2026年2月27日 / 美国东部时间上午6:51 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻
美国国务院周五批准非紧急人员及其家属离开以色列，理由是存在未具体说明的”安全风险”。
这一旅行指南的变更正值美国继续与伊朗就潜在核协议进行谈判之际，德黑兰希望通过谈判避免特朗普总统已通过向中东大规模部署军队准备的军事打击。
在阿曼斡旋下于周四在日内瓦举行的最新一轮间接谈判后，伊朗最高外交官表示，其核浓缩计划的新协议取得了一些进展，称这是”迄今为止最严肃、最长的一轮谈判”。
特朗普总统威胁称，如果无法达成限制伊朗核计划的协议，将对伊朗发动攻击。周四，几名外部专家告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻，谈判似乎不太可能达成双方都能接受的协议，这使得美国发动攻击的可能性增大，可能很快就会发生。
美国国务院在周五的最新旅行指南中没有提及伊朗，但表示由于安全风险，正授权美国政府非紧急人员及其家属离开以色列，并指出：”针对安全事件，且未预先通知的情况下，美国驻以色列大使馆可能会进一步限制或禁止美国政府雇员及其家属前往以色列部分地区、耶路撒冷老城和西岸地区。”
“在商业航班仍可使用时，个人可能希望考虑离开以色列，”美国国务院表示。当军事行动风险增加时，往返以色列及其他地区机场的航班通常会暂停。
美国特使史蒂夫·维特科夫（Steve Witkoff）和特朗普的女婿贾里德·库什纳（Jared Kushner）代表特朗普政府领导了与伊朗的谈判，但他们和白宫没有对周四在日内瓦的讨论结果做出说明。
尽管外界分析人士大多不抱乐观预期，伊朗——以及斡旋旨在避免美国打击的阿曼——试图将周四的会议描绘为富有成效的。许多人认为美国打击可能会演变为更广泛的地区冲突。
“在一些问题上，现在已有共识，在另一些问题上，存在分歧是很自然的，”伊朗外交部长阿巴斯·阿拉格希（Abbas Araghchi）表示，他率领伊朗代表团参加了日内瓦谈判。”然而，双方比以往更认真，目标是达成谈判解决方案。”
“双方同意技术团队将于周一在维也纳开始工作，在国际原子能机构（IAEA）专家的协助下进行技术审查，以制定解决一些技术问题的框架，”阿拉格希补充道，在双方谈判团队回到各自首都进行磋商后，”我们将于下周举行第四轮谈判。”
特朗普曾表示，国务卿马可·卢比奥（Marco Rubio）也重申，总统更希望通过谈判解决伊朗瘫痪核计划对峙问题，卢比奥指责德黑兰在去年6月美国打击后试图重建核计划，那次打击严重破坏了伊朗三个主要浓缩设施。
特朗普总统尚未明确表示，他是否会接受一项仅限制伊朗核计划而不解决美国其他不满的新协议，最主要的不满包括伊朗常规弹道导弹储备以及对该地区武装”代理团体”的支持。
副总统JD·万斯（JD Vance）周四告诉《华盛顿邮报》，特朗普仍在考虑军事打击”以确保伊朗不会获得核武器”，但他也仍然愿意通过外交方式解决”问题”。
万斯淡化了该地区许多国家的警告，包括美国在中东的一些亲密伙伴，这些警告称任何美国打击都可能引发其他国家卷入的战争，且无法迅速结束。
《邮报》援引万斯的话说：”我们将在中东打多年战争且看不到尽头的想法——这根本不可能发生。”
去年6月特朗普下令打击伊朗核设施时，以色列也加入了对伊朗的攻击，德黑兰回应向美国在中东最大军事基地发射导弹。特朗普表示，报复行动事先已通知美国，导弹被拦截。
10天前，伊朗发射了一系列导弹回击以色列的攻击，其中一枚突破以色列先进防空系统，落在其首都特拉维夫市中心。
尽管以色列在6月12天战争中严重破坏了伊朗的弹道导弹能力，但一些外部观察人士认为伊朗已重新补充军火库，拥有数百枚可瞄准以色列和美国在该地区军事资产的火箭弹。
周四，美国陆军退役中将H.R.麦克马斯特（H.R. McMaster），哥伦比亚广播公司新闻撰稿人，曾任特朗普第一届政府国家安全顾问，预测特朗普政府将无法与伊朗强硬的伊斯兰统治者达成足够共识，以避免新的军事冲突。
“神权独裁政权的意识形态及其对美国和以色列的永久敌意将导致不妥协，无法在浓缩铀、导弹计划和支持恐怖组织问题上做出让步，”他说。
麦克马斯特在军队服役期间曾指挥美国在中东的部队，他表示，与去年6月仅打击伊朗核设施的”午夜锤子行动”不同，”我认为，首次战役将规模庞大，而非’象征性’演习。由于美国强大的防空系统、进攻性反制空中力量和远程打击能力，伊朗报复和扩大冲突的选择将非常有限。”
周五美国更新的以色列旅行警告发布之际，还有许多其他国家对其公民发出了类似警告，包括离开以色列和伊朗的警告。
澳大利亚周三要求驻以色列和邻国黎巴嫩的外交官家属离开这些国家，并自愿为阿联酋、卡塔尔和约旦的家属提供撤离服务，理由是”该地区安全局势恶化”。
自1月中旬以来，印度、巴西、新加坡和至少六个欧洲国家已警告其公民不要前往伊朗，并敦促在伊朗的公民离开。中国官方媒体周五表示，在伊朗的中国公民也应撤离。
U.S. clears some diplomatic staff to leave Israel as tension with Iran continues despite talks
February 27, 2026 / 6:51 AM EST / CBS News
The U.S. State Department authorized non-emergency personnel and their family members to leave Israel on Friday, citing unspecified “safety risks.”
