作者: root

  • 新闻


    我们询问了科学家们,他们认为我们能从政府的不明飞行物(UFO)档案中了解到什么。以下是他们的看法。

    2026-02-24T05:00:10-0500 / https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ufo-files-released-scientists-trump/

    关于联邦政府可能掌握的有关宇宙中地外生命——甚至可能是地球上的地外生命——的信息的疑问,激发了人们的想象力、催生了阴谋论、科幻文学和大片。在特朗普总统上周呼吁公布与不明飞行物(UFO)或任何“外星及地外生命”相关的文件后,这些问题的一些答案可能终于会公之于众。

    特朗普在社交媒体上发文称,国防部长彼得·黑格塞斯(Pete Hegseth)和其他机构负责人应“开始着手识别和发布与外星及地外生命、不明空中现象(UAP)、不明飞行物(UFO)以及任何与这些高度复杂但极其有趣且重要的事项相关的政府文件”。

    这一宣布是在奥巴马前总统告诉一位询问外星人的播客主持人“它们是真实存在的,但我从未见过它们”之后。奥巴马后来澄清说,他在白宫期间从未见过证据,只是表示“从统计学角度看,宇宙如此浩瀚,存在生命的可能性很大”。特朗普告诉记者,他不确定外星人是否存在,但暗示他的前任可能指的是“机密信息”。

    随着文件的公布,美国公众可能会了解到政府是否记录了诸如去年国会一名成员公布的一段视频中显示的美国导弹击中空中一个不明发光球体并似乎弹开它之类的不明现象。

    根据一份政府报告,2023年5月至2024年6月期间,有超过750起新的不明空中现象(UAP)目击事件。尽管这些事件目前可能无法解释,但专家表示,公布这些文件的一个好处是,科学家可以通过分析数据,提供事实性解释。


    肖恩·柯克帕特里克(Sean Kirkpatrick),前美国政府UFO调查负责人

    美国国防部全域异常现象解决办公室(AARO)——该办公室负责调查不明飞行物——的首任主任肖恩·柯克帕特里克表示,那些期望在地球上看到外星生命证据的人可能会感到失望。

    “会有一些人感到不满,”他告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻(CBS News)。

    “你会看到很多人继续声称这是阴谋,他们会说存在掩盖行为,”柯克帕特里克说。他认为特朗普的命令是“政府的一种转移注意力的手段”。

    柯克帕特里克是一名物理学家,2022年7月至2023年12月1日领导AARO,其任务是调查不明飞行物和其他不明空中或异常现象。

    他发现的内容包括“空军中的恶作剧”以及他所谓的“为掩盖秘密国防项目而进行的欺骗行为”。柯克帕特里克说,他的办公室“不得不解密任何他们能解密的东西”,但并没有发现外星生命的证据。

    “在那份工作中,没有什么比发现外星技术并公之于众更能让我高兴的了,”柯克帕特里克说。“我不期望看到任何新东西。”

    柯克帕特里克认为宇宙中某个地方可能存在生命,但“外星智慧生命出现在地球上的可能性微乎其微”。

    费代丽卡·比安科(Federica Bianco),NASA研究团队成员

    特拉华大学天文与物理系副教授费代丽卡·比安科(Federica Bianco)呼应了柯克帕特里克的观点。

    “我们是宇宙中唯一的生命形式,甚至是唯一的科技文明的可能性微乎其微,”比安科说。

    比安科是NASA独立研究小组的成员,该小组负责研究不明异常现象。

    “作为一名科学家和NASA UAP小组的成员,我还没有看到任何表明我们观察到了违反物理定律、需要外星社会来访才能解释的现象,”比安科说。

    尼尔·德格拉斯·泰森(Neil deGrasse Tyson),天体物理学家

    美国自然历史博物馆罗斯地球与太空中心海登天文馆主任尼尔·德格拉斯·泰森(Neil deGrasse Tyson)表示,他将在文件中寻找:

    “一个真正的外星人。如果真的出现了,那么任何文件都不再必要。”泰森告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻。

    泰森说,这些文件可能有助于揭示“大多数仰望天空(无论白天还是夜晚)的人都不熟悉光学、气候和天文现象。在这种情况下,人们很容易将看到的东西报告为神秘的不明物体。”

    “急于得到答案的冲动驱使许多人将他们看到的东西解释为来自银河系的外星访客,”泰森说。“我称这种现象为‘我们无知的外星人’。”

    他指出,在互联网和社交媒体时代,现在很难隐藏来自异世界生物的访问。

    “每天有数十亿张照片和数百万小时的视频上传到互联网,但其中没有一张包含真正外星人的图像,”泰森说。“人们隐含的假设是,政府(不知为何)能够接触到来访的外星人,而世界上其他拥有智能手机的人却做不到。而且政府成功地在数百甚至数千人之间保守了这个秘密。在此期间,他们忘记了本杰明·富兰克林的名言:‘如果两个人死了,三个人可以保守一个秘密。’”

    泰森在其即将于5月出版的新书《带我见你的领袖:关于首次外星遭遇的思考》(Take Me To Your Leader: Perspectives on Your First Alien Encounter)中探讨了外星人抵达地球所需的条件。

    “在科学领域,怀疑是我们职业的基础,所以我们坚持证据标准,有些人将其解读为冷漠甚至否认。不要因此感到个人受到冒犯,这是这个世界上任何客观真理建立的方式,”泰森在该书序言中写道。

    雪莉·赖特(Shelly Wright),观测与实验天体物理学家

    加州大学圣地亚哥分校的观测与实验天体物理学家雪莉·赖特博士(Dr. Shelly Wright)表示,对不明异常现象和其他生命形式的科学研究往往会在人们中产生一种“咯咯笑的因素”。

    赖特也曾是NASA独立研究小组的成员,她认为围绕这一主题需要进行更多科学研究,公众对此有着浓厚的好奇心,经常有人问她:“我们是孤独的吗?”

    作为一名科学家,赖特说她一直在寻找“宇宙中的生命”,并对宇宙和我们的星系如此浩瀚感到敬畏。她指出:“其他外星生命存在的可能性很大,但这并不意味着它们就在我们附近。”

    尽管如此,她说她对文件的公布感到“兴奋”,但根据她在独立研究小组(该小组仅查看了未分类文件)的经验,她并不期望发现太多内容。

    赖特表示,她预计大部分文件会因负责记录许多UAP的军方使用的监视设备的敏感性而被大量删改。她认为公布这些信息可能会侵犯国家安全。

    然而,她补充说,政府可能会解密几十年前的安全和监视文件,让科学家利用当时尚未出现的新技术来研究这些材料。她说,这一决定既能保护国家安全,又能让科学家更深入地了解监视设备所捕捉到的内容。

    扬娜·莱文(Janna Levin),物理与天文学教授

    宇宙浩瀚无垠,包含无数其他行星,但在太阳系中,科学家们长期以来一直确定地球是唯一充满生命的行星。

    哥伦比亚大学巴纳德学院的物理与天文学教授、CBS新闻撰稿人扬娜·莱文博士表示,即使我们对宇宙了解得更多,“生命似乎仍然很罕见”。这就是为什么天文学家对这些公布的文件可能包含线索的前景感到“非常兴奋”。

    她说,天文学家并不是真的在寻找20世纪科幻作品中那种小绿人,而是对可能存在的微生物证据感到兴奋。这些微小的粒子是天文学家寻找的目标,因为微生物是地球上生命起源的关键。“让我们先从生命的起源说起,”她说。

    莱文认为,来自其他行星的微生物可能通过一个坠入地球的自然物体被带到这里。

    她表示,她希望对文件中可能存在的内容持“开放态度”。

    “如果文件中有任何内容,那将非常令人兴奋,”莱文说。但她警告说:“如果有关于其他文明实际技术的声称——科学上没有人会真正期望看到这些。我认为如果你期望看到这些,你会失望的。”

    阿维·勒布(Avi Loeb),理论物理学家

    哈佛大学理论物理学家、异常现象研究的杰出学者阿维·勒布表示,关键是要从已知的物理学角度研究这些文件。

    勒布告诉哥伦比亚广播公司新闻,他上周与国会成员进行了交谈,并告诉他们,他希望他们在审查文件时能咨询像他这样的科学家。他说,在大多数不明现象案例中,“一些平凡的事物可能就能解释这些数据”。

    他指出,去年夏天国会播放的一段视频显示,一枚导弹被发射向也门海岸附近一名国会议员称为“球体”的物体。

    勒布说,当他检查这段视频时,他得出结论,这有一个简单的解释。

    “我说,‘不,这并不异常,它只是一个无人机,’”勒布回忆道。

    当勒布有机会检查这些文件时,他将寻找无法解释的现象。

    “在数百起事件中,可能有几起确实异常,而这正是我要寻找的,”他说。

    勒布认为,检查每一个看似异常的数据都有一个“根本问题”:“我们看到的这些物体是否在人类的基本能力范围内运行?”

    如果不是,他会感兴趣。他说,一个似乎违背物理规律的物体可能是外星的。

    勒布领导着“伽利略项目”(Galileo Project),该项目致力于寻找地球附近外星文明的遗迹。他曾写道,为什么目前大部分机密材料可能对他没有吸引力:有些信息可能被隐瞒是为了避免向敌对国家暴露先进的军事传感器和系统,或者因为官员认为某些不明物体是由这些敌对国家制造的。

    “我对地球上人类制造的技术不感兴趣。地球技术的历史不吸引我,”勒布写道。“我更好奇的是,是否存在一个更先进的文明存在于星际空间中。”

    We asked scientists what they think we’ll learn from the government’s UFO files. Here’s what they said.

    2026-02-24T05:00:10-0500 / https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ufo-files-released-scientists-trump/

    Questions about what the federal government may know about extraterrestrial life in the cosmos — or possibly even here on Earth — have inspired imaginations, conspiracy theories, sci-fi literature and blockbuster films. Answers to some of those questions could finally become public after President Trump’s call last week for the release of files related to UFOs or any “alien and extraterrestrial life.”

    Mr. Trump posted on social media that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and other agency heads should “begin the process of identifying and releasing Government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life, unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), and unidentified flying objects (UFOs), and any other information connected to these highly complex, but extremely interesting and important, matters.”

