的议程,并试图将奥索夫描绘成极端分子——尽管该州在过去三次总统选举中都在两党之间摇摆。

    缅因州

    参议员苏珊·柯林斯(Susan Collins)是民主党长期以来的目标,该州在特朗普三次参选时均投票反对他。这位五届参议员有时会与总统意见相左,包括在其大规模国内议程法案和上月的战争权力投票中反对,这导致特朗普称柯林斯永远不应连任。但她在其他优先事项上支持特朗普,包括他的大部分内阁人选以及他第一任期内三个最高法院任命中的两个。

    保住该席位使其保持共和党(红色)立场是全国共和党人的首要任务。与参议院多数党领袖约翰·图恩(John Thune)密切相关的组织“参议院领导基金”(Senate Leadership Fund)已承诺初始投资4200万美元支持柯林斯。

    民主党初选中,78岁的州长珍妮特·米尔斯(Janet Mills,党内建制派宠儿)对阵41岁的格雷厄姆·普拉特纳(Graham Platner),后者是一位进步派牡蛎养殖者和退役老兵。

    米尔斯是一位受欢迎的人物,曾多次赢得全州范围选举。她将成为有史以来最年长的新当选参议员,但已承诺只任期一届。虽然她的参选令民主党领导人满意,但党内一些人对她能否激发基础选民的热情表示担忧。

    普拉特纳则以经济民粹主义诉求获得进步派的支持。但一系列负面报道,包括其过去有争议的网络帖子和疑似纳粹标志的纹身,可能使其初选和大选之路复杂化。

    密歇根州

    密歇根州是特朗普在2024年获胜的另一个摇摆州,民主党在此处于守势——同时该州的一场备受关注的民主党初选可能成为衡量该党在这一关键战场州走向的晴雨表。

    参议员加里·彼得斯(Gary Peters)的退休引发了民主党提名的激烈三选一:进步派前底特律卫生局主任阿卜杜勒·艾尔-赛义德(Abdul El-Sayed)、州参议员马洛里·麦克莫罗(Mallory McMorrow)以及被视为党内建制派宠儿的温和派众议员海莉·史蒂文斯(Haley Stevens)。

    共和党人希望民主党初选可能持续到8月的激烈竞争能对他们有利。前共和党众议员迈克·罗杰斯(Mike Rogers)在2024年参议院竞选中失利后再次参选,并在特朗普的支持下成为热门候选人。但民主党人认为罗杰斯是个“老调重弹”的人物,并有信心党内最终会团结在提名候选人周围。

    尽管特朗普在2016年和2024年赢得密歇根州,但民主党在2018年和2022年的全州中期选举中表现出色,该党希望在2026年延续这一趋势。

    北卡罗来纳州

    在共和党参议员汤姆·蒂利斯(Thom Tillis)决定不寻求连任后,北卡罗来纳州成为民主党最有希望的竞选州之一。

    民主党获得了他们心仪的候选人——前州长罗伊·库珀(Roy Cooper),他连任两届,卸任时支持率良好。库珀是一位多产的筹款人,并且在该州扩大医疗保健可及性方面处于前沿,这是民主党今年希望提升的议题。

    这并不意味着库珀在特朗普三次获胜的州会有轻松之路。得到总统支持的前共和党全国委员会主席迈克尔·惠特利(Michael Whatley)被看好将赢得下月的共和党初选。

    其他潜在竞争州

    在四个主要竞选中,参议院地图转向了一方有明显早期优势的州,但也给另一方带来了一定程度的乐观理由。

    阿拉斯加州在民主党获得了理想的候选人——前众议员玛丽·佩尔托拉(Mary Peltola)来挑战共和党参议员丹·沙利文(Dan Sullivan)后,成为民主党可能的目标。佩尔托拉在2022年赢得阿拉斯加唯一的众议院席位,是十多年来第一位在该州赢得全州选举的民主党人。尽管她在2024年竞选连任失利,但民主党认为她的中间派形象和“鱼、家庭与自由”的竞选信息将使该席位成为争夺焦点。

    他们需要克服该州的保守倾向。特朗普在三次竞选中都以两位数优势赢得阿拉斯加。该州的另一位参议员——温和派莉萨·穆尔科斯基(Lisa Murkowski)在跨党派支持佩尔托拉之前的众议院竞选后,已经支持了沙利文。

    俄亥俄州是民主党认为招募候选人使席位成为竞争焦点的另一州,前参议员谢罗德·布朗(Sherrod Brown)寻求重返参议院。尽管他在2024年的连任竞选中失利,但布朗的表现优于哈里斯,并曾通过经济民粹主义议程吸引工人阶级选民,在该州赢得过艰难的竞选。

    布朗需要应对特朗普时代该州向右的转变,共和党人指望这一点帮助他们支持的参议员候选人乔恩·哈斯汀(Jon Husted)在万斯辞职后获得完整六年任期。

    共和党众议员阿什利·辛森(Ashley Hinson)被视为在参议员乔尼·恩斯特(Joni Ernst)决定不寻求第三个任期后,保持爱荷华州共和党(红色)立场的有力竞争者。辛森是前新闻主播,2020年翻转了该州第二国会选区,已巩固了包括特朗普在内的共和党支持。

    民主党认为爱荷华州是一场艰难的战斗,但认为总统的贸易政策对该州农民造成了沉重打击,可能在11月产生影响。该党还指出,自特朗普第二任期开始以来,该州的特别选举中民主党表现强劲。民主党初选中包括海军陆战队退伍军人内森·赛奇(Nathan Sage)、两次残奥会金牌得主州众议员乔什·图雷克(Josh Turek)和州参议员扎克·沃尔什(Zach Wahls)。