The change in guidance from the State Department comes as the U.S. continues negotiations with Iran on a potential nuclear deal, which Tehran hopes will avert a potential American military assault President Trump has prepared for with a massive deployment to the Middle East.
After the latest round of indirect talks brokered by Oman, held Thursday in Geneva, Iran’s top diplomat said there was some progress toward a new agreement on his country’s nuclear enrichment program, calling it “one of the most serious and longest rounds of talks” to date.
President Trump has threatened to attack Iran if no deal to rein in its nuclear program can be reached, and several outside experts told CBS News Thursday that the negotiations appear unlikely to yield an agreement both sides can live with, making an American attack likely, possibly soon.
The State Department did not mention Iran in its latest travel guidance on Friday, but said it was authorizing the departure of non-emergency U.S. government personnel and family members from Israel due to safety risks, noting that, “in response to security incidents and without advance notice, the U.S. Embassy may further restrict or prohibit U.S. government employees and their family members from traveling to certain areas of Israel, the Old City of Jerusalem, and the West Bank.”
“Persons may wish to consider leaving Israel while commercial flights are available,” the State Department said. Flights to and from Israeli and other regional airports are often halted when the risk of military action increases.
The entrance to an underground shelter at a bus station is seen in Tel Aviv, Israel, on June 21, 2025, amid fear of Iranian missile strikes during a 12-day war fought by the two countries. Ilia Yefimovich/picture alliance/Getty
U.S. special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, Mr. Trump’s son-in-law, have led the negotiations with Iran on behalf of the Trump administration, and there was no readout from them or the White House on the discussions Thursday in Geneva.
While few outside analysts see much reason for optimism, Iran — and the Omanis, who are brokering the talks aimed at averting U.S. strikes that many believe could snowball into a wider regional conflict — tried to paint Thursday’s meetings as productive.
“Regarding some issues, there is now an understanding, and on others, it’s natural that we have differences,” said Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who led his country’s delegation in Geneva. “However, there was perhaps more seriousness on both sides than before, with the aim of reaching a negotiated solution.”