    His announcement came after former President Obama told a podcaster who asked about aliens, “They’re real, but I haven’t seen them.” He later clarified that he never saw evidence during his time in the White House and just meant that “statistically, the universe is so vast that the odds are good there’s life out there.” Mr. Trump told reporters he isn’t sure if aliens exist but suggested his predecessor may have been referring to “classified information.”

    With the release, the American public could learn what, if anything, the government has documented about the unexplained sightings, such as one seen in a video made public last year by a member of Congress showing a U.S. missile striking an unidentified glowing orb in the sky and appearing to bounce off it.

    There were more than 750 new UAP sightings between May 2023 and June 2024, according to a government report. While these instances may currently be unexplained, experts said one benefit of releasing the files may be that scientists, analyzing the data, can help provide factual explanations.

    Sean Kirkpatrick, former top government UFO investigator


    Sean Kirkpatrick, the first director of the U.S. Department of Defense’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), which investigates unidentified flying objects, says people expecting to see evidence of alien life here on Earth may be disappointed.

    “There are going to be unsatisfied people,” he told CBS News.

    “You’re going to have a bunch of people who are going to continue to cry conspiracy, they’re going to say there’s a cover-up,” Kirkpatrick said. He views Mr. Trump’s order as a “distraction for the administration.”

    Kirkpatrick, a physicist who led AARO from July 2022 to Dec. 1, 2023, was tasked with investigating unidentified flying objects and other unidentified aerial or anomalous phenomena.

    What he found ranged from “hazing” in the Air Force to what he called “deceptions” designed to hide secret defense programs.Kirkpatrick said his office “had to stand up anything they could declassify,” but proof of extraterrestrial life wasn’t there.

    “Nothing would have made me happier in that job but to have discovered alien technology and rolled it out,” said Kirkpatrick. “I don’t expect to see anything new.”

    Kirkpatrick believes there’s likely life out in the universe somewhere, but “the probability that extraterrestrial intelligent life is here is little to none.”

    Federica Bianco, NASA study team


    Federica Bianco, an associate professor at the University of Delaware’s astronomy and physics department, echoed Kirkpatrick’s perspective.

    “The probability that we are the only life form or even the only technical society in the universe is negligibly small,” Bianco said.

    Bianco was part of NASA’s independent team studying unidentified anomalous phenomena.

    “As a scientist and a member of the NASA UAP panel, I haven’t seen anything that indicates that we have observed phenomena that violate the laws of physics and require an alien society visiting us to be explained,” Bianco said.

    Neil deGrasse Tyson, astrophysicist


    Neil deGrasse Tyson, the director of the Hayden Planetarium at the American Museum of Natural History’s Rose Center for Earth and Space, knows what he’ll look for in the files:

    “An actual alien. If one is presented, then no documents are necessary at all,” Tyson told CBS News.

    Tyson said the files may help illuminate “that most people who look at the sky (day or night) are unfamiliar with optical, climactic, and astronomical phenomena. When that’s the case, a person is prone to report mysterious and unidentified objects.”

    “The urge to have immediate answers drives many people to explain what they see as visiting space aliens from across the galaxy,” Tyson said. “I call this, ‘aliens of our ignorance.’”

    He noted that in the age of the internet and social media, it would be hard now to hide a visit from otherworldly creatures.

    “Billions of photos and a million hours of video are uploaded daily to the internet, and none of them contain images of actual aliens,” Tyson said. “The implicit assumption is that the government (somehow) has access to visiting aliens that no one else in the world with a smart phone has. And that the government has successfully kept it a secret among hundreds and possibly thousands of people. All the while, forgetting Benjamin Franklin’s edict, ‘Three people can keep a secret if two of them are dead.’”

    Tyson wrote about what it would take for aliens to reach Earth in his upcoming book, “Take Me To Your Leader: Perspectives on Your First Alien Encounter.”

    “In science, skepticism is foundational to our profession, so we uphold standards of evidence that some interpret as disinterest or even denial. Don’t take it personally, it’s how any and all objective truths have ever been established in this world,” Tyson writes in the prologue to the book, which is scheduled for publication in May.

    Shelly Wright, observational and experimental astrophysicist


    Dr. Shelly Wright, an observational and experimental astrophysicist at the University of California San Diego, said scientific inquiry into unidentified anomalous phenomena and other life forms often creates a “giggle factor” among people.

    Wright, who also served on NASA’s independent study team, said she believes there needs to be more scientific inquiry around this topic and the public has a deep curiosity to know more. She said often people ask her, “Are we alone out here?”

    As a scientist, Wright said she is always looking for “life in the universe” and is humbled by how big the universe and our galaxy is. She noted, “The possibility of other alien life existing is likely, but it doesn’t mean it’s near us.”

    Regardless, she said she’s “excited” for the document release but doesn’t expect to find much after her experience on the independent study team, which only viewed unclassified documents.

    Wright said she expects most of the documents to be heavily redacted due to the sensitivity of the surveillance equipment used by the military responsible for sighting many of the UAPs. She said that releasing information could encroach on national security.

    However, she added that the administration could declassify security and surveillance documents from decades ago, allowing scientists to study the material with new technologies that weren’t available when the data was originally collected. This decision, she said, could protect national security and allow scientists to understand more about what was captured by surveillance.

    Janna Levin, professor of physics and astronomy


    The universe is vast and contains countless other planets, but in our solar system, scientists have long determined Earth is the only planet teeming with life.

    CBS News contributor Dr. Janna Levin, a professor of physics and astronomy at Barnard College of Columbia University, said that even as we learn more about the universe, “life still seems rare.” That’s why astronomers are “very excited” about the prospect that the released documents may hold clues.

    She said astronomers aren’t really looking for the little green men of 20th-century sci-fi, but instead are excited about potential evidence of microbes. These are the tiny particles astronomers are looking for because microbes were responsible for starting life on Earth. “Let’s just get life started,” she said.

    Levin said it’s possible microbes from other planets might have been carried here via a natural object that plunged to Earth.

    She said she’d like to keep “an open mind” about what might be in the documents.

    “If there is anything in them, it would be really thrilling,” Levin said. But she cautioned: “If there are claims of actual technologies from other civilizations — I don’t think anyone is actually expecting that, scientifically. I think if you’re expecting that, you’re going to be disappointed.”

    Avi Loeb, theoretical physicist


    Harvard theoretical physicist Avi Loeb, a prominent researcher of anomalous phenomena, said the key is to study the documents from the vantage of known physics.

    Loeb told CBS News that he spoke with members of Congress last week and told them he hopes they’ll look to scientists like himself when they examine the files. He said that in most instances of unidentified phenomena, “something mundane might explain the data.”

    He pointed to footage aired before Congress last summer that purported to show a missile being fired at what a congressman referred to as an “orb” off the coast of Yemen in 2024.

    Loeb said when he examined the footage, he concluded there was a simple explanation.

    “I said, ‘No, it’s not anomalous, it was just a drone,” Loeb recalled.

    When Loeb gets the chance to examine the files, he’ll be searching for the unexplainable.

    “There might well be a few incidents out of hundreds that would really be anomalous, and that’s what I’m looking for,” he said.

    Loeb said there’s a “fundamental question” to examining each incident with seeming anomalous data: “Are the objects we see as anomalous operating under the fundamental abilities of humans?”

    If not, he’s intrigued. An object that appears to defy physics could be extraterrestrial, he said.

    Loeb leads the Galileo Project, which searches for artifacts from extraterrestrial civilizations near Earth. He has written about why much of the currently classified material may be of no interest to him: Some information may have been kept from the public to avoid exposing sophisticated military sensors and systems to adversarial nations, or because officials believe certain unidentified objects were manufactured by those adversaries.

    “I am not interested in technologies manufactured by humans on Earth. The history of terrestrial technology does not interest me,” Loeb wrote. “I am far more curious about whether a more advanced civilization exists in interstellar space.”

  • 克宫:西方国家干预冲突 演变成更大规模对抗


    2026年2月24日 19:38 / 联合早报

    克里姆林宫发言人佩斯科夫说,俄罗斯尚未实现在乌克兰的所有战争目标,并将继续战斗直至达成目标。 (路透社档案照片)

    克里姆林宫指出,西方国家决定干预乌克兰冲突,意味着这场冲突已演变成一场更大规模的对抗。

    路透社报道,克里姆林宫发言人佩斯科夫星期二(2月24日)说:“在西欧国家和美国直接干预这场冲突后,这场特殊的军事行动实际上演变成俄罗斯与西方国家之间规模更大的对抗,而西方国家过去和现在都怀有摧毁我们国家的目标。”

    在俄罗斯入侵乌克兰四周年之际,佩斯科夫说,俄罗斯尚未实现在乌克兰的所有战争目标,并将继续战斗直至达成目标。

    当被问及莫斯科是否认为可以通过谈判解决冲突时,佩斯科夫说:“我们正在继续努力实现和平,我们的立场非常明确和一贯。现在一切都取决于基辅政权的行动。”

    佩斯科夫说,由于下一轮与乌克兰的谈判尚未最终确定,他无法透露谈判的具体时间和地点。“我们衷心希望这项工作能够继续下去。”

    另据法新社对战争研究所(ISW)数据的分析,俄罗斯军队在乌克兰战争第四年占领的领土,超过前两年总和。

    自2025年2月24日以来,莫斯科军队已占领4524平方公里的土地,超过战争第二年和第三年所占领领土的总和。

    这一数据来自战争研究所,该研究所与美国企业研究所(AEI)旗下的“关键威胁项目”合作,后者是另一家专门研究冲突问题的美国智库。

    克宫:西方国家干预冲突 演变成更大规模对抗

    2026年2月24日 19:38 / 联合早报

    克里姆林宫发言人佩斯科夫说,俄罗斯尚未实现在乌克兰的所有战争目标,并将继续战斗直至达成目标。 (路透社档案照片)

    克里姆林宫指出,西方国家决定干预乌克兰冲突,意味着这场冲突已演变成一场更大规模的对抗。

    路透社报道,克里姆林宫发言人佩斯科夫星期二(2月24日)说:“在西欧国家和美国直接干预这场冲突后,这场特殊的军事行动实际上演变成俄罗斯与西方国家之间规模更大的对抗,而西方国家过去和现在都怀有摧毁我们国家的目标。”