    两党都认为德克萨斯州的初选结果可能决定该席位在11月是否成为竞争焦点。

    共和党内部,参议员约翰·科宁(John Cornyn)、州检察长肯·帕克斯顿(Ken Paxton)和众议员韦斯利·亨特(Wesley Hunt)之间展开了激烈的竞争。科宁作为现任议员得到了党内全国基础设施的支持——但共和党所有人都关注特朗普,他尚未表态,但最近表示会“认真考虑”。

    民主党和一些共和党人认为,如果帕克斯顿成为共和党候选人,鉴于其丑闻历史,可能会使大选竞争更加激烈。大多数策略师认为共和党初选可能会进入5月的决选,延长党内争斗消耗宝贵资源。

    但民主党内部也有一场激烈的初选,考验着赢得红色州的最佳策略。44岁的民权律师贾斯敏·克罗克特(Jasmine Crockett)认为她能提高民主党选民的投票率,并依靠她在国会的经验。36岁的前教师和长老会神学院学生詹姆斯·塔拉利科(James Talarico)则试图吸引独立选民和对特朗普不满的共和党人。

    尽管民主党参议员珍妮·沙欣(Jeanne Shaheen)决定不寻求连任,民主党仍乐观地认为能保住新罕布什尔州的席位。2018年首次当选众议院议员的克里斯·帕帕斯(Chris Pappas)被民主党视为能应对艰难竞选的候选人。

    共和党人认为他们在新罕布什尔州(花岗岩州)有机会,前参议员约翰·E·苏努努(John E. Sununu)自2009年卸任后重返竞选,面临另一位前参议员斯科特·布朗(Scott Brown)的挑战,后者曾代表马萨诸塞州十多年。特朗普最近对苏努努的支持可能进一步倾向于他在初选中获胜。

    明尼苏达州的参议院竞选将受到密切关注,因为该州已成为特朗普移民执法行动的中心。

    参议员蒂娜·史密斯(Tina Smith)的退休使民主党必须捍卫另一个空缺席位——尽管该党有信心该州保持蓝色。首先,党内必须选出候选人,8月的初选凸显了进步派副州长佩吉·弗拉纳根(Peggy Flanagan)与温和派众议员安吉·克雷格(Angie Craig)之间的意识形态分歧,弗拉纳根本周得到了史密斯的支持。

    共和党候选人更多,但前体育播音员米歇尔·塔福亚(Michele Tafoya)的参选燃起了共和党人对11月的希望。明尼苏达州几十年来一直支持民主党总统候选人——尽管哈里斯仅以约4个百分点击败特朗普。

    除了激烈的大选格局,两党也在关注几个预计在11月安全属于民主党或共和党阵营的州的初选结果。这些竞选结果可能更清晰地揭示两党未来的走向。

    长期参议员米奇·麦康奈尔(Mitch McConnell)的退休使共和党人面临三位候选人的竞争:众议员安迪·巴尔(Andy Barr)、前州检察长丹尼尔·卡梅伦(Daniel Cameron)和商人内特·莫里斯(Nate Morris)。这三位候选人都与前参议院共和党领袖有关联,但更倾向于特朗普及其运动。总统尚未表态,但科技巨头埃隆·马斯克计划花费1000万美元支持莫里斯,后者是万斯的密友。

    伊利诺伊州也有一场三选一的民主党角逐,候选人是众议员拉贾·克里希纳穆尔蒂(Raja Krishnamoorthi,财务优势明显)、得到州长JB普利兹克支持的副州长朱莉安娜·斯特拉顿(Juliana Stratton)和众议员罗宾·凯利(Robin Kelly)。

    特朗普在Truth Social上的一条帖子颠覆了路易斯安那州的共和党参议院初选。总统对众议员朱莉娅·莱特洛(Julia Letlow)的支持为她挑战参议员比尔·卡西迪(Bill Cassidy)铺平了道路,后者是2021年第二次弹劾期间七位投票定罪特朗普的共和党参议员之一。5月16日的初选结果将考验特朗普在保守州的支持力量。

    马萨诸塞州的民主党参议院初选是今年突显党内代际分歧的几场竞选之一。79岁的参议员埃德·马基(Ed Markey)已在国会任职超过五十年,对阵47岁的众议员塞思·莫尔顿(Seth Moulton),后者将需要新领导作为其竞选核心。

    The 10 races that will decide control of the US Senate

    2026-02-04T11:00:47.907Z / CNN

    In the fight for control of the US Senate, the majority may come down to which factor carries more weight: the map or the environment.

    Let’s start with the map – and the math. Republicans currently hold 53 seats in the chamber compared to 47 for Democrats, which includes two independents who caucus with the party. With Vice President JD Vance serving as a potential tie breaker, that means Democrats need to gain four seats to claim the majority, a task made more difficult by a map that favors the GOP.

    Of the 35 seats up for grabs in November, Democrats have only one target in a state that former Vice President Kamala Harris won in 2024 (Maine) while they are defending two in battleground states President Donald Trump carried (Georgia and Michigan). From there, the opportunities for Democrats turn to North Carolina, which hasn’t elected a Democrat to the Senate since 2008, then stretches into deep red turf.

    Ad Feedback

    Republicans believe the friendly playing field will work in their favor and be more receptive to Trump’s agenda, including the massive tax and spending legislation enacted last year.

    As for the environment, Democratic leaders feel buoyed by recruiting wins and the party’s sweep of races in major off-year contests last November fueled in large part by an emphasis on cost-of-living concerns for voters. They are betting souring voter sentiment toward the president, particularly on his handling of the economy, will remain a driving force in elections this year – and will help the party overcome some of the challenges it faces when it comes to its own brand in the eyes of many Americans.