“It was agreed that technical teams will start their work in Vienna on Monday to conduct technical reviews at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) with the help of its experts, in order to develop a framework for addressing some technical issues,” Araghchi said, adding that following consultations by both negotiating teams back in their respective capitals, “we will have the fourth round of negotiations next week.”
A photo shared by the Omani Foreign Ministry shows Foreign Minister Badr bin Hamad Al Busaidi (left) meeting with U.S. special envoys Steve Witkoff, center, and Jared Kushner for Omani-brokered talks on Iran’s nuclear program, in Geneva, Switzerland, Feb. 26, 2026. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Oman/Handout
Mr. Trump has said, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio has reiterated, that the president would prefer a negotiated solution to the standoff over Iran’s crippled nuclear program, which Rubio has accused Tehran of trying to rebuild in the wake of U.S. strikes in June last year that seriously damaged the country’s three primary enrichment facilities.
President Trump has not made clear whether he would accept a new agreement that curbs Iran’s nuclear program without addressing other U.S. grievances, most notably Iran’s stockpile of conventional ballistic missiles and its support for armed “proxy groups” in the region.
Vice President JD Vance told The Washington Post on Thursday that Mr. Trump was still considering military strikes “to ensure Iran isn’t going to get a nuclear weapon,” but that he also remained open to solving “the problem diplomatically.”
Vance downplayed warnings from many nations in the region, including some of America’s close partners in the Mideast, that any U.S. strike could lead to a war that draws in other nations – and one that cannot be quickly ended.
“The idea that we’re going to be in a Middle Eastern war for years with no end in sight — there is no chance that will happen,” Vance was quoted as saying by The Post.
When Mr. Trump ordered the strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities in June, joining Israel in attacking the country, Tehran responded by launching missiles at the biggest U.S. military base in the Middle East. Mr. Trump indicated that the retaliation had been telegraphed to the U.S. in advance, and the missiles were intercepted.
Iran had, 10 days earlier, fired a barrage of missiles at Israel in response to its attacks, including one that slipped through Israel’s sophisticated air defenses and landed in the heart of its capital, Tel Aviv.
While Israel inflicted serious damage on Iran’s ballistic missile capacity during the 12-day war in June, some outside observers believe Iran has restocked its arsenal and has hundreds of rockets capable of targeting Israel and American military assets in the region.
Ballistic missiles, air defense systems and unmanned aerial vehicles are displayed at Baharestan Square in Tehran as part of Iran’s “Sacred Defense Week,” in a Sept. 27, 2025 file photo. Fatemeh Bahrami/Anadolu/Getty
On Thursday, retired U.S. Army Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster, a CBS News contributor who served as national security adviser in the first Trump administration, predicted that the Trump administration would not find enough common ground with Iran’s hardline Islamic rulers to avert a new military clash.
“The ideology of the theocratic dictatorship and its permanent hostility to the United States and Israel will result in intransigence and an inability to make concessions on enrichment, the missile program, and support for terrorist organizations,” he said.
McMaster, who commanded U.S. forces in the Middle East during his career in the Army, said rather than another limited strike like June’s “Operation Midnight Hammer,” which just hit Iranian nuclear facilities, “I think that the opening campaign will be extensive, not a ‘signaling’ exercise. Iran will have very limited options to retaliate and expand the conflict due to U.S. extensive air defense, offensive counter-air, and long-range strike capabilities.”
Friday’s U.S. travel advisory update on Israel came as a long list of other countries issued similar warnings for their citizens to leave the country, and Iran.
Australia told dependents of its diplomats in Israel and neighboring Lebanon to leave those countries on Wednesday, with voluntary departures offered to dependents in the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Jordan, as well, citing the “deteriorating security situation in the region.”
India, Brazil, Singapore and at least six European nations have, since mid-January, warned their citizens against travel to Iran and urged those in the country to leave, and China’s state-run media said Friday that Chinese nationals in Iran should also evacuate.