    在俄罗斯入侵乌克兰四周年之际,佩斯科夫说,俄罗斯尚未实现在乌克兰的所有战争目标,并将继续战斗直至达成目标。

    当被问及莫斯科是否认为可以通过谈判解决冲突时,佩斯科夫说:“我们正在继续努力实现和平,我们的立场非常明确和一贯。现在一切都取决于基辅政权的行动。”

    佩斯科夫说,由于下一轮与乌克兰的谈判尚未最终确定,他无法透露谈判的具体时间和地点。“我们衷心希望这项工作能够继续下去。”

    另据法新社对战争研究所(ISW)数据的分析,俄罗斯军队在乌克兰战争第四年占领的领土,超过前两年总和。

    自2025年2月24日以来,莫斯科军队已占领4524平方公里的土地,超过战争第二年和第三年所占领领土的总和。

    这一数据来自战争研究所,该研究所与美国企业研究所(AEI)旗下的“关键威胁项目”合作,后者是另一家专门研究冲突问题的美国智库。

  • 克宫:西方国家干预冲突 演变成更大规模对抗


    发布时间 / 来源:2026年2月24日 19:38 / 联合早报

    克里姆林宫发言人佩斯科夫说,俄罗斯尚未实现在乌克兰的所有战争目标,并将继续战斗直至达成目标。 (路透社档案照片)

    克里姆林宫指出,西方国家决定干预乌克兰冲突,意味着这场冲突已演变成一场更大规模的对抗。

    路透社报道,克里姆林宫发言人佩斯科夫星期二(2月24日)说:“在西欧国家和美国直接干预这场冲突后,这场特殊的军事行动实际上演变成俄罗斯与西方国家之间规模更大的对抗,而西方国家过去和现在都怀有摧毁我们国家的目标。”

    在俄罗斯入侵乌克兰四周年之际,佩斯科夫说,俄罗斯尚未实现在乌克兰的所有战争目标,并将继续战斗直至达成目标。

    当被问及莫斯科是否认为可以通过谈判解决冲突时,佩斯科夫说:“我们正在继续努力实现和平,我们的立场非常明确和一贯。现在一切都取决于基辅政权的行动。”

    佩斯科夫说,由于下一轮与乌克兰的谈判尚未最终确定,他无法透露谈判的具体时间和地点。“我们衷心希望这项工作能够继续下去。”

    另据法新社对战争研究所(ISW)数据的分析,俄罗斯军队在乌克兰战争第四年占领的领土,超过前两年总和。

    自2025年2月24日以来,莫斯科军队已占领4524平方公里的土地,超过战争第二年和第三年所占领领土的总和。

    这一数据来自战争研究所,该研究所与美国企业研究所(AEI)旗下的“关键威胁项目”合作,后者是另一家专门研究冲突问题的美国智库。

    克宫:西方国家干预冲突 演变成更大规模对抗

    发布时间 / 来源:2026年2月24日 19:38 / 联合早报

    克里姆林宫发言人佩斯科夫说,俄罗斯尚未实现在乌克兰的所有战争目标,并将继续战斗直至达成目标。 (路透社档案照片)

    克里姆林宫指出,西方国家决定干预乌克兰冲突,意味着这场冲突已演变成一场更大规模的对抗。

    路透社报道,克里姆林宫发言人佩斯科夫星期二(2月24日)说:“在西欧国家和美国直接干预这场冲突后,这场特殊的军事行动实际上演变成俄罗斯与西方国家之间规模更大的对抗,而西方国家过去和现在都怀有摧毁我们国家的目标。”

    在俄罗斯入侵乌克兰四周年之际,佩斯科夫说,俄罗斯尚未实现在乌克兰的所有战争目标,并将继续战斗直至达成目标。

    当被问及莫斯科是否认为可以通过谈判解决冲突时,佩斯科夫说:“我们正在继续努力实现和平,我们的立场非常明确和一贯。现在一切都取决于基辅政权的行动。”

    佩斯科夫说,由于下一轮与乌克兰的谈判尚未最终确定,他无法透露谈判的具体时间和地点。“我们衷心希望这项工作能够继续下去。”

    另据法新社对战争研究所(ISW)数据的分析,俄罗斯军队在乌克兰战争第四年占领的领土,超过前两年总和。

    自2025年2月24日以来,莫斯科军队已占领4524平方公里的土地,超过战争第二年和第三年所占领领土的总和。

    这一数据来自战争研究所,该研究所与美国企业研究所(AEI)旗下的“关键威胁项目”合作,后者是另一家专门研究冲突问题的美国智库。

  • 北京称中国军队有效应对处置美战机在黄海空域活动 | 联合早报


    发布/2026年2月24日 17:23

    针对有报道指驻韩美军战机曾在黄海空域进行的演训中与中国战机形成对峙,但未发生冲突,中国外交部回应称,中国军队有效应对处置美战机在黄海空域的活动。

    中国外交部发言人毛宁星期二(2月24日)在例行记者会上应询时说,针对美国军机近日在黄海有关空域的活动,中国军队依法依规全程跟监警戒,有效应对处置。

    韩联社上星期五(20日)引述韩国军方消息人士报道,隶属驻韩美军的10余架F-16战机上星期三(18日)进行单独训练。

    这些战机当天从韩国京畿道平泽市的乌山基地起飞,在黄海国际水域上空飞行,进入韩国防空识别区(KADIZ)与中国防空识别区(CADIZ)之间、双方识别区未重叠的区域。

    报道称,当驻韩美军战机接近中国防识区,中国空军也出动战机,双方一度对峙,但均未进入对方的防空识别区。

    防空识别区不同于一国领空,而是要求接近该区域的飞行器进行身份识别的空域。

    中国《环球时报》上星期五也引述消息人士报道,称近日“美军组织军机赴黄海我当面空域活动,中国人民解放军依法依规组织海空兵力全程跟监警戒、有效应对处置”。报道未披露更多信息。

    北京称中国军队有效应对处置美战机在黄海空域活动 | 联合早报

    发布/2026年2月24日 17:23

    针对有报道指驻韩美军战机曾在黄海空域进行的演训中与中国战机形成对峙,但未发生冲突,中国外交部回应称,中国军队有效应对处置美战机在黄海空域的活动。

    中国外交部发言人毛宁星期二(2月24日)在例行记者会上应询时说,针对美国军机近日在黄海有关空域的活动,中国军队依法依规全程跟监警戒,有效应对处置。

    韩联社上星期五(20日)引述韩国军方消息人士报道,隶属驻韩美军的10余架F-16战机上星期三(18日)进行单独训练。

    这些战机当天从韩国京畿道平泽市的乌山基地起飞,在黄海国际水域上空飞行,进入韩国防空识别区(KADIZ)与中国防空识别区(CADIZ)之间、双方识别区未重叠的区域。

    报道称,当驻韩美军战机接近中国防识区,中国空军也出动战机,双方一度对峙,但均未进入对方的防空识别区。

    防空识别区不同于一国领空,而是要求接近该区域的飞行器进行身份识别的空域。

    中国《环球时报》上星期五也引述消息人士报道,称近日“美军组织军机赴黄海我当面空域活动,中国人民解放军依法依规组织海空兵力全程跟监警戒、有效应对处置”。报道未披露更多信息。

  • 特朗普否认军方反对军事打击 称美国可轻易击败伊朗 | 联合早报


    发布/2026年2月24日 19:43

    美国海军福特号航空母舰周一抵达希腊克里特岛苏达湾,这里是北约的战略基地,据悉福特号将在停留数日进行补给后续程前往中东。 (路透社)

    (华盛顿综合电)美国总统特朗普否认美军最高将领反对打击伊朗,并称美国可在任何战争中轻松击败德黑兰。伊朗则再次警告,美国袭击伊朗将引发大规模区域冲突。

    特朗普星期一(2月23日)在社交媒体上说,“假新闻媒体”有关美军参谋长联席会议主席凯恩反对军事打击伊朗的报道完全错误。他写道:“凯恩和我们所有人一样不希望看到战争,但如果美国决定在军事层面对伊朗采取行动,他认为美国将能轻松赢得这场战争。”

    据美国媒体报道,凯恩一直在告诫特朗普,对伊朗发动大规模军事行动可能给美国带来重大风险,包括陷入长期冲突。但特朗普说:“他(凯恩)没有说过不要对伊朗采取行动……他只知道一件事,那就是如何取胜。”

    《华盛顿邮报》较早时报道,凯恩向白宫和五角大楼表达了担忧,认为弹药不足与缺乏盟军支援可能会增加美军面临的危险。

    《华尔街日报》也报道,凯恩和其他五角大楼官员警告,对伊朗发动袭击可能会导致美军与盟军人员伤亡,美军防空力量也将面临耗尽的风险。如果美军因此消耗大量防空弹药和其他供应有限的物资,可能会影响美国应对未来与中国潜在冲突的准备工作。

    新闻网站Axios的报道则说,凯恩担心美国可能会陷入旷日持久的冲突。报道还说,特朗普的特使威特科夫与女婿库什纳也劝说特朗普暂缓袭击伊朗,让美伊有机会通过外交途径解决问题。

    特朗普说,所有这些有关美伊可能爆发战争的报道都是错误的,且是蓄意而为。他强调:“决定将由我做出。我倾向于达成协议,但如果无法达成,那对伊朗来说将是很糟糕的一天。”

    特朗普去年下令对伊朗核设施发动袭击,并在近期多次威胁要采取进一步军事行动,以迫使伊朗就核问题与美国达成协议。

    美国在继续与伊朗谈判的同时,也向中东派遣了包括两艘航母在内的大量军力。下一轮美伊间接谈判将于周四(26日)在瑞士日内瓦举行。

    伊朗副外长加里巴巴迪周一在联合国人权理事会会议上说,美伊会谈的恢复是一个“新的契机”,但他同时警告,如果伊朗遭到攻击,整个中东地区都会受到波及。他说:“任何新侵略行为造成的后果都不会局限于单一国家,发起或支持这类行为者将承担责任。”