    Even as both parties agree that the economy and affordability will be central to shaping the contours of the midterms, there is a shared understanding that other issues could factor into the decisions of voters over the next nine months. The Trump administration’s handling of immigration enforcement operations has emerged as a political flashpoint following the fatal shootings of two protesters in Minneapolis by federal agents.

    Democrats are also hoping to capitalize on an energized base, with a recent CNN poll showing Democratic registered voters far more motivated to vote this year than Republicans – despite widespread dissatisfaction with party leaders. Republican candidates, meanwhile, will need to grapple with how to turn out base voters with the president’s name not on the ballot – something that has been a significant challenge during the Trump era.

    The midterm cycle kicks off next month with primaries in Texas and North Carolina. Here’s a look at where the key Senate races stand nine months from Election Day:

    Control of the Senate centers on four states featuring the most competitive races of the cycle: Georgia, Maine, Michigan and North Carolina.

    Democrats must hold onto Georgia and Michigan and flip the other two if the party stands a chance of claiming the majority. A loss in any of them would mean needing to win another seat on terrain much more friendly for Republicans.

    Sen. Jon Ossoff is the lone Democratic senator seeking reelection in a state Trump won in 2024. First elected in a runoff in 2021, Ossoff is a strong fundraiser and has tapped into frustration with Trump’s first year in office on issues like the economy and health care.

    While Ossoff is already in general election mode, Republicans are engaged in a contested primary featuring Reps. Buddy Carter and Mike Collins and former University of Tennessee football coach Derek Dooley, who has the backing of Gov. Brian Kemp.

    Trump has not yet endorsed in the race, but the GOP candidates have all aligned themselves closely with the president’s agenda and tried to portray Ossoff as extreme in a state that’s swung between parties in the past three presidential elections.

    Maine

    Sen. Susan Collins is a perennial target for Democrats in a state that’s voted against Trump all three times he’s been on the ballot. The five-term senator has at times bucked the president, including on his sweeping domestic agenda bill and a war powers vote last month, which led Trump to say Collins should never be reelected. But she has backed Trump on other priorities, including most of his Cabinet picks and two of his three Supreme Court appointments during his first term.

    Keeping her seat red is a top priority for national Republicans. The Senate Leadership Fund, a group closely aligned with Senate Majority Leader John Thune, has pledged an initial $42 million investment to boost Collins.

    The Democratic primary pits 78-year-old Gov. Janet Mills, a party establishment favorite, against 41-year-old Graham Platner, a progressive oyster farmer and former combat veteran.

    Mills is a popular figure who has won several statewide races. She would be the oldest freshman ever elected to the US Senate but has pledged to serve only one term. While her decision to run pleased Democratic leaders, some in the party have expressed concern about her ability to excite the base.

    Platner, meanwhile, has tapped into progressive enthusiasm with his economic populist pitch. But a trail of negative stories, including those detailing past controversial online posts and a tattoo resembling Nazi imagery, could complicate his primary and general election bids.

    Michigan is another swing state Trump won in 2024 where Democrats find themselves on defense – and engaged in one of this year’s most closely watched primaries that could serve as a barometer of where the party is heading in one of the country’s premier battlegrounds.

    The retirement of Sen. Gary Peters kicked off a crowded three-way race for the Democratic nomination between Abdul El-Sayed, the progressive former executive director of the Detroit Health Department; state Sen. Mallory McMorrow; and Rep. Haley Stevens, a moderate who is seen as the favorite of the party establishment.

    Republicans are hoping a potentially bruising Democratic primary stretching into August will work in their favor. Former GOP Rep. Mike Rogers is back for another bid after losing the Senate race in 2024 and cleared the field with Trump’s endorsement. But Democrats view Rogers as a retread and are confident the party will unite around the party’s eventual nominee.

    While Trump won Michigan in 2016 and 2024, Democrats performed well in statewide midterm races in 2018 and 2022, a trend the party hopes to extend in 2026.

    Democrats view North Carolina as one of their best pickup opportunities after GOP Sen. Thom Tillis, who at times has been a thorn in Trump’s side, decided not to seek reelection.

    Democrats got their preferred candidate in former Gov. Roy Cooper, who served two terms and left office with favorable approval ratings. He is a prolific fundraiser and was at the forefront of the state’s efforts to expand access to health care, an issue Democrats are seeking to elevate this year.

    That does not mean Cooper will have an easy path in a state Trump won three times. Former Republican National Committee chair Michael Whatley, who has the president’s backing, is favored to win the GOP primary next month.

    Once you get beyond the four marquee races, the Senate map shifts to states where one party holds a clear early advantage – but offers reasons for some degree of optimism on the opposing side.

    Alaska emerged as a possible pickup for Democrats after the party landed its desired recruit in former Rep. Mary Peltola to take on GOP Sen. Dan Sullivan. Peltola was the first Democrat to win statewide in more than a decade when she flipped Alaska’s lone US House seat in 2022. While she lost her reelection bid in 2024, Democrats think her moderate profile and “fish, family and freedom” campaign message will help put the seat in play.

    They will need to overcome the state’s conservative tilt. Trump won Alaska by double-digits in all three runs. The state’s other senator – moderate Lisa Murkowski – has endorsed Sullivan after crossing party lines to back Peltola’s past House campaigns.

    Ohio is another state where Democrats believe recruitment has put the seat in play, with former Sen. Sherrod Brown seeking a comeback. Though he lost his 2024 reelection bid, Brown overperformed Harris and has won hard-fought campaigns in the state before by appealing to work class voters with an economic populist agenda.

    Brown will need to navigate the state’s rightward shift during the Trump era, which Republicans are counting on to help lift GOP Sen. Jon Husted to a full six-year term after he was appointed to fill the seat vacated by Vance.