    伊朗外交部同日表明,美国的任何袭击,包括有限打击都将被视为侵略行为,伊朗将依据固有的自卫权,对侵略行为做出强烈回应。

    随着中东局势持续升温,美国已下令驻黎巴嫩大使馆的非紧急人员撤离。彭博社引述美国国务院匿名官员的话说,美国是在评估地区安全环境后决定缩减驻地规模,只保留必要人员。

    这名官员说,这项措施是暂时的,目前美国驻黎巴使馆仍照常运作。

    瑞典、塞尔维亚、波兰、澳大利亚和印度等国也呼吁本国公民离开伊朗。

    特朗普否认军方反对军事打击 称美国可轻易击败伊朗 | 联合早报

    发布/2026年2月24日 19:43

    美国海军福特号航空母舰周一抵达希腊克里特岛苏达湾,这里是北约的战略基地,据悉福特号将在停留数日进行补给后续程前往中东。 (路透社)

    (华盛顿综合电)美国总统特朗普否认美军最高将领反对打击伊朗,并称美国可在任何战争中轻松击败德黑兰。伊朗则再次警告,美国袭击伊朗将引发大规模区域冲突。

    特朗普星期一(2月23日)在社交媒体上说,“假新闻媒体”有关美军参谋长联席会议主席凯恩反对军事打击伊朗的报道完全错误。他写道:“凯恩和我们所有人一样不希望看到战争,但如果美国决定在军事层面对伊朗采取行动,他认为美国将能轻松赢得这场战争。”

    据美国媒体报道,凯恩一直在告诫特朗普,对伊朗发动大规模军事行动可能给美国带来重大风险,包括陷入长期冲突。但特朗普说:“他(凯恩)没有说过不要对伊朗采取行动……他只知道一件事,那就是如何取胜。”

    《华盛顿邮报》较早时报道,凯恩向白宫和五角大楼表达了担忧,认为弹药不足与缺乏盟军支援可能会增加美军面临的危险。

    《华尔街日报》也报道,凯恩和其他五角大楼官员警告,对伊朗发动袭击可能会导致美军与盟军人员伤亡,美军防空力量也将面临耗尽的风险。如果美军因此消耗大量防空弹药和其他供应有限的物资,可能会影响美国应对未来与中国潜在冲突的准备工作。

    新闻网站Axios的报道则说,凯恩担心美国可能会陷入旷日持久的冲突。报道还说,特朗普的特使威特科夫与女婿库什纳也劝说特朗普暂缓袭击伊朗,让美伊有机会通过外交途径解决问题。

    特朗普说,所有这些有关美伊可能爆发战争的报道都是错误的,且是蓄意而为。他强调:“决定将由我做出。我倾向于达成协议,但如果无法达成,那对伊朗来说将是很糟糕的一天。”

    特朗普去年下令对伊朗核设施发动袭击,并在近期多次威胁要采取进一步军事行动,以迫使伊朗就核问题与美国达成协议。

    美国在继续与伊朗谈判的同时,也向中东派遣了包括两艘航母在内的大量军力。下一轮美伊间接谈判将于周四(26日)在瑞士日内瓦举行。

    伊朗副外长加里巴巴迪周一在联合国人权理事会会议上说,美伊会谈的恢复是一个“新的契机”,但他同时警告,如果伊朗遭到攻击,整个中东地区都会受到波及。他说:“任何新侵略行为造成的后果都不会局限于单一国家,发起或支持这类行为者将承担责任。”

    伊朗外交部同日表明,美国的任何袭击,包括有限打击都将被视为侵略行为,伊朗将依据固有的自卫权,对侵略行为做出强烈回应。

    随着中东局势持续升温,美国已下令驻黎巴嫩大使馆的非紧急人员撤离。彭博社引述美国国务院匿名官员的话说,美国是在评估地区安全环境后决定缩减驻地规模,只保留必要人员。

    这名官员说,这项措施是暂时的,目前美国驻黎巴使馆仍照常运作。

    瑞典、塞尔维亚、波兰、澳大利亚和印度等国也呼吁本国公民离开伊朗。

  • 特朗普备战国情咨文之际,众议院共和党人显露不满迹象


    2026-02-24T06:00:10-0500 / CBS新闻

    华盛顿—— 周二晚上,当总统特朗普前往国会大厦,在参众两院联席会议上发表国情咨文时,他将在一系列不同政策问题上受到党内共和党同僚的热烈掌声。

    但这种欢迎背后,掩盖着部分共和党议员的不满情绪,近几个月来,他们越来越愿意与总统唱反调。

    众议院共和党人在关税、战争权力和爱泼斯坦档案等问题上的投票中批评了特朗普。随着议员们自身的连任希望开始与白宫推行的一些不受欢迎的政策产生冲突,随着中期选举临近,共和党叛逃者的数量可能会增加。

    布鲁金斯学会治理研究高级研究员伊莱恩·卡马克表示:”他迟早会成为跛脚鸭,通常是在中期选举之后。”

    “糖效”消退后


    这种动态与一年前形成对比。当时,特朗普在重返白宫后向参众两院联席会议发表讲话,共和党各派系均吹捧”共和党使命”和党内高度团结。

    乔治·华盛顿大学政治管理项目主任托德·贝尔特表示,当时共和党”正乘着总统选举胜利和重返白宫后一系列行政命令的浪潮”,党内出现了一种”糖效”(短期兴奋)。

    他说:”现在情况不同了,因为我们已经执政一年,你看到一些美国优先运动(MAGA)支持者感到不满,他们认为唐纳德·特朗普把太多注意力放在了美国以外的地方。”

    贝尔特指出,一些总统支持者对政府的经济和移民议程感到不满,认为这些政策违反了宪法原则的”核心准则”,这促使一些议员”在这些投票中表达自己的声音”。

    “有时候这些投票不会产生影响,这让投反对票更容易被视为抗议,”贝尔特说,”但对一些人来说,他们看到总统民调数字下滑,因此更容易公开反对他。”

    最新的众议院共和党人批评总统事件发生在6名共和党人加入民主党,投票撤销对加拿大的关税时。共和党领袖试图阻止该投票推进。特朗普承诺,共和党人”将在选举时严重承受后果”。

    上周最高法院宣布特朗普多项关税无效后,特朗普兑现威胁,撤回对6名叛逃共和党人之一、科罗拉多州众议员杰夫·赫德的支持,并支持其对手。特朗普指责赫德是”少数让我和国家失望的立法者之一”。

    1月份,特朗普差点面临另一项不信任投票。两名共和党人支持民主党人提出的决议,阻止美国在捕获前委内瑞拉总统马杜罗后向委内瑞拉派遣军队。预计议员们将在未来几天就战争权力决议再次投票,这次针对伊朗。

    但对特朗普来说,最尴尬的失败是迫使司法部公布所有与性犯罪者杰弗里·爱泼斯坦相关的文件。特朗普一直强烈反对,直到最后一刻。四名共和党人推动就此事进行投票,除一人外,所有共和党议员最终都投票支持公布文件。这一事件也成为总统与佐治亚州众议员玛乔丽·泰勒·格林关系破裂的导火索——格林曾是总统在国会最激烈的盟友之一,后来成为直言不讳的批评者,现在是最新一位宣布退休的议员。

    前众议院议长约翰·博纳和保罗·瑞安助手迈克·里奇表示,总统任期第二年出现”一些躁动不安”是正常的。

    “你冲刺了一年,尽可能完成了工作,然后面临中期选举,这完全是对总统和政策的公投。在经济焦虑时期,这更加复杂,”里奇告诉CBS新闻。

    里奇补充说,议员们”越来越多地展望未来,思考没有特朗普的生活可能是什么样子。”

    “有些人可能不想卷入其中,有些人可能想站在前线。但议员们开始面对这种情况:对总统的忠诚和自身长期政治定位开始出现冲突,”他说。

    挑战”恐吓因素”


    尽管特朗普的一些优先事项在共和党内部都不受欢迎,但近几周只有少数共和党人愿意主动反对总统。美国企业研究所(AEI)研究国会失灵的菲利普·沃拉赫将党内多数人对总统的忠诚归因于”恐吓因素”。

    “大多数议员仍感到强烈压力要保持一致,尤其是在初选之前,”沃拉赫告诉CBS新闻,”近年来,没有哪个总统的政党像这样完全围绕对总统个人领导的服从组织起来。”

    已经在某些问题上与特朗普疏远的人”与他的关系中没什么可失去的”,沃拉赫说。

    事实上,对于一些共和党叛逃者来说,由于他们决定不再寻求连任,这种计算变得更容易。在支持关税决议的共和党人中,华盛顿州众议员丹·纽豪斯和内布拉斯加州众议员唐·培根已宣布退休。加州众议员凯文·凯利(其席位因加州重新划分而受到威胁)尚未宣布计划。

    当被问及特朗普是否正在失去对众议院共和党人的控制力时,培根表示:”我不这么认为。”

    但培根在反对总统时毫不畏惧,称威胁不会吓倒他。

    “你必须坚持正确的立场,不管你的政党领导层怎么说,”培根告诉CBS新闻,”如果你威胁我,我往往会坚持自己的立场。”

    私下里,培根表示,共和党同僚批评特朗普的关税和对乌克兰战争的处理,但他们犹豫于公开反对总统。

    “我发现,在一些领域,他要求我们做违背常识或传统保守价值观的事情,”培根谈到与总统分歧时说。

    培根最近还联合发起了一项限制总统赦免权的宪法修正案,称”赦免权已被滥用”。

    还有肯塔基州共和党众议员托马斯·马西,他一直是反抗特朗普的主要煽动者。

    马西与加利福尼亚州民主党众议员罗·科哈尼合作,推动就爱泼斯坦档案进行投票,这在过去一年中一直是特朗普政府的一大难题。上周,马西宣布再次与科哈尼合作,推动就战争权力决议进行投票,要求总统在对伊朗采取军事行动前获得国会授权。

    这位肯塔基州共和党人的频繁叛逃招致总统多次不满,并引发了特朗普支持的初选挑战。他反对立法的倾向意味着共和党领袖(以及特朗普)几乎无法容忍其他反对声音。

    众议院共和党人以一票优势接近中期选举


    路易斯安那州共和党人、众议院议长迈克·约翰逊仅以一票优势领导党内,这让他保持党内团结的容错空间极小。下个月将举行特别选举填补格林的空缺,8月将举行填补加州共和党议员道格·拉马尔法(1月去世)的空缺,这两个席位预计仍将由共和党掌控。

    但民主党可能在4月的特别选举中再获一个席位,填补新泽西州州长米基·谢里尔留下的空缺,使共和党优势岌岌可危。

    共和党人的主要焦点是在11月选举后保持众议院控制权。传统政治智慧认为,执政党的国会下议院通常在中期选举中失去席位。

    卡马克表示,对特朗普及其政党而言,”现在是时候削减损失了。”

    “民主党会大胜(如30个席位),还是只获得5-10个席位?这取决于政府的具体行动。他们在移民问题上做出了正确的退缩,但在经济政策上没有看到正确举措。”

    如果共和党失去众议院控制权,总统的立法议程可能停滞,其任期最后两年可能被民主党新多数派发起的调查和传票淹没。

    处于少数派的前景意味着脆弱的共和党人可能更倾向于在未来几个月批评总统。共和党初选后,议员们将目光投向没有初选威胁的大选,可能出现更多叛逃。

    周二国情咨文演讲后,反对总统的空间可能进一步扩大。

    贝尔特说:”你不会想在国情咨文前就把总统推出去,之后情况会更棘手。”

    As Trump gears up for State of the Union, hints of frustration begin to emerge among House GOP

    2026-02-24T06:00:10-0500 / CBS News

    Washington — When President Trump heads to the Capitol to deliver his State of the Union address before a joint session of Congress on Tuesday night, he will be greeted by raucous applause from his fellow Republicans on a host of different policy matters.

    But that reception will mask signs of discontent among some GOP lawmakers, who have become more willing to cross the president in recent months.

    House Republicans have rebuked Mr. Trump in votes on tariffs, war powers and the Epstein files. And with members’ own reelection hopes beginning to clash with some politically unpopular policies coming from the White House, the number of Republicans defectors could grow as the midterm elections approach.

    “He was bound to be a lame duck at some time,” said Elaine Kamarck, a senior fellow in Governance Studies at Brookings. “Now, usually it happens after the midterms.”

    After the “sugar high”


    The dynamic is a shift from a year ago, when Mr. Trump addressed a joint session of Congress on the heels of his return to the White House. Republicans from all factions of the conference touted a GOP mandate — and a deep sense of unity.

    At the time, the GOP was “riding the wave” of the president’s electoral victory and a slew of executive orders he ordered once back in office, said Todd Belt, the director of the political management program at George Washington University. He said there was a “sugar high” among the GOP conference in the early days of Mr. Trump’s term.

    President Trump addresses a joint session of Congress as Vice President JD Vance and House Speaker Mike Johnson listen in the Capitol building’s House chamber on March 4, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

    “It’s different now because we’ve had a year in and you’re seeing a break with some of the America-firsters in the MAGA movement, who have been frustrated with the fact that Donald Trump has been focusing a lot of his attention on other places than the United States,” he said.

    Belt noted that some of the president’s supporters have been put off by aspects of the administration’s economic and immigration agendas, and what they see as violation of “core precepts” of constitutional principles in both areas. That has prompted some members to “exert their voices in some of these votes.”

    “Sometimes those votes won’t make a difference, and it makes it easier to cast that vote as a little bit of a protest vote,” Belt said. “But for some of them, they’re seeing a weakened president in terms of his poll numbers, so it’s easier for them to speak out against him.”

    The latest House GOP rebuke of the president came when six Republicans joined Democrats in voting to rescind the president’s tariffs against Canada. GOP leaders tried to prevent the vote from moving forward. Mr. Trump pledged that Republicans would “seriously suffer the consequences come Election time.”

    After the Supreme Court invalidated many of Mr. Trump’s tariffs last week, Mr. Trump followed through on his threat. The president withdrew his support from one of the six GOP defectors, Rep. Jeff Hurd of Colorado, and endorsed his opponent. The president derided Hurd as “one of a small number of Legislators who have let me and our Country down.”

    Mr. Trump nearly suffered another vote of disapproval in January when two Republicans supported a Democrat-led resolution to block the president from putting troops in Venezuela after the U.S. captured former Venezuela President Nicolás Maduro. Lawmakers are expected to force another vote on a war powers resolution in the coming days, this time involving Iran.

    But arguably the most embarrassing defeat for Mr. Trump came in the effort to force the Justice Department to release all the files related to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a push that Mr. Trump strongly opposed until the last minute. Four Republicans helped force a floor vote on the issue, and all but one GOP lawmaker ultimately voted for the files’ release. The episode was also at the center of a public falling out between the president and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, once one of the president’s fiercest allies in Congress, who became a vocal detractor — and then the latest member to retire.

    Mike Ricci, a former aide to House speakers John Boehner and Paul Ryan, said it’s “typical to have some restlessness” in the second year of a president’s term.

    “You’ve sprinted for a year, you’ve gotten as much done as you can, and you’re staring down a midterm election where it’s entirely a referendum on you and your policies. And obviously, in a time of economic anxiety, that’s even more complicated,” Ricci told CBS News.

    Ricci added that members are “more and more peeking over the horizon into what may feel to them like a vast nothingness that is life beyond Trump.”

    “Some may want no part of that. Some may want to be on the front lines. But members are beginning to navigate this moment where that loyalty to him and that long-term positioning for themselves is starting to overlap,” he said.

    Defying the “intimidation factor”


    Though some of Mr. Trump’s priorities have been widely unpopular even among the GOP, only a handful of Republicans in recent weeks have been willing to actively go against the president. Philip Wallach, who studies congressional dysfunction at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute, attributed the loyalty of the majority of the conference to the “intimidation factor.”

    “I’d say most members still feel a pretty strong pressure to stay in line, especially until they get past their primary elections,” Wallach told CBS News. “In recent times, there really has not been a president with a party that is organized so dominantly around obedience to the personal leadership of the president.”

    Those who have already distanced themselves from Mr. Trump on some issues “don’t really have much to lose in their relationship with” him, Wallach said.

    Indeed, for some of the GOP defectors, the calculus is made much easier due to their decision not to seek reelection. Two of the Republicans who voted in favor of the tariff resolution, Reps. Dan Newhouse of Washington and Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska, are retiring. Rep. Kevin Kiley of California, whose seat was targeted in California’s redistricting push, has yet to announce his plans.

    When asked by CBS News whether Mr. Trump is losing his grip on House Republicans, Bacon said, “that’s not how I look at it.”

    But Bacon has been unafraid to speak out when he disagrees with the president, saying the threats don’t intimidate him.

    “You got to stand for what’s right despite where your party leadership is at,” Bacon told CBS News. “If you threaten me, I tend to dig my heels in.”

    In private, Bacon said his Republican colleagues have criticized Mr. Trump’s tariffs and his handling of the war in Ukraine. Yet those colleagues have been hesitant to speak out or vote against the president.

    “I find that in a few areas, he is asking us to do things that defy common sense or what is traditionally conservative,” Bacon said of the instances he’s broken with the president.

    Bacon also recently cosponsored a constitutional amendment to limit the president’s pardon authority, saying in a statement it’s clear “the pardon authority has been abused.”

    Then there’s GOP Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, who’s been a main instigator in the rebellion against Mr. Trump.

    Massie led the push with Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California to force a vote on the Epstein files, which became a huge thorn in the Trump administration’s side in the last year. Then last week, Massie announced that he and Khanna were teaming up again to force a vote on a war powers resolution to require the president to get authorization from Congress before taking military action against Iran.

    The Kentucky Republican’s frequent defections from his party have drawn the president’s repeated ire and prompted a primary challenge backed by Mr. Trump. And his inclination to oppose legislation means GOP leaders, and by extension Mr. Trump, can afford little other opposition.

    A narrow House GOP majority approaches the midterms


    House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, is working with a one-vote margin, leaving him with little margin for error in keeping his conference united. A special election to replace Greene is set for next month, while a special election to replace Doug LaMalfa, a GOP member from California who died in January, will be held in August. Both should remain in GOP hands.

    But Democrats are likely to pick up another seat in April, when a special election will be held to fill the seat left vacant by New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherill, keeping the GOP margin on a knife’s edge.

    The larger focus for Republicans will be on maintaining control of the House after November’s elections. Traditional political wisdom holds that the party controlling the White House typically loses seats in the lower chamber in the midterm elections.

    For Mr. Trump and his party, Kamarck said, “at this point, it’s a matter of sort of cutting his losses.”

    “Do the Democrats have a huge victory, like 30 seats, or do they get, you know, five or 10 seats?” Kamarck said. “It depends on really what the administration does. They made the right pull-back on immigration, but I don’t see them making the right moves on the economy.”

    If Republicans lose control of the House, the president’s legislative agenda would likely grind to a halt, and his final two years in office could be consumed by a flurry of investigations and subpoenas from a newly empowered Democratic majority.

    The prospect of languishing in the minority means vulnerable GOP members may be more inclined to rebuke the president in the coming months. More defections could be possible after the GOP primaries, when members turn an eye toward the general election without the threat of a primary challenge.

    There may be more room yet for pushback against the president after he addresses the joint session of Congress on Tuesday.

    “You don’t want to throw your president under the bus right before the State of the Union,” Belt said. “Things will get a little stickier afterwards.”