    Republicans see GOP Rep. Ashley Hinson as a strong contender to keep Iowa red following Sen. Joni Ernst’s decision not to seek a third term. Hinson, a former newscaster who flipped the state’s 2nd Congressional District in 2020, has already consolidated GOP support including from Trump.

    While Democrats see Iowa as an uphill climb, they believe the president’s trade policies have hit farmers in the state hard and could resonate come November. The party also points to strong showings in special elections in the state since the start of Trump’s second term. The Democratic primary includes Marine Corps veteran Nathan Sage; state Rep. Josh Turek, a two-time Paralympic gold medalist; and state Sen. Zach Wahls.

    Both parties believe the results of the primaries in Texas are likely to determine whether this seat gets put in play come November.

    On the Republican side, there is an all-out brawl between Sen. John Cornyn, state Attorney General Ken Paxton, and Rep. Wesley Hunt. Cornyn, as the incumbent, has the backing of the party’s national infrastructure – yet all eyes in the GOP are on Trump, who has yet to endorse in the race but said recently he would give it “a serious look.”

    Democrats – and some Republicans – think if Paxton emerges as the GOP nominee it could make for a much more competitive general election given his history of scandals. Most strategists believe the GOP primary will head to a May runoff, soaking up valuable resources with an extended intraparty fight.

    But Democrats are engaged in a contentious primary of their own that will test competing theories of the best way to win the red state. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, a 44-year-old civil rights attorney, is making the case she’ll drive up turnout among Democratic voters and leans on her experience in Congress. State Rep. James Talarico, a 36-year-old former teacher and Presbyterian seminarian, is seeking to appeal to independents and Republican voters turned off by Trump.

    Democrats are optimistic they will hold onto this New Hampshire seat despite Sen. Jeanne Shaheen’s decision not to seek reelection. First elected to the US House in 2018, Rep. Chris Pappas is seen by Democrats as a candidate who has faced tough campaigns.

    Republicans feel they could have an opening in the Granite State with former Sen. John E. Sununu, who has been out of office since 2009. He’s facing a primary against another former senator – Scott Brown – who represented the neighboring state of Massachusetts more than a decade ago. Trump’s recent endorsement of Sununu could further tilt the primary in his favor.

    The Senate race in Minnesota will be watched closely as the state has become the epicenter of Trump’s immigration enforcement actions.

    The decision by Sen. Tina Smith to retire creates another open seat Democrats must defend – though the party is confident the state will stay blue. First the party must pick a nominee, with the August primary highlighting the ideological divide between progressive Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan, who was endorsed by Smith this week, and moderate Rep. Angie Craig.

    The GOP field is much more crowded, but former sportscaster Michele Tafoya’s bid has sparked Republican hopes for November. Minnesota has consistently voted for Democrats in presidential elections for decades – though Harris only defeated Trump there by about 4 points.

    Beyond the competitive general election landscape, both parties are also keeping their eyes on several primary battles in states that are expected to be safely in either the Democratic or Republican column come November. The outcome in those contests could offer a clearer picture of the direction of both parties moving forward.

    The retirement of longtime Sen. Mitch McConnell has set up a three-way fight between Rep. Andy Barr, former state Attorney General Daniel Cameron and businessman Nate Morris. All three candidates have ties to the former Senate GOP leader but have aligned themselves more with Trump and his movement. The president has yet to endorse in the race – but tech titan Elon Musk plans to spend $10 million to help bolster Morris, who is a close friend of Vance.

    There is another three-way battle underway in Illinois, where Democrats are picking a potential successor to retiring Sen. Dick Durbin. The primary includes Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, who has a strong financial advantage; Lt. Gov. Juliana Stratton, who was endorsed by Gov. JB Pritzker; and Rep. Robin Kelly.

    With a single post on Truth Social, Trump upended the GOP Senate primary in Louisiana. The president’s endorsement of Rep. Julia Letlow paved the way for her to launch a challenge against Sen. Bill Cassidy, one of seven Republican senators to vote to convict Trump during his second impeachment in 2021. The result of the May 16 primary will test the power of Trump’s endorsement in a solidly conservative state.

    The Massachusetts Democratic Senate primary is one of several contests this year that highlights the generational divide within the party. The matchup pits 79-year-old Sen. Ed Markey, who has served in Congress for more than five decades, against 47-year-old Rep. Seth Moulton, who has made the need for new leadership a centerpiece of his campaign.

  • 韩国高龄者雇佣率首破70% 延长退休年龄成政策焦点


    发布/2026年2月4日 20:35

    在中壮年重新活跃于劳动市场的趋势下,韩国55至64岁高龄者的雇佣率于2025年首次突破70%,引发各界对延长退休年龄与再雇用制度的广泛讨论。

    据韩国雇佣劳动部星期三(2月4日)发布的《高龄者雇佣动向》数据显示,2025年,55至64岁高龄者雇佣率达70.5%,较2024年的69.9%提高0.6个百分点,创1983年有统计以来新高。

    自2007年起,高龄者就业率维持在60%左右,2013年后逐步上升,2022年进入60%后段区间,呈持续增长趋势。这意味着超过七成的高龄人口仍活跃于职场,反映其对经济收入的高度依赖。

    此外,高龄者的经济活动参与率(包括就业者与求职者)亦达72.0%,同比上升0.4个百分点,同期失业率则由2.4%降至2.1%,呈现稳定下降趋势。

    延迟退休成社会关注课题

    国家统计资料也显示,高龄者(55至64岁)在职人口中,占比达18.4%,在15岁以上人口中则为五分之一。目前逐步进入60岁的群体多为1964至1974年出生的“第二次婴儿潮”一代,约有954万人,占全国人口的18.6%。该世代的大量退休,使得韩国面临严重的劳动力结构压力。