  • 弗吉尼亚州州长阿比盖尔·斯潘伯格将在国情咨文回应中传递哪些信息


    发布时间:2026年2月24日,美国东部时间凌晨4:00

    [阿比盖尔·斯潘伯格] 并不以雄辩著称,而更以深入钻研政府工作和抵制党内领导层的决策而闻名。

    周二晚上,她将发表一场政治上颇具风险的演讲,需要巧妙地把握发言方向。

    这位46岁的弗吉尼亚州州长,是该州首位女性首席执行官,被众议院少数党领袖哈基姆·杰弗里斯选中,在周二回应唐纳德·特朗普总统的国情咨文演讲。特朗普曾警告称,此次国情咨文可能再次冗长不堪。

    这位前中央情报局官员从不使用口号或吸引人的承诺,曾在接受美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)采访时将自己描述为“乐观而充满理想主义的务实主义者”。她拒绝支持南希·佩洛西担任议长,并曾反驳前总统乔·拜登的总体经济推动计划,称没有人选他来试图成为新的富兰克林·罗斯福。

    斯潘伯格将在威廉斯堡殖民地现场发表演讲。一位助手表示,她选择这个地点——现在是学校团体喜爱的实地体验殖民时代重演的热门地点——是因为1776年弗吉尼亚州正是从这里派出代表团参加大陆会议,提议独立,不到一个月后,又通过了《弗吉尼亚权利宣言》。

    助手补充说,斯潘伯格的演讲将围绕以下主题展开:经济可负担性、特朗普政府和国会共和党人未能更多地抵制总统所造成的“混乱”,以及她将引用自己在中情局的经验,指出政府正在全球范围内造成危险的不确定性。

    在应对又一场大风暴的同时,斯潘伯格还在处理大量祝贺和建议的电话与短信。她和高级助手们一直在撰写和排练这场他们深知极具挑战性的演讲。

    她不仅要立即反驳一位常常即兴发挥的总统,还要以此作为其政党中期选举活动的开端。她需要成为一个在立场和目标上仍存在巨大分歧的政党的统一声音。

    杰弗里斯在宣布选中她时称斯潘伯格是“唐纳德·特朗普的鲜明对比”。

    斯潘伯格倾向于谈论弗吉尼亚州选民的感受——该州在2024年投票支持卡玛拉·哈里斯,但优势远低于预期——以及他们如何看待特朗普的第二个任期。

    “我对他这个人没有好感,但这是他做出的选择。这些选择得到了其他人的支持或纵容,无论他们是来自弗吉尼亚州,还是来自其他州的参议员和众议员,”去年选举日之前,她在竞选巴士上接受美国有线电视新闻网采访时表示。当时她以超过15个百分点的优势获胜。

    她说,民主党人的回应不应继续困惑地询问人们为何会投票给特朗普,而应具体指出他的议程实际带来的影响。

    “答案是:他欺骗了他们。他欺骗了弗吉尼亚州的农民。弗吉尼亚州的农民正在挣扎,而他们却看到他在救助阿根廷?”她在特朗普政府向阿根廷经济提供200亿美元救助后不久说道。“按照很多州的标准,我们这里有规模较小的家庭养牛场。他们需要的是本地化加工,而不是更多垄断性的肉类加工行业,以及他们所产产品的市场。而他却要让美国市场充斥阿根廷牛肉?这是对他们的侮辱。在我们的大豆种植者在2017年失去中国市场之前,情况就已经如此糟糕了。

    “有太多人觉得,‘是的,这不是你承诺的’,”她说。

    斯潘伯格花了两年时间准备竞选州长,但即便如此,她上任的第一个月也比任何人想象的都要紧张。

    1月中旬,在今年第一场冬季风暴来临前几天宣誓就职时,这位民主党人立即遭到了一场抹黑运动,被塑造成一个极左的“白女巫”,部分原因是她在就职典礼上穿着的全白色服饰让人联想到女权运动者,还有一部分原因是将她与州议会其他议员提出的各种法案联系起来。

    尽管斯潘伯格一直强调自己是一位获得大量共和党人支持的温和派,但特朗普的第一任白宫新闻秘书肖恩·斯派塞上周在X平台(原推特)上称她的任命是“一份礼物”。

    “再也没有比斯潘伯格更能摧毁一个州的例子了,”他写道,尽管她上任才一个月。“如果选择(纽约市市长佐伦·曼达尼)会更好。”

    除了准备演讲,斯潘伯格还在制定紧缩的州预算。她正在改革一系列由共和党前任州长格伦·杨金留下的任命和决策。她还在推动一项民主党重新划分选区的计划,这可能会淘汰该州目前由共和党人占据的几个众议院席位。

    斯潘伯格已经采取了几项强硬举措,首先是要求弗吉尼亚大学和乔治梅森大学董事会的几名杨金任命者辞职,然后提名了自己的一批任命者,他们将组成管理这两所机构的多数派。

    她的大部分立法议程仍在制定中,但就在周五晚上,她签署了一项法律,正式定于4月21日举行特别选举,让弗吉尼亚州选民投票决定是否采用新的选区划分方案,这可能让民主党有机会赢得该州11个众议院席位中的10个。

    在当地法官应共和党人要求颁布禁令后,弗吉尼亚州最高法院预计将最终决定是否允许公投继续进行。

    但在接下来的几个小时里,斯潘伯格正精心准备如何在演讲中传递全国性的关切,并确保自己不会重蹈阿拉巴马州参议员凯蒂·布里特、如今的国务卿马科·卢比奥曾被批评抢水喝,或是2018年民主党回应者、前众议员乔·肯尼迪的覆辙——当时他的精彩演讲被过度涂抹润唇膏而显得“流口水獠牙”的形象所掩盖。

    What to expect from Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger’s State of the Union response

    PUBLISHED Feb 24, 2026, 4:00 AM ET

    [Abigail Spanberger] is less known for her oratory than for drilling down into the work of government and bucking her party leadership.

    On Tuesday night, she has one of the riskier speeches in politics to figure her way through.

    The 46-year-old Virginia governor, the first female chief executive of her state, was House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries’ pick to rebut a State of the Union address Tuesday that President Donald Trump warned would likely again be very long.

    The onetime CIA officer doesn’t talk in slogans or catchy promises, once instead describing herself to CNN in an interview as “an optimistic, starry-eyed pragmatist.” She refused to support Nancy Pelosi for speaker and once pushed back on former President Joe Biden’s overarching economic push by saying no one had elected him to try to be a new Franklin Roosevelt.

    Spanberger will deliver the speech live from Colonial Williamsburg, with an aide saying that she picked the spot – now a favorite for school groups to enjoy live re-enactments of colonial times – because it was from there in 1776 that Virginia sent its delegation to the Continental Congress to propose independence, and less than a month later, adopted the Virginia Declaration of Rights.

    The aide added that Spanberger’s address will hit on themes of affordability, the “chaos” caused by the Trump administration and Republicans in Congress not standing up more to the president. She’ll also talk about how some citizens are pushing back, and, calling on her experience in the CIA, argue the administration is causing dangerous uncertainty around the world.

    Between directing the response to yet another big storm and fielding calls and texts of congratulations and advice, Spanberger and top aides have been writing and rehearsing what they know will be a tricky task.

    Not only will she have to immediately rebut a president who often goes off script, but she’ll be doing it as the kickoff to her party’s midterm campaign, trying to be the unified voice of a party that remains very much divided over what it stands for and what it wants to be.

    In announcing her selection, Jeffries called Spanberger a “stark contrast to Donald Trump.”

    Spanberger tends to talk in terms of how people in her state, which voted for Kamala Harris in 2024 but by a much slimmer margin than expected, are processing Trump’s second term.

    “I have no positive feelings about him as a human, but it’s the choices he’s making. And those are choices that he’s helped along with by others who are supporting him or who aren’t standing up to him, whether they’re here in Virginia or they’re senators and Congress people from other states,” she told CNN in an interview last year on her campaign bus just before election day, where she went on to score an over 15-point win.

    Democrats’ answer, she said then, shouldn’t be about continuing to ask in bewilderment how people could vote for Trump, but citing specifics of what his agenda has actually meant.

    “The answer is: He lied to them. He lied to Virginia farmers. Virginia farmers are struggling and they’re watching him bail out Argentina?” she said, speaking shortly after the Trump administration offered a $20 billion lifeline to the Argentine economy. “We have small, by a lot of state standards, family cattle farms. What they need is localized processing. They need to not have more of a monopolistic meatpacking industry and they need markets for what they’re producing. And he’s going to flood the US market with Argentinian beef? It’s a slap in the face. And this is after our soybean growers have lost China as a market and mostly lost it back in 2017.

    “There are so many people that it’s like, ‘Yeah, this is not what you voted for,’” she said.

    Spanberger spent two years gearing up to be governor, but even so, her first month on the job has been more intense than anyone would have imagined.

    Sworn in in mid-January days before the first big winter storm of the year, the Democrat was also immediately deluged by an online effort to make her out as a far-left “white witch,” in part because of the all-white suffragette-nodding outfit she wore at her inauguration, and in part because of tagging her to a variety of bills introduced by others in the state legislature.

    Though Spanberger has made a point to talk about herself as a moderate who won with significant Republican support, Sean Spicer, Trump’s first White House press secretary, called Spanberger’s selection “a gift” in a post last week on X.

    “There is no better example of how to destroy a state than Spanberger,” he wrote, though she has only been on the job a month. “It would have been better to pick (New York City Mayor Zohran) Mamdani.”

    Aside from speech preparation, Spanberger has been putting together a tightened state budget. She’s been revamping a range of appointments and decisions left by her Republican predecessor, Glenn Youngkin. She’s also been helping steer a Democratic gerrymandering effort likely to eliminate several of the state’s currently Republican-held seats in the House of Representatives.

    Spanberger has already made several hard moves, starting off with asking for the resignations of several Youngkin appointees to the boards of the University of Virginia and George Mason University and then nominating a slate of her own appointees who would then make up the majorities governing both institutions.

    Most of her legislative agenda is still taking shape, but just on Friday evening, she signed a law which formally set a special election on April 21 for Virginians to vote on whether to institute newly gerrymandered maps that could give Democrats a chance at winning 10 of the state’s 11 US House districts.

    The Supreme Court of Virginia is expected to eventually decide whether to let the referendum go forward after a local judge issued an injunction sought by Republicans.

    But for the next few hours, Spanberger is gaming out how to achieve a national sensibility for her speech and make sure she doesn’t fall victim to the kind of criticism faced by Alabama Sen. Katie Britt, the viral grab for water by now-Secretary of State Marco Rubio, or then-Rep. Joe Kennedy’s 2018 response, when his own big address for Democrats was overshadowed by an over-application of lip balm that left him looking like he had “drool fangs.”

  • 特朗普否认军方反对军事打击 称美国可轻易击败伊朗 | 联合早报


    特朗普
    发布/2026年2月24日 19:43

    特朗普否认军方反对军事打击 称美国可轻易击败伊朗

    美国海军福特号航空母舰周一抵达希腊克里特岛苏达湾,这里是北约的战略基地,据悉福特号将在停留数日进行补给后续程前往中东。 (路透社)

    (华盛顿综合电)美国总统特朗普否认美军最高将领反对打击伊朗,并称美国可在任何战争中轻松击败德黑兰。伊朗则再次警告,美国袭击伊朗将引发大规模区域冲突。

    特朗普星期一(2月23日)在社交媒体上说,“假新闻媒体”有关美军参谋长联席会议主席凯恩反对军事打击伊朗的报道完全错误。他写道:“凯恩和我们所有人一样不希望看到战争,但如果美国决定在军事层面对伊朗采取行动,他认为美国将能轻松赢得这场战争。”

    据美国媒体报道,凯恩一直在告诫特朗普,对伊朗发动大规模军事行动可能给美国带来重大风险,包括陷入长期冲突。但特朗普说:“他(凯恩)没有说过不要对伊朗采取行动……他只知道一件事,那就是如何取胜。”

    《华盛顿邮报》较早时报道,凯恩向白宫和五角大楼表达了担忧,认为弹药不足与缺乏盟军支援可能会增加美军面临的危险。

    《华尔街日报》也报道,凯恩和其他五角大楼官员警告,对伊朗发动袭击可能会导致美军与盟军人员伤亡,美军防空力量也将面临耗尽的风险。如果美军因此消耗大量防空弹药和其他供应有限的物资,可能会影响美国应对未来与中国潜在冲突的准备工作。

    新闻网站Axios的报道则说,凯恩担心美国可能会陷入旷日持久的冲突。报道还说,特朗普的特使威特科夫与女婿库什纳也劝说特朗普暂缓袭击伊朗,让美伊有机会通过外交途径解决问题。

    特朗普说,所有这些有关美伊可能爆发战争的报道都是错误的,且是蓄意而为。他强调:“决定将由我做出。我倾向于达成协议,但如果无法达成,那对伊朗来说将是很糟糕的一天。”

    特朗普去年下令对伊朗核设施发动袭击,并在近期多次威胁要采取进一步军事行动,以迫使伊朗就核问题与美国达成协议。

    美国在继续与伊朗谈判的同时,也向中东派遣了包括两艘航母在内的大量军力。下一轮美伊间接谈判将于周四(26日)在瑞士日内瓦举行。

    伊朗副外长加里巴巴迪周一在联合国人权理事会会议上说,美伊会谈的恢复是一个“新的契机”,但他同时警告,如果伊朗遭到攻击,整个中东地区都会受到波及。他说:“任何新侵略行为造成的后果都不会局限于单一国家,发起或支持这类行为者将承担责任。”

    伊朗外交部同日表明,美国的任何袭击,包括有限打击都将被视为侵略行为,伊朗将依据固有的自卫权,对侵略行为做出强烈回应。

    随着中东局势持续升温,美国已下令驻黎巴嫩大使馆的非紧急人员撤离。彭博社引述美国国务院匿名官员的话说,美国是在评估地区安全环境后决定缩减驻地规模,只保留必要人员。

    这名官员说,这项措施是暂时的,目前美国驻黎巴使馆仍照常运作。

    瑞典、塞尔维亚、波兰、澳大利亚和印度等国也呼吁本国公民离开伊朗。

    特朗普否认军方反对军事打击 称美国可轻易击败伊朗 | 联合早报

    特朗普
    发布/2026年2月24日 19:43

    特朗普否认军方反对军事打击 称美国可轻易击败伊朗

    美国海军福特号航空母舰周一抵达希腊克里特岛苏达湾,这里是北约的战略基地,据悉福特号将在停留数日进行补给后续程前往中东。 (路透社)

    (华盛顿综合电)美国总统特朗普否认美军最高将领反对打击伊朗,并称美国可在任何战争中轻松击败德黑兰。伊朗则再次警告,美国袭击伊朗将引发大规模区域冲突。

    特朗普星期一(2月23日)在社交媒体上说,“假新闻媒体”有关美军参谋长联席会议主席凯恩反对军事打击伊朗的报道完全错误。他写道:“凯恩和我们所有人一样不希望看到战争,但如果美国决定在军事层面对伊朗采取行动,他认为美国将能轻松赢得这场战争。”

    据美国媒体报道,凯恩一直在告诫特朗普,对伊朗发动大规模军事行动可能给美国带来重大风险,包括陷入长期冲突。但特朗普说:“他(凯恩)没有说过不要对伊朗采取行动……他只知道一件事,那就是如何取胜。”

    《华盛顿邮报》较早时报道,凯恩向白宫和五角大楼表达了担忧,认为弹药不足与缺乏盟军支援可能会增加美军面临的危险。

    《华尔街日报》也报道,凯恩和其他五角大楼官员警告,对伊朗发动袭击可能会导致美军与盟军人员伤亡,美军防空力量也将面临耗尽的风险。如果美军因此消耗大量防空弹药和其他供应有限的物资,可能会影响美国应对未来与中国潜在冲突的准备工作。

    新闻网站Axios的报道则说,凯恩担心美国可能会陷入旷日持久的冲突。报道还说,特朗普的特使威特科夫与女婿库什纳也劝说特朗普暂缓袭击伊朗,让美伊有机会通过外交途径解决问题。

    特朗普说,所有这些有关美伊可能爆发战争的报道都是错误的,且是蓄意而为。他强调:“决定将由我做出。我倾向于达成协议,但如果无法达成,那对伊朗来说将是很糟糕的一天。”

    特朗普去年下令对伊朗核设施发动袭击,并在近期多次威胁要采取进一步军事行动,以迫使伊朗就核问题与美国达成协议。

    美国在继续与伊朗谈判的同时,也向中东派遣了包括两艘航母在内的大量军力。下一轮美伊间接谈判将于周四(26日)在瑞士日内瓦举行。

    伊朗副外长加里巴巴迪周一在联合国人权理事会会议上说,美伊会谈的恢复是一个“新的契机”,但他同时警告,如果伊朗遭到攻击,整个中东地区都会受到波及。他说:“任何新侵略行为造成的后果都不会局限于单一国家,发起或支持这类行为者将承担责任。”

    伊朗外交部同日表明,美国的任何袭击,包括有限打击都将被视为侵略行为,伊朗将依据固有的自卫权,对侵略行为做出强烈回应。

    随着中东局势持续升温,美国已下令驻黎巴嫩大使馆的非紧急人员撤离。彭博社引述美国国务院匿名官员的话说,美国是在评估地区安全环境后决定缩减驻地规模,只保留必要人员。

    这名官员说,这项措施是暂时的,目前美国驻黎巴使馆仍照常运作。

    瑞典、塞尔维亚、波兰、澳大利亚和印度等国也呼吁本国公民离开伊朗。

  • 特朗普2026年国情咨文今晚发表 了解要点及观看方式


    2026年2月24日 / 美国东部时间凌晨6:00 / 哥伦比亚广播公司新闻

    华盛顿 — 总统特朗普将于周二向国会参众两院联席会议发表2026年国情咨文,阐述其新一年的施政纲领,并吹嘘自己重返白宫后的政绩。

    此次演讲的背景是,最高法院数日前裁定他无权依据紧急权力法实施全面关税,这对其贸易议程造成重大打击。总统已誓言绕过法院裁决,利用其他权力对进口商品征税。

    演讲同时正值美国与伊朗在中东地区的紧张局势升级之际。预计本周将继续就伊朗核计划及其他议题进行谈判。总统表示,若谈判失败不排除对伊朗采取军事行动。

    以下是关于特朗普2026年国情咨文演讲的要点:

    2026年国情咨文何时开始和结束?


    国情咨文预定于东部时间晚上9点开始,但可能因总统抵达国会大厦的时间而延后。

    特朗普总统以往向国会发表的演讲时长各不相同。特朗普曾发表过三次国情咨文和两次国会联席会议演讲(后者在总统就职后不久发表,并非正式国情咨文)。

    根据美国总统项目(The American Presidency Project)的数据,其此前各次演讲时长如下:

    • 2017年:1小时
    • 2018年:1小时21分钟
    • 2019年:1小时22分钟
    • 2020年:1小时18分钟
    • 2025年:1小时40分钟

    他2025年的演讲是至少自1964年以来国会联席会议最长的一次演讲。

    1/1 跳过广告 广告后继续观看

    周一在白宫,特朗普总统预览此次演讲时称,

    Trump’s 2026 State of the Union is tonight. Here’s what to know and how to watch.

    February 24, 2026 / 6:00 AM EST / CBS News

    Washington — President Trump will deliver the 2026 State of the Union address before a joint session of Congress on Tuesday, laying out his agenda for the year ahead and touting his accomplishments since returning to office.

    The address comes days after the Supreme Court ruled he does not have the authority to impose sweeping tariffs under an emergency powers law, dealing a significant blow to his trade agenda. The president has vowed to go around the court’s decision and use other authorities to place tariffs on imports.

    The speech also comes amid increasing tensions in the Middle East between the U.S. and Iran. Talks over Iran’s nuclear program and other matters are expected to continue this week. The president has not ruled out using military force against the country if negotiations fail.

    Here’s what to know about Mr. Trump’s 2026 State of the Union speech:

    What time will the 2026 State of the Union start and end?


    The State of the Union is scheduled to begin at 9 p.m. ET, but it could start later depending on when the president arrives at the Capitol.

    The length of Mr. Trump’s addresses to Congress has varied over the years. Mr. Trump has delivered three State of the Union addresses and two speeches to a joint session of Congress, which come shortly after a president is inaugurated but are not formal State of the Union addresses.

    Here is a breakdown of how long each of his previous speeches have lasted, according to The American Presidency Project:

    • 2017: 1 hour
    • 2018: 1 hour and 21 minutes
    • 2019: 1 hour and 22 minutes
    • 2020: 1 hour and 18 minutes
    • 2025: 1 hour and 40 minutes

    His 2025 address was the longest address to a joint session of Congress since at least 1964.