    随着高龄人口不断增加,延迟退休成为社会关注课题。

    劳动界主张,应依据国民年金的领取年龄,将退休年龄延至65岁,企业界则更倾向于推行“退休后再雇用”等灵活模式,同时指出在现有“定岗年薪制”下,如延长退休年龄,还需配合薪资体系的改革。

    此外,一些人担忧,大规模延迟退休可能抑制青年就业,诱发代际矛盾。

    高龄就业趋势 折射出严重老年贫困问题

    值得注意的是,韩国高龄就业趋势背后,也折射出严重的老年贫困问题。

    据统计,2023年韩国66岁以上人口的收入贫困率为39.7%,在经济合作与发展组织(OECD)成员国中排名第一。2024年,相对贫困率在66至75岁为26.6%,76岁以上更飙升至53.8%。贫困程度随年龄递增,尤其在农村地区更加明显,农渔村老年人口贫困率比城市高出1.37倍。

    专家呼吁,政府加快改革养老金制度,扩大对高龄群体的社会保障,尤其应强化农村与弱势群体的福利支援,并创造更多适合老年人的灵活就业岗位,以应对持续扩大的老年贫困与劳动力结构变动。

    韩国高龄者雇佣率首破70% 延长退休年龄成政策焦点

    发布/2026年2月4日 20:35

    在中壮年重新活跃于劳动市场的趋势下,韩国55至64岁高龄者的雇佣率于2025年首次突破70%,引发各界对延长退休年龄与再雇用制度的广泛讨论。

    据韩国雇佣劳动部星期三(2月4日)发布的《高龄者雇佣动向》数据显示,2025年,55至64岁高龄者雇佣率达70.5%,较2024年的69.9%提高0.6个百分点,创1983年有统计以来新高。

    自2007年起,高龄者就业率维持在60%左右,2013年后逐步上升,2022年进入60%后段区间,呈持续增长趋势。这意味着超过七成的高龄人口仍活跃于职场,反映其对经济收入的高度依赖。

    此外,高龄者的经济活动参与率(包括就业者与求职者)亦达72.0%,同比上升0.4个百分点,同期失业率则由2.4%降至2.1%,呈现稳定下降趋势。

    延迟退休成社会关注课题

    国家统计资料也显示,高龄者(55至64岁)在职人口中,占比达18.4%,在15岁以上人口中则为五分之一。目前逐步进入60岁的群体多为1964至1974年出生的“第二次婴儿潮”一代,约有954万人,占全国人口的18.6%。该世代的大量退休,使得韩国面临严重的劳动力结构压力。

    随着高龄人口不断增加,延迟退休成为社会关注课题。

    劳动界主张,应依据国民年金的领取年龄,将退休年龄延至65岁,企业界则更倾向于推行“退休后再雇用”等灵活模式,同时指出在现有“定岗年薪制”下,如延长退休年龄,还需配合薪资体系的改革。

    此外,一些人担忧,大规模延迟退休可能抑制青年就业,诱发代际矛盾。

    高龄就业趋势 折射出严重老年贫困问题

    值得注意的是,韩国高龄就业趋势背后,也折射出严重的老年贫困问题。

    据统计,2023年韩国66岁以上人口的收入贫困率为39.7%,在经济合作与发展组织(OECD)成员国中排名第一。2024年,相对贫困率在66至75岁为26.6%,76岁以上更飙升至53.8%。贫困程度随年龄递增,尤其在农村地区更加明显,农渔村老年人口贫困率比城市高出1.37倍。

    专家呼吁,政府加快改革养老金制度,扩大对高龄群体的社会保障,尤其应强化农村与弱势群体的福利支援,并创造更多适合老年人的灵活就业岗位,以应对持续扩大的老年贫困与劳动力结构变动。

  • 2024年试图暗杀当时总统候选人唐纳德·特朗普的枪手将于周三被判刑,检方寻求终身监禁


    59岁的瑞安·劳斯(Ryan Routh)去年9月被判定犯有五项联邦刑事罪名,包括试图暗杀一名主要总统候选人、袭击联邦官员以及多项枪支犯罪。据报道,在判决宣读后,劳斯试图用钢笔刺自己的脖子,随后被四名美国法警制服。

    检方在上个月提交的量刑备忘录中表示:“劳斯对其罪行毫无悔意,从未为自己危及的生命道歉,他的一生几乎完全无视法律。”他们在备忘录中主张,根据联邦量刑指南,他应该在监狱中度过余生。

    劳斯的新辩护律师马丁·L·罗斯(Martin L. Roth)要求法官偏离量刑指南:在因一项枪支罪名被判处七年强制刑期的基础上,再增加20年监禁。

    特朗普高尔夫俱乐部枪手暗杀未遂后被判有罪;庭审中试图自残

    2022年5月,瑞安·劳斯在乌克兰基辅的一次示威活动中举着写有“世界帮帮我们”的横幅。(Artem Gvozdkov/Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images)

    罗斯在一份文件中写道:“被告距离60岁还差两周。公正的惩罚应判处足够长的刑期,施加足够但不过度的惩罚,并让被告重获自由,而非在狱中死去。”

    佛罗里达州圣卢西亚堡(Fort Pierce)对劳斯的量刑听证会最初定于12月举行,但美国地区法官艾琳·坎农(Aileen Cannon)同意将日期推迟,因为劳斯决定在量刑阶段聘请律师,而不是像审判大部分时间那样自行辩护。

    瑞安·劳斯在有罪判决宣读后尖叫着逃离法院

    2024年9月,涉嫌暗杀的瑞安·劳斯在佛罗里达州被执法部门逮捕。他被判定犯有所有指控。(马丁县警长办公室/路透社)