    1/1 Skip Ad Continue watching after the ad

    At the White House on Monday, Mr. Trump previewed the speech by saying,

  • 特朗普国情咨文演讲值得关注的四点内容


    作者:凯文·利普塔克 | 发布时间:2026年2月24日,美国东部时间上午6:00 | 更新于31分钟前

    自唐纳德·特朗普总统去年向国会发表讲话以来,情况发生了很大变化。但至少在一个方面,他周二晚间的国情咨文演讲似乎可能与他上一次走进众议院会议厅时相似。

    “这将是一场漫长的演讲,”在去年3月发表了历史上最长的联席会议讲话后,他说道,“我们有太多内容要讨论。”

    经历了一年的政治动荡和支持率下滑,特朗普在周二晚上9点(美国东部时间)登上讲台时,无疑有很多话题可以讨论。国情咨文传统上是一份成就清单和政策建议清单,通常是总统一年中电视观众最多的一次演讲。

    对于特朗普来说,他每周会在不同场合多次出现在电视上,他面临的挑战是要突破他通常在活动中使用的自夸、抱怨和模糊承诺的框架。过去,他在演讲中至少会带来一些惊喜,要么是在讲话中包含意外内容,要么是在旁听席上安排特殊嘉宾。

    以下是特朗普演讲中值得关注的四个方面:

    中期选举的政治信号


    特朗普周二将进入众议院会议厅,试图打破历史预期:正如他经常说的那样,现任总统所在的政党在中期选举中往往会失利。

    共和党人希望他的演讲能成为竞选季的宣传开端,而竞选季很可能取决于特朗普在美国选民中的支持率。

    上周,在特朗普核心官员、民调专家和战略家的闭门政治策略会议上,有一个(或许并不令人意外的)观点是:经济问题将决定11月的选举——因此将重点放在经济上势在必行。在演讲前进行的一项CNN民调显示,57%的美国人认为经济和生活成本问题是周二演讲中最重要的议题。

    然而,特朗普的计划往往不同。即使是表面上聚焦经济的演讲,最终也会偏离方向,包括他的移民打击行动和对他不喜欢的人的老套抱怨。

    当他确实讨论经济时,往往是自夸其相对强劲——一些共和党顾问担心这种做法可能会淡化美国人对经济的担忧。

    周二的演讲将精心策划,提及节省成本的举措,包括降低处方药价格和减税。但许多美国人仍然表示经济对他们不起作用——这对特朗普来说是一个考验,需要他承认仍有工作要做。

    关税政策受挫


    在特朗普国情咨文演讲前四天,最高法院对他议程的支柱之一——他在贸易和更广泛的外交政策中用作全球杠杆的单边关税——给予了打击。

    特朗普坚称他有备选方案。他已经宣布将使用另一种(但未经测试的)授权实施15%的全球关税。尽管如此,这一裁决仍是一个打击,甚至在几天后仍引发了特朗普的强烈愤怒,几乎肯定会迫使他对原计划的演讲内容做出一些调整。

    最高法院裁决给特朗普带来的一个主要问题是,他声称将由关税支付的一系列政策项目。这包括去年宣布的120亿美元农民救助计划,以及从未公布发放时间的2000美元美国民众退税支票。

    特朗普将如何应对其过去承诺中明显的资金缺口,仍是一个未知数。

    传统上,至少有几名最高法院大法官会出席国情咨文,通常坐在前排。周五的裁决后,特朗普猛烈抨击了对他不利的裁决者,特别是他任命的两名保守派大法官尼尔·戈萨奇和艾米·科尼·巴雷特。

    如果他们选择出席,可能会引发总统的又一次抨击。

    伊朗问题的疑问


    伊朗周围大规模的军事集结,以及特朗普对该国的战争威胁,将为周二的演讲营造紧张的背景。虽然总统暗示要进行政权更迭,并坚持伊朗不能拥有核武器,但他尚未向美国民众说明什么理由可以证明一场长期冲突是正当的。

    他似乎不太可能在国情咨文中提出这样的论点。他的顾问们计划了一场以国内议题为主的演讲。在CNN的民调中,只有2%的受访者表示希望总统在演讲中谈论外交政策——这是所有议题中最低的。

    尽管如此,战争的迹象引发了人们对总统将依靠哪些权力对伊朗领导人或设施发动新攻击的质疑。他尚未正式试图获得国会的支持,而国会拥有宣战的宪法权力。

    特朗普更有可能回顾去年摧毁伊朗核设施的行动,这是他在回顾其重返办公室第一年的成就时经常自夸的内容。

    然而,这可能会引发关于伊朗后续行动的疑问。虽然特朗普声称核设施“已被彻底摧毁”,但他现在暗示可能需要进一步打击以防止德黑兰获得核武器。

    民主党回应


    去年的国情咨文回应混乱且不连贯——其中包括挥舞拐杖的众议员阿尔·格林被逐出会议厅——之后,民主党人希望今年在反对特朗普的信息上表现得更加团结。

    官方的党派回应将由弗吉尼亚州州长阿比盖尔·斯潘伯格发表,她将在威廉斯堡殖民地发表演讲,似乎可能会在国家即将迎来250周年诞辰之际,探讨保护美国民主的问题。

    斯潘伯格去年以15个百分点的优势入主州长官邸,她的表态被许多民主党人视为赢得选举季的前奏。她说她将解决“不断上涨的成本、社区的混乱,以及对每一天可能带来什么的真正恐惧”。

    但这一任务是政治中最棘手的任务之一。两党中许多被选中发表官方回应的人,在事后要么被遗忘,要么被嘲笑。

    国会中的一些民主党人计划完全跳过特朗普的演讲,选择参加各种反特朗普集会。

    4 things to watch in Trump’s State of the Union

    By Kevin Liptak | Published Feb 24, 2026, 6:00 AM ET | Updated 31 min ago

    A lot has changed since President Donald Trump addressed Congress a year ago. But in one area, at least, his State of the Union address Tuesday evening seems likely to resemble his last visit to the House chamber.

    “It’s going to be a long speech,” he said, after delivering the longest joint session address in history last March. “We have so much to talk about.”

    After a year of political upheaval and declining popularity, Trump certainly has plenty to discuss when he climbs the rostrum Tuesday at 9 p.m. ET. Traditionally a laundry list of both accomplishments and policy prescriptions, the State of the Union is typically a president’s largest television audience of the year.

    For Trump, who appears in various settings on television multiple times a week, the challenge will be to break through beyond the boasts, grievances and vague promises that comprise his usual events. In the past, he has come to the address with at least a few surprises, either contained in his remarks or in the form of guests sitting up in the galleries.

    Here are four things to watch for in Trump’s speech:

    A midterm message


    Trump will enter the House Chamber on Tuesday looking to defy historic expectations: as he frequently says, incumbent presidents’ parties often suffer in midterm elections.

    And Republicans are hoping his speech acts as a messaging kickoff for a campaign season that could very well hinge on Trump’s own standing among American voters.

    During a closed-door political strategy session last week among top Trump officials, pollsters and strategists made the (perhaps unsurprising) point that economic issues will dictate November’s election — and that focusing there is imperative. In a CNN poll taken before the speech, 57% of Americans named the economy and cost of living issues as the most important issue for Tuesday’s speech.

    Trump, however, often has different plans. Even speeches ostensibly focused on the economy end up meandering in other directions, including his immigration crackdown and old gripes about people he dislikes.

    When he does discuss the economy, it is often to boast about its relative strength — an approach some GOP advisers worry risks downplaying Americans’ economic worries.

    Tuesday’s speech will be carefully scripted with references to cost-saving initiatives, including lowering prescription drug prices and cutting taxes. But many Americans still say the economy isn’t working for them — providing a test for Trump in acknowledging there’s still work to do.

    Tariff setback


    Four days before Trump’s State of the Union, the Supreme Court dealt a blow to one of the pillars of his agenda: the unilateral tariffs he’s used as leverage around the world, on both trade and his broader foreign policy.

    Trump insists he has backup options. He’s already announced he would apply a 15% global tariff using a different — but untested — authority. Still, the decision was a blow, evoking significant outrage from Trump even days later, and almost certainly forced some changes to the remarks he was planning to deliver.

    One major problem for Trump arising from the court’s ruling was the litany of policy items he’s claimed would be paid for by the tariffs. That includes a $12 billion bailout for farmers announced last year and $2,000 rebate checks for Americans, the timing of which was never announced.

    How Trump addresses the apparent shortfalls of his past promises remains an open question.

    Traditionally, at least a handful of Supreme Court justices attend the State of the Union, often seated near the front. After Friday’s decision, Trump railed against those who ruled against him, in particular the two conservatives he appointed, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett.

    If they opt to attend, it could provoke another tirade from the president.

    Questions on Iran


    The massive military buildup around Iran, and Trump’s threats of war against the country, will make for a tense backdrop to Tuesday’s speech. While the president has hinted at pursuing regime change, and insisted Iran not obtain a nuclear weapon, he has yet to lay out to the American people what might justify a prolonged conflict.

    It seems unlikely he would use the State of the Union to make such an argument. His advisers have planned a mostly domestic speech. And in CNN’s poll, only 2% of respondents said they wanted to hear from the president on foreign policy in his address — the lowest of any issue.

    Still, the rumblings of war have led to questions about what authorities the president would rely upon to stage a new attack on Iranian leaders or facilities. He has not made any formal attempt to gain buy-in from Congress, which holds the constitutional authority to declare war.

    Trump is perhaps more likely to recount last year’s mission to take out Iran’s nuclear facilities, something he frequently boasts about when he ticks through the accomplishments of his first year back in office.

    Yet that may raise questions about pending action in Iran. While Trump claims the nuclear facilities were “totally obliterated,” he is now suggesting further strikes might be necessary to prevent Tehran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.

    Democrats respond


    After a chaotic and disjointed response to last year’s address — which included the cane-waving Rep. Al Green being ejected from the chamber — Democrats are hoping this year to appear more united in their opposition to Trump’s message.

    The official party response will come from Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger, whose speech from Colonial Williamsburg seems likely to address the issue of protecting American Democracy as the country approaches its 250th birthday.

    Spanberger, who swept into the governor’s mansion last year after a 15-point win, offered what many Democrats hope is a preview of a winning election season. She said she would address “rising costs, chaos in their communities, and a real fear of what each day might bring.”

    But the assignment is among the most fraught in politics. Many in both parties who have been selected for the official response find themselves at best forgotten, and at worst ridiculed, in the aftermath.

    Some Democrats in Congress are planning to skip Trump’s speech altogether, choosing to attend various counter-rallies instead.