    检方称,劳斯花了数周时间策划杀害特朗普。2024年9月15日,当当时的共和党总统候选人在佛罗里达州西棕榈滩的乡村俱乐部打高尔夫球时,劳斯从灌木丛后瞄准步枪。

    点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用程序

    在劳斯的审判中,一名在高尔夫球场协助保护特朗普的特勤局特工作证说,他在特朗普出现前就发现了劳斯。劳斯将步枪对准特工,特工开枪,导致劳斯掉落武器并逃跑,未开枪。

    一名描绘2025年9月23日佛罗里达州圣卢西亚堡瑞安·劳斯审判法庭程序的素描。(Lothar Speer)

    福克斯新闻数字版的布雷恩·德皮施(Breanne Deppisch)和美联社对此报道有贡献。

    格雷格·诺曼是福克斯新闻数字版的记者。

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6380033887112

    The gunman convicted of trying to assassinate then-presidential candidate Donald Trump at his West Palm Beach golf club in 2024 is set to be sentenced Wednesday, with prosecutors pushing for a life term.

    Ryan Routh, 59, was found guilty last September on five federal criminal counts, including attempting to assassinate a major presidential candidate, assaulting a federal officer and multiple firearms offenses. After the verdict was read, Routh reportedly appeared to try to stab himself in the neck with a pen before four U.S. Marshals restrained him.

    “Routh remains unrepentant for his crimes, never apologized for the lives he put at risk, and his life demonstrates near-total disregard for law,” prosecutors said in a sentencing memorandum filed last month in which they argued he should spend the rest of his life in prison,in accordance with federal sentencing guidelines.

    Routh’s new defense attorney, Martin L. Roth, is asking the judge for a variance from sentencing guidelines: 20 years in prison on top of a seven-year, mandatory sentence for one of the gun convictions.

    TRUMP GOLF CLUB GUNMAN FOUND GUILTY AFTER ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT; TRIES TO STAB SELF IN COURT

    Ryan Routh is seen in May 2022 holding a banner stating “World Help Us” during a demonstration in Kyiv, Ukraine.(Artem Gvozdkov/Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images)

    “The defendant is two weeks short of being sixty years old,” Roth wrote in a filing. “A just punishment would provide a sentence long enough to impose sufficient but not excessive punishment, and to allow defendant to experience freedom again as opposed to dying in prison.”

    Routh’s sentencing in Fort Pierce, Fla., had initially been scheduled for December, but U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon agreed to move the date back after Routh decided to use an attorney during the sentencing phase instead of representing himself as he did for most of the trial.

    RYAN ROUTH’S DAUGHTER SCREAMS AND RUNS FROM COURTHOUSE AFTER GUILTY VERDICT READ

    Suspected would-be assassin Ryan Routh was arrested by law enforcement in Florida in September 2024. He was convicted of all charges against him.(Martin County Sheriff’s Office/ REUTERS)

    Prosecutors said Routh spent weeks plotting to kill Trump before aiming a rifle through shrubbery as the then-Republican presidential candidate played golf on Sept. 15, 2024, at his West Palm Beach, Fla., country club.

    A sketch depicting court proceedings during the Ryan Routh trial in Fort Pierce, Fla., on Sept. 23, 2025.(Lothar Speer)

    CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

    At Routh’s trial, a Secret Service agent helping protect Trump on the golf course testified that he spotted Routh before Trump came into view. Routh aimed his rifle at the agent, who opened fire, causing Routh to drop his weapon and run away without firing a shot.

    Fox News Digital’s Breanne Deppisch and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Greg Norman is a reporter at Fox News Digital.

    https://www.foxnews.com/video/6380033887112

  • 以色列对加沙袭击致近20人死亡,含2名婴儿,医院呼吁“停火在哪里?”


    更新于:2026年2月4日 / 美国东部时间上午6:57 / 哥伦比亚广播公司/美联社

    代尔拜莱赫,加沙地带— 医院官员称,周三上午以色列对加沙发动的袭击已造成至少19名巴勒斯坦人死亡,其中大多数是妇女和儿童。以色列方面表示,袭击将持续进行,并称之为对武装分子袭击以色列士兵(造成一名士兵重伤)的回应。

    医院官员称,在遇难的巴勒斯坦人中,有5名儿童(包括一名5个月大的婴儿和一名仅10天大的婴儿)、7名妇女和一名医护人员。自2025年10月10日美国促成的和平计划生效并停火以来,这是加沙地带最新的巴勒斯坦人死亡事件,期间以色列的致命袭击不断。

    加沙由哈马斯管理的卫生部称,在此期间已有至少556名巴勒斯坦人被以色列军队火力打死,该部门将周三单日死亡人数定为21人。

    以色列国防军周三发表声明,指责哈马斯武装分子“公然违反当前停火协议”,称其对加沙北部的部队发动了袭击。

    军方表示:“在确认开火后,以色列国防军装甲部队和以色列空军战机对该区域发动了打击。”

    不断上升的巴勒斯坦人死亡人数考验着美国支持的和平计划,加沙地带的许多巴勒斯坦人表示,感觉战争并未结束。

    加沙城希法医院院长穆罕默德·阿布塞尔米亚博士在Facebook帖子中表示:“针对我们加沙人民的种族灭绝战争仍在继续。停火在哪里?调解人在哪里?”

    一名以色列军方官员(出于军事政策考虑要求匿名)告诉美联社,以色列将继续打击加沙地带。自停火生效以来,以色列军方为致命袭击辩护称,这是对哈马斯违反协议或武装分子袭击其士兵的回应。军方称,停火生效以来已有4名士兵死亡。

    调解方谴责了这些袭击,哈马斯称这些袭击违反了协议。

    周三早些时候,希法医院称,以色列军队向加沙北部图法赫街区的一栋建筑开火,造成至少11人死亡,其中大多数来自同一个家庭。死者包括两名父母、他们10天大的女儿、5个月大的表亲以及他们的祖母。

    以色列军方表示,在武装分子向部队开枪后,其战机和装甲部队进行了回击,造成一名预备役士兵重伤并被送往医院。以色列称武装分子的袭击违反了协议。

    医院官员称,图法赫袭击事件后,以色列的火力继续在加沙地带蔓延。纳赛尔医院称,以色列对汗尤尼斯南部城市一个家庭的帐篷发动的袭击造成3人死亡,包括一名12岁男孩。加沙城东部扎伊顿街区的坦克炮击造成另外3名巴勒斯坦人死亡,包括一对夫妇,希法医院报告。

    加沙南部汗尤尼斯地区,在停火期间因以色列炮击遇难的巴勒斯坦人(包括儿童)亲属,将他们的遗体从纳赛尔医院停尸房抬出参加葬礼游行,2026年2月4日。哈尼·阿尔沙尔/阿纳多卢通讯社/盖蒂图片社

    图中显示的是,在加沙地带汗尤尼斯南部,以色列炮击导致巴勒斯坦人死亡后,亲属们抬着遗体参加葬礼。

    汗尤尼斯穆瓦西地区一个帐篷的袭击造成至少2人死亡,5人受伤,据该地区巴勒斯坦红新月会运营的野战医院称。医院称,死者包括巴勒斯坦红新月会的一名医护人员侯赛因·哈桑·侯赛因·阿尔塞米里,他当时正在值班。

    加沙卫生部称,自战争开始以来,已有超过71,800名巴勒斯坦人死亡,该部未说明其中有多少是战斗人员或平民。该部门是哈马斯领导的政府的一部分,其伤亡记录被联合国机构和独立专家视为普遍可靠。他们认为实际死亡人数要高得多,因为许多尸体仍在废墟中尚未被找到。

    以色列对卫生部的统计数据提出异议,但自2023年10月7日哈马斯发动恐怖袭击(造成约1,200名以色列人死亡,另有251人被劫持)以来,以色列尚未提供加沙平民的伤亡数据。

    Israeli strikes in Gaza kill almost 20, including 2 infants, hospitals say, asking, “Where is the ceasefire?”

    Updated on: February 4, 2026 / 6:57 AM EST / CBS/AP

    Deir al-Balah, Gaza Strip— Israeli strikes in Gaza on Wednesday morning killed at least 19 Palestinians, most of them women and children, according to hospital officials. Israel said the strikes would continue and called them a response to a militant attack on Israeli soldiers that seriously wounded one.

    Among the Palestinians killed were five children, including a 5-month-old and a baby just 10 days old; seven women; and a paramedic, said hospital officials. They were the latest Palestinians killed in Gaza since a U.S.-brokered peace plan, which has been punctuated by deadly Israeli strikes, brought a ceasefire into effect on Oct. 10, 2025.

    At least 556 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli fire in that time, according to Gaza’s Hamas-run health ministry, which put the death toll on Wednesday alone at 21.

    The Israel Defense Forces, in a statement on Wednesday, accused Hamas militants of a “blatant violation of the current ceasefire agreement” with the alleged attack on forces in northern Gaza.

    “Upon identification of the fire, IDF armored units [tanks] and IAF [Israeli Air Force] aircraft conducted strikes in the area,” the military said.

    The escalating Palestinian death toll has tested the U.S.-backed peace plan, and many Palestinians in the strip say it doesn’t feel like the war has ended.

    The bodies of Palestinians killed in an Israeli strike, including children, are seen outside Al-Shifa Hospital ahead of funeral procedures, in Gaza City, Gaza, Feb. 4, 2026. Khames Alrefi/Anadolu/Getty

    “The genocidal war against our people in the Gaza Strip continues,” said Dr. Mohamed Abu Selmiya, director of Gaza City’s Shifa Hospital, in a Facebook post. “Where is the ceasefire? Where are the mediators?”

    An Israeli military official, speaking on the condition of anonymity in line with military policy, told The Associated Press that Israel would continue striking the strip. Since the ceasefire took hold, Israel’s military has defended deadly strikes by saying it is responding to Hamas violations or militant attacks on its soldiers. The military says four soldiers have been killed since the ceasefire took hold.

    Mediators have condemned the attacks and Hamas has called them violations of the deal.

    Early Wednesday, Israeli troops fired on a building in the Tuffah neighborhood in north Gaza, killing at least 11 people, most from the same family, said Shifa Hospital, which received the bodies. The dead included two parents, their 10-day-old girl, her 5-month-old cousin and their grandmother.

    Israel’s military said its aircraft and armored units had returned fire after militants started shooting at troops, badly wounding a reservist soldier who was evacuated to a hospital. Israel called the militant attack a violation of the deal.

    After the Tuffah strike, Israeli fire continued across the strip, said hospital officials. An Israeli strike on a family’s tent in the southern city of Khan Younis killed three people including a 12-year-old boy, said Nasser hospital, which received the bodies. Tank shelling in Gaza City’s eastern neighborhood of Zaytoun killed another three Palestinians, according to Shifa Hospital, including a husband and his wife.

    Relatives of Palestinians, including children, killed in Israeli artillery shelling in the southern Gaza area of Khan Younis amid a ceasefire, bring their bodies from the morgue of Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis for funeral processions, Feb. 4, 2026. Hani Alshaer/Anadolu/Getty

    A strike on a tent in the Muwasi area of Khan Younis killed at least two people and wounded five others, according to a field hospital run by the Palestinian Red Crescent in the area. The dead included Hussein Hassan Hussein al-Semieri, a paramedic for the Palestinian Red Crescent who was on duty at the time, said the hospital.

    More than 71,800 Palestinians have been killed since the start of the war, according to the Gaza health ministry, which does not say how many were fighters or civilians. The ministry, which is part of the Hamas-led government, maintains detailed casualty records that are seen as generally reliable by U.N. agencies and independent experts. They believe the actual death toll is substantially higher because many bodies have still to be recovered from the rubble.

    Israel disputes the ministry’s tally, but has provided no casualty figures for civilians in Gaza since it launched the war against Hamas in response to the group’s Oct. 7, 2023 terrorist attack, which killed some 1,200 Israelis and saw 251 others taken hostage.

  • 韩国高龄者雇佣率首破70% 延长退休年龄成政策焦点


    发布/2026年2月4日 20:35

    在中壮年重新活跃于劳动市场的趋势下,韩国55至64岁高龄者的雇佣率于2025年首次突破70%,引发各界对延长退休年龄与再雇用制度的广泛讨论。

    据韩国雇佣劳动部星期三(2月4日)发布的《高龄者雇佣动向》数据显示,2025年,55至64岁高龄者雇佣率达70.5%,较2024年的69.9%提高0.6个百分点,创1983年有统计以来新高。

    自2007年起,高龄者就业率维持在60%左右,2013年后逐步上升,2022年进入60%后段区间,呈持续增长趋势。这意味着超过七成的高龄人口仍活跃于职场,反映其对经济收入的高度依赖。

    此外,高龄者的经济活动参与率(包括就业者与求职者)亦达72.0%,同比上升0.4个百分点,同期失业率则由2.4%降至2.1%,呈现稳定下降趋势。

    延迟退休成社会关注课题

    国家统计资料也显示,高龄者(55至64岁)在职人口中,占比达18.4%,在15岁以上人口中则为五分之一。目前逐步进入60岁的群体多为1964至1974年出生的“第二次婴儿潮”一代,约有954万人,占全国人口的18.6%。该世代的大量退休,使得韩国面临严重的劳动力结构压力。

    随着高龄人口不断增加,延迟退休成为社会关注课题。

    劳动界主张,应依据国民年金的领取年龄,将退休年龄延至65岁,企业界则更倾向于推行“退休后再雇用”等灵活模式,同时指出在现有“定岗年薪制”下,如延长退休年龄,还需配合薪资体系的改革。

    此外,一些人担忧,大规模延迟退休可能抑制青年就业,诱发代际矛盾。

    高龄就业趋势 折射出严重老年贫困问题

    值得注意的是,韩国高龄就业趋势背后,也折射出严重的老年贫困问题。

    据统计,2023年韩国66岁以上人口的收入贫困率为39.7%,在经济合作与发展组织(OECD)成员国中排名第一。2024年,相对贫困率在66至75岁为26.6%,76岁以上更飙升至53.8%。贫困程度随年龄递增,尤其在农村地区更加明显,农渔村老年人口贫困率比城市高出1.37倍。

    专家呼吁,政府加快改革养老金制度,扩大对高龄群体的社会保障,尤其应强化农村与弱势群体的福利支援,并创造更多适合老年人的灵活就业岗位,以应对持续扩大的老年贫困与劳动力结构变动。

    韩国高龄者雇佣率首破70% 延长退休年龄成政策焦点

    发布/2026年2月4日 20:35

    在中壮年重新活跃于劳动市场的趋势下,韩国55至64岁高龄者的雇佣率于2025年首次突破70%,引发各界对延长退休年龄与再雇用制度的广泛讨论。

    据韩国雇佣劳动部星期三(2月4日)发布的《高龄者雇佣动向》数据显示,2025年,55至64岁高龄者雇佣率达70.5%,较2024年的69.9%提高0.6个百分点,创1983年有统计以来新高。

    自2007年起,高龄者就业率维持在60%左右,2013年后逐步上升,2022年进入60%后段区间,呈持续增长趋势。这意味着超过七成的高龄人口仍活跃于职场,反映其对经济收入的高度依赖。

    此外,高龄者的经济活动参与率(包括就业者与求职者)亦达72.0%,同比上升0.4个百分点,同期失业率则由2.4%降至2.1%,呈现稳定下降趋势。

    延迟退休成社会关注课题

    国家统计资料也显示,高龄者(55至64岁)在职人口中,占比达18.4%,在15岁以上人口中则为五分之一。目前逐步进入60岁的群体多为1964至1974年出生的“第二次婴儿潮”一代,约有954万人,占全国人口的18.6%。该世代的大量退休,使得韩国面临严重的劳动力结构压力。

    随着高龄人口不断增加,延迟退休成为社会关注课题。

    劳动界主张,应依据国民年金的领取年龄,将退休年龄延至65岁,企业界则更倾向于推行“退休后再雇用”等灵活模式,同时指出在现有“定岗年薪制”下,如延长退休年龄,还需配合薪资体系的改革。

    此外,一些人担忧,大规模延迟退休可能抑制青年就业,诱发代际矛盾。

    高龄就业趋势 折射出严重老年贫困问题

    值得注意的是,韩国高龄就业趋势背后,也折射出严重的老年贫困问题。

    据统计,2023年韩国66岁以上人口的收入贫困率为39.7%,在经济合作与发展组织(OECD)成员国中排名第一。2024年,相对贫困率在66至75岁为26.6%,76岁以上更飙升至53.8%。贫困程度随年龄递增,尤其在农村地区更加明显,农渔村老年人口贫困率比城市高出1.37倍。

    专家呼吁,政府加快改革养老金制度,扩大对高龄群体的社会保障,尤其应强化农村与弱势群体的福利支援,并创造更多适合老年人的灵活就业岗位,以应对持续扩大的老年贫困与劳动力结构变动。